United States: Patent Office Proposes Rule Changes Concerning Patent Agent And Foreign Patent Practitioner Privilege And Duty Of Disclosure

Recognizing Patent Agent and Foreign Practitioner Privilege

On October 18, 2016, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the "PTO") issued a proposed rule that would "amend the rules of practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to recognize that, in connection with discovery conducted in certain proceedings at the United States Patent and Trademark Office... communications between U.S. patent agents or foreign patent practitioners and their clients are privileged to the same extent as communications between clients and U.S. attorneys.1

The PTO's proposal stems from a February 2015 roundtable and solicitation of comments on attorney-client privilege issues. Commenters "unanimously supported a rule recognizing" a patent agent privilege.2

The PTO's currently-proposed rule is especially timely and necessary to resolve the uncertainty over patent agent privilege created by the various judicial and administrative bodies. As the PTO noted, "PTAB proceedings are subject to the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE), which include rules on attorney-client privilege.... Accordingly, privilege may be asserted in PTAB proceedings by licensed attorneys. However, the FRE does not explicitly address privilege for communications with non- attorney U.S. patent agents or with foreign patent practitioners."3 Moreover, "[t]he rules governing PTAB practice likewise do not address this matter, and when it arises, PTAB Administrative Law Judges make legal determinations as to which communications may be protected from disclosure on a case-by-case basis, based on common law."4 And, the PTO recognized that "U.S. courts have devised several different approaches to determine under what circumstances communications with these practitioners are privileged... and results sometimes conflict."5

Earlier this year, the Federal Circuit appeared to have clarified matters in In re Queens, holding that the patent agent privilege extends to communications with patent agents when those agents are acting within the scope of their authorized practice of law before the PTO.6 The Federal Circuit examined the unique role of patent agents and the history and treatment of the profession by Congress and the Supreme Court, with the majority concluding that the agent-client relationship is virtually indistinguishable from the attorney-client relationship.7 A lack of the patent agent privilege, the court found, would hinder communications between patent agents and their clients, thereby undermining Congress's dual-path system affording applicants the choice between agents and attorneys.8

But, more recently, a Texas Appellate Court re-injected uncertainty into the discussion. In In re Silver, the Texas Appellate Court denied a petition for mandamus, and declined to adopt the patent agent privilege recently recognized by the Federal Circuit.9 The petition arose from an underlying contract dispute wherein the trial court did not recognize the patent agent privilege because it is not recognized by Texas statute or rule.10 Without the authority to adopt a new discovery privilege, the Texas Appellate Court found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to adopt the privilege.11 It further found that the Federal Circuit precedent in the patent case In re Queens was not binding in this breach of contract case.12 Rather, the patent agent privilege does not govern communications "that are not reasonably necessary and incident to the prosecution of patents before the [PTO]."13 And, "in a civil case, state law governs privilege regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision."14

The PTO's proposal also seems to go beyond the Federal Circuit's In re Queens holding, as it appears to bring communications with non-U.S. patent-related personnel within the ambit of the privilege. This issue has, for some time, been of special interest to companies based in countries—like Japan—with few lawyers, and where in-house IP departments are largely staffed by "informally" trained ex-engineers, so long as they are "authorized to practice patent matters in foreign jurisdictions."15 The PTO's proposal will not completely solve this issue for these companies, as it remains unclear how courts will deal with in-house communications that are not clearly related to a proceeding before the PTO.

The comment period ends on December 19, 2016.

Modifications to Duty of Disclosure

In addition to the proposed rule on patent agent privilege, on October 28, 2016, the PTO published a proposed rule revising the duty to disclose information in patent applications and reexamination proceedings in light of the 2011 Federal Circuit Therasense case.16 In Therasense, an en banc Federal Circuit tightened the materiality standard for inequitable conduct, holding that "the materiality required to establish inequitable conduct is but-for materiality"—likely reducing the number of inequitable conduct cases that the Court would have to review. The PTO's proposed rule would modify 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.56(a) and 1.555(b) to incorporate but-for materiality as set forth in Therasense into the materiality standard for the duty of disclosure. It would also incorporate affirmative egregious misconduct to address any fraudulent schemes that might arise under the but-for materiality standard.

The PTO stated that the proposed rule would have the following positive effects: (1) simplifying the patent system as a whole; (2) decreasing the frequency of inequitable conduct charges; (3) lessening the amount of marginally relevant information in information disclosure statements; (4) enhancing patent quality through more focused prior art submissions; and (5) continuing to encourage applicants to act in good faith.

While the proposed rule would appear to officially narrow the duty of disclosure, we believe that it is unlikely to have significant practical effect, as applicants likely will continue to err on the side of over-disclosure.

The comment period ends on December 27, 2016.


1 81 Fed. Reg. 71653, 71653–54 (Oct. 18, 2016) (to be codified at 37 C.F.R. pt. 42).

2 Id. at 71654.


4 Id. (citing GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc., IPR2014-00041, Paper 117 (PTAB 2014) (ordering Petitioner to produce documents despite Petitioner's argument that said documents were protected by the attorney-client privilege)).

5  81 Fed. Reg. 71653, at 71654.

6 In re Queen's Univ. at Kingston, 820 F.3d 1287, 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2016).

7 Id. at 1300.

8 Id.

9 In re Silver, – S.W.3d –, 2016 WL 4386004 (Tex. App. Aug. 14, 2016).

10Id. at *2–3.

11 Id at *3.

12 Id.

13 Id. (quoting In re Queen's, 820 F.3d at 1301–02).

14 Id. (quoting In re Queen's, 820 F.3d at 1294).

15 The Notice defines the term "patent practitioner" to include "both those authorized to practice patent matters before the USPTO and those authorized to practice patent matters in foreign jurisdictions."

16 Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co., 649 F.3d 1276 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (en banc).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions