United States: Final IP And International Guidelines

January 25, 2017 - On January 13, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") and the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") issued new editions of their Antitrust Guidelines for Licensing of Intellectual Property ("IP Guidelines") and Antitrust Guidelines for International Enforcement and Cooperation ("International Guidelines"). A draft of the updated IP Guidelines had been released for public comment on August 12, 2016, and the updated International Guidelines were likewise circulated for public comment on November 1, 2016. Both sets of Guidelines were first published in 1995, and had not been updated since.

Neither new set of Guidelines reflects a major change from the Agencies' approach to antitrust enforcement in recent years, or even from the 1995 Guidelines. Instead, they largely conform to the earlier guidelines to statutory and case law development since that time, and tackle the growing importance of international cooperation.

It remains to be seen if President Trump's as-yet-unnamed appointees at the DOJ and FTC treat these as useful updates of consensus, mainstream antitrust policy that they will follow, or if they will repudiate them.

IP Guidelines

The IP Guidelines provide updates on significant pieces of case law and terminology.1 Specifically, the IP Guidelines are updated to reflect a number of Supreme Court decisions since they were first published in 1995, notably Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.2 (confirming that a patent does not necessarily confer market power), Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.3 (holding that minimum resale price maintenance agreements are not per se illegal), and Kimble v. Marvel Entertainments, LLC4 (confirming that post-expiry patent royalty license provisions are unenforceable). The new IP Guidelines also use new terminology, such as "Research and Development Market" instead of "innovation market." Notably, however, the IP Guidelines stay away from certain controversial topics that have been a focus of enforcement agency guidelines outside of the U.S. For example, the Japanese, Korean, Canadian, and Chinese guidelines all express views on standard essential patents, but the new IP Guidelines do not discuss them. Similarly, the IP Guidelines do not provide the Agencies' views on patent assertion entities/non-practicing entities (more commonly known as "patent trolls").

The IP Guidelines as finalized last week contain a small number of edits following the public comments received from "academics, private industries, law associations, and non-profit organizations."5 Perhaps most notable were the comments submitted by the Global Antitrust Institute of George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School ("GAI"), which were drafted by -- among others -- Joshua Wright, who leads the new President's antitrust transition team.6

The GAI comments were generally strongly supportive of the IP Guidelines. However, those comments did suggest six specific improvements to the draft, but none of them saw their way into the IP Guidelines as finally issued on January 13. These suggestions were: (1) clarify the sections on refusals to license to show that the antitrust laws only impose liability on firms for refusals to license in specific circumstances, in line with the FTC's 2007 Antitrust-IP Report7 ; (2) replace the phrase "unreasonable conduct" with a clear statement of an effects-based approach when discussing intellectual property and market power 8; (3) limit the inclusion or use of "research and development markets" as an analytic tool; (4) explicitly state that abandoning the rule of reason analysis when evaluating licensing restraints is only permissible in certain limited circumstances; (5) remove references to a policy-focused 2011 IP Report by the FTC 9; and (6) edit a supposed misinterpretation of Broadcom v. Qualcomm.10 If Prof. Wright transitions into leadership of the Antitrust Division at DOJ or the FTC, some of these suggestions may be reflected changes in agency policy or further revisions of the IP Guidelines.

The edits that were made to the proposed IP Guidelines following the public comments add clarifications in several places. The IP Guidelines also added additional case law and clarifications. Most significantly, the IP Guidelines clarified the type and extent of evidence needed to show that a firm would be a potential competitor in the absence of a license agreement. The Agencies cite two decisions to show when a potential competitor could run afoul of antitrust law: the Supreme Court's holding in FTC v. Actavis11 and the D.C. Circuit's decision in United States v. Microsoft Corp12. The IP Guidelines also added a citation to a notable 2015 Second Circuit decision, United States v. Apple, Inc.,13 to support the proposition that agreements constituting a horizontal cartel will be considered per se illegal even where there is a vertical dimension to the agreement.

International Guidelines

Much like the IP Guidelines, the International Guidelines do not reflect any significant breaks in enforcement policy, but instead contain updates from recent case law, and also recognize the much greater importance in recent years of the Agencies' cooperation with foreign antitrust authorities. In particular, the International Guidelines were revised to reflect Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ("FTAIA") case law developments in a substantially rewritten Chapter 3, which discusses when foreign commerce is subject to the Agencies' antitrust enforcement. The updated Guidelines provide a more complete analysis of the Agencies' interpretation of the "effects test," which extends the U.S. antitrust laws to non-import foreign commerce where there is "a direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable" impact on U.S. foreign or domestic commerce, based on the case law applying that test. The updated Guidelines take the position that a price-fixing agreement between two foreign manufacturers of a component that they sell to another foreign company for integration into products to be sold into the United States may be subject to the U.S. antitrust laws if it can be shown to be the proximate cause of a substantial and foreseeable increase in the price of the finished goods sold into the United States. The revised International Guidelines also include an entirely new chapter providing a more detailed description of the mechanisms of international enforcement coordination between the Agencies and foreign authorities.

The International Guidelines as finally issued clarify several important points from the November draft. The Agencies received public comment from eight individuals and organizations, including the Antitrust Committee of the International Bar Association ("IBA"), the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the American Bar Association ("ABA") Antitrust and International Law sections.

The final International Guidelines appear to have taken some of these comments onboard. Specifically, the Agencies provide further clarification on their application of U.S. antitrust law to conduct involving foreign commerce, though they do not go as far as the comments urge. The final International Guidelines also acknowledge the Seventh Circuit's 2014 decision in Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp.,14 as urged by the ABA, though the Agencies did not add an in-depth discussion. The final International Guidelines further revise an example on component products to list more factual considerations and confirm that the Agencies would first analyze if the price-fixing of the component had an effect on U.S. import commerce, and then further analyze the evidence "to determine: (1) whether the price fixing was the proximate cause of that effect, (2) whether the effect was substantial, and (3) whether that effect was a result of the price fixing that was foreseeable to a reasonable person making practical business judgments."15 The Agencies rely on United States v. Hsiung,16 a Ninth Circuit decision that analyzes the "effects test."

The International Guidelines as now issued also strengthen the proposed language on the growing importance of international cooperation in antitrust enforcement, though the Agencies could have gone further in stating their intentions to cooperate. For example, the Agencies added citations to publications by the International Competition Network ("ICN") and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ("OECD") to the Introduction, pointing to the many benefits this type of guidance provides. The International Guidelines also clarify how the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which protects companies from antitrust liability for concerted conduct aimed at securing governmental action that restrains trade would be applied, by analogy, to petitioning for foreign governmental action.

Notably, the International Guidelines do not clarify the Agencies' position on the open question of whether the FTAIA should be regarded as a jurisdictional or substantive limit on antitrust claims. The ABA argued that the Agencies should take a firm stand that the FTAIA is a jurisdictional bar, pointing to evidence that this is more in line with Congressional intent and the fact that it lowers the litigation burdens on defendants.17 Most recent court decisions on this issue, however, go the other way, which is perhaps why the Agencies chose not to take a position. The International Guidelines also do not acknowledge the Second Circuit's 2016 In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation18 decision in clarifying the Agencies' view of comity principles, despite being urged to do so by both the IBA and the ABA.


1 For an in-depth look at the case law changes, please see the Hughes Hubbard News Alert by Michael Salzman and Hannah Miller from September 2016, DOJ and FTC Call for Public Comments on Proposed Updates to Their IP Licensing Guidelines, https://www.hugheshubbard.com/news/doj-and-ftc-call-for-public-comments-on-proposed-updates-to-their-ip-licensing-guidelines.

2 547 U.S. 28 (2006).

3 551 U.S. 877 (2007).

4 135 S. Ct. 2401 (2015).

5 Press Release, FTC, FTC and DOJ Issue Updated Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property (Jan. 13, 2017), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/01/ftc-doj-issue-updated-antitrust-guidelines-licensing-intellectual.

6 The comments are available online at http://gai.gmu.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2016/07/GAI-Comment_DOJ-FTC-Updated-IP-Guidelines_9-19-16_FINAL.pdf.

7 DOJ & FTC, Antitrust Enforcement and Intellectual Property Rights: Promoting Innovation and Competition (Apr. 2007), https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/antitrust-enforcement-and-intellectual-property-rights-promoting-innovation-and-competition-report.s.department-justice-and-federal-trade-commission/p040101promotinginnovationandcompetitionrpt0704.pdf.

8 While the Agencies did remove the phrase "unreasonable conduct," they did not substantively edit this section.

9 FTC, The Evolving IP Marketplace: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition (Mar. 2011), https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/reports/evolving-ip-marketplace-aligning-patent-notice-and-remedies-competition-report-federal-trade/110307patentreport.pdf.

10 501 F.3d 297 (3d Cir. 2007).

11 133 S. Ct. 2223 (2013).

12 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

13 791 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2015).

14 775 F.3d 816 (7th Cir. 2014).

15 International Guidelines at 23.

16 758 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2014).

17 Joint Comments of the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law and Section of International Law on the Proposed Update to the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Antitrust Guidelines for International Enforcement and Competition (Dec. 1, 2016), https://www.justice.gov/atr/page/file/915786/download.

18 837 F.3d 175 (2d Cir. 2016).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions