United States: IADC Campaigns For Industry Custom Evidence In California's Design Defect Risk-Benefit Analysis

Recently, the International Association of Defense Counsel ("IADC") filed an amicus brief in support of Toyota in William Jae Kim v. Toyota Motor Corporation (No. S232754). Kim v. Toyota is currently on appeal before the California Supreme Court regarding whether evidence of industry custom is relevant to the risk-benefit test for design defect. The brief sheds light on the uncertainty currently facing manufacturers in California.

Procedural History

Plaintiff/Appellant Kim was seriously injured after driving his 2005 Toyota Tundra truck off a mountain road. Kim sued Toyota, blaming the accident on the truck's lack of Electronic Stability Control ("ESC"), a then-emerging technology that assists drivers in loss-of-control situations. ESC was an optional feature in the 2005 Toyota Tundra. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Toyota on Kim's strict product liability claim. Kim unsuccessfully moved for a new trial, arguing that industry custom evidence should never have been admitted by the trial court. Kim, however, first introduced evidence that no other car manufacturers had ESC in a full-size truck at the time.

The Second Appellate District Court of Appeal identified two ways where industry custom evidence can be relevant to the risk-benefit test: to show "the feasibility of a safer alternative design" and to demonstrate "the consequences that would result from an alternative design."1 The Court explained that the ESC evidence was relevant in both of those ways, noting that Kim himself conceded that "[o]ne might use other vehicles for purposes of showing alternative design or the feasibility of a given improvement."2 The Court also held that the industry custom evidence became relevant as a means of rebutting Kim's argument that "Toyota was planning on making ESC standard on its trucks until it learned its competitors were not going to do so."3

IADC's Amicus Brief

IADC is an association of corporate and insurance attorneys from the United States and around the globe whose practices are concentrated on the defense of civil lawsuits. IADC supports Toyota's position that industry custom plays an important role in the design defect analysis. It argues that industry custom makes the design defect analysis more realistic, eliminating the need for jurors to decide cases in a theoretical vacuum. When used this way, evidence of industry custom can aid both defendants and plaintiffs.

IADC first relies on the test promulgated in Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.4 to provide jurors with insight into the feasibility and marketability of alternative design features proposed by plaintiffs. The Supreme Court in Barker set forth five nonexclusive factors for juries to consider when assessing the adequacy of a manufacturer's product design: "[1] the gravity of the danger posed by the challenged design, [2] the likelihood that such danger would occur, [3] the mechanical feasibility of a safer alternative design, [4] the financial cost of an improved design, and [5] the adverse consequences to the product and to the consumer that would result from an alternative design."5 The evaluation of these factors requires "the balancing or weighing of competing considerations" with the aim of achieving "reasonable and practical safety under a multitude of varying conditions."6

The IADC also argues that the Supreme Court's stated goal of "reasonable and practical safety" implies that the design defect determination should not be conducted in a vacuum. This Court expressly stated that the Barker factors were nonexclusive and that the California Civil Jury Instructions authorize considering "[o]ther relevant factor(s)."In order to fulfill their role as "hypothetical manufacturers," jurors must be able to consider the practices of the relevant industry. To use the Barker test, a juror must assess the risks and benefits of various product designs. After all, no rational manufacturer would create a product without knowing how it measures up against the features and costs of competing products on the market.

In response, Kim argues that marketability can only be relevant when consumers appreciate the value of the benefits they receive. When the alternate design consists of technology unknown to consumers, other manufacturers' designs are irrelevant to the cost of implementation. IADC counters that this argument makes no sense. Under Kim's vision of product liability, a manufacturer that invents a revolutionary but costly new safety feature will be forced to implement it in all its future products.

Additionally, when consumers do not know the value or utility of a novel product feature, they may purchase a competitor's product instead of spending money on the new product. This concern drove Toyota's decision to make ESC an optional feature on the 2005 Toyota Tundra. Indeed, Kim admitted that he purchased the Tundra because it was the cheapest of all available options.

IADC also refutes Kim's argument that industry custom diverts juror attention away from the riskbenefit factors and towards a "standard of care," sounding more in negligence than strict liability. According to the IADC, evidence of industry custom by itself does not satisfy a manufacturer's burden to show that there was no feasible alternative and safer design. Although the Court of Appeal has stated that this evidence can be relevant, its admissibility depends on the evidence and both sides' arguments. Kim also overlooks that industry custom evidence may ease a plaintiff's burden when a product deviates from industry custom.

Finally, the IADC urges the Supreme Court to distinguish that its holdings in Grimshaw and progeny are no longer good law.7 The Grimshaw Court of Appeal deemed industry custom to be irrelevant to a design defect determination simply because it did not appear on the list of factors enumerated in Barker. It should not have done so. The Supreme Court expressly stated that the Barker factors were nonexclusive and that the California Civil Jury Instructions authorize considering other relevant factors other than those listed in Barker. Additionally, the Grimshaw court misinterpreted Barker's holding that industry custom is irrelevant. The Barker court held that while a manufacturer's design process may be irrelevant in strict liability, its design choices are not.

The distinction is important. Without that distinction, if a product caused harm, a manufacturer who engaged in a careful and deliberate process may be just as liable as one who produced a product without thinking about the issues at all.8 A manufacturer's choices are synonymous with the condition of the product, because its choices produce the product.

In the California Supreme Court's Hands

As the Court of Appeals has ruled inconsistently about whether industry custom evidence is admissible in design defect cases, trial counsel on both sides will be watching the Supreme Court's decision closely.


1 Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp., 243 Cal. App. 4th 1366, 1379 (2016).

2 Id.

3 Id. at 1383

4 Barker v. Lull Engineering Co., 20 Cal.3d 413 (1978).

5 Id. at 426, 431.

6 Id. at 434.

7 Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757 (1981).

8 See Barker, 20 Cal.3d at 434.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.