United States: Achieving Cyber-Fitness In 2017: Part 3—Proving Compliance And The Role Of Third-Party Auditors

The Department of Defense final rule for safeguarding covered defense information requires contractors to implement the security controls in National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-171 by December 31. See 81 Fed. Reg. 72986; Chierichella, Bourne and Biancuzzo, Feature Comment, "Achieving Cyber-Fitness In 2017: Part 1—Planning For Compliance," 59 GC ¶ 25. In enacting the final rule, the drafters created "[n]o new oversight paradigm" or certification requirement. 81 Fed. Reg. 72990. More recently, in response to questions from industry on compliance with NIST SP 800-171, DOD stated,

The rule does not require "certification" of any kind, either by DoD or any other firm professing to provide compliance, assessment, or certification services for DoD or Federal contractors. Nor will DoD give any credence to 3rd party assessments or certifications—by signing the contract, the contractor agrees to comply with the terms of the contract. It is up to the contractor to determine that their systems meet the requirements.

Some companies with limited cybersecurity expertise may choose to seek outside assistance in determining how best to meet and implement the NIST SP 800-171 requirements in their company. But, once the company has implemented the requirements, there is no need to have a separate entity assess or certify that the company is compliant with NIST SP 800-171.

DOD FAQs Regarding Network Penetration Reporting and Contracting for Cloud Services (DFARS Case 2013-D018), Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement subpt. 204.73 and PGI subpt. 204.73, and DFARS subpt. 239.76 and Procedures, Guidance and Information subpt. 239.76 (Jan. 27, 2017), available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/docs/FAQs_Network_Penetration_Reporting_and_Contracting_for_Cloud_Services_(01-27-2017).pdf (emphasis added).

Thus, DOD expects the contractor to demonstrate compliance and, without any Government audit and approval of the contractor's systems, and without any "safe harbor" arising out of prophylactic third-party audits, DOD will serve as judge and jury on the sufficiency of contractor safeguards. So, how should contractors assess and demonstrate their compliance with NIST SP 800-171? This part of our series focuses on best practices and strategies for demonstrating compliance and reducing potential liability or lost business should a cyber incident occur.

Proving Compliance—First, check the DOD solicitation—it may be your lucky day! In industry guidance, DOD stated that agencies may include in sections L and M of a solicitation "what constitutes acceptable/unacceptable compliance with NIST SP 800-171" or "how offeror compliance with NIST SP 800-171 will be evaluated." DOD FAQs, supra at A21.

Thus, in some cases the path to NIST SP 800-171 compliance may be spelled out. Solicitation guidance, however, may arrive too late to be of general utility in framing a compliance plan and, in the end, it will be strictly applicable only to the contract that results from that solicitation. If your customer has not addressed compliance in the solicitation, the next best option is to focus on other compliance regimes.

Note: Revision 1 of NIST SP 800-171 provides that a companion publication likely to be published this year "will provide assessment procedures to help organizations determine compliance to the security requirements." NIST SP 800-171 (Rev. 1) at n. 10.

Lessons Learned From Other Compliance Regimes—As discussed in Part 2 of our series, contractors may be subject to various cybersecurity requirements depending on their agency customers and the data with which they work. NIST SP 800-171 is not significantly different from any other compliance regime—it is a checklist of minimum security requirements.

Drafters of the DFARS final rule made it clear that compliance with NIST SP 800-171 does not preempt other cybersecurity requirements (or vice versa). See 81 Fed. Reg. 72987. "DFARS 204.7300(b) states that the rule 'does not abrogate any other requirements regarding contractor physical, personnel, information, technical, or general administrative security operations governing the protection of unclassified information.'" Although contractors must be mindful of other security obligations, and recognize that compliance with one regime does not necessarily guarantee compliance with others, they still can—and should—leverage documentation and agency guidance under other compliance regimes to support their response to the requirements of NIST SP 800-171.

FISMA/FedRAMP: The Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) requires federal agencies to implement programs to provide security for information and information systems. Organizations under contract to process, store or transmit Government data must comply with the minimum security requirements in Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 200 as well as appropriate security controls in NIST SP 800-53 (see Part 1, discussing the interrelationships between NIST SP 171-800, FIPS 200 and NIST SP 800-53).

FISMA also applies to cloud service providers (CSPs). The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) provides a standard process for ensuring the security of CSPs for use by the Government. The process and resources for securing Government authorization to operate under FedRAMP are well defined, and include (1) a readiness assessment phase; (2) an initial authorization phase, which involves creating a system security plan (SSP), a security assessment plan, a security assessment report, a plan of action and milestones; and (3) a continuous monitoring phase. See https://www.fedramp.gov/resources/templates-2016/ . Resources and a security assessment framework are available for both low and moderate impact level systems, which are subject to different control levels under NIST SP 800-53.

Independent assessors, including third-party assessment organizations (organizations vetted and approved to conduct FedRAMP assessments of CSPs), are an integral part of this process. A CSP is required to create a security assessment plan with an independent assessor describing the assets to be reviewed and the methodology for the assessment, including testing. Following the security assessment, the independent assessor is required to provide a final security assessment report that includes

  • a system overview,
  • description of tests performed,
  • identification of system vulnerabilities,
  • a risk analysis,
  • recommended corrective actions,
  • identification of known risks, and
  • an authorization recommendation.

The CSP then develops a plan of action and milestones with planned dates as well as a point of contact responsible for each weakness identified. The CSP may receive provisional authority to operate from the Joint Authorization Board (JAB), which consists of the chief information officers from the Department of Homeland Security, General Services Administration and DOD, or an individual agency may provide its own authority to operate. A provisional authority to operate from JAB indicates the CSP has met FedRAMP requirements and may be used Government-wide; individual agencies may grant authority to operate on the basis of the provisional authority to operate from JAB.

Under DFARS Clause 252.239-7010, Cloud Computing Services, CSPs must comply with the Cloud Computing Security Requirements Guide, with which many companies already may comply. A contractor using an external CSP to store or transmit covered defense information must ensure that the CSP meets security requirements equivalent to those established by the Government for the FedRAMP "moderate" baseline at the time award. DFARS clause 252.204-7012(b)(2)(ii)(D); see 81 Fed. Reg. 72994.

As discussed more fully below, in taking steps to prove compliance under the DFARS rule, contractors might hire an accredited FedRAMP third-party assessment organization with demonstrated technical experience with NIST SP 800-53 assessments. Because NIST SP 800-171 is a subset of the NIST SP 800-53 security controls, an audit conducted by a third-party assessment organization should face less resistance from the Government.

HIPAA/HITECH: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act requires the Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to audit covered entity and business associate compliance with the HIPAA privacy, security and breach notification rules. Currently in Phase 2, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) audit program has matured considerably from the 2011 pilot program, and provides a useful resource for proving compliance.

The HIPAA audit process is document-intensive, and is intended to ensure that covered entities and business associates (a) have appropriate written policies and (b) follow them. During the audit process, OCR sends an initial request asking entities to identify and provide applicable policies, procedures and evidence of HIPAA implementation, or an explanation for any deficiency.

Generally, the documents requested include privacy policy and procedure manuals, workforce training documentation, incident response plans (including breach response) and risk analyses, as well as associated documented risk mitigation plans. The final audit report results in one of four findings: (1) no major compliance gaps are found and a compliance action plan is presented; (2) significant issues are found and the report proposes a remediation plan; (3) a serious deficiency is found and the OCR conducts further review; or (4) willful neglect is found and an OCR enforcement action may be brought, resulting in fines or penalties.

Contractors demonstrating compliance with the DFARS rule can use the HIPAA audit process as a guide to best practices, especially where a NIST SP 800-171 control is vaguely worded or DOD balks at the contractor's proof of compliance. A third-party auditor experienced with HIPAA can help identify corollary controls; alternatively, contractors looking to "go it alone" can cross reference the requirements using Appendix D of NIST SP 800-171 and the OCR HIPAA Security Rule Crosswalk, available at https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/nist-csf-to-hipaa-security-rule-crosswalk-02-22-2016-final.pdf.

Where a contractor maintains a clear file of all plans, procedures and compliance documentation for each security control (or a documented rationale explaining why a control is not applicable or why an alternate control is sufficient), a Government reviewer should be more likely to find that the contractor has taken reasonable steps to protect and secure data, and the legal and business consequences of any breach should be less severe. Furthermore, contractors already proving compliance under HIPAA may be able to repurpose much of the documentation if it is tailored to specific controlled unclassified information (CUI) under NIST SP 800-171.

Contractor Documentation—Proving compliance requires a solid trail of documentation demonstrating the contractor's understanding of, and efforts to implement, each of the security controls outlined in NIST SP 800-171. (Table 1 at the end of this article lists NIST SP 171-800 security controls warranting specific documentation.)

SSP: NIST SP 800-171 requires contractors to develop, document and periodically update their SSP. Although there is "no prescribed format or specified level of detail" required, the SSP must at a minimum "describe system boundaries, system environments of operation, how security requirements are implemented, and the relationships with or connections to other systems." NIST SP 800-171 (Rev. 1), 3.12.4, n. 26 (Dec. 20, 2016).

Aside from the 14 control families listed in NIST SP 171-800, other items to address in the SSP are:

  • Governance: There should be a designated individual or group charged with overseeing data security. A charter should establish the individual or group's authority, outline objectives, and provide procedures for change control and obtaining approvals.
  • Supply Chain Management: In addition to the flowdown requirements under the DFARS clause, supply chain risks should be addressed in the policies and procedures. For example, incident response should be tested with key subcontractors.
  • Incident Reporting: There should be documented escalation processes for complaints and incidents to get the right attention at the right levels in the organization. Training should include incident reporting as well.
  • Insider Threats: Insider threat training is required under NIST SP 800-171, 3.2 (distinct from the more specific insider threat requirements for cleared contractors under the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual). Policies should address how insider threat indicators are monitored, identified, handled and communicated internally.
  • Monitoring: At least 11 security controls in NIST SP 800-171 expressly require monitoring activities. However, contractors also should monitor high-risk areas, focusing on risks that can have the greatest impact, and leverage risk assessments across different compliance areas if there are common controls. Contractors should document assumptions and define metrics that provide visibility into the program's effectiveness, including early indicators of security risks and compliance issues. Metrics should be reassessed periodically.

In developing their plans, contractors should consider the NIST cybersecurity framework, available at https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework/draft-version-11. This voluntary framework provides guidance on managing cybersecurity risk. More importantly, the framework allows organizations to demonstrate compliance with the CUI security requirements in the context of their established information security programs. NIST SP 800-171 notes:

Organizations that have implemented or plan to implement the NIST Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity can find in Appendix D of this publication, a direct mapping of the Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) security requirements to the security controls in NIST Special Publication 800-53 and ISO/IEC 27001. Once identified, those controls can be located in the specific categories and subcategories associated with Cybersecurity Framework core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. The security control mapping information can be useful to organizations that wish to demonstrate compliance to the CUI security requirements in the context of their established information security programs, when such programs have been built around the NIST or ISO/IEC security controls.

NIST 800-171 at vii; Appendix D at D-1; see Cybersecurity Framework Draft Version 1.1, available at https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework/draft-version-11 (note: Comments on the proposed updates in version 1.1 are due by April 10 and should be sent to cyberframework@nist.gov.).

Compliance Matrix/Plan of Action: As discussed in Part 1, a compliance matrix is a useful tool for tracking what has been done and what is being done for each security control. The matrix should address how the controls are implemented by the contractor, e.g., "What mechanisms does the company employ to ensure requirement [XX] is properly implemented and sustained?" A thorough compliance matrix can help guide the contractor through the compliance process, and is an accessible tool to provide to the Government if questions about the contractor's compliance arise. For security controls or mitigation actions not yet implemented, NIST SP 800-171 provides that contractors should create plans of action. NIST SP 800-171, 3.12.2.

  • Plan of Action and Milestones—Contractors may look to the plan of action and milestones developed under FedRAMP or other Government programs for guidance in drafting a solid compliance matrix. These plans of action and milestones are likely to be familiar to many Government customers and, thus, more likely to be accepted as evidence of a viable compliance approach. See, e.g., DSS Job Aid: POA&M, available at http://www.dss.mil/documents/rmf/Plan_of_Action_and_Milestones_POAM_Job_Aid.pdf .

Security Assessment Report/Report of Compliance: Contractors can benefit from creating a comprehensive report on the methodology employed for determining security compliance. As noted above, under FedRAMP, the report should include consideration of risks and contractor vulnerabilities as well as corrective action plans. If a third-party auditor is used, a report of compliance from the auditor (even if not required or given "credence" by DOD) adds to the contractor's compliance arsenal and can bolster credibility if there are any security issues. If a DOD contractor feels a control is inapplicable, or an adequate alternate exists, the contractor may provide a written explanation, which will be presented to the DOD CIO and adjudicated.

The rule allows for the contractor to identify situations in which a required control might not be necessary or for an alternative to a required control. In such cases, the contractor should provide a written explanation in their proposal describing the reasons why a control is not required or adequate security is provided by an alternative control and protective measure. The contracting officer will refer the proposed variance to the DoD CIO for resolution. The DoD Chief Information Officer (CIO) is responsible for ensuring consistent adjudication of proposed non-applicable or alternative security measures.

See DOD FAQs at A18, A19. There is no guarantee an alternate will be approved, however, and the proposal could be deemed noncompliant for failure to meet requirements and be ineligible for contract award. Documentation and a clear rationale for contractor assessments (whether demonstrating compliance or asserting a certain control does not apply) is key. Contractors should be proactive and include this information in their compliance matrices and compliance reports, and should inform the customer as soon as possible to allow for resolution of any issues.

Third-Party Audits—Although DOD will not require a third-party assessment or certification under the DFARS rule, and will not regard such an assessment or certification as determinative, engaging a third party to assess and audit your systems can be beneficial, particularly where it leads to an independent finding that your systems have adequate security controls, and your processes and plans are sufficient.

An auditor can review the contractor's current level of compliance, provide a gap analysis, assist in generating solutions and provide documentation confirming contractor compliance. A third-party auditor also may be able to facilitate use of penetration testers—individuals who will attempt to gain access to your systems to test whether appropriate security controls are in place prior to beginning an audit. (For movie fans among you, think of Robert Redford's team in Sneakers.) Contractors may also consider licensing third-party tools that will set systems within a specific compliance framework for testing.

  • Practitioner's Note: If you choose to bring in penetration testers, these individuals should not be the same team you hire for the audit. To preserve the final report's integrity, there needs to be an arms-length distance from the final audit team. Additionally, consider having outside counsel retain the penetration testers so that their findings may be protected as attorney work product.

Because third-party audits are typically longer than a self-assessment, it is important to determine as soon as possible whether your company will use a third-party auditor. As noted in Part 1 of this series, experts estimate that an assessment could take between 3–6 months for a contractor with 600 employees and 30 servers (located within the contiguous U.S.). However, timing can be negotiated depending on how many resources the auditor can bring to bear during the requisite time period, and how much the contractor is willing to pay.

Pre-Audit Considerations—Before beginning an audit (either a self-assessment or a third-party audit), the contractor should conduct a thorough review to define the applicable contractor systems and security standards for the audit, and a security assessment plan should be created. As noted above, contractors may be subject to more than just the security controls in NIST SP 800-171 under the DFARS rule, and 2017 is a good time to ensure the sufficiency of controls and compliance under all applicable regimes. Also, it is important to review applicable contracts to ensure customers do not specify additional controls.

Even where the contractor identifies the systems to be audited, the contractor should review this finding with the auditor. According to Christopher Pogue, a veteran third-party auditor and chief information security officer (CISO) at Nuix, an international cybersecurity software company, "nine times out of ten the contractor is unclear about which systems actually house data that should be included."

What should contractors look for when hiring a third-party auditor? Neither the regulation nor the NIST standard specifies a standard for auditors. In fact, DOD's frequently asked questions make it clear that the agency is taking a hands-off approach in this regard. According to Pogue, "The most important considerations are who will have 'fingers on the keyboard' during the audit, and what is that person's experience?"

Aside from having an information technology degree (or the equivalent), it is recommended that auditors have between three to five certifications, such as Certified Information Systems Security Professional; GIAC Security Essentials Certification (entry-level certification); Certified Information Systems Auditor; Certified Ethical Hacker (pen-testing techniques and technologies). Finally, the terms of the third-party auditor agreement should include data protection clauses, a nondisclosure agreement, and terms that clearly define the scope of the audit (with potential room for expansion if the auditor determines that additional scope is necessary).

The Audit—Although each audit is unique, below are common steps in an audit that contractors should anticipate.

  1. The audit leader (or audit mediator) will meet with you to discuss goals, explain the audit process and identify how long it should take.
  2. The audit team will ask a series of questions about the nature of your business, the computer systems, data dispensation and the business processes. These questions help the team determine whether all areas of your network have been appropriately included within the scope of the audit.
  3. The team will audit your system against specific controls. The team will ask you to show it specific aspects of your system and processes, which requires the appropriate personnel within your organization to be available and responsive to facilitate the audit. Note: Your team should be prepared to explain if there are "compensating controls" in place (i.e., alternate but equally effective controls).
  4. The audit team will compile a report on its findings (sometimes known as a report of compliance) that establishes what systems were audited and that the systems were compliant as of the date of the assessment.
  5. If there are any noncompliances or deficiencies identified, you should communicate a date by which you will get the issue fixed so that the final report can reflect that you are compliant. The auditor will reassess and issue the final report.

If shortcomings are too complex to correct before the audit is complete, the contractor's CISO should document these items in a compliance matrix—or plan of action—and develop a roadmap for achieving compliance. The matrix provides critical documentation if an issue ever emerges later regarding whether the contractor took reasonable steps to remedy deficiencies in a timely manner.

Post-Audit Considerations—After the audit is complete and the final report is on file, congratulations—time to "Netflix and chill" with a few of those Oscar-winning movies you missed, right? WRONG! "Security is not a destination, it's the beginning," explains Nuix's Pogue. He cautions clients:

The problem inherent to any compliance regime is that people assume that if every box is checked, they are secure. However, you cannot check-box your way to security. You have an enemy that is proactive—spending between 1-5 hours per week improving their craft—and you need to match their enthusiasm. This requires preemptively "threat hunting" and "proactive forensics."

Nuix's "The Black Report 2017: Decoding the Minds of Hackers" identifies a few alarming statistics in this regard. Of the penetration testers and hackers interviewed:

  • 88 percent could compromise a target in less than 12 hours, and 81 percent said they could identify and exfiltrate your data in less than 12 hours.
  • 50 percent changed their attack methodologies with every target.
  • 64 percent said their biggest frustration was that organizations did not fix the things they knew were broken.

An effective compliance program is required to ensure not only that you currently satisfy the security requirements, but that you continue to satisfy them. While DOD currently has no intention of auditing contractors for compliance, that may not always be the case.

For example, HHS has only recently implemented audits for HIPAA compliance. Contractors who implement robust compliance plans should be less likely to see their proposals deemed noncompliant with cybersecurity requirements, or their contracts terminated for lack of adequate security. Documentation identifying compliance with contractor controls, including a report from a third-party auditor, can prove to be useful evidence in the face of any Government inquiries.

Conclusion—The age-old adage that you should not put off until tomorrow what you can do today was never truer. Like a healthy lifestyle, cybersecurity is not a destination—it is a journey. Some days you meet all of your goals, other days you uncover an area that needs improvement. Organizations must understand and embrace the fact that cybersecurity is not a static process—it encompasses prevention and continuous improvement.

Table 1: NIST SP 800-171 (Rev. 1): Security Controls Warranting Specific Documentation

Reprinted from The Government Contractor, with permission of Thomson Reuters. Copyright © 2017.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
26 Sep 2018, Seminar, San Francisco, United States

Please join us for Sheppard Mullin's Labor & Employment Law Update & Happy Hour Seminar Series.

28 Sep 2018, Other, Los Angeles, United States

Leaders today don't just have to worry about nefarious cybercriminals getting "inside" their firewalls; there's an entire ecosystem of SAAS partners, third party vendors and suppliers, and all the hardware from switches to POS terminals that need to be monitored.

9 Oct 2018, Other, Los Angeles, United States

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP has opened for business in Dallas to proudly serve the Texas business community.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions