United States: Online Sellers Beware: Plaintiffs' Lawyers Use Old New Jersey Law To Unleash Flurry Of Class Action Claims Against Website Terms Of Use

February 15, 2017 - In 2016, plaintiffs' lawyers representing consumers used a 35-year-old, pre-worldwide-web statute as the basis for putative class action lawsuits against online sellers of a variety of products and services alleging that provisions of their websites' Terms of Use ("TOU") violated New Jersey's Truth-In-Consumer Contract, Warranty & Notice Act ("TCCWNA" or the "Act"). Arguing that the statutory civil penalty of $100.00 for violations applies to each consumer who visited the defendants' websites, plaintiffs' lawyers seek millions of dollars in damages, plus attorney's fees and court costs.

The TCCWNA was enacted in 1981 to prevent deceptive practices in consumer contracts by prohibiting the use of illegal terms or warranties. The Act contains two sections that prohibit certain provisions in consumer contracts and other covered writings. The first of these sections — Section 15 — prohibits the use of provisions in any written consumer contract or written consumer warranty, notice or sign that "violates any clearly established legal right of a consumer or responsibility of a seller . . . as established by State or Federal law . . . ." N.J. STAT. ANN. § 56:12-15 (West). The prohibited conduct applies to any "seller, lessor, creditor, lender or bailee," and, therefore, potentially applies to a wide range of industries that deal with a "consumer," such as retailers, banks, hotel chains, car rental companies, etc. Id. "Consumer" is defined in the Act and "means any individual who buys, leases, borrows, or bails any money, property or service which is primarily for personal, family or household purposes." Id. Section 16 prohibits any consumer contract, warranty, notice or sign from containing any provision by which the consumer waives his rights under the Act, and prohibits any consumer contract, notice or sign from stating that any of its provisions "is or may be void, unenforceable or inapplicable in some jurisdictions without specifying which provisions are or are not void, unenforceable or inapplicable within the State of New Jersey . . . ." § 56:12-16. For violations of the Act, an "aggrieved consumer" can recover a civil penalty of $100.00 or actual damages, or both, together with reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. § 56:12--17.

Last year, over twenty such lawsuits were filed in or removed to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alone. In nearly all of these cases, motions to dismiss have been filed. Defendants have won motions decided thus far, but many remain undecided, and decisions are not expected until the latter half of the year. The reason: Decisions in many of the remaining cases have been stayed by court order or joint stipulation pending a decision from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Russell v. Croscill Home, L.L.C., No. 16-03939 (3d Cir. filed Oct. 25, 2016). Some of the stays also reference two other appeals pending in the Third Circuit — Wenger v. Bob's Discount Furniture L.L.C., No. 16-01572 (3d Cir. filed Mar. 17, 2016) and Spade v. Select Comfort Corp., No. 16-01558 (3d Cir. filed Mar. 17, 2016).

Here is a summary of what's at stake in the pending appeals, what online sellers of products and services can expect in 2017, and what they should consider doing to avoid being named a defendant in one of these class action lawsuits.

Russell v. Croscill Home

At issue in Russell is whether the plaintiff meets the injury-in-fact requirement of Article III standing under the United States Supreme Court's decision in Spokeo v. Robins, 136 S.Ct. 1540 (2016), and whether the plaintiff is an "aggrieved consumer" under the TCCWNA.

In Russell, the plaintiff ordered a tea-light holder through the defendant's website. According to plaintiff's complaint, the website's TOU violated the TCCWNA by including allegedly illegal exculpatory provisions and limiting various remedies. Plaintiff alleged that these provisions violated Section 15 of the Act. As noted by the district court, the complaint lacked any allegations that the product was defective, or that any of the provisions of the TOU were invoked by defendant, or that plaintiff even read the TOU, or was in any way injured. Transcript of Opinion at 4, Russell v. Croscill Home, L.L.C., No. 16-1190 (PGS) (D.N.J. Oct. 11, 2016). However, plaintiff claimed he and each member of the proposed class were entitled to the statutory civil penalty afforded to an "aggrieved consumer."

In granting defendant's motion to dismiss, the district court focused on whether plaintiff met the injury-in-fact requirement of standing under Article III of the Constitution and whether plaintiff is an "aggrieved consumer" under the TCCWNA. Id. at 6. On the issue of standing, the district court cited to the Supreme Court's recent decision in Spokeo and held that plaintiff did not meet the injury-in-fact requirement as the plaintiff had sustained no concrete injury. Id. at 8. Relying on Spokeo, the district court held that a "[c]oncrete injury must be de facto, that is, it must actually exist" and "a plaintiff [does not] automatically satisf[y] the injury-in-fact requirement whenever a statute grants a person a statutory right." Id. (quoting Spokeo, 136 S.Ct. at 1548-49).

Based on similar reasoning, the district court also held that plaintiff was not an "aggrieved consumer" under the TCCWNA. Adopting the definition of "aggrieved party" in Black's Law Dictionary as "one entitled to a remedy, especially a party who's [sic] personal, pecuniary or property rights have been adversely affected by another person's action," the district court held that plaintiff was not an "aggrieved consumer" because he had not alleged any losses stemming from the terms and conditions of the defendant's website. Id. at 9.

Briefing on plaintiff's appeal to the Third Circuit is scheduled to be completed by the end of March, and a decision should be rendered sometime in the second half of 2017. Incidentally, an appeal of a dismissal of a TCCWNA claim on Spokeo grounds is also pending in the Ninth Circuit, with briefing scheduled to be completed in April. See Candelario v. Rip Curl, Inc., No. 16-56382 (9th Cir. Sept. 22, 2016).

Wenger v. Bob's Discount Furniture L.L.C. and Spade v. Select Comfort Corp.

Neither of these cases involves an online TOU. However, each case may provide clarification of the term "aggrieved consumer" and what constitutes a violation of a "clearly established legal right of a consumer or responsibility of a seller . . . ." See §§ 56:12-17, 56:12-15.

In Wenger and Spade, plaintiffs brought claims for statutory damages under the TCCWNA predicated on alleged violations of New Jersey's Delivery of Household Furniture and Furnishings Regulations ("Furniture Delivery Regulations"), N.J. ADMIN. CODE § 13:45A-5.1 (2012) et seq. The Furniture Delivery Regulations include rules about timely furniture delivery and language that must be included in a furniture sales contact. In both cases, the furniture was timely delivered but the contracts allegedly did not fully comply with the regulations. The district court ruled in both cases that plaintiffs failed to allege a cause of action under the TCCWNA because they were not "aggrieved." Transcript of Opinion at 15, Wenger v. Bob's Discount Furniture, L.L.C., No. 14-7707 (PGS) and Spade v. Select Comfort Corp., No. 15-1826 (PGS) (D.N.J. Feb. 29, 2016). The district court reasoned that "both defendants provided delivery dates and timely delivered the merchandise, and in Spade, the plaintiff received a refund for defective furniture;" therefore, the defendants' actions were in accordance with the spirit of the Furniture Delivery Regulations, even if they may not have met the written requirements. Id.

On appeal, the Third Circuit, in turn, has in each case certified two questions to the New Jersey Supreme Court: "(1) Is a consumer who receives a contract that does not comply with the Furniture Delivery Regulations, but has not suffered any adverse consequences from the noncompliance, an 'aggrieved consumer' under the TCCWNA? (2) Does a violation of the Furniture Delivery Regulations alone constitute a violation of a clearly established right or responsibility of the seller under the TCCWNA and thus provide a basis for relief under the TCCWNA?" Petition for Certification of Question of State Law at 5, Spade v. Select Comfort Corp., No. 16-1558 (3d Cir. Nov. 18, 2016); Petition for Certification of Question of State Law at 5, Wenger v. Bob's Discount Furniture, L.L.C., No. 16-1572 (3d Cir. Nov. 18, 2016). The New Jersey Supreme Court has not yet decided whether to accept the certified questions. But, answers to these questions by either the New Jersey Supreme Court or the Third Circuit have the potential to inform the decision on appeal in Russell and the other cases stayed in the District of New Jersey.


If the Third Circuit affirms in Russell, Wenger and Spade, some plaintiffs in the stayed cases with pending motions may abandon their claims. Other plaintiffs, on the other hand, may try to amend their complaints to meet whatever the Third Circuit may say is required to withstand a motion to dismiss based on the pleadings.

If the Third Circuit rules in favor of the plaintiffs on the questions of Article III standing and "aggrieved consumer," viable defenses remain to defeat these claims. The district court will have to consider other arguments raised in these motions that are not the subject of the pending appeals, including whether the TOU provisions at issue violate a "clearly established legal right of a consumer or responsibility of a seller" or, in cases alleging a Section 16 violation, whether the TOU contains a prohibited geographic qualifier, or whether a TOU that contains a choice-of-law provision that requires application of the law of a state other than New Jersey bars application of the TCCWNA. See, e.g., Palomino v. Facebook, Inc., No. 16-cv-04230-HSG, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2971 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2017) (granting motion to dismiss TCCWNA claim on the ground that California choice-of-law clause in Facebook's online TOU was enforceable).

Even if the pending cases can overcome motions to dismiss, the question remains as to whether these cases are appropriate for class certification. That question may be informed by two more cases pending before the New Jersey Supreme Court — Dugan v. TGI Friday's, Inc., No. 077567 (N.J. Sup. Ct. July 26, 2016) and Bozzi v. OSI Restaurant Partners, L.L.C., No. 077556 (N.J. Sup. Ct. July 26, 2016). In both cases, the court will decide whether class certification is appropriate where plaintiffs allege that defendant violated the Consumer Fraud Act and the TCCWNA by failing to include drink prices on its menu.

Online sellers can expect fewer new case filings than in 2016 until the Third Circuit decides the appeals in Russell, Wenger, and Spade. If you are an online seller who has not yet been sued, you may want to consider reviewing and revising your website's TOU now to strengthen your defenses and minimize your risk of being a defendant in a class action lawsuit before new case filings potentially resume in earnest in the second half of the year.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions