United States: Lee v. Tam: Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments On Lanham Act Section 2(A) Prohibition Of Registration Of Disparaging Marks

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Lee v. Tam to examine the constitutionality of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(a). Section 2(a) prevents the registration of a mark that “consists or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt or disrepute….”  (emphasis added).1


In 2011, Simon Shiao Tam, of an Asian-American dance-rock band called “The Slants,” applied to register THE SLANTS with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) for “entertainment in the nature of live performances by a musical band” based on his use of the mark since 2006. The examining attorney denied registration on the ground that the mark is disparaging toward Asian Americans. Mr. Tam appealed to the PTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”), which affirmed the denial.

Mr. Tam then appealed to the Federal Circuit, and a panel of the Federal Circuit likewise affirmed the denial. However, the Federal Circuit, sua sponte, ordered a rehearing en banc. The Federal Circuit subsequently reversed the panel decision and held that:

“[i]t is beyond dispute that § 2(a) discriminates on the basis of content in the sense that it applies to particular speech because of the topic discussed. Section 2(a) prevents the registration of disparaging marks—it cannot reasonably be argued that this is not a content-based restriction or that it is a content-neutral regulation of speech.“2

The en banc court further held Section 2(a) to be viewpoint discrimination, as it discriminates based on the message expressed by the mark.3 The court noted that the purposes of the Lanham Act are to protect consumers from confusion and to ensure that markholders can protect investments in their marks. The court observed that some restrictions in the Lanham Act serve these purposes, for example, by prohibiting registration of marks that are deceptive or misleading. The court explained that, in contrast, the anti-disparagement provision of Section 2(a) focuses on the expressive nature of the content and does not further the Lanham Act’s purposes.4

The Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard oral argument on January 18, 2017.  

Brief Summary of Oral Argument

Presented below is a brief summary of the argument. The PTO argued that Section 2(a)’s disparagement provision is a reasonable limit on access to its trademark registration program and not a restriction on speech in violation of the First Amendment. The PTO explained that its refusal to register the mark “did not limit Respondent's ability to use the mark in commerce, or otherwise to engage in expression or debate on any subject he wishes.”

Several justices focused on the purpose of a trademark and what is appropriate to serve that purpose. The PTO agreed that a trademark serves as a source identifier, but also did not deny that trademarks may have expressive purposes as well. Some comments from the Court suggested agreement that language traditionally not afforded First Amendment protection, such as statements subject to claims for libel or slander, could be refused registration as a trademark. However, when pressed on how Section 2(a) furthered the goal of identifying source, the PTO answered that Section 2(a) prevents words that would distract the consumer from identifying what was the source of the product. Justice Breyer, in response, noted that many registered trademarks contain distracting language.

The Justices raised several other points with the PTO. For example, after discussion of the fact that the PTO allows registration of marks that contain “complimentary” language, the PTO was asked why allowing such language but denying disparaging language was not viewpoint discrimination, which is prohibited for government programs. The PTO also was asked whether the language of Section 2(a) is vague, since it would be possible for trademark examining attorneys to disagree as to what constituted a disparaging mark.

During Mr. Tam’s argument, some Justices pointed out that even if a mark is refused registration as disparaging, it may still be used as a trademark and the mark owner can assert common law trademark rights under Lanham Act Section 43(a). Mr. Tam’s attorney was asked whether his client was significantly injured by denial of registration, as he “can still sue… [and] still compete” based on his common law rights. Mr. Tam’s attorney responded that registration of trademarks is a government program that provides several advantages to trademark owners, and that denial of these advantages to markholders based on the viewpoint expressed in the mark is a significant burden on free speech.

Some Justices asked whether the registration of trademarks amounts to government speech. Mr. Tam’s attorney answered that registration is not government speech because the register simply serves as a recordation, and the mark’s message, creation, and design is, at all times, in the complete control of the applicant.

When asked to comment on the proposition that denying registration for disparaging trademarks serves the source-identifying purpose of the trademark system because such marks distract from that function, Mr. Tam’s attorney responded that the disparaging qualities of such marks do not in any way detract from the source-identifying function of the marks.

The Court’s decision in this case could have a significant effect on the kinds of trademarks that may be registered. We will provide a further alert after the Court decides the case.


1 This is not the first time in the recent past that Section 2(a) has been in the spotlight. In 2014, in Blackhorse v. Pro-Football Inc., 2014 TTAB LEXIS 231, 111 USPQ2d (BNA) 1080 (Trademark Trial & App. Bd. June 18, 2014), the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) decided that registered trademarks consisting in whole or in part of the term REDSKINS for professional football-related services were registered in violation of Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, because they were disparaging to Native Americans at the time they were registered. Accordingly, the TTAB ordered the cancellation of the registrations. The Eastern District of Virginia affirmed the TTAB’s decision. The district court noted that the marks may still be used in commerce even though the registrations have been cancelled. The Blackhorse case is on appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

2 In re Tam, 808 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2015)(internal quotations omitted)

3 Id. at 1336-37.

4 Id. at 1329-30.

This article is intended to provide information of general interest to the public and is not intended to offer legal advice about specific situations or problems. Brinks Gilson & Lione does not intend to create an attorney-client relationship by offering this information and review of the information shall not be deemed to create such a relationship. You should consult a lawyer if you have a legal matter requiring attention. For further information, please contact a Brinks Gilson & Lione lawyer.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions