United States: What Now? The Outlook For Tax Policy After The 2016 Elections

Last Updated: November 30 2016
Article by Warren Payne

In a Legal Update prior to the US 2016 elections, we highlighted the possibility of tax policy legislation being considered in the lame-duck and discussed the prospects for tax reform in 2017. Post-election, the odds of any significant tax legislation being considered in the lame-duck have declined significantly. With full GOP control of both the executive and legislative branches pending in 2017, most major policy changes will be deferred until then.

Full GOP control significantly increases the odds for tax reform. In fact, it is nearly a certainty that tax reform legislation will be considered and the odds of enactment of major tax legislation within the next two years are very high. It will take time for the incoming administration to staff up, but work on legislation by Congress will begin quickly. This Legal Update provides interested taxpayers with information on some of the key considerations, with regard to both process and policy, that policymakers will need to address in the course of drafting, considering and enacting any tax reform legislation. As policymakers address these issues, those decisions will have broad ramifications on the timing and scope of any tax reform legislation being enacted into law.


The process of drafting, analyzing, reviewing and voting on tax reform legislation in Congress is time-consuming and resource-intensive. The process will take several months. Therefore, the earliest we would expect any tax reform legislation to be effective would be January 2018. We think it is quite possible that given the complex nature of tax reform and the competing demand on the time and resources of Congress from other policy issues, enactment of tax reform legislation could take until early 2019. In such a situation the effective date of any reform legislation would likely shift to January 2020. Further, many tax policy changes may be phased in over a period of time. For example, in the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the reduction in tax rates were phased in over two years and under a recent congressional proposal, the Tax Reform Act of 2014, the reduction in the corporate rate was phased in over five years.


The process by which tax reform legislation will be considered can have a significant impact on the policies enacted. There are essentially two different processes that Congress can use to draft and consider tax reform legislation: 1) regular order or 2) budget reconciliation. Major legislation has been enacted into law using both of these processes and, in some cases, the combination of the two.

Regular order basically describes the normal process through which legislation is considered. In the case of tax reform legislation, it means that the tax-writing committees, Ways & Means in the House and Finance in the Senate, originate the legislation and the legislation is considered under the normal rules in the House and Senate. In the Senate, this process includes the ability of senators to filibuster the legislation.

In contrast, budget reconciliation is a special process that allows the majority party in the Senate to avoid the filibuster. Specifically, the budget reconciliation process begins with the agreement between the House and Senate on a budget resolution. The budget resolution gives the Budget Committees in the House and Senate the authority to send instructions to the Ways & Means and Finance Committees to consider tax legislation. The legislation produced by those two committees is then sent back to the Budget Committees and subsequently considered under special rules by the whole House and Senate. In the Senate, the key benefit is that the legislation can be passed with just a simple majority vote and therefore there is no opportunity to filibuster the legislation.

There are, however, significant budget and process rules that are unique to the budget reconciliation process. These rules can limit the options policymakers have in crafting the legislation. For example, one key budget rule prohibits the consideration of legislation that would increase the deficit in the long-run or beyond the ten-year budget window. This rule is why the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (also known as the Bush tax cuts) was enacted on a temporary basis. Thus, there are significant downsides to using the budget reconciliation process.

In addition, the budget reconciliation process is generally considered a partisan exercise as it denies the minority party in the Senate its ability to filibuster legislation. If congressional Republicans were to use the budget reconciliation process, it would increase the likelihood that the crafting of the legislation would be primarily a partisan exercise.

Several key Republican policymakers in Congress as well as the incoming administration have signaled an interest in making the tax reform effort bipartisan. A bipartisan process increases the likelihood that enough members of Congress would support the legislation so that Congress would not need the budget reconciliation process to avoid the Senate filibuster. However, a bipartisan process also means that both Democrats and Republicans will likely have to compromise on key policy issues in order maintain bipartisanship.

Advisors for the incoming administration have floated the possibility of pursuing a two-step process under which Congress first considers the business aspects of the tax code, likely on a bipartisan basis, and then subsequently addresses the individual side of the code, likely on a more partisan basis.

Lastly, congressional Republicans have the option of starting the process on a bipartisan basis but subsequently moving to the budget reconciliation process if congressional Democrats are unwilling to sufficiently compromise in the negotiations. The first few months of 2017 will reveal the answer to the question of how bipartisan the process will be, and the answer to that question will likely provide the answer as to whether Congress proceeds under regular order or through budget reconciliation.


The scope of any tax reform legislation will be highly influenced by the extent to which the exercise is bipartisan. Comprehensive tax reform is generally meant to denote tax reform that applies to both the individual and business components of the tax code. Both Republicans in the House of Representatives and the incoming administration have comprehensive tax reform proposals. Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee Orin Hatch, the leader for Senate Republicans on tax policy, has been developing a corporate integration proposal that would reform only the corporate aspects of the tax code. Democrats have generally been opposed to tax reform efforts that would lower the top tax rates that apply to individuals. However, many Democrats have indicated a willingness to reform the business side of the code, and in particular, the international aspects of the code. This creates an opportunity for bipartisan legislation that addresses the business and international aspects of the code. However, if congressional Republicans start the process by trying to enact comprehensive reform, the process is more likely to be partisan, in which case, the use of the budget reconciliation process is also more likely.

Policy Considerations

The process has an impact on the policy. For example, if Congress proceeds on a process that first addresses the business and international aspects of the code, it could avoid the budget reconciliation process. This means that the legislation would not be subject to the long-term budget tests described above. This is particularly important for international reform as virtually any significant and meaningful reform of the international aspect of the code would fail the long-term budget test.

Proceeding with business tax reform first also means that Congress will have to specifically address the taxation of pass-through entities. The current administration has opposed lowering rates for pass-through entities and instead has generally advocated that large pass-through entities should be taxed as C corporations and smaller pass-through entities be dealt with through faster cost-recovery and expanded cash-accounting rules. These proposals have been viewed as non-starters by Republicans and many Democrats. Therefore, some form of relief on tax rates for pass-through entities is likely necessary.

House Republicans have proposed a structure that would provide a separate and lower rate for qualified pass-through entity income. We summarized this structure and the important political aspects of this approach in a prior Legal Update. Designing and implementing separate rate structure is complex and few details are currently available as to how Congress would attempt this. However, there are a few broad aspects we can highlight at this time. First, the rules around determining which income qualifies would likely need to be extremely arbitrary so as to minimize the ability of taxpayers to qualify income that would more properly be considered wage income. For example, it is quite possible that Congress would simply exclude certain types of income, e.g., professional services income, completely from qualifying. Congress might also set caps on the amount of income a taxpayer could qualify for under the separate pass-through rate. There are also numerous aspects of the code that interact with a separate rate structure for pass-throughs that would need to be addressed. These include the applicability of payroll taxes, treatment of carried interest and reasonable compensation rules. Because Congress has not specified decisions on many of the design issues around creating a separate rate structure for pass-throughs, taxpayers interested in these issues have a window of opportunity to influence the decision-making process.

The trade-off between the amount of benefits policymakers can provide versus the amount of revenue that can be raised through politically acceptable base broadeners will be a major issue for policymakers. We anticipate that policymakers will subject themselves to some budget constraint, regardless of the process they adopt. Even with the application of dynamic scoring, policymakers will have a finite amount of revenue they can use to provide tax reform benefits before the revenue loss is too large relative to the revenue that can be raised through politically acceptable base broadeners. The enactment of the PATH Act at the end of 2015 mitigates this constraint somewhat. That legislation made a number of temporary tax policies permanent without offsetting the revenue loss. Thus, policymakers need to raise several hundred billion dollars less in revenue to achieve the revenue-neutral reform that they did prior to 2015.

When wrestling with what benefits to provide, much of the focus will be on the options of lowering rates versus accelerating cost recovery. Any budget constraint will limit the ability of policymakers to both lower rates and accelerate cost recovery. Some industry sectors benefit more from lower rates than faster cost recovery while the reverse is true in other sectors. The ultimate balance between lower rates and faster cost recovery that is struck by policymakers could have a significant impact on how different sectors benefit from reform.

Potentially one of the biggest base broadeners policymakers will consider is the treatment of interest expense. The House Republican proposal eliminates interest deductions, both for domestic and international interest expenses, except when applied to interest income. Inclusion of such a policy would likely have a profound impact on how businesses raise capital and may have significant secondary impacts on the broader corporate debt market. Other policies that have been proposed that would limit, but not eliminate, the ability of businesses to deduct interest expenses include broad thin cap rules, deducting an inflation factor from interest expense and with respect solely to the international aspects of the code, further limitations under section 163(j).

Lastly, with regard to international tax reform, we think it extremely unlikely that policymakers will settle for an international-only tax reform. Instead, policymakers will incorporate international reform in a broader tax reform process. In addition, there is significant interest among policymakers in using some of the revenue raised in international tax reform to fund large investments in infrastructure.

In the course of designing any international tax reform, policymakers will need to address two core policy issues. First will be the degree to which the United States gives up the right to tax foreign-source income. The answer to this question will impact the size of the exemption from US tax that any repatriated income will receive. Second will be how policymakers design anti-base erosion rules to minimize or block the incentive to move operations overseas to take advantage of the reduced tax on repatriated income. Until recently, policymakers have focused anti-base erosion rules on a subset of income, namely interest and intangible income. However, the recent House Republican proposal takes a much broader approach. It proposes to make the corporate income tax code border adjustable, in a manner similar to how VATs are border adjustable. We summarized this concept in a prior Legal Update. While Congress has yet to provide any significant detail on how such a policy would be designed and implemented, the potential consequences are vast. Substantial disruptions to global supply chains are likely, and given that the United States runs a large trade deficit, the potential of such a policy to trigger significant inflation pressure is quite real.

In conclusion, we expect that policymakers will dedicate significant time and resources to the tax reform effort and full Republican control drastically increases the odds that policymakers will be successful in enacting tax reform legislation. However, exactly what path that process takes and what the final legislation looks like are very unclear at this point. Over the next several months, policymakers will make decisions that will help clarify and refine where the tax reform process will go.

Originally published 29 November 2016

Learn more about our Government Relations, International Trade and Tax practices.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2016. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.