United States: The Fourth Circuit Limits Standing To Bring Data Breach Cases

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has made it more difficult to establish Article III standing in data breach cases both at the pleading stage and at summary judgment by requiring plaintiffs to allege and show that data thieves intentionally targeted the personal information that is stolen in a data breach. The decision in the case, Beck, et. al. v. McDonald, et. al., No. 15-1395, came down on February 6, 2017.

Privacy Act of 1974

The Privacy Act of 1974 governs the collection, maintenance, use, and dissemination of personally identifiable information about individuals that is maintained in systems of records by federal agencies. The Privacy Act provides that: "No agency shall disclose any record which is contained in a system of records by any means of communication to any person, or to another agency, except pursuant to a written request by, or with the prior written consent of, the individual to whom the record pertains," and under other limited exceptions articulated in the statute. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b).

Background: Court Considers Whether Data Breaches Caused Actual Damages

On February 11, 2012, a laptop containing the unencrypted personal information of 7,400 patients, including names, birthdates, the last four digits of social security numbers, and physical descriptors (such as age, race, gender, height and weight), was likely stolen from the William Jennings Bryan Dorn Veteran Affairs Medical Center. Dorn VAMC officials notified every patient whose information was on the missing laptop and offered each one year of free credit monitoring. Richard Beck filed a putative class action complaint on behalf of the 7,400 patients alleging that the data breach constituted negligence and a violation of the Privacy Act which caused "embarrassment, inconvenience, unfairness, mental distress and threat of current and future substantial harm from identity theft and other misuse of their personal information." Beck further alleged that the threat of identity theft caused him to monitor his account statements and purchase credit monitoring services. Beck also brought a claim for injunctive relief under the Administrate Procedure Act to require the VA to account for all the records in the possession of the Dorn VAMC and destroy any improperly maintained records.

The district court dismissed Beck's negligence claim at the pleading stage but allowed the Privacy Act and APA claims to go forward. After extensive discovery, the defendant again moved to dismiss and, in the alternative, filed for summary judgment. The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiffs' fear of harm from future identity theft was too speculative to confer standing because it was "contingent on a chain of attenuated hypothetical events and actions by third parties independent of defendants." It further rejected the plaintiffs' attempt to "create standing by choosing to purchase credit monitoring services or taking any other steps to mitigate the speculative harm of future identity theft" because these measures were taken solely "to mitigate a speculative future harm." The district court also ruled that, in the alternative, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment on the merits because the plaintiffs had not suffered any actual damages.

In July 2014, four boxes of pathology reports containing the identifying information of 2,000 patients, including names, social security numbers, and medical diagnoses, were misplaced or stolen. Dorn VAMC officials notified the affected individuals and offered them one year of free credit monitoring. Beverly Watson filed a putative class action complaint on behalf of the 2,000 patients alleging claims similar to those raised by Beck. The district court dismissed the complaint, holding that the plaintiff lacked Article III standing because she had not alleged "any actual or attempted misuse of her personal information," rendering her allegation that her information would eventually be misused as "speculative." It also rejected Watson's allegations that any costs incurred to fend off identity theft constituted an injury-in-fact. For the purposes of the appeal, the Fourth Circuit consolidated the Beck and Watson cases.

Fourth Circuit Decision Centers on Question of Hypothetical Future Harm, Circuits Split on Injury-In-Fact

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the decisions of both district courts, concluding that the plaintiffs had failed to establish a non-speculative, imminent injury-in-fact for purposes of Article III standing. Citing Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA, 133 S. Ct. 1138, 1147-48, 1151 (2013), the Fourth Circuit explained that "threatened injury must be certainly impending to constitute injury in fact," and a plaintiff may not "manufacture standing merely inflicting harm on themselves based on their fears of hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending." Beck, at 13, 14.

Turning to the allegations in the cases, the Fourth Circuit considered the plaintiffs' allegations of the increased risk of future identity theft. The court acknowledged that there was a circuit split concerning whether this risk constituted an injury-in-fact, with the Sixth, Seventh and Ninth Circuit recognizing that the plaintiffs could establish standing at the pleading stage based upon allegations of this threatened injury; while, the First and Third Circuits rejected such allegations as insufficient. However, the Fourth Circuit found that the Sixth, Seventh and Ninth Circuit decisions supported the dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims as "too speculative" because, in those decisions, the plaintiffs had alleged that the data thief had intentionally targeted the personal information compromised in the data breaches. See id., at 18. Indeed, in one of the decisions, a named plaintiff had alleged actual misuse or access of that personal information by the thief. See id. In contrast, the Beck and Watson plaintiffs, even after extensive discovery, had failed to uncover any evidence that their stolen information had been accessed or misused in any way. See id., at 19.

The Fourth Circuit then explained that, under Clapper, 133 S. Ct. at 1150 n.5, standing could also be established based on a showing that there was "substantial risk" that harm would occur, which would prompt a party to reasonably incur costs to mitigate or avoid that harm; but, the plaintiffs had fallen short of that standard. See id., at 21. Addressing the plaintiffs' allegation that 33% of health-related data breaches resulted in identity theft, the court noted that, even accepting those allegations as true, over 66% of veterans affected by the breaches in the present cases would suffer no harm. In addition, the Fourth Circuit declined to infer the existence of a substantial risk of harm of future identity theft from the Dorn VAMC's offer of credit monitoring for the affected individuals, holding that "[t]o adopt such a presumption would surely discourage organizations from offering these services to data-breach victims, lest their extension of goodwill render them subject to suit." Id., at 22.

Next, the Fourth Circuit addressed the allegation that the plaintiffs suffered an injury-in-fact because they incurred or would incur the cost of measures to guard against identity theft. The court rejected these allegations as costs the plaintiffs incurred "in response to a speculative threat" and held that "these self-imposed harms cannot confer standing." Id., at 23.

Finally, the Fourth Circuit examined the plaintiff's allegations under the APA that Dorn VAMC's "inadequate actions or inactions [would] repeatedly harm every veteran" and Dorn VAMC would never comply with the Privacy Act without court action. Although it found that the plaintiffs' data breaches allegations were "disconcerting," the court nonetheless held that the plaintiffs lacked standing to seek injunctive relief because "[t]he most that can be reasonably inferred from the plaintiffs' allegations regarding the likelihood of another data breach at Dorn VAMC is that the plaintiffs could be victimized by a future data breach," and such allegations were simply "not enough." Id., at 25.

Takeaways: Beck Raises the Bar for Establishing Standing in Data Breach Cases

Beck represents a significant departure from the recent trend of appellate decisions concerning standing in data breach cases. The Sixth Circuit in Galaria and the Seventh Circuit in Neiman Marcus and P.F. Chang's found that plaintiffs could plead an injury-in-fact sufficient to confer Article III standing by alleging that their personal information was stolen and they faced an increased risk of identity theft and had incurred mitigation costs in response to that risk. The Sixth and Seventh Circuits also found that a company's offer to provide free credit monitoring and identity theft protection to its customers following a data breach established that the company recognized that the risk of future harm from the breach was substantial.

Beck raises the bar (at least in the Fourth Circuit) for what plaintiffs needed to allege and show to establish standing in the data breach context. Plaintiffs cannot rely on any mitigation costs they might incur to supplement their allegations of "speculative" harm and manufacture standing. Nor can they rely on a company's offer of free credit monitoring after a breach to demonstrate a substantial risk of harm. Instead, plaintiffs must now allege and show that their personal information was intentionally targeted for theft in a data breach as evidenced by the misuse or accessing of that information by the data thieves. Beck further exacerbates a division among the circuit courts concerning whether the increased risk of identity theft coupled only with the plaintiffs' mitigation costs following a data breach are sufficient to confer Article III standing. This division may be not resolved unless and until the Supreme Court decides to weigh in on the issue.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
22 Aug 2018, Speaking Engagement, Koln, Germany

The panel discusses recent European legal developments around what you can and cannot put in your game – from the design of in-app purchases and rewarded ads to current age-rating trends and the ubiquitous loot box.

23 Aug 2018, Other, Washington, DC, United States

In August, NELI will present the nation's foremost annual public sector training surveying EEO and employment law developments impacting federal, state and local government employment, examining the effect of these developments on current practices, and providing practical advice to ensure compliance in the areas listed below:

5 Sep 2018, Other, Chicago, United States

As the world’s economies grow increasingly integrated through trade, acquisitions and joint ventures, U.S. international tax laws impact a greater percentage of businesses and transactions.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions