United States: Insider Trading And Remote Tippees

It is by now old news that the United States Supreme Court recently upheld a tipping conviction in Salman v. United States. The case turned on the issue of personal benefit, introduced in the seminal 1983 Supreme Court case of Dirks v. SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). In a widely discussed forerunner to Salman handed down in 2014, U.S. v. Newman, 773 F. 3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014), the Second Circuit overturned the conviction of remote tippees, in part on the basis that the government had not demonstrated that the initial tippers received a personal benefit. In addition to finding no personal benefit, however, the Second Circuit in Newman also reversed "because the Government introduced no evidence that the defendants knew that the information they traded on came from insiders or that the insiders received a personal benefit in exchange for the tips." The Supreme Court in Salman expressly left this ruling from Newman – which has significant consequences for professional market participants – undisturbed. Salman offers an opportunity to review Newman and more recent case law on remote traders from a prophylactic perspective.

U.S. v. Newman

In Newman, the evidence at trial showed that defendants Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson (and others) indirectly obtained information from company insiders at Dell and NVIDIA. Newman and Chiasson were several degrees of separation away from the source of the information, and there was no evidence that either was aware of the source.

In reversing the conviction, the Second Circuit reasoned that even if the first-stage exchange of information involved a personal benefit conferred upon the tipper, there was no evidence that the downstream tippees knew of this benefit, or even of identities of the initial tipper and tippee. As the court said, "It is largely uncontroverted that Chiasson and Newman and even their analysts, who testified as cooperating witnesses for the government, knew next to nothing about the insiders and nothing about what, if any, personal benefit had been provided to them." The court thus rejected the invitation of the government to conclude that the "specificity, timing and frequency of the updates provided to Newman and Chiasson about Dell and NVIDIA were so 'overwhelmingly suspicious' that they warranted material inferences that could support a guilty verdict." According to the appellate court, even if "detail and specificity could support an inference of the nature of the source of information, it cannot, without more, permit an inference as to that source's improper motive for disclosure." Thus, even assuming such an improper motive, the defendants could not be convicted unless they knew, or deliberately avoided knowing, that the information they received originated from corporate insiders whose relationship with their tippees was such that they received the personal benefit required by Dirks. This holding of the Second Circuit was not disturbed by Salman.

SEC v. Payton

Newman was a criminal case. Last year, a federal trial court addressed the teachings of Newman in a civil case, SEC v. Payton, 97 F. Supp. 3d 558 (SDNY 2015). The court observed that there was an important distinction between criminal and civil insider trading cases. "[S]ometimes [insider trading] cases are criminal prosecutions, in which circumstance a court is obliged to define unlawful insider trading narrowly ... Other times those cases are civil proceedings, most often brought by the [SEC], in which circumstance a court is inclined to define unlawful insider trading broadly ..." With the lower standards of proof in the civil case, the court allowed the SEC to proceed to trial with its case in Payton, even though the Department of Justice had declined to bring a criminal action.

In brief, the facts of Payton were as follows. Michael Dallas was a law firm associate assigned to work on the acquisition of SPSS, Inc. by IBM. Trent Martin, who was employed at a registered broker-dealer, was a close friend of Dallas. Martin roomed with Thomas Conradt, a lawyer who also worked at a broker-dealer. Defendants Daryl Payton and Benjamin Durant worked at the same broker-dealer as Conradt. Dallas told Martin about the SPSS acquisition in confidence, after which Martin tipped the information to Conradt. Conradt then informed Payton and Durant about the pending acquisition. According to the SEC complaint, Payton and Durant knew that Conradt was Martin's roommate and the source of the information "but did not ask why Martin told Conradt, and they did not ask how Martin learned the information."

In their motion to dismiss, the defendants asserted that the complaint did not adequately allege that the original tipper (Martin) received a personal benefit or that the defendants had knowledge of the personal benefit, as required by Newman. The court disagreed, saying there were facts (not recited here) on the basis of which a jury could make a finding of personal benefit. The court also held that under the facts of the case, a jury could find that the remote tippees, Payton and Durant, had enough knowledge of the personal benefit to satisfy a lower standard of knowledge than would be required in a criminal case. As the court said in a later pretrial ruling in the case (155 F. Supp. 3d 428 (SDNY 2015)), "the SEC need only prove 'that the defendants knew or had reason to know of the benefit to the tipper' in the general sense that they knew that a benefit had been provided." The court distinguished Newman, where the tippees "knew next to nothing about the tippers," from Payton, "where the defendants knew the basic circumstances surrounding the tip."

In February of this year, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the SEC in the Payton case, and in November, the court denied a motion to set aside the judgment as a matter of law. On the knowledge issue, the court said, "There was ... plentiful evidence from which the jury could have concluded that defendants deliberately chose not to ask Conradt questions about the circumstances in which Martin told him about the confidential SPSS information, because they understood that there was a high probability that they would have learned of Martin's personal benefit."

A Spectrum of Situations

At one end of the situational spectrum is information that likely came from an insider but is now widely known in the market. While the widespread knowledge does not vitiate possible fraud of an initial tipster, it is difficult to envision an enforcement action, since the market price should have largely assimilated the information. At the other end is a circumstance in which the information has not been disseminated, the trader does not actually know the source of the information, but the trader consciously avoids learning the source's identity. Newman, in the criminal context, and Payton, in the civil context with its lower standard of proof, counsel that a trader cannot intentionally turn a blind eye to available information on the identity and motivation of the source.

In the middle ground, the information is not yet out in the market, but the trader, while possibly suspicious, lacks credible knowledge of the source. Newman seemingly protects the trader from liability, but caution and consultation with legal counsel are nonetheless advisable even when the source of the information is remote and unknown. While the holding of Newman stands undisturbed, recent case law, and possible after-the-fact accusations of conscious avoidance, argue in favor of a cautious approach.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.