United States: Key Takeaways From The Sedona Conference Commentary On Defense Of eDiscovery Process: Principles 10-13 (Part IV)

Last Updated: December 12 2016
Article by Natalya Northrip

In Part I, Part II, and Part III of this series, we discussed the key takeaways from Principles 1-3, 4-6, and 7-9, respectively, of The Sedona Conference WG1's "Commentary on Defense of Process: Principles and Guidelines for Developing and Implementing a Sound E-Discovery Process" (available for download here). The Commentary seeks to address what parties can do to avoid, or at the least prepare for, challenges to an eDiscovery process they apply in a given matter and how courts should address discovery disputes.

In today's installment, we discuss the key takeaways from the remaining principles, Principles 10-13 of the Commentary.

Principle 10. A party may use any reasonable process, including a technology-assisted process, to identify and withhold privileged or otherwise protected information. A party should not be required to use any process that does not adequately protect its rights to withhold privileged or otherwise protected information from production.

Parties have a right to not reveal their privileged or otherwise protected information, and attorneys have a duty to protect such information belonging to their clients. The need to design an eDiscovery process that appropriately identifies and withholds privileged information is one of the highest priorities during any review and production undertaking. This is so because a party wishing to rely on the "claw-back" provisions of Federal Rule of Evidence 502(b) in case of inadvertent disclosure of privileged information would need to demonstrate that it "took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure."

When it comes to privilege review, reasonableness and proportionality are evaluated depending on the circumstances at hand, including time constraints, resource limitations, the volumes of ESI, the complexity of the task, and the inevitability of human error. Case law suggests, for instance, that failing to review a sample of "non-hits" (documents that were not responsive to the search terms) to test the effectiveness of the selection criteria developed to identify privileged material, would be inherently "not reasonable." See Victor Stanley Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., 250 F.R.D. 251 (2008).

The Commentary cautions that the use of TAR in privilege review (compared to when TAR is used for responsiveness determination) is relatively new and may require the use of other quality-assessment approaches. This can be addressed through a supplemental manual review. Because manual review can take considerable time, parties should be prepared to provide an accurate estimate to the court of the time needed to conduct privilege review when requesting a reasonable production deadline.

Principle 11. Whenever possible, a dispute about an e-discovery process should be timely resolved through informed mechanisms, such as mediation between the parties and conferences with the court, rather than through formal motion practice and hearings.

The Commentary points out that early identification and resolution of potential eDiscovery disputes is critical to avoiding costly "discovery about discovery" and moving the case along. Many eDiscovery disputes can be resolved through proper communication between parties. Several mechanisms are built into the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and their state counterparts, to ensure that parties have an opportunity to focus on their eDiscovery strategy and articulating their respective positions.

  • Rule 26(f) provides for discovery planning, during which parties are encouraged to discuss their eDiscovery plans and attempt to agree on an eDiscovery protocol that will govern document collection, review, and protection in their case.
  • Rule 26(c) calls for a meet-and-confer process prior to filing a motion for protective order when discovery requests have been served. Often disputes as to the scope of the request can be negotiated at this stages, without the need to involve the court. At a minimum, this exercise can provide a way to rehearse and test an argument before the motion is filed.
  • Rule 37(a)(1) calls for a meet-and-confer process prior to filing a motion to compel production. Similarly to a Rule 26(c) meet-and-confer, this process can help resolve the dispute or, at a minimum, help sharpen the argument.

Additional mechanisms are available for resolving eDiscovery disputes, including mediation and Special Masters. The Commentary points out the innovation of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in creating a panel of Electronic Discovery Special Masters ("EDSM") to assist in addressing ESI issues that may arise during litigation in the district. EDSM panel members are appointed by a committee of judges from the district in accordance with a set of criteria, including experience with eDiscovery issues. Once a determination is made that an EDSM panel should be involved and the parties have selected an EDSM panel member, the court will specify the Special Master's duties, "which may include, by way of example, developing protocols for the preservation, retrieval or search of potentially relevant ESI; developing protective orders to address concerns regarding the protection of privileged or confidential information; monitoring discovery compliance; [and] resolving discovery disputes." Western District of Pennsylvania, ED Information.

Wider adoption of EDSM panels by courts could provide great benefit by ensuring that a certain level of expertise and consistency is applied to eDiscovery disputes in a given jurisdiction and that case judges can focus on the merits of each case rather than on the eDiscovery process.

Principle 12. A party should not be required to provide discovery about its e-discovery process without good cause.

This principle is based on the premise that parties have a right to choose and apply their own eDiscovery process without being questioned about it until and unless good cause exists to question the quality of the results of that process. Consistent with the proportionality principles incorporated in Rules 26(b)(1) and 26(g), the District of Kansas, for example, explicitly stated in its eDiscovery guidelines that discovery about discovery should only be permitted upon a showing of good cause, considering the specific need for the discovery, including its relevance and the suitability of alternative means of obtaining information. District of Kansas, Guidelines for Cases Involving Electronically Stored Information (ESI), at 9 (July 18, 2013).

The Commentary suggests that reasonable and proportional discovery about discovery should be allowed. This includes, for instance, interrogatories seeking the identity of document custodians or deposition questions about the party's IT systems or data sources. However, more burdensome or wide-ranging discovery about discovery, such as Rule 30(b)(6) depositions of a party's IT staff or eDiscovery vendor, or extensive interrogatories about a party's preservation and production efforts or the eDiscovery process employed in the case should only be permitted upon the showing of good cause.

Principle 13. The court should not decide a motion regarding the adequacy of an e-discovery process without a sufficient factual record. In many instances, such a motion may not be ripe for determination before there has been substantial or complete production.

The Commentary makes an excellent observation that often discovery disputes are brought to court prematurely, thereby wasting judicial and party resources and time. The party seeking discovery or objecting to the reasonableness of the responding party's eDiscovery process has the burden of proving that a discovery response is deficient. Simple logic dictates that completeness of a discovery response cannot be judged until the actual production is complete. An exception to this would be a situation where it is demonstrably obvious that a party is about to embark on a patently deficient eDiscovery process, for instance, by applying a date range that does not include the entire period at issue in the case. In such situations, posing an early challenge to an eDiscovery process would prevent the need to expand the scope of eDiscovery at a later stage.

Using the Commentary's guidance on what constitutes a defensible eDiscovery process will undoubtedly prove useful to parties and courts, particularly during the time of changing technology and evolving eDiscovery case law, as courts work on defining the impact of the amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Natalya Northrip
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions