United States: Insider Trading And Remote Tippees

It is by now old news that the United States Supreme Court recently upheld a tipping conviction in Salman v. United States. The case turned on the issue of personal benefit, introduced in the seminal 1983 Supreme Court case of Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). In a widely discussed forerunner to Salman handed down in 2014, U.S. v. Newman, 773 F. 3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014), the Second Circuit overturned the conviction of remote tippees, in part on the basis that the government had not demonstrated that the initial tippers received a personal benefit. In addition to finding no personal benefit, however, the Second Circuit in Newman also reversed "because the Government introduced no evidence that the defendants knew that the information they traded on came from insiders or that the insiders received a personal benefit in exchange for the tips." The Supreme Court in Salman expressly left this ruling from Newman – which has significant consequences for professional market participants – undisturbed. Salman offers an opportunity to review Newman and more recent case law on remote traders from a prophylactic perspective.

U.S. v. Newman

In Newman, the evidence at trial showed that defendants Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson (and others) indirectly obtained information from company insiders at Dell and NVIDIA. Newman and Chiasson were several degrees of separation away from the source of the information, and there was no evidence that either was aware of the source.

In reversing the conviction, the Second Circuit reasoned that even if the first-stage exchange of information involved a personal benefit conferred upon the tipper, there was no evidence that the downstream tippees knew of this benefit, or even of identities of the initial tipper and tippee. As the court said, "It is largely uncontroverted that Chiasson and Newman and even their analysts, who testified as cooperating witnesses for the government, knew next to nothing about the insiders and nothing about what, if any, personal benefit had been provided to them." The court thus rejected the invitation of the government to conclude that the "specificity, timing and frequency of the updates provided to Newman and Chiasson about Dell and NVIDIA were so 'overwhelmingly suspicious' that they warranted material inferences that could support a guilty verdict." According to the appellate court, even if "detail and specificity could support an inference of the nature of the source of information, it cannot, without more, permit an inference as to that source's improper motive for disclosure." Thus, even assuming such an improper motive, the defendants could not be convicted unless they knew, or deliberately avoided knowing, that the information they received originated from corporate insiders whose relationship with their tippees was such that they received the personal benefit required by Dirks. This holding of the Second Circuit was not disturbed by Salman.

SEC v. Payton

Newman was a criminal case. Last year, a federal trial court addressed the teachings of Newman in a civil case, SEC v. Payton, 97 F. Supp. 3d 558 (SDNY 2015). The court observed that there was an important distinction between criminal and civil insider trading cases. "[S]ometimes [insider trading] cases are criminal prosecutions, in which circumstance a court is obliged to define unlawful insider trading narrowly ... Other times those cases are civil proceedings, most often brought by the [SEC], in which circumstance a court is inclined to define unlawful insider trading broadly ..." With the lower standards of proof in the civil case, the court allowed the SEC to proceed to trial with its case in Payton, even though the Department of Justice had declined to bring a criminal action.

In brief, the facts of Payton were as follows. Michael Dallas was a law firm associate assigned to work on the acquisition of SPSS, Inc. by IBM. Trent Martin, who was employed at a registered broker-dealer, was a close friend of Dallas. Martin roomed with Thomas Conradt, a lawyer who also worked at a broker-dealer. Defendants Daryl Payton and Benjamin Durant worked at the same broker-dealer as Conradt. Dallas told Martin about the SPSS acquisition in confidence, after which Martin tipped the information to Conradt. Conradt then informed Payton and Durant about the pending acquisition. According to the SEC complaint, Payton and Durant knew that Conradt was Martin's roommate and the source of the information "but did not ask why Martin told Conradt, and they did not ask how Martin learned the information."

In their motion to dismiss, the defendants asserted that the complaint did not adequately allege that the original tipper (Martin) received a personal benefit or that the defendants had knowledge of the personal benefit, as required by Newman. The court disagreed, saying there were facts (not recited here) on the basis of which a jury could make a finding of personal benefit. The court also held that under the facts of the case, a jury could find that the remote tippees, Payton and Durant, had enough knowledge of the personal benefit to satisfy a lower standard of knowledge than would be required in a criminal case. As the court said in a later pretrial ruling in the case (155 F. Supp. 3d 428 (SDNY 2015)), "the SEC need only prove 'that the defendants knew or had reason to know of the benefit to the tipper' in the general sense that they knew that a benefit had been provided." The court distinguished Newman, where the tippees "knew next to nothing about the tippers," from Payton, "where the defendants knew the basic circumstances surrounding the tip."

In February of this year, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the SEC in the Payton case, and in November, the court denied a motion to set aside the judgment as a matter of law. On the knowledge issue, the court said, "There was ... plentiful evidence from which the jury could have concluded that defendants deliberately chose not to ask Conradt questions about the circumstances in which Martin told him about the confidential SPSS information, because they understood that there was a high probability that they would have learned of Martin's personal benefit."

A Spectrum of Situations

At one end of the situational spectrum is information that likely came from an insider but is now widely known in the market. While the widespread knowledge does not vitiate possible fraud of an initial tipster, it is difficult to envision an enforcement action, since the market price should have largely assimilated the information. At the other end is a circumstance in which the information has not been disseminated, the trader does not actually know the source of the information, but the trader consciously avoids learning the source's identity. Newman, in the criminal context, and Payton, in the civil context with its lower standard of proof, counsel that a trader cannot intentionally turn a blind eye to available information on the identity and motivation of the source.

In the middle ground, the information is not yet out in the market, but the trader, while possibly suspicious, lacks credible knowledge of the source. Newman seemingly protects the trader from liability, but caution and consultation with legal counsel are nonetheless advisable even when the source of the information is remote and unknown. While the holding of Newman stands undisturbed, recent case law, and possible after-the-fact accusations of conscious avoidance, argue in favor of a cautious approach.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions