United States: U.S. Enforcement And Regulatory Update: Safest Approach Is To Assume Substantial Enforcement Policy Continuity Based On The Newly Issued DOJ Fraud Section Criteria For Evaluation Of Corporate Compliance Programs

Last Updated: March 22 2017
Article by Sharie A. Brown

DOJ's Evaluation Of Corporate Compliance Programs

On February 8, 2017, the U.S. Senate confirmed Senator Jeff Sessions of (R - Alabama) as the Attorney General of the United States, a little over one week after Acting U.S. Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates was dismissed from her position at the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ"). In the aftermath of her dismissal, many companies and practitioners quietly wondered what would be the practical fate of the so-called "Yates Memo," a memorandum issued by Sally Yates, DOJ's then-Deputy Attorney General, dated September 9, 2015, entitled, "Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing,"1 as well as the so-called "DOJ FCPA Pilot Program," described in a DOJ Criminal Division communication from Andrew Weissmann, Fraud Division Chief, dated April 5, 2016, entitled, "The Fraud Section's Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement Plan and Guidance"2 (which went into effect for one year.)

Also on February 8, 2017, DOJ provided some clues that may indicate what companies, individuals and practitioners can expect from U.S. prosecutors; that is, a lot more of the same. A preliminary review of a DOJ document entitled, "Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs," from DOJ's Criminal Division, Fraud Section ("DOJ's Compliance Program Evaluation"),3 suggests that the safest approach is for companies to continue to conduct independent internal investigations with a view towards providing prosecutors information about individuals (including senior managers and officers, if any) engaged in misconduct, in hopes that DOJ will continue to consider the effectiveness of a company's existing compliance program (and remedial efforts to implement an effective program or improve an existing program) in deciding whether to bring charges against the company, or negotiating an agreement or other settlement with the company under investigation.

Compliance Program Effectiveness Factors Include Individual Accountability For Manager And Senior Executive Actions Based On DOJ Questions

The Yates Memo enforcement principles related to individual accountability for corporate wrongdoing appear to have found a home in DOJ's Compliance Program Evaluation, at least based upon a review of the sample topics and questions that prosecutors should consider in determining whether to bring a case against a company, or negotiate a favorable settlement or agreement. Specifically, in Topic 1, "Analysis and Remediation of Underlying Misconduct," DOJ's questions seek identification of exactly who within the company was involved in making the root cause analysis of the corporate misconduct at issue. Every person involved and their position and department should be clearly identified.4 In Topic 2, "Senior and Middle Management," DOJ seeks information regarding what actions senior leaders took (by words or actions) to encourage or discourage the misconduct that occurred at the company.5 The questions raise justifiable concern that conduct of managers could be misinterpreted by employees or third parties with less than full knowledge of the facts behind a manager's decision or actions.

Similarly, Topic 7, "Confidential Reporting and Investigation," reiterates a theme of individual accountability for prosecution in discussing a company's response to investigations. DOJ focuses on whether the accountability lapses include supervisory manager and senior executives, and how high up within the company the investigative findings go.6 Thus, these questions suggest that DOJ will not be satisfied with the cooperation of companies that merely identify an individual who is considered to be a "rogue employee" wrongdoer; DOJ also appears to want to hold their managers and executives accountable for what they knew or should have known about the rogue employee's misconduct at the company. Finally, in Topic 8, "Incentives and Disciplinary Measures," it is important to DOJ for managers to be held accountable for misconduct that occurred under their supervision, and whether the company provided disciplinary action for supervisors' failure in oversight.7 DOJ also seeks to know the specific nature of any disciplinary action taken with respect to employees (termination, reduction of bonuses, or warning letter) for the misconduct at issue.8 A company's answers to DOJ's questions in this regard would provide the road map for DOJ to possibly investigate certain individuals in the company for a criminal offense who the company's independent investigators may not have uncovered sufficient evidence of wrongdoing to even support a criminal referral of the individual(s) to DOJ.

Compliance Program Evaluation Effectiveness Factors Are Similar To Those Described In The DOJ FCPA Pilot Program

A company's responses to the above topics in DOJ's Compliance Program Evaluation would not only support the DOJ prosecution principles identified in the Yates Memo; but a preliminary review indicates that the company responses could also support the requirements for compliance and ethics program credit in the DOJ FCPA Pilot Program with respect to voluntary self-disclosure, full and timely cooperation, as well as timely and appropriate remediation in FCPA matters.9 The DOJ FCPA Pilot Program considers the following:

  • Whether the company has established a culture of compliance;
  • Whether the company dedicates sufficient resources to the compliance function;
  • The quality and experience of the compliance personnel such that they can understand and indentify the transactions identified as posing a potential risk;
  • The independence of the compliance function;
  • Whether the company's compliance program has performed an effective risk assessment and designed a program commensurate with that risk;
  • How compliance personnel are compensated and promoted compared to other employees;
  • Auditing the compliance program to ensure effectiveness;
  • The reporting structure of compliance personnel within the company;
  • Appropriate discipline for employees, including those identified as responsible for the misconduct, as well as discipline for other with oversight of the responsible individuals; and
  • Any additional steps that demonstrate recognition of the seriousness of the corporate misconduct, acceptance of responsibility, and measures to reduce the risk of repetition of misconduct.10

However, DOJ's Compliance Program Evaluation posted on February 8, 2017, includes several explanatory questions for eleven broad topics that will reveal specific compliance and ethics program details for each topic so that DOJ can distinguish between a well-drafted "paper" corporate compliance program and a highly rigorous "best practices" corporate compliance program. These eleven topics include the first two already mentioned, as well as Autonomy and Resources (Topic 3), Policies and Procedures (Topic 4), Risk Assessment (Topic 5), Training and Communications (Topic 6), Confidential Reporting and Investigation (Topic 7), Continuous Improvement, Periodic Testing (Topic 9), Third Party Management (Topic 10), and Mergers and Acquisitions (Topic 10).11

It is reasonable for companies to assume that DOJ will view differences in a company's evaluated compliance programs in a manner that could result in a DOJ enforcement declination, or the award of a high level of cooperation credit that results in reduced fines or penalties for a company under investigation, or the award of very little cooperation credit by DOJ due to the lack of voluntary cooperation by a company, or because a company failed to provide information on individuals engaged in misconduct, or a company had an inadequate and ineffective corporate compliance program or remediation efforts.

In light of the issuance of DOJ's Compliance Program Evaluation, we recommend that despite the recent change in DOJ senior leadership, the safest approach is for companies to continue to update compliance programs and procedures in accordance with the focus of the topics covered on February 8, in hopes that DOJ prosecutors will continue to afford the most favorable enforcement action outcomes (on FCPA and other Fraud Section cases) to those companies that voluntarily and timely cooperate, while also having highly effective compliance programs and appropriate remediation for misconduct of all parties involved in the corporate wrongdoing.


1. A copy of the Yates Memo may be downloaded by clicking on the following link: https://www.justice.gov/dag/file/769036/download.

2. A copy of the DOJ FCPA Pilot Program may be downloaded by clicking on the following link: https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/file/838416/download

3. A copy of DOJ's Compliance Program Evaluation posted on February 8, 2017 is available for download by clicking on the following link: https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/page/file/937501/download

4. See DOJ's Compliance Program Evaluation at 1.

5. See DOJ's Compliance Program Evaluation at 2.

6. See id. at 5.

7. See id. at 6.

8. Id.

9. See generally DOJ FCPA Pilot Program.

10. See id. at 7-8.

11. See generally DOJ's Compliance Program Evaluation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Sharie A. Brown
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.