United States: Private Leveraged Buyouts, Fraudulent Transfers And FTI Consulting

Last Updated: December 22 2016
Article by Peter C. Blain

Leveraged buyouts ("LBOs") are acquisitions in which the assets of the target are pledged as collateral for loans used to fund the buyouts of the target's shareholders. If the target subsequently fails, the LBOs may be subject to avoidance as fraudulent transfers because the target's shareholders were paid before its creditors. Parties attacking LBOs rely upon section 548 of the United States Bankruptcy Code,1 which provides that transfers by an entity made for less than reasonably equivalent value and (1) made while the entity is insolvent (or which cause the entity to become insolvent), (2) which leave the target with unreasonably small capital, or (3) which the target knows or should have known will cause the target to be unable to pay its debts as they became due, are avoidable as fraudulent transfers. Transfers made up to two years prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition are avoidable under Code section 548. Parties attacking LBOs also rely upon Code section 544, which allows the trustee to utilize applicable law, including the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (the state law analog to Code section 548), to avoid transfers made usually up to four years prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition.2

However, Code section 546(e) provides that, notwithstanding Code sections 548 or 544, "settlement payments" (including payments made in connection with the sale of securities)3 made by or to (or for the benefit of) a "financial institution" (including a commercial bank)4 are not avoidable as fraudulent transfers. The statute creates a safe harbor which on its face seems to broadly insulate from fraudulent transfer attack sales of securities where payment is "made by or to a financial institution." The rationale for Code section 546(e) is to prevent systemic risk to the financial markets caused by "one large bankruptcy from rippling through the securities industry."5

But what about LBOs pursuant to which the shareholders of a closely held corporation receive payments comprised of leveraged loan proceeds from a commercial bank which acts as a mere conduit for the purchase price paid by the target's purchasers? Reading the statute literally, the Second,6 Eighth,7 Sixth,8 Third9 and Tenth10 Circuit Courts of Appeal have strictly applied the Code section 546(e) safe harbor to insulate private transactions involving "settlement payments" which were made "by or to a financial institution" from fraudulent transfer avoidance.

Only the Eleventh Circuit11 —and now the Seventh Circuit, in the recent decision of FTI Consulting, Inc. v. Merit Management Group, LP12 —have ruled that the Code section 546(e) safe harbor does not apply to protect from fraudulent transfer attack private LBOs where payments are made through a financial institution acting as a mere conduit.

FTI involved two competitors, Bedford Downs and Valley View Downs, who desired to obtain licenses to operate "racinos" (a combination of harness racing tracks and casinos) in Pennsylvania. Rather than compete for the license, the competitors combined—one competitor purchased all of the shares of the other in a $55 million leveraged buyout. Payment for the shares was made through Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, acting as escrow agent. However, when the required licenses were not granted, the combined entity filed a Chapter 11 petition. As trustee of a Chapter 11 litigation trust, FTI Consulting sued defendant Merit Management (which received $16.5 million of the $55 million purchase price) under Code sections 544 and 548. Merit argued that the Code section 546(e) safe harbor shielded it from liability. When the district court agreed and granted judgement on the pleadings to Merit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), FTI appealed.

The Seventh Circuit analyzed the meaning of Code section 546(e) and found it to be ambiguous. The court noted that when a party sends a postcard in the U.S. Mail, it could be said that the postcard was sent "by" the sender or "by" the U.S. Postal Service. When a customer makes a payment via an electronic bank transfer, the payment could be said to be made "by" the owner of the account or "by" the bank. Similarly, when a transfer is made through a financial intermediary, it could be said to be made "by or to" the financial institution or "by or to" the party receiving the funds. The plain language of Code section 546(e) does not clarify the ambiguity in this case, and, said the court, "standing alone, does not point us in one direction or the other."13

In Chapter 5 of the Code, sections 544, 547 (dealing with preferential transfers) and 548 address the types of transfers which a bankruptcy trustee can avoid. Code section 546(e) puts limitations on those avoidance powers. FTI argued that because only Chapter 5 transfers made by the debtor prepetition can be avoidable, a named entity in Code section 546(e) (such as a financial institution) ought also to refer to a transfer of property by the debtor, as opposed to a financial intermediary. Additionally, because Code sections 544, 547 and 548 refer to avoidance of transfers to or for the benefit of entities subject to fraudulent transfer liability, Code section 546(e) must refer only to transfers made to a named entity that is a creditor, rather than a non-stakeholder financial intermediary. The court agreed, saying that Chapter 5 creates a system of avoiding transfers and a safe harbor from avoidance—two sides of the same coin. It therefore makes sense to understand the safe harbor as applying to transfers that are eligible for avoidance in the first place.14

The court also agreed with FTI that Code sections 548(a)(2) and 555 support its argument. Code section 546(a)(2) shields from avoidance charitable contributions made "by a natural person" "to a qualified" charity. FTI argued that Code sections 548(a)(2) and 546(e) should be read consistently. Otherwise, charitable contributions made by wire transfer or check through a bank would be avoidable. Code section 555 permits counterparties to a securities contract with the debtor to enforce ipso facto provisions in the contract despite Code section 365(e)'s general prohibition on the enforcement of such provisions. Because Code section 555 focuses on the economic substance of the transaction and only applies where the named entity is a counterparty rather than a conduit or bank for a counterparty, Code section 546(e)'s safe harbor should apply in the same manner. It is the economic substance of the transaction, said the court, that matters.15

The court next addressed the concept of "transferee" under Code section 550, which describes how a trustee is to recover avoidable transfers. Under Code section 550, the trustee may avoid transfers received by immediate or mediate transferees (subject to a defense absolving an immediate or mediate transferee who takes in good faith and without knowledge of the voidability of the transfer). The court discussed its prior decision in Bonded Financial,16 wherein it defined "transferee" as an entity with "dominion over the money" or "the right to put the money to one's own purposes."17 In that case, the court found that a bank which "acted as a financial intermediary" and "received no benefit" was not a "transferee" within the meaning of Code section 550.18 The court acknowledged that Bonded Financial did not address Code section 546(e), but specifically extended Bonded Financial's reasoning to apply to transfers involving Code section 546(e).19 In doing so, it rejected Merit's arguments that Bonded Financial was distinguishable because it dealt with Code section 550 rather than Code section 546(e). While Code section 546(e) renders a transfer unavoidable and Code section 550 provides a good faith defense, the court found no reason why unavoidability provisions should be broader than defenses to recovery. Rather, said the court, the opposite should be true.20

The court turned to the history of Code section 546(e), the purpose of which was to "'protect [ ] the market from systemic risk and allow [ ] parties in the securities industry to enter into transactions with greater confidence'—to prevent 'one large bankruptcy from rippling through the securities industry.'"21 Although the scope of Code section 546(e) is broad, the court indicated that does not mean there are no limits.22 The court was not troubled by the prospect of Merit's returning the funds to FTI causing such a disruptive impact. Consequently, it refused to interpret the Code section 546(e) safe harbor as covering any transaction involving securities that uses a financial institution or other entity enumerated in the statute as a mere conduit.23

The court acknowledged that its decision differed from five other circuits' and agreed with only one, the Eleventh. Like the Eleventh Circuit, the court held that Code section 546(e) is inapplicable where the principal parties are not the type of entities enumerated in the statute, and where the financial institution involved acts only as a conduit. The court further observed that if Congress had intended to say that acting as a conduit for a transaction between two entities not otherwise covered by Code section 546(e) is enough to trigger the statute, it could have done so.24

This decision is an important one for transactions involving leveraged buyouts between two private companies operating outside the public securities markets. The court's conclusion that using a non-stakeholder financial institution as a conduit is insufficient to trigger the exception appears to be correct. This is particularly true in light of the reasons why Code section 546(e) was added to the Code. However, the statute on its face makes no distinction between financial institutions having a stake in the LBO and those which act as a mere conduit. Given the circuit split, this seems like an issue bound for the United States Supreme Court, whose decision may depend upon the make-up of the Court at the time it takes the issue up.25

Footnotes

1 11 U.S.C. §§ 101 1532 (hereinafter the "Code").

2 Some states, such as New York, are governed by the Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act, which has a statute of limitations of six years. In a very recent decision, Mukamal v. Citibank, N.A. (In re Kipnis), 555 B.R. 877 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2016), the bankruptcy court found that where the Internal Revenue Service is a creditor, "applicable law" includes the Internal Revenue Code, and a trustee asserting a claim under Code section 544(b) is not bound by state statutes of limitation.

3 See 11 U.S.C. § 741.

4 See 11 U.S.C. § 101(22).

5 See Grede v. FCStone, LLC, 746 F.3d 244, 252 (7th Cir. 2014).

6 See In re Quebecor World (USA) Inc., 719 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2013).

7 See Contemporary Indus. Corp. v. Frost, 564 F.3d 981 (8th Cir. 2009).

8 See In re QSI Holdings, Inc., 571 F.3d 545 (6th Cir. 2009).

9 See In re Resorts Int'l. Inc., 181 F.3d 505 (3d Cir. 1999).

10 See In re Kaiser Steel Corp., 952 F.2d 1230 (10th Cir. 1991).

11 See In re Munford, Inc., 98 F.3d 604 (11th Cir. 1996).

12 See FTI Consulting, Inc. v. Merit Mgmt. Grp., LP, 830 F.3d 690 (7th Cir. 2016).

13 Id. at 692 693.

14 Id. at 694.

15 Id. at 695.

16 Bonded Fin. Servs., Inc. v. European Am. Bank, 838 F.2d 890 (7th Cir. 1988).

17 Id. at 893.

18 Id.

19 FTI Consulting, 830 F.3d at 695.

20 Id.

21 Id. at 696 (quoting Grede v. FCStone, LLC, 764 F.3d 244, 252 (7th Cir. 2014)).

22 Id.

23 Id at 697.

24 Id.

25 A petition for certiorari arising out of the Second Circuit's decision in the Tribune Chapter 11 regarding Code section 546(e) was filed on September 9, 2016. See Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Ams. v. Large Private Beneficial Owners (In re Tribune Co.), 818 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2016) (petition for cert. pending, No. 16 317 (filed Sept. 9, 2016)).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Peter C. Blain
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions