United States: The Supreme Court Clarifies Patent Rights After A Patented Item Is Sold

Last Updated: July 3 2017
Article by Mae Hong and Ajay A. Jagtiani

On May 30, 2017, in Impression Products 1, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a patent owner's sale of an item, either within or outside the United States, exhausts all of the patent owner's patent rights in that item, regardless of any restrictions the patentee purports to impose upon the sale. This Court's decision solved long-term unsettled issues with respect to patent owners' post-sale restrictions on the use or resale of patented items.

Over the years, disputes have arisen with respect to the enforcement of patent owners' post-sale restrictions on the use or resale of patented items. In Mallinckrodt 2 the Federal Circuit determined that a post-sale restriction on a post-sold patented medical device for only a single patent use was valid and enforceable under the patent law because the use is within the scope of the patent grant.3 Since then, while many federal court decisions relied on the Federal Circuit's ruling in Mallinckrodt, the decisions from other federal courts have been inconsistent. This inconsistency among the courts is highlighted in the outcomes of cases involving Lexmark International Inc. (Lexmark), a manufacturer of laser and inkjet printers. Lexmark has been involved in a series of battles addressing its return program ("Prebate" program) in different federal courts with differing outcomes. Lexmark started the "Prebate" program in 1997, offering Prebate cartridges at a discount compared to the prices of its regular cartridges in exchange "for the customer's agreement to use each of the cartridges only once and return it only to Lexmark for remanufacturing or recycling."4 Lexmark used printer lock-out chips to prevent Lexmark printers from recognizing cartridges manufactured or refilled by others. A license agreement was placed on the outside of the each cartridge package which stated: "This patented cartridge is sold at a special price subject to a restriction that it may be used only once. Following this initial use, you agree to return the empty cartridge only to Lexmark for remanufacturing and recycling."5 At the same time, Lexmark also offered regular cartridges without the license agreement at regular prices.6

In 2003, Arizona Cartridge Remanufactures Association ("ACRA"), an association of remanufactured printer cartridge wholesalers, filed a lawsuit challenging Lexmark's Prebate program.7 ACRA argued that Lexmark's Prebate program misled consumers to believe that the post-sale restriction in the agreement was enforceable when in fact Lexmark had exhausted its rights in the sold cartridges and the post-sale restriction was unenforceable.8 ACRA also argued that Lexmark's use of "lock-out" chip was an unfair business practice.9 The district court, relying on the Federal Circuit's decision in Mallinckrodt, held that Lexmark's Prebate program was not a deceptive practice.10 The district court ruled that Lexmark had not exhausted its patent rights and the single-use condition fell "squarely within Lexmark's patent right."11 ACRA appealed. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision and decided that the restriction, on its face, was enforceable.12

In 2002, Lexmark sued Static Control Components ("Static Control") and numerous other parties, i.e, companies engaged in the business of remanufacturing and refurbishing used toner cartridges. The district court, relying on Mallinckrodt, found that "Lexmark's Prebate program avoided the exhaustion of patent rights normally associated with a patented article's first sale" and was valid.13 Later in 2009, in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Quanta,14 the district court reversed its prior order and found that "[n]o potential buyer was required to agree to abide by the Prebate terms before purchasing a cartridge," thus, "sales of the Lexmark's Prebate toner cartridges were authorized and unconditional, just like sales of LGE's patented products in Quanta."15 Based on this finding, the district court held that Lexmark exhausted its patent right in its toner cartridges and the Prebate program was invalid under patent law.16

In 2010, Lexmark sued Impression Products, Inc. ("Impression") for infringement because Impression was acquiring and reselling Lexmark's Prebate program cartridges that have been sold in the United States and foreign countries.17 Impression contended that Lexmark exhausted its U.S. patent rights in the Prebate program cartridges by its initial sale.18 In 2016, the Federal Circuit, in an en banc decision, held that "when a patentee sells a patented article under otherwise-proper restrictions on resale and reuse communicated to the buyer at the time of sale," the patentee "does not exhaust its § 271 patent rights to charge the buyer who engages in those acts—or downstream buyers having knowledge of the restrictions—with infringement."19 The Federal Circuit further held that "a foreign sale of a U.S. patented article, when made by or with the approval of the U.S. patentee, does not exhaust the patentee's U.S. patent rights in the article sold, even when no reservation of rights accompanies the sale."20

On appeal, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider: 1) whether the patent exhaustion doctrine applies to a "conditional sale" that "transfers title to the patented item while specifying post-sale restrictions on the article's use or resale, and 2) whether the patent exhaustion doctrine applies to a sale of a patented article—authorized by the U.S. patentee— that takes place outside of the United States."21 In Impression, No. 15-1189, the Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit's en banc decision and remanded for further proceedings.

Specifically, the Supreme Court provided four clarifications.

First, the Supreme Court clarified its decision in Quanta, stating that "[w]ithout so much as mentioning the lawfulness of the contract, we held that the patentee could not bring an infringement suit because the 'authorized sale...took its products outside the scope of the patent monopoly.'"22 The Supreme Court concluded that "Lexmark exhausted its patent rights in these cartridges the moment it sold them."23 According to the Supreme Court, "Lexmark cannot bring a patent infringement suit against Impression Products to enforce the single-use/no-resale prevision accompanying its Return Program cartridges...whatever rights Lexmark retained are a matter of the contracts with its purchasers, not the patent law."24

Second, the Supreme Court clarified that "the exhaustion doctrine is not a presumption about the authority that comes along with a sale; it is instead a limit on 'the scope of the patentee's rights."25 The Court specifies that "[t]he right to use, sell, or import an item exists independently of the Patent Act. What a patent adds—and grants exclusively to the patentee—is a limited right to prevent others from engaging in those practices."26 According to the Court, "Exhaustion extinguishes that exclusionary power... As a result, the sale transfers the right to use, sell, or import because those are the rights that come along with ownership, and the buyer is free and clear of an infringement lawsuit because there is no exclusionary right left to enforce."27

Third, the Court further clarified that a patentee can impose restrictions on licensees because "a license is not about passing title to a product, it is about changing the contours of the patentee's monopoly."28 However, "[a] patentee's authority to limit licensees does not...mean that patentees can use licenses to impose post-sale restrictions on purchasers that are enforceable through the patent laws."29 Accordingly, "[o]nce a patentee decides to sell-whether on its own or through a licensee-that sale exhausts its patent rights, regardless of any post-sale restrictions the patentee purports to impose, either directly or through a license."30

Fourth, with respect to the question about international exhaustion, the Supreme Court explicitly expressed that "[a]n authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act."31 The Court concluded that "exhaustion occurs because, in a sale, the patentee elects to give up title to an item in exchange for payment ... restrictions and location are irrelevant; what matters is the patentee's decision to make a sale."32

In sum, the Supreme Court clearly answered the questions with respect to how much control a patentee retains over sold patented products under patent law. Simply put, the patentee retains no patent rights once title to the patented product changes hands. However, a patentee can still negotiate a contract restricting the purchaser's right to use or resell the item, but the patentee must file a breach of contract action to enforce that restriction, as opposed to filing a patent infringement lawsuit.33


1 Impression Products, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc. No. 15-1189, 581 U.S.___(2017)

2 Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed. Cir. 1992)

3 See Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed. Cir. 1992). In this case, the medical device was marked with the appropriated patent number and trademarks including "Mallinckrodt" and "Ultra Vent" and the inscription "Single Use Only." The package for each unit has words "For Single Patient Use Only." In addition, the package provided instructions on the procedures of disposal of contaminated apparatus. Id. at 702.

4 See https://www.lexmark.com/en_us/products/supplies-and-accessories/lexmark-return-cartridges.html. (last visited on 6/2/2017).

5 Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n. Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l Inc., 290 F. Supp. 2d 1034, 1038 (N.D.Cal. 2003).

6 See https://www.lexmark.com/en_us/products/supplies-and-accessories/lexmark-return-cartridges.html. (last visited on 6/2/2017).

7 See Arizona Cartridge Remfrs. Ass'n. Inc.v. Lexmark Int'l Inc. 290 F. Supp. 2d.

8 See id. at 1042.

9 See id. at 1038.

10 See id. at 1042.

11 See id. at 1050.

12 See Arizona Cartridge Remfrs. Ass'n. Inc., 421 F. 3d 981, 988 (9th Cir. 2005). The Ninth Circuit reasoned that the consumers had notice of the condition, had a chance to reject the contract, and had received consideration in the form of a reduced price in exchange for the limits placed on reuse of the cartridge. The Ninth Circuit further affirmed the district court's decision on the use of the lock-out chip. The Ninth Circuit stated that ACRA failed to allege that Lexmark acted beyond the scope of its patent in imposing a condition enforced with the use of the lock-out chip and failed to show that the use of the lock-out chip impermissibly exceeds the patent grant to produce anticompetitive effects.

13 Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l Inc., 615 F. Supp. 2d 575, 578 (2009).

14 In Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics., Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008), the Supreme Court reaffirmed its precedent in holding that "the right to vend is exhausted by a single, unconditional sale, the article sold being thereby carried outside the monopoly of the patent law and rendered free of every restriction which the vendor may attempt to put upon it." The Court ruled that the doctrine of patent exhaustion "provides that the initial authorized sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item."

15 Static Control Components, 615 F., at 585.

16 Id. at 588. The lawsuits between Lexmark and Static Control continued to reach the Supreme Court, but the district court's decision on the validity of Lexmark's Prebate program was not further challenged.

17 Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc., 816 F.3d 721, 728 (2016).

18 See id. at 729.

19 Id. at 729-74.

20 Id. at 729-74.

21 See SCT Docket No. 15-1189, 580 U.S. ___(2016).

22 Impression, No. 15-1189, at 9. (Citing Quanta Computer, 553 U.S., at 638.)

23 Id. at 5.

24 Id. at 9.

25 Id. at 10.

26 Id.

27 Id.

28 Id. at 11.

29 Id.

30 Id. at 13.

31 Id. at 13.

32 Id. at 18.

33 Id. at 3.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.