United States: Court Refers Parts Dispute To FAA Under Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine

Marc L Antonecchia is a Partner in our New York office.

A Florida district court has taken the rare step of referring a dispute between aerospace industry competitors to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under the "primary jurisdiction doctrine."1  Under this doctrine, a court may stay or dismiss an action pending resolution of a factual issue that falls within the special competence of an administrative agency. 

Plaintiff and defendants sell various fasteners installed on general aviation airframes, corporate jet aircraft, and commercial airplanes.  In order to be sold and installed, the fasteners must meet performance standards set forth in technical standard order (TSO) C-148, which is issued by the FAA.  Plaintiff alleged that defendants falsely advertised approval for certain fasteners and implemented a complex scheme using forged or fraudulent documents that purported to evidence approval.  Plaintiff sought a preliminary injunction to enjoin defendants from selling, as FAA approved, the fasteners and other products used on airplanes. 

The primary jurisdiction doctrine may justify staying or dismissing an action that raises issues of fact not within the conventional experience of judges or requires the exercise of administrative discretion.  The court noted that the two main justifications for invoking the primary jurisdiction doctrine are "the need for agency expertise and the need for uniform interpretation of a statute or regulation."

If a particular administrative agency has jurisdiction over the issue, the court considers four factors to determine whether to apply the doctrine:  (1) the need to resolve an issue that (2) has been placed by Congress within the jurisdiction of an administrative body having regulatory authority (3) pursuant to a statute that subjects an industry or activity to a comprehensive regulatory scheme that (4) requires expertise or uniformity in administration.

In this instance, the court determined that the factual issues were within the FAA's jurisdiction and regulatory authority, required the FAA's expertise, and necessitated regulatory uniformity.  Through Congress, the FAA has expansive authority to "promote safe flight of civil aircraft" by prescribing "minimum standards required in the interest of safety for appliances and for the design, material, construction, quality of work, and performance of aircraft." 2   Under this congressional power, the FAA has issued regulations that allow it to set minimum performance standards for specified articles used on civil aircraft.  If a specific article meets a TSO, the FAA will issue a "TSO authorization," which "is an FAA design and production approval issued to the manufacturer of an article that has been found to meet a specific TSO."3

The court elaborated on the specific process to obtain a letter of TSO design approval, which includes applying to the appropriate aircraft certification office and providing a statement of conformance and a copy of the technical data required in the applicable TSO.  After the issuance of TSO authorization, the holder of the TSO continues to undergo FAA oversight, including having to immediately notify the FAA in writing of any change that may affect the inspection, conformity or airworthiness of the article.  The applicant must allow the FAA to inspect its quality system, facilities, technical data, and any manufactured articles.  In sum, the court determined that the role of the FAA in issuing TSO authorizations involve a "myriad of factors," including analyzing the inspection and test procedures used to ensure that each article conforms to the type design as is in a condition for safe operation, i.e., the article is airworthy.

In addition to issuing approvals, the court found that the FAA has broad enforcement power, including suspending or revoking any approval based on a fraudulent, intentionally false, or misleading statement in any application or in any record or report kept, made, or used to show compliance.  The FAA may impose civil penalties, cease and desist orders, injunctions, and seek criminal fines and imprisonment.  And where, as here, a private citizen suspects violations of FAA regulations, the FAA contemplates reporting suspected unapproved parts through the FAA's Suspected Unapproved Parts Program.4  

Plaintiff asserted that the dispute should remain before the court because it encompassed nothing more than "historical fact finding" as to whether the approval existed at the time defendants advertised to the public that they had FAA approval.  Defendants contended that the issues before the court were "technical questions of whether they properly obtained the TSO-C148 approvals they say they have, and assuming they did properly obtain the approvals, when did they obtain them." 

The court determined that the issues before it were not limited to the "historical questions" of whether defendants advertised approvals that they did not receive, but included the broader questions of whether defendants forged the FAA documents, submitted those documents to the FAA, and "conned" the FAA into granted TSO-C148 approvals.  For instance, the court noted that even if it found that all of the documents alleged by plaintiff to be fraudulent actually were, it could not say whether the FAA, in its discretion, properly granted or would have granted approval.  Whether defendants should have approval "is surely a technical question for the FAA to decide in its judgment and discretion."  In referring the issue to the FAA, the court directed plaintiff to file a formal complaint with the FAA5 and ordered the delivery of relevant court filings to the FAA. 

In the aviation context, courts invoke the primary jurisdiction doctrine sparingly.  The court cited only one other instance of referring a plaintiff to seek administrative relief before the FAA.6   Other courts have declined to invoke the doctrine on the basis that the fact finder, with the aid of expert witnesses, are capable of determining defective aircraft designs.7    

Determining whether an issue is subject to "historical fact finding" by a court or "uniform regulatory enforcement" by an administrative agency is not necessarily a straightforward inquiry.  The court itself noted that the inquiry may shift during the pendency of an action:  "To be sure, the issues before the Court were – at one point in time – simply the historical questions of whether [Defendants] falsely advertised TSO-C148 approval. . . . But now, as this case has progressed, there is certainly a question here as to whether Defendants have forged purported FAA documents." 

Given that the doctrine provides for a permissive – not mandatory – remedy of referral, the result here will continue to be the exception rather than the norm.  But it does signal that, in certain instances, the combination of the FAA's approval and enforcement powers may weigh in favor of referral:  "[W]hether the FAA properly granted those TSO-C148 approvals are technical issues best left to the agency that is alleged to have been defrauded, the agency with authority to enforce its regulations and to do so uniformly." 

Footnotes

1 Skybolt Aeromotive Corporation v. Milspec Products, Inc., No. 5:16-cv-616, 2017 WL 2540817 (M.D. Fla. June 9, 2017)

2 49 U.S.C. § 44701(a)(1). 

3 14 C.F.R. § 21.601(b)(2).

4 FAA Order 8120.16A. 

5 14 C.F.R. § 13.5 provides:  "Any person may file a complaint with the Administrator with respect to anything done or omitted to be done by any person in contravention of any provision of any Act or of any regulation or order under it, as to matters within the jurisdiction of the Administrator." 

6 See Commander Properties Corp. v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 745 F. Supp. 650 (D. Kan. 1990) (uniformity and consistency in the aviation field would be promoted by FAA's resolution of whether wing design was defective and whether modification would correct defect and make the aircraft "airworthy").

7 See, e.g., Sunbird Air Service, Inc. v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 789 F. Supp. 360 (D. Kan. 1992) (FAA decision to certify aircraft relevant to the determination but not dispositive).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions