ARTICLE
7 December 2016

IRC § 673(c): An ING Bar Or An ING Hurdle?

WE
Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

Contributor

More than 800 attorneys strong, Wilson Elser serves clients of all sizes across multiple industries. It maintains 38 domestic offices, another in London and enjoys more extensive international reach as a founding member of Legalign Global.  The firm is currently ranked 56th in the National Law Journal’s NLJ 500.
William D. Lipkind (Partner-New Jersey) and Tammy L. Meyer (Of Counsel-New Jersey) collaborated on "IRC § 673(c): An ING Bar or an ING Hurdle?"...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

William D. Lipkind (Partner-New Jersey) and Tammy L. Meyer (Of Counsel-New Jersey) collaborated on "IRC § 673(c): An ING Bar or an ING Hurdle?" published in the November 2016 issue of Leimberg's Asset Protection Planning Newsletter. PLR 201642019 (the 2016 PLR) revokedthe conclusion of Ruling 1 of PLR 201426014 (the 2014 PLR), which held that the trust under consideration (the Trust) was not a grantor trust, i.e., that income of the Trust would not be taxable to the grantor pursuant to IRC § 671. The reason given for the revocation was that the grantor held a reversionary interest within the meaning of IRC § 673(a). Bill and Tammy submit that the 2016 PLR is not supportable as a matter of law, or was based on facts not disclosed, or did not fully reflect the reasoning of the draftsperson.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More