United States: The National Industrial Security Program Directive: Some Hits, Some Runs, Some Errors

Our Comments On The Proposed Rule

Our Comments On The Proposed Rule

On January 11, 2017, the Information Security Oversight Office ("ISOO") of the National Archives and Records Administration published a proposed rule amending the National Industrial Security Program ("NISP") Directive Number 1 ("Proposed Rule"), including provisions on Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence ("FOCI") mitigation and negation. The Proposed Rule provides guidance to Federal agencies, but will have significant, if indirect, impact on foreign- controlled government contractors.

Having advised on hundreds of FOCI negation and mitigation cases over nearly 40 years, we understand how these programs work – and don't work. We decided, therefore, to file comments on the Proposed Rule. This Stroock Special Bulletin highlights some of the key issues in the comments we have filed.

A Single Cognizant Security Agency is a Good Thing

The Proposed Rule states that "the goal [of the NISP] is to have one responsible CSA [Cognizant Security Agency] for each agency and for each entity, to minimize the burdens that can result from complying with differing CSA procedures and requirements."

We agree. As a matter of administrative convenience, efficiency, and good order, limiting the oversight of a cleared entity to a single CSA is extremely important, and avoids the confusion that would follow if entities were answerable to multiple and disparate agencies. Departures from this rule should require an extraordinary showing of necessity.

No Carve-outs

The Proposed Rule, like the Executive Order on which it is based, makes clear that it does not supersede the authority of agencies to control classified information under a series of identified statutes and executive orders. Because the Proposed Rule is intended to harmonize agency policies, we believe it is prudent to make clear that this provision is not intended to operate as a "carve-out" for the identified agencies.

We've recommended that the Proposed Rule be amended to make clear that, although it does not supersede or supplant the authority of the identified agencies, this is only true in so far as the Proposed Rule conflicts with these statutes and orders, and that, to the extent possible, all agencies and departments should endeavor to facilitate Part 2004's goals: to encourage reciprocity, avoid duplication, and generally foster a uniform approach to industrial security across all government agencies.

Clarity is Needed Regarding Limitations on Entity Eligibility Determinations

The Proposed Rule would allow CSAs to complete eligibility determinations when a CSA cannot make an eligibility determination in time to qualify an entity for the procurement action that gave rise to the Government Contracting Activity's ("GCA") request. This is a good idea, in our view, and presumably would allow facility security clearance determinations to be banked and later activated without a new eligibility determination process, avoiding additional time, effort, and money to restart the process.

Assuming this reading of the Proposed Rule is correct, we've asked ISOO to make clear any intended limitations on favorable eligibility determinations, such as time limits on the eligibility determination (i.e., where no classified procurement is awarded to the entity), and

whether an eligibility determination requested by one GCA will be valid if a different GCA is first to provide a new classified contract award to the entity after the eligibility determination. These questions are certain to arise, and should be addressed in the final rule.

Criteria for Limited Entity Eligibility Determinations are Unclear

"Limited eligibility determinations" (a/k/a Limited Facility Security Clearances) have long been available to companies that are unable or unwilling to mitigate or negate FOCI. The Proposed Rule, however, would authorize limited entity eligibility determinations generally – i.e., for cases that do not involve FOCI mitigation or negation.

What's not clear is when agencies are expected or allowed to opt for limited determinations. The Proposed Rule implies that limited eligibility determinations should be subject to the same requirements as eligibility determinations generally. We've asked ISOO to provide examples where they believe such limited eligibility determinations are appropriate. This appears to be a new authority, and agencies will need guidance on how to use it.

Make Sure FOCI Mitigation and Negation Plans Do Not Interfere with the Ability of Any Entities (including Parents and Affiliates) to Comply with Applicable Laws

The Proposed Rule states that "[a]ny mitigation or negation measures the CSA approves for an entity must not impede or interfere with the entity's ability to manage and comply with regulatory requirements imposed by other Federal agencies (such as Department of State's International Traffic in Arms Regulation)." This addresses an important concern, but under the Proposed Rule, the term "entity" refers only to the entity being processed for an eligibility determination (facility clearance). We believe it also is important that the FOCI mitigation or negation plan not interfere with the ability of the parent company or affiliates to comply with regulatory requirements imposed by law.

For example, the statutory obligation of publicly-traded companies to maintain internal controls makes no exception for companies operating under FOCI mitigation or negation plans. Moreover, whether publicly traded or not, under U.S. and foreign laws, corporate entities will be held responsible for the transgressions of their subsidiaries, and thus must ensure compliance not only with anti-corruption laws but also, by way of example, equal opportunity employment laws, whistleblower protection, environmental laws and regulations, and like matters.

