United States: FERC Accelerates Efforts To Integrate Electric Storage Projects Into Jurisdictional Wholesale Markets

Over the past year, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has accelerated its efforts to facilitate integration of electric storage projects into wholesale electricity markets subject to its jurisdiction.

Historically, electricity "storage" has consisted of hydroelectric pumped storage projects, which pump water to higher-level reservoirs when electricity demand is low, and allow it to flow downhill through electricity-generating turbines when demand increases.  However, over the past two decades, new electricity storage technologies have entered the market.  These technologies include batteries (lead acid, lithium ion, sodium sulfur, flow, dry cell); flywheels (mechanical devices that harness rotational energy to deliver instantaneous electricity); compressed air energy storage that uses electricity to compress air, then expand it through a turbine to generate electricity later; electrochemical capacitors that store electricity in an electrostatic charge; and thermal energy storage that either uses heat sinks like molten salts to store heat energy, which can either generate electricity or provide heating later, or uses electricity that can be used to freeze water into ice, which can be used to provide air conditioning later.

As defined by FERC, an "electric storage resource" is a resource "capable of receiving electric energy from the grid and storing it for later injection of electricity back to the grid regardless of where the resource is located on the electrical system."

Within electricity markets, electric storage resources have provided bulk energy services, ancillary services (frequency regulation, energy management, backup power and load leveling), and transmission services (voltage support and grid stabilization).

In April 2016, FERC's staff sent data requests to Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) and Independent System Operators (ISOs).  These requests sought information about whether barriers exist to the participation of electric storage resources in the capacity, energy and ancillary services markets operated by the six FERC jurisdictional RTOs and ISOs that could lead to unjust and unreasonable rates for wholesale sales of electricity, which are prohibited by the Federal Power Act (FPA).  In addition, the staff wanted to know whether any changes to RTO and ISO tariffs are necessary if such barriers exist.   (See Energy Update, Vol. 3, Issue 3, September 2016).  FERC also convened a technical conference in November 2016 to discuss utilization of electric storage resources as transmission assets compensated through transmission rates, for grid support services that are compensated in other ways and for multiple services.

Following its review of the information obtained through the data request and technical conference, and prior to the inauguration of President Trump, FERC took two actions to increase the ability of electric storage resources to participate in wholesale electricity markets and clarified its policy with respect to the rates that may be charged by electric storage resources participating in wholesale markets.  In January 2017, FERC issued a Policy Statement giving guidance on the ability of electric storage resources to provide transmission or grid support services at cost-based rates while, at the same time, providing other services, such as power sales, at market-based rates.[1]  In mid-November 2016, FERC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) to amend its regulations under the FPA and remove barriers that prevented electric storage resources and distributed energy resource aggregators to participate in the capacity, energy, and ancillary service markets operated by the six RTOs and ISOs subject to FERC jurisdiction.[2]  These RTOs and ISOs are NYISO, ISO-NE, PJM, MISO, SPP and CAISO.

FERC Policy Statement on Rates Charged by Electric Storage Resources

In its Policy Statement, FERC observed that electric storage resources can both charge and discharge electricity, provide multiple services and switch from providing one service to another almost instantaneously.  Based on these characteristics, FERC found that electric storage resources may fit into one or more of the traditional electricity asset functions of generation, transmission and distribution and, further, that an electric storage resource receiving cost-based rate recovery for providing one service also may be technically capable of providing other market-based rate services.

Section 205 of the FPA requires that the rates, terms and conditions of public utilities for the transmission or sale of electricity at wholesale in interstate commerce be on file with FERC, "just and reasonable" and not unduly discriminatory or preferential.  Cost-based rates allow a public utility to recover its costs of providing service, allocated among customer classes, and make a reasonable rate of return on its investment.  FERC authorizes market-based rates for wholesale sales of electric energy, capacity and ancillary services, where the utility demonstrates that it and its affiliates do not have or have mitigated market power in the relevant market(s), and for merchant transmission.

