United States: Which Constitutional Question Will Decide PHH v. CFPB

The May 24, 2017, oral argument in PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB" or "Bureau") before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, sitting en banc, sent strong signals that the Court is likely to decide this case on the Constitutionality questions, rather than the statutory ones. Discussion of the statute of limitations and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA") issues in the case, themselves of weighty legal and practical consequence for the mortgage industry, occupied but a few minutes at the end of the oral argument (with a brief PHH plea for reinstatement of the three-judge panel's RESPA decision in its favor).

While commentators have focused on the Constitutionality of the CFPB's structure, there is a real question of whether the deciding Constitutionality issue in PHH will be:

  1. whether the CFPB's single-director structure is consistent with the Constitution; or
  2. whether the administrative law judge ("ALJ") who heard the case was an "inferior officer" under the law and thus appointed in violation of the Appointments Clause (the question in Securities & Exchange Commission ("SEC") v. Lucia, argued immediately before PHH).

Finally, perhaps the even more important practical question is whether the Court will render its decision in time to have a significant impact on the date when Richard Cordray will leave his post as CFPB Director.

Is the CFPB's Single-Director Structure Constitutional?

The beginning of the PHH oral argument was dominated by Judges Tatel, Griffith, Pillard, Henderson and Srinivasan, questioning how the Court could rule for PHH on the issue of the CFPB's single-Director structure given the Supreme Court's holdings in Humphrey's Executor v. United States and Morrison v. Olson. Humphrey's Executor held that Title II of the Constitution permits Congress to create independent agencies (in that case, the Federal Trade Commission) to exercise executive power, with agency heads removable by the President only for cause, not at will. Morrison similarly held that Congress' creation of the Office of Independent Counsel, with a single individual exercising that Office's executive power and removable by the President only for cause, not at will, did not violate the principle of Separation of Powers. Of note, while under fire, PHH's counsel suggested that the Court could specify that it was ruling in favor of the CFPB only because it was bound by these two decisions, pointing to the Supreme Court to revisit the issue.

As the CFPB took its turn at the podium, however, Judge Kavanaugh voiced the rationale of the 2-1 opinion which he had penned for the three-judge panel ruling against the CFPB. He emphasized the Supreme Court's directive in Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board to look to history and tradition in Separation of Powers cases. Pointing to references in Humphrey's Executor to independent agencies as quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial entities which, he argued, should thus be multi-member, bi-partisan bodies, Judge Kavanaugh described the CFPB's structure as a gross departure from settled historical practice. Occasional interjections from some of the other judges, including Judges Rogers, Wilkins and Brown, also suggested some questioning of the concentration of powers in the CFPB, and more particularly in its single Director removable only for cause. Nevertheless, the tone of the argument overall likely will render the CFPB cautiously optimistic that it may prevail on this issue.

The argument took an interesting detour after Judge Brown questioned whether there has ever been a successful removal of an agency head for cause, and whether the lack of such examples demonstrates that the for-cause requirement results in a significant diminution of Presidential power. There was some speculation around commentators' arguments that the courts have no jurisdiction to enjoin the President from removing an officer for cause, which could render the for-cause requirement toothless. One might query whether opponents of the CFPB and Director Cordray might seize on this concept to urge the President's removal of the Director for cause. We continue to believe that the likelihood of the President taking such action is low, given the associated political and procedural complications and other matters dominating this Administration's agenda.

Is the ALJ an "Inferior Officer" Subject to the Appointments Clause?

Despite the spotlight on the CFPB's structure, the Court's ruling in PHH well might rest on the question of whether the ALJ in the case, borrowed from the SEC, was appointed in violation of the Constitution. The outcome rests on the interpretation of the Supreme Court's holding in Freytag v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue that the Tax Court's special trial judges were inferior officers and not employees. The Supreme Court identified three factors in making the relevant determination: (i) whether the position was "established by law;" (ii) whether "the duties, salary, and means of appointment" for that office were specified by statute; and (iii) most important, whether that person exercised significant duties and discretion.

Notably, in December 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that, under the Freytag standard, SEC ALJs were inferior officers and thus had to be appointed by the President, courts or agency heads (which they were not). In so holding, the Tenth Circuit criticized the D.C. Circuit's 2000 ruling in Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") that FDIC ALJs were not inferior officers because they did not have final decision-making authority. The Tenth Circuit's decision was the first major victory for opponents of the SEC's use of its new authority under the Dodd-Frank Act to seek monetary penalties through its administrative adjudication process rather than through the courts.

The Lucia argument, which preceded the PHH argument, was rigorous, turning largely on the question of whether: (i) the SEC ALJs' ability to "shape the evidence" and the Commission's practice of conducting substantive review of only a small percentage of ALJ decisions made these ALJs inferior officers; or (ii) the SEC Act's reservation of the Commission's authority to review every ALJ decision, and the necessity of a finality order from the Commission to make an ALJ decision enforceable, established that these ALJs were only employees, not inferior officers. The questions from the Court gave no clear indication of its leaning on this analysis, but did highlight the judges' concern regarding the broader impact of a potential holding that the SEC ALJs were inferior officers. The Court will have to wrestle with the question of whether and how such a decision could affect not only matters involving the SEC ALJs, but also the ALJs in dozens of other federal agencies, including, for example, Social Security judges.

Will Resolution of PHH Come Too Late to Force Director Cordray's Departure?

The combination of two complex and high profile Constitutional questions in PHH raises a substantial likelihood that the Court, sitting en banc, will not reach a decision until early 2018. If the Court holds that the CFPB's structure is unconstitutional, the CFPB would be out of options, as it has no independent authority to seek Supreme Court review, and the Office of Solicitor General ("OSG") under President Trump would reject its request to file a petition for writ of certiorari. Conversely, OSG likely would support PHH if it was to seek cert. from a holding against it, increasing the probability that the Supreme Court would take the case and further delay its final resolution. Finally, a ruling based on the ALJ issue would present a wild card as it is unclear whether OSG under President Trump would opt to defend the ALJ framework or align with industry opponents.

Given the complexity of these issues, there is a significant probability that PHH will not reach a final resolution substantially in advance of the natural expiration of Director Cordray's term in July 2018. As previously noted, it appears unlikely that President Trump will forcibly remove Director Cordray in the interim. Of course, if the Court were to hold that the CFPB's structure is unconstitutional, even if that ruling could be stayed pending review, there is a possibility that President Trump might promptly seize the opportunity to place his own pick to head the agency. Weighed against that, however, will be the prospect of giving Director Cordray additional political capital through a forced early departure. As his opponents mull over these options, Director Cordray himself will be pondering whether to depart before the expiration of his term, given the February 2018 filing deadline for the Ohio gubernatorial race. Nevertheless, the cautious optimism no doubt emboldening the CFPB following the PHH hearing only adds to the enormous pressure from CFPB proponents, particularly Democratic Party leaders, for Director Cordray to maintain his leadership of the CFPB for as long as possible.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.