United States: The State Of Crawford In 2017

More than eight years ago, the California Supreme Court handed down Crawford v. Weather Shield (2008) 44 Cal.4th 541, holding that a contractual indemnitor must immediately assume an indemnitee's defense, irrespective of whether it is determined that indemnity is actually owed. The Crawford Court determined that, per California Civil Code section 2778, a promise of indemnity against claims, demands, or liability "embraces" the costs of defense against such claims, demands, or liability and that this obligation includes an obligation of "active responsibility" on the part of the indemnitor. Id. at 553-554. The Court further clarified that under section 2778, the duty to defend is distinct and separate from the contractual obligation to pay an indemnitee's defense costs after the fact, as part of any indemnity owed under the agreement. Id. Perhaps most striking about Justice Marvin Baxter's decision at the time was his affirmation that, even if it is ultimately determined that the indemnitor was not negligent for the claims giving rise to the duty to indemnify, an indemnitor nonetheless has an immediate duty to defend the indemnitee upon a proper tender of defense.

What is the status of Crawford in 2017? While the passage of California Senate Bill 474 in 2011 and its resulting revisions to California Civil Code 2782.05 in 2012 was anticipated to limit the application of Crawford, at least in the context of construction defect actions, the core principles set forth in Crawford remain undisturbed. Notably, neither the California Courts of Appeal nor the California Supreme Court have addressed any limitations on Crawford by section 2782.05. To the contrary, Crawford is regularly referenced by courts and practitioners in California as the dominant authority when a contractual indemnitee seeks defense and indemnification from another entity who has expressly agreed to hold harmless the indemnitee. See Searles Valley Minerals Operations Inc. v. Ralph M. Parsons Serv. Co. (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 1394, 1401 (under Crawford, indemnitee was entitled under the agreement to a defense from the indemnitor and, since the indemnitor did not provide a defense, indemnitee was entitled to recover its defense costs); Valley Crest Landscape Dev., Inc. v. Mission Pools of Escondido, Inc. (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 468, 489 (finding that under Crawford, a subcontractor's contractual duty to defend and indemnify under the subcontract was triggered by the allegations that the subcontractor's negligence contributed to the damage); UDC-Universal Dev., L.P. v. CH2M Hill (2010) 181 Cal. App. 4th 10, 24 (Crawford applies retroactively and commands that a duty to defend arises out of an indemnity obligation as soon as the litigation commences and regardless of whether the indemnitor is ultimately found negligent.) Crawford is also invoked in numerous unpublished decisions. See, e.g., Jqd Inc. v. Ir. Beach Clusterhomes Ass'n, 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 1621; Morales v. County of L.A., 2015 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 2944).

The term "Crawford" has become part of California's judicial vernacular such that many judges, practicing attorneys, mediators and claims professionals regularly refer to "Crawford motions" and "obligations under Crawford." Crawford is now synonymous with an immediate duty to defend. California Appellate Courts published two recent decisions further affirming Crawford's tenets.

The Duty to Defend Remains Distinct From the Duty to Indemnify

In Aluma Systems Concrete Construction of California v. Nibbi Bros. Inc., (2016) 2 Cal. App. 5th 620, 623, a contractor, Aluma agreed to design and supply shoring for Nibbi's construction project. Nibbi agreed to defend and indemnify Aluma from and "against any and all claims, actions, expenses, damages, losses and liabilities, including attorneys' fees and expenses, for personal injuries (including death) and/or property damage arising from or in connection with this contract and/or [Aluma]'s equipment and services, except to the extent such claims, actions, expenses, damages, losses and liabilities are caused by the acts or omissions of [Aluma] or anyone directly or indirectly employed by [Aluma] or anyone for whose acts [Aluma] may be liable." Id. Employees of Nibbi sued Aluma, alleging that they were injured after the shoring system designed by the Aluma collapsed. Aluma then sued Nibbi for indemnification. Id.

The trial court granted Nibbi's demurrer to Aluma's complaint on the grounds that the allegations the employees' lawsuit set forth claims only against Aluma and not Nibbi. Id. The Court of Appeal reversed the trial court, citing Crawford's proposition that "the duty to indemnify is distinct from the duty to defend: the former "require[s] one party to indemnify the other, under specified circumstances, for moneys paid or expenses incurred ... as a result of" a third party claim, while the latter "assign[s] one party ... responsibility for the other's legal defense when a third party claim is made." Id. at 627. The Court noted that both Aluma and Nibbi did not make any distinction between Nibbi's duty to defend and its duty to indemnify. Therefore, the Court stated that it did not have to consider Nibbi's duty to defend because Aluma's complaint sufficiently stated a claim with respect to Nibbi's duty to indemnify. The Court found that, while the allegations in employees' complaint may be relevant to the duty to defend, the allegations did not govern Nibbi's duty to indemnify. Id. at 628.

Indemnitees asserting Crawford claims should consider whether to plead two separate causes of action for breach of the duty to indemnify and breach of the duty to defend, based on the circumstances of the third party claim and the third party's allegations. In Aluma, Aluma's cause of action for express indemnification included an allegation that Nibbi also owed a duty to defend. It may be prudent in certain situations to plead these obligations separately so that if one cause of action is dismissed, the possibility of risk transfer remains.

Interpretation of "Embraced By"

How do courts determine whether a third party claim is "embraced by" an indemnification provision? While California courts have, for the most part, taken an expansive approach to the defining what is "embraced by" an indemnification obligation, the term is not limitless. Courts may want to prevent parties claiming they are owed indemnity from overreaching. A Court of Appeal recently considered the following hold harmless provision: "Except for Lessor's gross negligence or willful misconduct, Lessee shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the Premises, Lessor and its agents, Lessor's master or ground lessor, partners and Lenders, from and against any and all claims, loss of rents and/or damages, liens, judgments, penalties, attorneys' and consultants' fees expenses and/or liabilities arising out of, involving or in connection with, the use and/or occupancy of the Premises by Lessee." Morlin Asset Management LP v. Murachanian (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 184, 188.

Morlin involved a carpet cleaner who filed suit against a building tenant (the "Lessee") and the tenant's landlords (the "Lessors") alleging that he was injured when he slipped and fell on the stairs in the common area of the commercial building. Id. at 187. The carpet cleaner was an employee of a cleaning service hired by the Lessee to clean his dental suite and the Lessors cross-claimed the Lessee for express indemnity under the terms of the lease. Id. at 187-188. The Court of Appeal concluded as a matter of law that the indemnification clause in the lease did not extend to claims or liabilities arising out of an accident in the common area over which the tenant had no control and affirmed the Lessee's motion for summary judgment. Id. at 189. The Court stated that it did not matter that the accident would not have happened but for the tenant hiring the plaintiff to clean the carpets because the connection between the tenant's use of his suite and the accident in the stairwell over which the tenant had no control was too remote to have been within the contemplation of the parties when they entered into the lease. The Court concluded that such an interpretation of the lease was "fully consistent" with the law governing indemnification provisions, as set forth in Crawford. Id. at 193.

Continuing Enforcement of Defense Obligations

Consistent with the general principals of contractual interpretation, Crawford requires "clear and explicit" language in the indemnifying agreement in order for the indemnitee to enforce its rights to be held harmless. More often than not, the language of the provision will indicate an intent to "hold harmless" the indemnitee, as Crawford is typically invoked in disputes involving entities in the construction industry where form contracts are prepared by contractors who are mindful of the language which triggers the indemnification obligation. Courts have ruled accordingly. In one recent trial court decision, counsel for an indemnitor argued that the phrase "it will accept and assume responsibility for and immediately undertake defense of any claim" in a lengthy hold harmless clause should be interpreted to mean that the provision only requires that it defend itself, and not the indemnitee. The court held that such an interpretation was unreasonable and illogical.

In attempts to potentially maximize recovery for their clients, some plaintiffs' attorneys include broad, encompassing allegations in a complaint to implicate as many parties as possible and secure additional contribution to a claim. Under Crawford, the indemnitor's defense obligation is triggered immediately upon proper tender. Defendants who have the benefit of a written indemnity agreement running in their favor must ensure that written tenders are transmitted to all potentially implicated parties as soon as these parties are identified. Sometimes these tenders are transmitted prior to the filing of a claimant's lawsuit. This dynamic would seem to provide an incentive for the indemnitee to resolve the claim as soon as possible, prior to incurring additional defense fees and costs. From a practical viewpoint, providing an immediate defense may, depending on the circumstances, allow the indemnitor to control, or at the very least, monitor the progress of the litigation and assess the exposure. In actual practice, this does not occur as often as it should, often resulting in continued litigation, cross claims for defense fees and costs, subrogation actions and multiple lawsuits between co-indemnitors. 

What does Crawford mean for entities who are subject to hold harmless provisions? These entities will have to continue to pay particular attention to the indemnification language with an awareness that they may be requested to defend third party claims even prior to a determination of whether they owe indemnity. Inequities in bargaining power between and indemnitor and indemnitee may force indemnitors to continue to enter into these types of agreements, which may raise the cost of doing business for the entities who frequently face requests to defend against third party claims.

In sum, Crawford remains the prevailing authority for an indemnitee to enforce contractual defense and indemnity obligations and will continue to do so unless the California Supreme Court issues a decision to the contrary. Alternatively, a legislative amendment to California Civil Code section 2778 may limit Crawford's reach. However, section 2778 has not been amended since its enactment in 1872, and there are no pending legislative bills pertaining to this section.

With regard to construction defect actions, and as discussed in more detail in a sister articles in this newsletter, California Civil Code section 2782.05 applies to non-residential construction contracts entered into after January 1, 2013, so courts may not have had the opportunity to analyze a dispute involving the interplay of the two authorities. We can anticipate that the courts will address the effect of section 2782.05, if any, on Crawford in the near future.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.