In the Policy Statement, FERC clarified that, as a matter of policy, an electric storage resource may provide services at both cost-based and market-based rates at the same time, so long as three issues are addressed:   the potential for double recovery of costs by the electric storage resource owner or operator to the detriment of cost-based ratepayers; the potential for cost recovery through cost-based rates to inappropriately suppress competitive prices in wholesale electric markets to the detriment of other competitors who do not receive such cost-based rate recovery; and the level of control in the operation of an electric storage resource by an RTO/ISO that could jeopardize its independence from market participants.

As part of its policy guidance, FERC clarified rulings and statements made in two prior orders addressing rates charged by electric storage resources.

With respect to the potential for double recovery of costs by the electric storage resource owner or operator, FERC clarified that, in addition to the approach it approved in its Western Grid order,[3] crediting any market revenues back to the cost-based ratepayers is one possible way to address potential double recovery of costs.  In Western Grid, FERC authorized Western Grid to charge cost-based transmission rates for the provision of voltage support and thermal overload services protection to CAISO because, among other things, Western Grid would operate the energy storage projects, at CAISO's direction, only as transmission assets, and had committed to forego any sales into CAISO's organized wholesale electric markets.

FERC also indicated that where crediting is utilized to address double recovery of costs, the amount of crediting may vary depending on how the cost-based rate recovery is structured.  In a case where the costs of an electric storage resource is recovered through cost-based rates, the electric storage resource owner or operator may credit all projected market revenues earned by the electric storage resource over a reasonable period of time (expected useful life of the asset or the term of the cost-based rate services).  Alternatively, the market-revenue off-set can be used to reduce the amount of the revenue requirement to be used in the development of the cost-based rate.

With respect to the second issue, the potential for cost recovery through cost-based rates to inappropriately suppress competitive prices in wholesale electric markets, FERC stated that it was "not convinced" by commenters' arguments that allowing electric storage resources to receive concurrently cost- and market-based revenues for providing separate services will undermine competition or suppress market prices to subcompetitive levels.  Denying electric storage resources the opportunity to earn cost-based and market-based revenues on the theory that dual revenue streams undermine competition would require revisiting years of precedent allowing concurrently cost-based and market-based sales for reactive power and market-based rate wholesale sales, and for cost-based sales to captive wholesale requirements customers and off-system market-based rate sales.  FERC also said that the concern that electric storage resources would suppress market clearing prices by offering services for which they receive cost-based rates could be addressed by the manner in which the costs that are included in the cost-based rates are established.

With respect to the third issue, maintaining RTO/ISO independence from market participants, FERC clarified its previous conclusion in its Nevada Hydro[4] order that it would not be appropriate to require CAISO to assume "any level of operation control" over Nevada Hydro's hydroelectric pumped storage project.  "There is nothing unreasonable about an RTO/ISO exercising some level of control over the resources it commits or dispatches where it can be shown that the RTO/ISO independence is not an issue," FERC said.  In Nevada Hydro, FERC denied Nevada Hydro's request to treat its pumped storage project as a transmission facility under the operational control of CAISO for rate recovery purposes.  FERC agreed with CAISO that under Nevada Hydro's proposal, CAISO would have to decide when the LEAPS project would operate, how much energy it would provide and when it would operate the pumps to store water for future electricity generation, compromising CAISO's independence.

FERC further stated that in order to ensure RTO/ISO independence, the provision of market-based rate service should be under the control of the electric storage resource owner or operator, rather than the RTO/ISO.  Where a service compensated though cost-based rates is needed, the RTO/ISO should give priority to the dispatch of the electric storage resource to address over the electric storage resource's provision of market-based rate services.  Performance penalties could be imposed on the electric storage resource owner or operator for failure to perform at these times.

