United States: Litigating The Implied Covenant Of Good Faith

Last Updated: December 20 2016
Article by Craig R. Tractenberg

The implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is a departure from traditional contract law. This covenant or duty often is in derogation of the doctrine of the parties "freedom to contract," whereby a gloss is imposed on express terms, and contractual terms are judicially imposed where the parties choose or neglected to address certain issues. The cases are challenging to both win and defend, and the results are unpredictable because the parties did not expressly contract to limit their risk.

These cases all start with the notion that a party, through action or inaction, caused harm to the other, depriving them of the fundamental purpose of their contract. The strategy in these cases is to demonstrate the reasonableness or unreasonableness of the parties conduct, and to explain the process by which the conduct occurred. This is one of the few instances where the motive of the parties to a contract may be determinative of a commercial outcome.

Understanding the Duty of Good Faith And Fair Dealing

Section 205 of Restatement (Second) of Contract provides "[e]very contract imposes upon each party a duty of good faith and fair dealing in its performance and its enforcement." Not all jurisdictions follow the Restatement, and some reinterpret the duty under the jurisprudence of each state. State law will generally prohibit opportunistic behavior that impairs a long-term contractual relationship of mutual dependence and cooperation. The duty is judicially imposed to require the parties to act honestly and observe commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade. The covenant may be invoked to clarify or supply a missing term and to limit the exercise of discretion to fulfill the reasonable expectations of the parties.

Uniform Commercial Code §1-201(b)(7) defines "good faith" as honesty in fact and the observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade. The UCC would thus permit expert testimony on "reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade" as a factual matter.

Depending on the jurisdiction, the duty would require:

1. Acting in a fair and equitable manner so as to guarantee freedom from coercion or intimidation;

2. The absence of language in the contract that would prohibit the conduct;

3. The absence of bad faith.

Restatement (Second) of Contracts §205 provides a partial list of bad faith examples, such as subterfuge and evasive conduct; overt actions to undermine the relationship; inaction when action should have been taken; avoidance or denial of the spirit of the contract; lack of diligent behavior or slacking off performance; willful rendering of imperfect performance, abuse of power to clarify ambiguous or defective terms; interference with or failure to cooperate in the other party's performance. The comments add that other evidence includes trying to force a party out of business, concealing the true nature of ownership and control of the business and refusing to operate consistent with the contractual standards provided.

Burden of Persuasion

Regardless of the burden of proof or persuasion, bad faith can be demonstrated where the evidence does not support the stated reason for the corporate action.

The claimant always has the burden of proof as in any contract breach case. But unlike breach of contract cases, the express words of the contract can only provide limited comfort because motive has a role in these cases. The best defense to the claim of unfair treatment is establishing that the parties contracted for this outcome. If the express language of the contract permitted this result, or gave a party a right to accomplish this result, a dispositive motion may succeed. As long as the result is within the realm of reasonable expectation, then the exercise of an express contractual right generally will not be successfully challenged under the implied duty.

The issue of motive arises where a question arises whether given the facts, this is a reasonable outcome. In other words, whether the express language of the contract results in unintended consequences due to the factual context. A landlord defaulting a lease for non-payment of rent is a reasonable exercise of express contractual rights, however, motive becomes an issue if the landlord has unsuccessfully attempted to evict the tenant and an excusable reason outside the control of the tenant caused the landlord not to receive the rent. Unlike a lease where little discretion is vested in the performance by the parties, long-term licensing or franchise agreements have branding and performance issues which arise during the term that simply cannot be anticipated. These are the types of contracts where the implied duty, and consequently the motive of the parties, may become relevant.

Dealing With Burden Shifting Language in the Contract

Express terms generally limit the imposition of the implied covenant, but the use of contract clauses to shift the burden of scrutiny can be problematic. Express contractual clauses that target the precise issue in dispute are much easier to defend than trying to use "catch-all" provisions that vest exclusive or absolute discretion on broad issues. The catch-all provisions are not particularly effective, and may be used as evidence that the contract is unfairly written, favoring the dominant party.

Judicious use of "sole" discretion on certain items is effective and defensible. But an integration clause alone may not be enough to prevent a tribunal for filling in gaps in express contracts, as opposed to adding new terms to the written expression of the parties' agreement.

Drafters have attempted, usually unsuccessfully, to write a deferential standard into the agreement for reviewing the good faith and fair dealing. The "business judgment rule" used to presume proper corporate action by officers and directors in justifying corporate decisions has been engrafted into agreements to encourage courageous actions as a matter of discretion. The business judgment rule presumes that officers and directors made their decision in an informed manner, and consistent with the best interests of the corporation. Only where this presumption is rebutted must the directors and officers prove the transaction is fair and reasonable.

The problem with this approach in ordinary contracts is that one party has this one-sided provision which is intended to insulate a party from the consequences of its wrongful decisions. It demonstrates that the parties are not on an even playing field, and is evidence of oppression. Even though the parties have the freedom to contract for these presumptions, the effect of the provision may be evidence of the evil that is claimed in the dispute.

An example of this is the outcome in Mercedes-Benz USA v. Carduco, 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 3254 (Tex. App. March 31, 2016). The Texas Court of Appeals upheld a jury verdict awarding an auto dealership more than $21 million in compensatory damages and $115 million in punitive damages.1 The dealer bought the franchise based on an understanding that relocation was available after purchase. After purchase, the relocation was denied because another prospect was ready to open in the desired area. The court held that the good faith and fair dealing imposed by statute trumped the absolute discretion expressed in the contract that the manufacturer enjoyed to decline relocation. The bad faith was shown because the manufacturer did not disclose the existence of the prospect to the dealer before the purchase, or until the request for relocation. This is the type of conduct contained in the catalog of bad faith acts in the Restatement, tantamount to fraud and resulting in punitive damages.

Proving That Erroneous Judgment Is Not Necessarily Bad Faith

Successful defense may require a showing that erroneous judgment and the consequences are not the product of bad faith. Absent willful behavior, most implied covenant cases fail. The parties prevail when they can articulate the efforts expended before deciding on the corporate action. Showing transparency in the decision-making, the communication during the process, and consideration of all other alternatives will support the argument that it was a fair decision.

In this context where all parties are acting in their economic self- interest, it is important to show that even though it may be a zero-sum game, no party was entirely subjugated or totally victimized by the discretionary decision. Fairness may be demonstrated by showing the greater utility that benefits all, rather than simply the singular interests of the counter party.

Conclusion

Implied covenant cases do not enjoy a high success rate, but they do enjoy unpredictable damages. The unpredictability encourages counsel to use more creativity in pleading breaches of the duty, causing every dispute to be cloaked with allegations of ulterior motive or retribution.

Proof of open, honest, considered communication taking into thoughtful account all possibilities and alternatives is the best defense. Clients should document their decision-making and alternatives considered, communicate with the affected parties and fully explain the reasons for the considered decision. This is an important exercise because it provides a sounding board for the decision, and will play well before the trier of fact.

Footnotes:

1. The punitive damages were remitted to $600,000. 2016 WL 4939377 (Sept. 15, 2016).

Previously published in The New York Law Journal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Craig R. Tractenberg
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions