ARTICLE
4 May 2017

Congress Considers FLSA Amendment That Could Provide Flexible Overtime Options

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
The bill, dubbed the Working Families Flexibility Act would permit employers to offer paid time off as an alternative to time-and-a-half overtime wages.
United States Employment and HR

Employers are generally well aware that they must comply with the main pillars of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), requiring that (1) employees be paid at least minimum wage and (2) employees be paid at a rate of one-and-a-half times their hourly wage for all hours worked in excess of 40 in a week. However, if some members of Congress have their way, this longstanding doctrine may be upended.

In the latest wave of new proposed legislation, the House Rules Committee announced that it will meet during the first week of May to discuss the possibility of debate over a Republican-sponsored bill that would add a new wrinkle to the FLSA. The bill, dubbed the Working Families Flexibility Act would permit employers to offer paid time off as an alternative to time-and-a-half overtime wages. Last week, just before the House Rules Committee announced its plan to meet, the House Education and Workforce Committee approved the bill via a vote that fell strictly along party lines.

If the Act, which would amend the FLSA, becomes law, an option would be created whereby employers and employees could voluntarily agree to one-and-a-half hours of paid time off for every overtime hour worked. The bill proposes capping the number of leave hours under the amendment at 160. Under the current version of the bill, all requested time off would be subject to employer approval.

Republican proponents of the bill laud it as providing flexibility to workers at a time when rigid schedules make workers' ability to meet all of their personal obligations more difficult. Democrats who oppose the bill, however, expressed concern that providing such an option would permit employers to coerce their workers into choosing paid time off over increased pay for overtime hours.

A version of the bill currently in the Senate was recently referred to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, with further action to follow in the coming weeks. Notwithstanding these developments, employers should remain mindful of their standing obligations to comply with the requirements of the FLSA as it currently exists, as it remains the law of the land. However, we will continue to track the progress of this bill through Congress and provide appropriate updates accordingly.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More