FERC NOPR on Participation by Electric Storage Resources in Wholesale Electricity Markets

In the NOPR, FERC found that, currently, resource participation in wholesale electric markets operated by RTOs and ISOs is governed by participation models consisting of market rules designed for different types of resources and technical requirements for market services that those resources are eligible to provide.  To address this, FERC proposed, among other things, to require each RTO/ISO to revise its tariff to include market rules that accommodate the participation of electric storage resources organized as wholesale electric markets, recognizing the physical and operational characteristics of electric storage resources.

Under the NOPR, RTO/ISO market rules would have to satisfy numerous requirements.

First, electric storage resources must be eligible to provide all capacity, energy and ancillary services that they are technically capable of providing.  With respect to this requirement, FERC also proposes that electric storage resources should be able to provide services that the RTOs/ISOs do not procure through a market mechanism, such as blackstart, primary frequency response and reactive power, if they are technically capable.  Where compensation for these services exists, electric storage resources also should receive such compensation commensurate with the services provided.  FERC proposes to require each RTO/ISO to revise its tariff to clarify that an electric storage resource may de-rate its capacity to meet minimum run-time requirements to provide capacity or other services.  RTOs/ISOs with capacity markets that de-rate capacity value for electric storage resources must be consistent with the quantity of energy required to be offered into the day-ahead energy markets for resources with capacity obligations.

Second, bidding parameters (the physical and operational constraints that a resource would identify when submitting offers to sell capacity, energy or ancillary services or bids to buy energy in wholesale electric markets) incorporated in the participation model must reflect and account for the physical and operational characteristics of electric storage resources.  With respect to this requirement, FERC explained that bidding parameters allow the RTO/ISO to model and dispatch the resource consistent with its operational constraints.  FERC found that by requiring electric storage resources to use bidding parameters developed for traditional generators or other supply resources, RTOs/ISOs may fail to effectively utilize these resources, possibly precluding electric storage resources from providing all of the services that they are physically and technically capable of providing.  FERC found that resource bidding parameters vary greatly between RTOs/ISOs.  Some require the same bidding parameters from all resources offering into a specific market, while others tie bidding parameters to specific participation models.  FERC proposed that the RTOs/ISOs establish state of charge, upper charge limit, lower charge limit, maximum energy charge rate and maximum energy discharge rate as bidding parameters for the participation model.  FERC proposes to require that RTO/ISO participation models include the four bidding parameters that market participants may submit, at their discretion, for their resource based on its physical constraints or desired operation:  minimum charge time, maximum charge time, minimum run time and maximum run time.  Where the RTO/ISO has reserved for itself the right to manage the state of charge of an electric storage resource, FERC proposes to require that the RTOs/ISOs allow electric storage resources to self-manage their state of charge and upper and lower charge limits.

Third, electric storage resources can be dispatched and set the wholesale market clearing prices as both a wholesale seller and a wholesale buyer consistent with existing rules that govern when a resource can set the wholesale price.  FERC proposed to require RTOs and ISOs to accept wholesale bids from electric storage resources to buy energy so that the economic preferences of these resources are fully integrated in the market; the electric storage resource can set the price as a load resource where market rules allow and can be available to the RTO/ISO as a dispatchable demand asset.  However, these requirements must not prohibit electric storage resources from participating in wholesale electric markets as price takers.

Fourth, the minimum size requirement for electric storage resources to participate in the organized wholesale electric market must not exceed 100 kW.  FERC concluded on a preliminary basis that such a minimum size requirement would balance the benefits of increased competition with the ability of RTO/ISO market clearing software to effectively model and dispatch smaller resources often located on the distribution system.  FERC proposed to require each RTO/ISO to revise its tariff to include a participation model for electric storage resources that establishes a minimum size requirement for participation in wholesale markets not exceeding 100 kW, including any minimum capacity requirements, minimum offer requirements and minimum bid requirements for resources participating in these markets under the electric storage resource participation model.

Fifth, the sale of energy from the organized wholesale electric markets to an electric storage resource that the resource then resells back to those markets must be at the wholesale locational marginal price (LMP).  With respect to this requirement, FERC states that it previously has found that the sale of energy from the grid that is used to charge electric storage resources for later resale constitutes a FERC jurisdictional wholesale sale and, as such, the just and reasonable rate for that sale is the RTO/ISO market's wholesale price for energy, or LMP.  FERC observed that the manner in which an electric storage resource charges (consumes) and discharges (produces) energy will determine whether the electric storage resource is making a jurisdictional sale for resale.  In the NOPR, FERC proposes to require each RTO/ISO to revise its tariff to specify that the wholesale LMP is required for the sale of energy from wholesale electric markets to an electric storage resource that the resource then resells back to those markets.

Next Steps

Following its review of comments filed in response to the NOPR, FERC will decide whether to issue a Final Order implementing some or all of the proposals contained in the NOPR.  However, FERC cannot issue a Final Order until there is a quorum of Commissioners.  It is likely that when the full FERC considers any staff proposal with respect to a Final Order, only one FERC commissioner who voted on the NOPR will still be on the Commission.

Prior to losing its quorum in early February, FERC implemented some of its NOPR proposals in an order granting the request of Indianapolis Power & Light Company (IPL) that it find MISO's tariff to be unjust, unreasonable and unduly discriminatory because it unnecessarily restricts competition by preventing electric storage resources from providing all the services that they are technically capable of providing, which could lead to unjust and unreasonable rates.[5]  IPL had argued that its Battery Facility, a grid-scale lithium ion battery-based energy storage system containing a 20 MW array of lithium ion cells, can provide nearly instantaneous primary frequency response and could become a "Load Modifying Resource" under MISO Tariff that could provide five MW of capacity or Planning Reserve Margin Requirement.  IPL also argued that its Battery Facility already was providing primary frequency response, but there was no provision in MISO's Tariff to compensate IPL for this reliability service.

In its order responding to IPL's complaint, FERC found that although an electric storage resource, such as IPL's Battery Facility, can participate in MISO as a "Stored Energy Resource," this resource category limits the resource to participation in MISO's regulation market and does not allow it to qualify for capacity, energy, ramp capability and contingency reserves.  FERC directed MISO to submit a compliance filing proposing Tariff revisions that accommodate participation of all electric storage resources, regardless of technology, in all MISO markets that they are technically capable of participating in, taking into account their unique physical and operational characteristics.  This requirement is similar to the proposed RTO/ISO tariff revisions in the NOPR.

FERC recognized that the issue raised in IPL's complaint currently is being addressed in its NOPR and stated that, in the event that MISO's Tariff revisions conflict with required Tariff revisions in any final rule resulting from the NOPR, MISO may be required to adjust its Tariff to align with FERC's determination in the final rule.

MISO has requested rehearing of FERC's order.  As is the case with the NOPR, FERC cannot act on the rehearing request until it has a quorum of Commissioners.  On May 8, President Trump announced his intention to nominate Neil Chatterjee, energy policy advisor to Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY), and Robert F. Powelson, a commissioner on the Pennsylvania Public Utilities Commission and current President of the National Association of Utility Regulatory Commissioners, to two of the open Republican seats on FERC.


[1]Utilization of Electric Storage Resources for Multiple Services When Receiving Cost-Based Rate Recovery, Policy Statement, Docket No. PL17-2-000 (Jan. 19, 2017) (the "Policy Statement").

[2]Electric Storage Participation in Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Docket Nos. RM16-23-000 and AD16-20-000 (Nov. 17, 2016) (the "NOPR").

[3]Western Grid Dev., LLC, 130 FERC ¶ 61,056, reh'g denied, 133 FERC ¶ 61,029 (2010) ("Western Grid").

[4]Nevada Hydro Co., Inc., 122 FERC ¶ 61,272 (2008), reh'g denied, 133 FERC ¶ 61,155 (2010) ("Nevada Hydro").

[5]Indianapolis Power & Light Company v. Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., "Order Granting Complaint in Part and Denying Complaint in Part," 158 FERC ¶ 61,107 (2017).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.