In our experience, well-managed companies under FOCI mitigation and negation plans comply with organization-wide policies intended to ensure compliance with law, under the oversight of the cleared company's board-level Government Security Committee, and subject at all times to the obligation of the uncleared parent and affiliates to avoid actions that would adversely affect the performance of classified contracts or compromise the integrity of classified and controlled unclassified information.

The NISP should recognize, therefore, that mitigation or negation measures not only should not impede or interfere with the cleared entity's "ability to manage and comply with regulatory requirements imposed by other Federal agencies" but also should not impede or interfere with the ability of the entity's parents and affiliates to comply with applicable laws.

In this respect, we have also recommended that the Proposed Rule extend the same treatment (subject to the same limitations) to state and local regulatory requirements as would be accorded Federal regulatory requirements. Further, all U.S. companies, including but not limited to foreign- controlled companies, may have compliance obligations under applicable foreign laws, e.g., the UK Bribery Act 2010, which subjects commercial entities (including U.S. companies doing business in the U.K.) to sanctions for failure to prevent bribery unless they have "adequate procedures" in place to prevent such offenses.

In sum, FOCI mitigation or negation agreements should not interfere with the ability of any parties to comply with applicable law, so long as compliance would not violate U.S. law or result in unauthorized access to classified information or compromise the performance of classified contracts.

Ownership does not Necessarily Require Tougher Measures

The Proposed Rule states that "[m]itigation or negation options are different for ownership versus control or influence." We agree. But the Proposed Rule goes on to make the erroneous claim that "ownership necessitates a stronger mitigation or negation measure." [Emphasis added.] Although it is generally true that ownership encompasses control and warrants a stronger mitigation measure than "control or influence" without ownership, it is not necessarily true. For example, a foreign person may have the contractual and unilateral right to appoint senior management of a joint venture under a teaming arrangement in which they supply personnel and technology but have no ownership in the joint venture.

Since the determination respecting a mitigation or negation measure in all cases will be fact specific, we have recommended that ISOO strike the phrase "ownership necessitates a stronger mitigation or negation measure."

Voting Trust Agreements and Proxy Agreements are Not "Substantially Identical"

The Proposed Rule states that Voting Trust Agreements ("VTA") and Proxy Agreements ("PA") are "substantially identical arrangements[.]" [Emphasis added.] This is true only in the sense that both act as FOCI negation plans; not as a matter of law. The Proposed Rule acknowledges this in the sentences immediately following the quoted language: "Under the VTA, the foreign owner transfers legal title in the entity ... Under the PA, the foreign owner conveys their voting rights...." There is a significant difference between transferring legal title to an entity and transferring voting rights, which is likely why the VTA is almost never used.

We have recommended that Section 2004.34(f)(6)(iv) be amended by striking the words "substantially identical."

CSAs Should have the Authority to Waive Prior Involvement by Candidates for Trustee, Proxy Holder, and Outside Director Positions

The Proposed Rule states, without limitation, that candidates for trustee, proxy holder, and outside director positions must be "completely disinterested individuals with no prior involvement with the entity, the entities with which it is affiliated, or the foreign owner...." This language conflicts with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual ("NISPOM"), which states that candidates must be completely disinterested "[e]xcept as approved by the CSA in advance and in writing...." No waiver authority is included in this provision of the Proposed Rule.

The failure to include waiver authority here may be inadvertent. It is certainly ill-advised. Candidates for trustee, proxy holder, and outside director positions may have had a prior involvement with the entity that, viewed objectively, should not be disqualifying. Such determinations are fact specific. The NISPOM wisely allows the CSA to waive the prohibition (in advance and in writing). We recommended adding waiver authority.

The National Interest Determination ("NID") Process Needs Repair

The release of a revised NISP Directive provides an opportunity to correct the NID problem, which has continued to plague a large number of entities that are cleared through Special Security Agreements ("SSA"). Despite incremental improvements over time, the process remains long, opaque, and an unfair competitive disadvantage for companies operating under SSAs, to the detriment of competition and U.S. national security.

We have therefore proposed that ISOO establish criteria to provide a "presumption of NID approval" under specific circumstances. These criteria, among other things, would almost assuredly require a strong record of NISP and SSA compliance. In such cases, it is fair to presume that proscribed information can be entrusted to the entity at very low risk. Requiring all companies to go through the lengthy NID process – even when success is virtually guaranteed – is an unnecessary impediment. Establishing standards for a presumptive NID would facilitate competition and free government resources to focus on entities that do not have a lengthy history of successful compliance with the NISPOM and other U.S. laws and regulations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions