We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
2017 promises to be an exciting year for copyright law. Here are
some of the most cutting-edge cases to keep on your radar.
Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.,
No. 17-1202 (Fed. Cir.), could have a major impact on the future of
software development and interoperability. In 2010, Oracle sued
Google for using application programming interfaces from
Oracle's Java code in Google's Android platform. Google
argued that the APIs were not entitled to copyright protection. In
2014, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit disagreed,
holding that Google's use infringed Oracle's copyrights in
the APIs. But last May, a jury in a trial on remand held that
Google's use of the APIs was protected by fair use—a
defense to copyright infringement. The case is now headed back to
the Federal Circuit, where the court will decide whether there was
sufficient evidence to support the finding of fair use.
Capitol Records, LLC v. Vimeo, LLC,
No. 16-771 (U.S.), could change how the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act shields technology companies from infringement
liability for user-uploaded content. In 2009, several music
publishing and record companies sued Vimeo, the online
video-sharing platform, for copyright infringement over
user-uploaded videos that allegedly contained sound recordings
owned by the plaintiffs. Many of those sound recordings were
recorded before 1972 and, thus, not entitled to federal copyright
protection. Last June, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit held that the DMCA—federal law—shields
DMCA-compliant internet service providers from state law copyright
claims regarding pre-1972 sound recordings. The U.S. Supreme Court
has not yet decided whether it will hear the music companies'
appeal.
Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., No.
16-217 (U.S.) (a.k.a. the "Dancing Baby Case"),could
raise the bar for rights holders who send DMCA takedown notices to
internet service providers. In 2007, Stephanie Lenz uploaded a
29-second video of her baby dancing to Prince's "Let's
Go Crazy." Universal sent a DMCA takedown notice to YouTube,
and the video was removed. After sending two counter-notices
claiming fair use and getting her video reposted, Lenz sued
Universal for misrepresenting to YouTube that her video was
infringing. In 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
Circuit held that copyright owners had to subjectively believe a
use was infringing before sending a DMCA takedown notice.
Lenz's pending appeal to the Supreme Court goes one step
further, arguing that a copyright holder needs an
objectively reasonable belief that a use is infringing
before it can send a DMCA takedown notice. The Supreme Court has
not yet decided whether it will hear the appeal.
Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands,
Inc., No. 15-866 (U.S.), could alter the copyright
protections afforded to fashion designs. Varsity Brands, one of the
country's largest suppliers of cheerleading equipment, sued
rival Star Athletica for copying its uniform designs. Courts have
long considered apparel a "useful article" too
utilitarian in nature to warrant copyright protection. Varsity
Brands, however, argues that the decorative elements of its
uniforms are conceptually separable from the underlying garments,
making those elements eligible for copyright protection. The case
is currently pending before the Supreme Court. If the justices
agree with Varsity Brands' interpretation of the conceptual
separability doctrine, the decision could have far-reaching
implications for the use and display of certain fashion designs in
other media, such as movies or video games.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
This one-day forum will focus on the disruptive changes occurring in the automobile industry as autonomous vehicles become a reality. Attendees will hear from some of the top in-house and law firm automobile lawyers discussing litigation, IP, insurance, and transactional issues
17 Sep 2019, Speaking Engagement, California, United States
We are highlighting the importance of having a buttoned-up IP strategy and portfolio in two back-to-back panels. The first panel will be led by Fenwick’s David Hayes, one of the top IP attorneys in the US, along with noted IP strategist Shmuel Silverman of Multi-Innovation.
The second panel will be led by Stephen Kuhn of Advantary, Bryan Lawrence of KPMG’s valuation practice, and corporate & strategic buyers to discuss IP from the hard, practical real-world perspective – transaction value.
2 Dec 2019, Speaking Engagement, San Francisco, United States
With the revenue and lease standards in the rear-view mirror but CECL still to be adopted, it is as important as ever to keep up with new and evolving accounting standards and regulations especially given the SEC’s Disclosure Modernization and Simplification initiatives.
The Annual Forum will provide key insights and updates from regulators, industry and topic experts. Attendees will learn about the standard-setting agenda of the FASB as well as updates on rulemaking, interpretive guidance, frequent comments, and enforcement actions emanating from the SEC. In addition, we have a panel on ethical challenges which qualifies for ethics credit for CPE purposes.
In its recently issued opinion in Automotive Body Parts Association v. Ford Global Technologies, LLC, the Federal Circuit reaffirms the importance of design patents and their value in an overall patent portfolio strategy for automotive manufacturers and others who may be threatened by aftermarket sales of replacement parts.
"Licensee Estoppel" is a judge-made doctrine based on the idea that a licensee should not be able to attack the licensor's rights while benefitting from the license. But the doctrine has not been applied to all IP licenses even when a contract clause prohibits a licensee challenge.
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Copyright Law Strikes A New Chord In The Music Industry (Video)
