United States: AIA Reviews: New Rule Packages Illustrate The PTO's Evolutionary Approach To Rulemaking

Originally appeared in PTAB Monitor: Developments in Inter Partes Review Practice

The America Invents Act (AIA) tasked the Director of the Patent Office with creating rules for implementing post-grant proceedings (e.g., covered business method, post grant, and inter partes reviews). But while the Director enacted a rule set in 2012, the Director's view was that the rules were to be evolutionary. In the words of Director Michelle K. Lee, "[t]he USPTO issued rules and guidance for the new AIA proceedings in 2012. Despite best efforts, we never envisioned that our rules or guidance would be perfect at the outset, but instead anticipated making refinements along the way."1

So, in 2014, the Patent Office conducted a nationwide "listening tour" and, in response, considered and instituted a number of rule changes for post-grant proceedings. These changes are important both to clients and practitioners because post-grant challenges have become a key component in the enforcement and defense of patent rights.2 Notably, the Patent Office rule changes illustrate that the rules of post-grant proceedings are not set in stone and that the Patent Office is sensitive to issues of fairness. The most important areas addressed by the Patent Office's 2016 rule changes are as follows:

Claim Construction Standard

Importantly, the Patent Office considered but ultimately declined to change one of its most contentious rules—that for any unexpired patent examined in a post-grant proceeding, the Patent Office will use the Broadest Reasonable Interpretation (BRI) claim construction standard, as opposed to the Phillips claim construction standard used in District Court proceedings. Notably, by the time that the Patent Office issued its decision to keep the rule unchanged, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had already affirmed the Patent Office's use of the rule,3 and the Supreme Court later agreed.4 But the Patent Office did clarify that for patents that are set to expire within 18 months of the petition, either party can request a Phillips-type claim construction standard.

The Patent Owner Can Submit New Testimonial Evidence with a Preliminary Response

One of the most important changes to the PTAB practice is the new ability of Patent Owners to submit testimonial evidence in support of their preliminary Patent Owner statements (submitted prior to an Institution Decision). Before May 2, 2016, a petitioner was able to submit a petition challenging the validity of a patent along with supporting testimonial evidence (e.g., an expert declaration), but the patent owner was only able to argue against institution and could not submit any supporting testimonial evidence. The Patent Office changed its rule to correct the apparent asymmetry by "allow[ing] a patent owner to submit new testimonial evidence with its preliminary response."5 In the six months since this rule change, roughly 31 percent of Patent Owners preliminary responses filed have included such declarations. However, notably, in the four decisions on institution that have resulted therefrom, the Board instituted trial in all four cases despite the Patent Owner having submitted a declaration with its preliminary response. See Amneal Pharms. LLC. v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al., IPR2016-01028, Paper 12 at 36-37 and IPR2016-01027, Paper 13 at 29 (instituting trial even though the patent owner submitted a declaration with regards to secondary considerations of nonobviousness); see also AM General LLC v. UUSI LLC, IPR2016-01050, Paper 17 at 25-26 (instituting trial even though the patent owner submitted a declaration attempting to distinguish the prior art).

It may well be the case that this rule change does not bring a substantial shift in institution decisions because "any factual dispute created by [the patent owner's] testimonial evidence that is material to the institution decision will be resolved in favor of the petitioner solely for purposes of determining whether to institute a trial."6 The Patent Office still has only three months after receiving the preliminary response to decide whether to institute review, which is not enough time to "allow generally for cross-examination of a" patent owner's declarant or to resolve factual disputes. Therefore, declarations that only raise a battle between experts will not be enough to avoid institution. For example, in Akamai Techs. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., the Patent Office received expert declarations from both the petitioner and patent owner regarding the construction of a claim term and ultimately determined that since they created a "genuine issue of material fact" the Patent Office credited the petitioner's declaration and instituted trial. IPR2016-01011, Paper 8 at 13.

Similarly, while the Patent Office does not allow "the petitioner to file a reply brief as of right," the Patent Office may allow a petitioner to file a reply upon a showing of good cause. In the six months since the rule changes, petitioners have filed roughly 30 such motions, half of which were granted. Notably, in the Akamai proceeding discussed above the petitioner filed a preliminary reply and the patent owner a surreply (on the issue of standing) and the Patent Office still instituted trial.

But we have yet to see whether this rule change will affect the course and outcome of a PTAB trial, where the Patent Office fairly weighs the strength of the experts against each other without any petitioner tie-breaker. Moreover, while a preliminary Patent Owner declaration may not be enough to dispose of trial altogether, the patent owner can use the opportunity to, through an expert, raise issues of credibility and recast facts before institution, refine those positions throughout trial and ultimately achieve success in a Final Written Decision.

Sanctions

The Patent Office also provided a mechanism to assure a level of good faith dealings by practitioners and parties during post-grant proceedings, by implying certifications with papers submitted in post-grant reviews and exposing practitioners and parties to sanctions if they don't comply, akin to Rule 11 certification in district court practice. The Patent Office amended 37 C.F.R. 42.11 to specify that when a party makes a submission in a post-grant proceeding, the party impliedly certifies, to the best of their knowledge, that: (1) the paper is not being filed for an improper purpose; (2) all legal positions taken therein are warranted by either existing law or a non-frivolous argument to change the law; (3) all factual allegations made therein have (or will likely have) evidentiary support; and (4) all denials of factual contentions are true and have evidentiary support or are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief.7 Sanctions are available against any attorney, registered practitioner or party that violates this rule is or responsible for such a violation.

In the six months since this rule was implemented, there has been only one request for authorization to file a motion for sanctions under the new rule. The request was filed in six separate proceedings. See Hilti, Inc. and Snap-On Inc.v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp., IPR2015-01164, IPR2015-01165, IPR2015-01166, Paper 70; Snap-On Inc.v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp., IPR2015-01242, IPR2015- 01243, IPR2015-01244, Paper 70. The patent owner alleged that the petitioner paid its declarant for his testimony and to "dig up" confidential documents from a third party. The Patent Office denied the request because the patent owner did not suggest that the rate paid the declarant was unreasonable for the time spent or why any breach of the patent owner's confidentiality by the third party should be attributable to the declarant and Petitioner. While there has only been one ruling thus far under the revised rule, based on the tenor of the Board's decision to date, we can fairly assume that the PTAB will use its sanctions power sparingly.

In addition to the substantive changes discussed above, the Patent Office's 2016 rule changes also touched procedural aspects of PTAB proceedings, namely page limits:

Relaxing Page Limits

Previously, parties to post-grant proceedings were highly constrained by many of the Patent Office's strict page limits. So in rule changes on April 1 and May 2, 2016 the Patent Office changed the page limits on party submission to word limits. While this change may seem small, it allows parties dealing with complicated technologies to effectively use graphics to illustrate complex technological nuances without worrying about page constraints. The Patent Office also expanded the limits for certain submissions for which parties felt especially constrained (i.e., motion to amend, opposition to motion to amend, and petitioner's reply). We expect to see an increased use of illustrations or graphics to explain technology and convey arguments in light of the PTO's rule changes.

Conclusion

It is too soon to know what kind of impact the Patent Office's new rules will have on post-grant proceeding outcomes. But it is clear that the Patent Office cares about the public's perception of post-grant proceedings and is willing to listen to criticisms and take measured rule-changing action in response.


» Read more articles from our latest report, PTAB Monitor: Developments in Inter Partes Review Practice.


1.http://www.uspto.gov/blog/director/entry/ptab_s_quick_fixes_for

2.http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2016-07-31%20PTAB.pdf at 6.

3.In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC, 793 F.3d 1268, 1278 (Fed. Cir. July 8, 2015).

4.Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 2131, 195 L. Ed. 2d 423 (2016)

5.http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/81%20FR%2018750.pdf at 18755; 37 C.F.R. 42.107(a).

6. http://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/81%20FR%2018750.pdf at 18755; 37 C.F.R. 42.108(c).

7. See 37 C.F.R. 11.18(b)(2).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Haug Partners
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Haug Partners
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions