United States: Bank M&A Lessons Found In 2016's Regulatory Approvals

2016 marked an interesting year in Bank M&A, particularly at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve), which approved 13 bank and/or BHC merger/acquisition (M&A) applications.1 Perhaps most interesting, the Federal Reserve considered, but never acted on, an application, resulting in the parties terminating the transaction. A review of the Federal Reserve approval orders, and other select agency approvals, reveals common themes that are instructive to industry participants considering testing the M&A market. Specifically, this article analyzes: (i) the importance of an institution's compliance history; (ii) consideration of CRA ratings, fair lending, and commitment to community development plans; (iii) consideration of potential job losses; (iv) consideration of anticompetitive effects; (v) timing of approvals; and (vi) expectations for the 2017 M&A regulatory climate.

Acquirers Face Significant Regulatory Scrutiny of Their Compliance History

In 2016, medium-sized and large transactions continued to receive greater scrutiny, and compliance history remained an essential element of the regulatory analysis for buyers of all sizes. While the banking regulators focused on a variety compliance issues beyond CRA and fair lending compliance—such as Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), overdraft policies, residential servicing, commercial real estate concentration, and enterprise risk management—it seems that fair lending was one of the hottest compliance issues that arose in connection with the merger approval process.

In addition, agencies are reviewing applicants' collective compliance programs and controls to ensure that the resulting institution is properly suited to protect against the new risks created through the transaction, particularly when key regulatory growth thresholds will be crossed due to the transaction . Indeed, although New York Community Bancorp (NYCB) did not disclose the reasons for the lack of timely regulatory approval of its acquisition of Astoria Financial Corporation (Astoria), it was widely known that this transaction would have caused NYCB to cross and significantly exceed the US$50 billion asset threshold. Similarly, Bank of the Ozarks, Inc. (Bank of the Ozarks), which received regulatory approval for two transactions in 2016, crossed the lower threshold of US$10 billion in early 2016 while its two acquisition applications were pending. As evidenced by the Bank of the Ozarks approval order, CRA and fair lending compliance were significant factors for the Federal Reserve's evaluation of the transaction. The second half of 2016 also saw Investors Bancorp, Inc. add a risk factor to its Form 10-Q disclosing the potential for its pending acquisition of Princeton Bancorp to be delayed as a result of its corrective actions in the area of BSA compliance. Finally, in at least one transaction, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation conditioned its approval on the resulting institution implementing strategies to address compliance deficiencies.

Fair Lending, and Community Development Plans In Particular, Emerge as Factors Critical to Regulatory Approval

A common characteristic of institutions that obtained Federal Reserve approval for an acquisition in 2016 was their ability to demonstrate their commitment to fair lending compliance, despite "Satisfactory" or "Outstanding" CRA ratings. Nearly all approved applicants confirmed that they had designated a CRA officer and/or a CRA committee, and several applicants described detailed plans for improving community lending in particular assessment areas. For example, in the approval order for Bank of the Ozarks, the Federal Reserve noted that Bank of the Ozarks had identified specific nonprofit organizations with which to partner and had specific plans for its target's headquarters' area.

The 2016 M&A approvals also revealed the impact of community benefit plans, as most clearly demonstrated in KeyCorp's acquisition of First Niagara Financial Group, Inc. (First Niagara) and Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's (Huntington) acquisition of FirstMerit Corporation (FirstMerit). These transactions received a considerable number of public comments focused on CRA and fair lending, and the parties utilized community benefit plans as an effective tool for these large financial institutions to demonstrate their fair lending compliance.

As one example, in response to comment letters received on its merger application, KeyCorp held community outreach meetings and worked closely with various community organizations to develop a community development plan (the KeyCorp Plan), which was announced in March 2016 prior to KeyCorp's receipt of regulatory approval for its merger. In connection with the KeyCorp Plan, KeyCorp made the following commitments:

  • To direct US$16.5 billion in lending toward low- and moderate-income (LMI) communities over a five-year period, with up to 35% of the total commitment targeted for the areas where KeyCorp and First Niagara overlapped in New York.
  • To open an additional branch in an LMI community in East Buffalo and to keep open four other branches in LMI communities that had originally been slated for closing.
  • To convert First Niagara's existing headquarters in western New York into KeyCorp's post-merger Northeast regional headquarters.

Similarly, following the submission of its merger application, Huntington adopted its own community plan (the Huntington Plan), under which it committed to invest US$16.1 billion in the communities it serves, including LMI communities, over a five-year period. The Federal Reserve approval orders acknowledge that the KeyCorp Plan and the Huntington Plan were adopted, at least in part, in response to the comment letters received on the merger applications and that the Federal Reserve shared some of the commenters' concerns.

KeyCorp and Huntington are not the only banks to adopt community plans in connection with a proposed merger. A review of other applications revealed community plans that included commitments to invest funds in communities in which the acquirer and the target have overlapping operations and/or to divest branches in order to address market concentration-related antitrust concerns. The Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), in connection with its acquisition of City National Corporation (City National), represented to the Federal Reserve that City National had adopted a new community development plan to help meet the credit needs of the communities it served, detailing its commitment to achieve a minimum of US$11 billion in qualified lending, investment, and charitable contributions. Perhaps serving as guidance to applicant in 2016, the Federal Reserve's 2015 approval of the RBC merger noted that a number of community groups that initially opposed the merger application subsequently withdrew their comments following adoption of the plan.

Notwithstanding these successful approaches, the Federal Reserve likely will not require a bank to make any community investment pledge to any organization in the absence of significant negative comments or, more importantly, adverse examination findings or a pending enforcement action. Despite the Federal Reserve's reliance on the KeyCorp Plan and the Huntington Plan in concluding that the relevant institutions are meeting the credit needs of the communities they serve, the Federal Reserve noted in the Huntington approval order that it "has consistently found that neither the CRA nor the federal banking agencies' CRA regulations require banks to make pledges or enter into commitments or agreements with any organization." Nevertheless, given their apparent benefits, both for Federal Reserve applications and for general community and regulator relations, community plans likely will remain a factor in the approval process for bank mergers that attract the attention of community groups.

Political Pressures, Not Regulatory, Underscore the Importance of Attention to Job Losses

Although commenters frequently expressed concerns over potential job losses, it was political pressures, not the Federal Reserve, that drove some applicants' decision-making. Indeed, despite high-profile public officials publicly raising the prospect of job losses as the result of transactions, and comments echoing such concerns, the Federal Reserve did not substantively opine on the issue. Instead, the Federal Reserve noted in both the KeyCorp and Huntington orders that "this concern is outside the limited statutory factors that the [Federal Reserve] is authorized to consider when reviewing a merger application."

In the KeyCorp merger, both Governor Andrew M. Cuomo and Senator Charles E. Schumer, as well as many other New York public officials, publicly opposed the merger on the grounds that the branch closures and consolidations contemplated by the proposed merger would result in significant job losses. During the pendency of the merger, KeyCorp directly engaged with public officials to alleviate their concerns, and Senator Schumer and Representative Brian Higgins released a statement in July 2016 noting that they had for months been discussing with KeyCorp concerns regarding potential job loss and that, pursuant to an agreement reached with the bank, KeyCorp would not lay off any branch employees and would employ at least 6,117 people in Upstate New York by 2021.

Similarly. facing similar criticism regarding potential job losses in Akron, Ohio, where FirstMerit is headquartered, Huntington stated publicly that it is committed to maintaining a stable employment level within the city.

Institutions Are Taking Strategic Measures to Alleviate Anticompetitive Concerns

Consistent with prior years, the Federal Reserve continued to receive comments objecting to merger proposals on the grounds that the proposed mergers would have significant anticompetitive effects in certain banking markets, but applicants were able to successfully assuage such concerns through strategic branch divestitures. In 2016, for example, KeyCorp and First Niagara had subsidiary depository institutions that competed directly in 12 banking markets in New York State, which led the Department of Justice (DOJ) to express antitrust concerns regarding the merger. To alleviate these concerns, KeyCorp and First Niagara entered into an agreement with DOJ in April 2016 pursuant to which KeyCorp agreed to sell 18 of First Niagara's branches in and around Buffalo. In connection with that agreement, DOJ publicly stated the following:

[DOJ] will advise the Federal Reserve Board that it will not challenge the merger provided that: the parties divest the branch offices, associated loans and deposits and the entire customer relationships associated with the divestiture branches; the parties commit to the Federal Reserve Board that they will comply with the agreement with the department; and the parties' commitments to the department are included as a condition to any order the Federal Reserve Board enters allowing the transaction.

Similarly, as a condition to the consummation of the Huntington merger, to mitigate the potentially adverse competitive effects of the proposed merger in the Akron, Ohio market, where Huntington is the fifth largest bank and FirstMerit is the largest bank, Huntington committed to divest one branch office. Huntington also committed to divest 10 branches in Canton, Ohio and two branches in Ashtabula, Ohio.

Pursuant to joint FAQs published by the Federal Reserve and DOJ in October 2014, the number of branches required to be divested in the face of competitive concerns will vary due to the presence of mitigating factors; however, there are no general guidelines for determining the level of divestiture that would be necessary to allow the Federal Reserve to approve a potentially anticompetitive application. Although branch divestitures are not a new remedy to address antitrust concerns, the recent merger approvals make clear that the Federal Reserve and DOJ are carefully scrutinizing large bank acquisitions to consider and mitigate the potentially adverse competitive effects of a proposed merger. If the Federal Reserve and DOJ determine that branch divestitures are necessary for approval of a transaction, such divestitures will likely be conditions to the proposed merger's closing. Therefore, banks submitting applications for approval of a merger involving geographic overlap should consider preempting antitrust concerns raised by the Federal Reserve, DOJ, or any commenters by preparing a strategy of potential branch divestitures.

Impact of Regulatory Delay

When both the KeyCorp and Huntington mergers were announced, questions were raised in the marketplace regarding whether the bank regulators would have the appetite to approve additional large acquisitions considering the other large M&A deals that were previously announced, including deals announced by BB&T Corporation and NYCB. Despite skepticism regarding whether and how quickly the Federal Reserve would approve the mergers, the Federal Reserve released its orders approving the KeyCorp and Huntington transactions seven and one-half months after KeyCorp announced its plans to acquire First Niagara and six months after Huntington's announcement to acquire First Merit. These timeframes for approval are relatively fast for large deals, which typically take six to 12 months from announcement to regulatory approval.

In contrast to the KeyCorp and Huntington applications, the Federal Reserve took three years to approve the proposed merger between Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. (HCBK) and M&T Bank Corp (M&T), which is the longest review period ever for a US deal valued at more than US$1 billion. In its order approving the HCBK–M&T merger, however, the Federal Reserve noted that it "expects that a banking organization will resolve all material weaknesses identified by examiners before applying to engage in expansionary activity." M&T's issues largely arose during the processing of its merger application, and the Federal Reserve "took the highly unusual step of permitting the case to pend while M&T addressed its weaknesses." The Federal Reserve's order warned that "[t]he [Federal Reserve] does not expect to take such action in future cases. Rather, in the future, if issues arise during processing of an application, the [Federal Reserve] expects that a banking organization will withdraw its application pending resolution of any supervisory concerns."

Perhaps in an example of this policy in action, NYCB's proposed merger with Astoria, which was announced a day before the KeyCorp merger, still was awaiting Federal Reserve approval when the merger's termination was announced on December 20, 2016, a month after NYCB announced that regulatory approval was not expected by the end of 2016. Another test of the policy expressed in the HCBK–M&T approval order may be the Investors Bancorp–Princeton Bancorp transaction. Arguably, a much smaller transaction, it may provide some clues as to whether compliance issues will continue to overwhelm the financial and strategic benefits of a transaction

Outlook

Recent merger approvals make clear that a well thought-out consolidation plan, a strong compliance plan, and a comprehensive fair lending strategy (which may or may not include a community benefit plan) is likely to be well received by the regulators and considered in applicable approval analyses.

Further, although significant changes in the bank-regulatory environment are anticipated in light of the results of the 2016 presidential election, such changes typically do not occur overnight. We expect the regulatory staff of each of the federal banking regulators to continue to focus on compliance issues, particularly those areas most impacted by significant and immediate growth (i.e., fair lending, CRA, and BSA compliance). Over time, the change in the administration and resultant policy impact on bank regulation may allow the agencies' staffs to allow for commitments from the buyers and non-standard approval conditions to reduce the regulatory delays that have resulted in recent years from compliance issues. In any event, we expect BSA, risk management, and cyber security issues to continue to be M&A stumbling blocks. We also expect community groups, as well as politicians, to continue to comment actively on the consumer compliance issues of buyers in bank merger transactions and attempt to influence the activities of those buyers. Finally, we expect institutions with outstanding enforcement actions, unresolved systemic compliance issues, and supervisory issues related to risk management to continue to be sidelined from merger activity by the regulatory agencies.

Footnote

1. This total does not include acquisitions that were approved by Federal Reserve Banks acting under delegated authority.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions