United States: The Federal Circuit Found Direct Infringement Attributable To Physicians Where "No Single Actor Performs All Steps Of A Claim"

Last Updated: March 8 2017
Article by Mae Hong and Andrew W. Wahba

Can a patient's action in taking a generic drug be attributable to a physician such that it can support a finding of the physician's direct patent infringement? According to a recent precedential opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the "Federal Circuit"), at least in some circumstances, it is possible.

On January 12, 2017, the Federal Circuit in Eli Lilly and Company v. Teva Parenteral Medicines, No. 2015-2067 ("Eli Lilly") affirmed a district court's findings of (1) direct infringement attributable to physicians and (2) Defendants' liability for inducing physicians' infringement, even though "no single actor performs all steps of the asserted claims." The Federal Circuit at the same time affirmed that the asserted claims were not invalid for indefiniteness, obviousness, or obviousness-type double patenting (invalidity issues are not discussed in this blog).

Eli Lilly is a Hatch-Waxman lawsuit in which Eli Lilly asserted U.S. Patent No. 7,772,209 ("the '209 patent"). The '209 patent claims methods of administering the chemotherapy drug pemetrexed disodium after pretreatment with folic acid and vitamin B12. Eli Lilly has marked Pemetrexed disodium under the name ALIMTA®. Defendants filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications ("ANDA") to seek FDA's approval of generic versions of ALIMTA®. Eli Lilly sued Defendants for liability of inducing infringement. Defendants counterclaimed that the asserted claims of the '209 patent were invalid and that there was no infringement.

All asserted claims include a step of administering certain amount of folic acid and methylmalonic acid, such as vitamin B12, prior to administering pemetrexed disodium. For example, asserted claim 12 recites:

12. An improved method for administering pemetrexed disodium to a patient in need of chemotherapeutic treatment, wherein the improvement comprises:

  1. administration of between about 350 μg and about 1000 μg of folic acid prior to the first administration of pemetrexed disodium;
  2. administration of about 500 μg to about 1500 μg of vitamin B12, prior to the first administration of pemetrexed disodium; and
  3. administration of pemetrexed disodium.

Both parties agreed that the steps as recited in the asserted claims were divided between physicians and patients, where physicians administer vitamin B12 and pemetrexed and patients self-administer folic acid. Id. at 5.

In light of the Supreme Court's holding that liability for inducement cannot be found without direct infringement, id. at 6 (citing Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc. (Akamai III), 134 S. Ct. 2111 (2014)), the Federal Circuit first considered the direct infringement issue. According to the Federal Circuit, where no single actor performs all steps of a method claim, direct infringement only occurs if "the acts of one are attributable to the other such that a single entity is responsible for the infringement." Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. (Akamai V), 797 F.3d 1020, 1022 (Fed. Cir. 2015) (en banc) (per curiam), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 1661 (2016). The performance of method steps is attributable to a single entity when that entity "directs or controls" others' performance, or when the actors "form a joint enterprise." Eli Lilly, at 9 (citing Akamai V). Since Eli Lilly did not pursue a joint enterprise theory, the Federal Circuit only considered whether physicians direct or control their patients' administrations of folic acid.

In considering the "direct or control" issue, the Federal Circuit applied the two-prong test set up in Akamai V:

  1. "conditions participation in an activity or receipt of a benefit' upon others' performance of one or more steps of a patented method,"
  2. "establishes the manner or timing of that performance." Id. (citing Akamai V, at 1023).

The Federal Circuit's determination relied on the evidence of product labeling and Eli Lilly's expert testimony. Defendants' proposed generic product labeling was similar to the ALIMTA® product labeling, which specified that physicians should instruct patients to take folic acid and included information about folic acid dosage ranges and schedules. Id. Eli Lilly's expert testified that taking folic acid was "an absolute requirement" before pemetrexed treatment and a physician would not give the pemetrexed if a patient did not follow his or her instructions to take folic acid. Id. at 12.

With respect to the first prong, the Federal Circuit first agreed that the district court "correctly identified pemetrexed treatment as the benefit to be conditioned" and concluded that the product labeling, combined with the testimony, provided sufficient evidence that physicians condition pemetrexed treatment on folic acid pretreatment. Id. at 13. According to the Federal Circuit, the record was "replete with evidence that physician[s] delineate the step of folic acid administration that patients must perform if they wish to receive pemetrexed treatment." Id. at 12. The Federal Circuit rejected the Defendants' argument that mere guidance or instruction was insufficient to show "conditioning" under Akamai V, stating "that evidence regarding the critical nature of folic acid pretreatment and physicians' practices support a finding that physicians cross the line from merely guiding or instructing patients to take folic acid to conditioning pemetrexed treatment on their administration of folic acid." Id. at 12.

With respect to the second prong, the Federal Circuit stated that the product's Physician Prescription Information instructed physicians not only to tell patients to take folic acid orally, but also informed the dosage range of folic acid and schedules. Id. at 14. In addition, the expert testified that it is the doctor "who decides how much [folic acid] the patient will take and when the patient takes it." Id. Accordingly, the district court's finding that physicians establish the manner and timing of patients' folic acid intake was not clearly erroneous. Id. at 14-15.

After establishing physicians' direct infringement, the Federal Circuit went further to find liability for induced infringement. According to the Federal Circuit, the mere existence of direct infringement by physicians was not sufficient for inducement. Id. at 15. To show inducement, there must be specific intent and action to induce infringement. Id. According to the Federal Circuit, the product labeling included repeated instructions and warnings regarding the importance of and reasons for folic acid treatment. The instructions are unambiguous on their face and encourage or recommend infringement of the asserted claims. Id. at 16-18. Because the product labeling "would inevitably lead some physicians to infringe establishes the requisite intent for inducement," the district court did not clearly err in finding Defendants' inducement. Id. at 18.

In sum, the Federal Circuit upheld a district court's finding of performance of method steps being attributable to physicians, even though steps of the asserted claims were divided between physicians and patients. The Federal Circuit, however, particularly pointed out that the holding did not assume that patient action is attributable to a prescribing physician solely because they have a physician-patient relationship. The Federal Circuit left open for future determination whether other scenarios may also be found to satisfy the "direction or control" requirement. Id. at 15.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions