United States: New Rules For OTT Services—The EU Commission's Draft Electronic Communications Code

In December 2015, we reported about a German court that classified Google's Gmail as a regulated telecommunications service. This court decision added to the discussion of whether and to what extent communications services that are provided "over the top" (OTT) (i.e., via the open Internet) shall be regulated under European telecommunications laws. The Gmail decision also provided momentum for the traditional telcos' call for a regulatory "level playing field" among traditional telecoms services (e.g., voice telephony over fixed or mobile networks, or SMS services) and OTT services. Google's appeal against the Gmail decision is still pending so, under current German law, these particular questions will not be finally resolved for quite some time. In a very similar case, the National Regulatory Authority (NRA) of Belgium fined Skype this summer with more than EUR 220,000 for failure to notify itself as a provider of SkypeOut as an – allegedly – regulated telecoms service. And most recently, a Belgian court issued a further fine against Skype for failure to comply with statutory obligations addressed to providers of regulated telecoms services. It can be expected that Skype will appeal this decision.

In September 2016, however, the European Commission presented a new draft directive, the European Communications Code (ECC). The ECC shall enact a specific regulatory framework for OTT communications services. While under this framework many OTT services would only become subject to a limited set of new requirements, others—specifically those that allow a breakout to the public switched telephone network (PSTN)—would then be regulated on the same level as traditional telecoms services.

For a quick overview of the ECC, please also refer to our infographic which can be downloaded here.


The ECC shall replace the current EU telecoms framework which was last revised in 2009, and which consists of four different directives (Access Directive, Authorisation Directive, Framework Directive and Universal Service Directive).

The discussion on the regulatory treatment of OTT communications services demonstrates one of the major shortcomings of the current regulatory framework because its statutory definition of an electronic communications service (ECS) is rather blurry. It leaves Member States with a lot of room for interpretation whether a specific service consists "mainly in the conveyance of signals" as demanded by the current definition of ECS under European law and thus qualifies as a regulated service. This is especially questionable where the provider of the respective service does not control the underlying transmission infrastructure and does not at least send all traffic through a central infrastructure. The statutory definition therefore allows for strictly technical interpretations (rather favoring the non-regulation of OTT services) as well as more functional interpretations (rather favoring regulation of OTT services).

These uncertainties result in a patchwork of deviating regulatory views on OTT services across the European Union. On the one hand, in an early statement in 2004, the Commission itself suggested that VoIP services shall not be considered to be regulated telecoms services. On the other hand, Member States (like the German NRA and court with respect to Gmail or the Belgian NRA with respect to SkypeOut) took a stricter approach toward regulating OTT services. Most recently, as mentioned above, a Belgian court imposed a EUR 30,000 fine on Skype for failing to comply with an order to cooperate with Belgian law enforcement authorities. Similar to the German order demanding Google to register its Gmail service as a regulated ECS, both Belgian orders were also based on the assumption that Skype and SkypeOut qualify as a regulated ECS under Belgian telecoms law, which is also based on the current European regulatory framework. While the court's full decision is not yet available, Skype apparently argued that it does not provide an ECS, but merely offers software allowing its users to communicate without Skype's further involvement.


With the draft ECC, the Commission now suggests an amended ECS definition. In the future, ECS shall be subdivided into three different service categories, whereas multiple categories may apply to the same service:

  • Internet Access Services as defined in the Net Neutrality Regulation (EU/2015/2120). The definition includes all services that provide access to the Internet, and thereby connectivity to virtually all end points of the Internet, irrespective of the network technology and terminal equipment used.
  • Interpersonal Communications Services is a subcategory that includes all services that allow direct interpersonal communication and therefore also most OTT services. See below for further details of the specific criteria.
  • Other services are also included but only if they mainly consist of the conveyance of signals. According to the Commission, this shall include transmission services for M2M communications or for broadcasting, both of which do not include Internet access or interpersonal communications.

Services in either of these subcategories shall only be subject to regulation if they are normally provided for remuneration. This requirement was also at stake in the German Gmail case, where the relevant questions (e.g., Is a service provided for remuneration if it is provided free of charge to the users but features paid advertisements?) are still unresolved.

If the ECC is adopted as currently drafted, most traditional as well as OTT communications services targeted at end users will qualify as Interpersonal Communications Services (ICS)—and therefore also as regulated ECS.

The ECC defines all services as ICS to which all of the following criteria apply:

1. Services that enable direct interpersonal and interactive exchange of information via an electronic communications network This includes all services that allow the user to engage in live voice and/or video conversation or to exchange text, voice, video or email messages. In contrast, transmission services for M2M communications, for example, will not qualify as an ICS because these services do not entail an interpersonal exchange of information, but merely facilitate the exchange of information between individual IoT devices or an IoT device and its human operator;


2. Services that allow such exchange of information only between a finite number of persons as defined by initiator and/or the participants This includes all services that allow the exchange of information among certain individuals or a limited number of persons. In contrast, it excludes broadcast transmission services from the scope of ICS. These services allow the exchange of interpersonal information, but broadcasting always entails one-to-many communications; and

3. Services that are not ancillary features of another service This includes interpersonal exchanges of information that must not merely be a minor feature of another service to which they are intrinsically linked. This excludes, e.g., a chat feature that is part of a video game from the scope of ICS.

To allow for a graduated level of regulation, the ECC divides ICS into two further subcategories:

  • Number-based ICS are capable of PSTN communications either via E.164 numbers assigned by the service provider, or by enabling communication with third-party E.164 numbers (without assigning such numbers to its own users). Accordingly, only services which allow for a "breakout" to the PSTN will be subject to the regulatory requirements addressed for Number-based ICS.
  • All other ICS are defined as Number-independent ICS. This subcategory also includes services that use E.164 numbers for purposes other than the actual communications process (e.g., to identify user accounts as is the case with WhatsApp or iMessage).

Compared to the current framework, the Commission has decided to set aside the approach of defining regulated ECS merely based on technical features (i.e., the conveyance of signals). Instead, the ECC suggests adopting more of a functional understanding of the relevant communications services.


Since most OTT services would qualify as an ICS based on the suggested ECC definition, these services will generally also qualify as regulated ECS. This does not, however, mean that all OTT services will be subject to a level of regulation similar to the one currently imposed on traditional telecoms services. Rather, the Commission wanted to involve a degree of deregulation for all regulated services. At the same time, where necessary, a more limited set of communications-specific rules should be applied to all relevant traditional telecoms services and OTT services—but only if the latter are comparable to traditional telecoms services.

Therefore, under the draft ECC, only Number-based ICS will be regulated on the same level as traditional telecoms services. However, some level of regulation will also apply to Number-independent ICS, i.e., OTT services that do not allow a PSTN breakout. As a general approach, the Commission chose to only make providers of Number-independent ICS subject to regulatory obligations where this is required by public policy interests:

  • The provision of Number-independent ICS will not require any individual or even general authorisation by any of the Member States' NRA. However, providers of Number-independent ICS may still be required to notify NRAsabout their service commencement. But it shall be sufficient to submit such notification to BEREC instead of having to file it with the competent NRA in each Member State where the service shall be offered.
  • Providers of Number-independent ICS shall not have to participate in the dispute resolution scheme prescribed for all other ICS.
  • Users of Number-independent ICS will generally not have to be provided with the ability to reach emergency services via the respective service.
  • Most of the sector-specific consumer protection rules set forth in the ECC will only apply to Number-based ICS and Internet Access Services. In particular, this concerns the following provisions which will not apply to Number-independent ICS: o Transparency obligations demanding the publication of general or quality-of-service-related information;
    • Additional information requirements that the ECC sets forth with respect to end-user contracts;
    • Sector-specific restrictions on the maximum duration of end-user contracts and end-users' additional statutory rights to terminate such contracts; and
    • Providers of Number-independent ICS shall have no obligation to facilitate change of provider.
  • Finally—and in contrast to some demands by traditional telcos—Number-independent ICS will not have to be interoperable with each other. Respective obligations may, however, be imposed by the respective NRA if the general access to emergency services or the general end-to-end connectivity between end users becomes endangered due to an overall lack of interoperability among ICS. From today's perspective, such a situation seems unlikely. It may, however, occur if end users start using or providers start offering services with end-to-end (i.e., PSTN) connectivity on a larger scale.

While all of the aforementioned rules and obligations do not apply to Number-independent ICS, OTT services with a PSTN breakout that can be qualified as Number-based ICS will be subject to all of these respective provisions and traditional telecoms services will be as well.


The current draft ECC generally allows only for little Member State deviation or additional regulations on the topics within its scope. Nevertheless, its implementation into Member State law will likely still not provide for a consistent regulatory framework for OTT (and other ECS) services across the EU. In particular, Member States will remain relatively free to impose further obligations on all ECS providers' ECS (including Number-independent ICS) where deemed necessary to ensure the protection of national security interests, to safeguard public policy, public morality and public security, or to permit criminal prosecution.

This is already the case under the current telecoms regulatory framework and shall not change under the ECC. As a consequence, OTT providers may still be facing different regulatory regimes in different EU Member States, in particular with respect to the following regulations:

  • Depending on the respective Member State law, such public security obligations may require providers to disclose information about their users (e.g., names, records or addresses).
  • Providers may be required to maintain records on communications activity under applicable data retention regimes and to provide access to such information for law enforcement authorities.
  • Providers may be obligated to allow legal interception of ongoing communications amongst their end users.

These changes could raise tricky questions regarding how to comply with legal developments in this area from a technical standpoint, and in a way which will be consistent with privacy and confidentiality requirements in other EU legal instruments such as the ePrivacy Directive and the General Data Protection Regulation.

Therefore, OTT providers should be prepared to increasingly become targets of requests from local law enforcement authorities, as was the case for Skype in Belgium. Like the requirements set forth by the ECC itself, such obligations imposed under national security legislation may also apply to non-EU based operators because Member States could make compliance with such obligations a prerequisite of allowing a provider to offer its services in their territory.


The Commission's proposed directive will now be forwarded for deliberations to the European Parliament and the European Council. It can be expected that these discussions will lead to further amendments of the current draft:

  • On the one side, the traditional telcos cannot be fully satisfied with the current draft. Many OTT services they were complaining about (e.g., instant messaging services which are eating up their text message revenues) are still only regulated to a minimal extent, as opposed to their own SMS service offerings.
  • On the other side, OTT providers may fear loopholes that Member States can use to introduce further regulation under the public security umbrella. With many national governments seeing a problem in not being able to extend their surveillance of telecoms to OTT services, this fear may in fact be justified.

If the ECC is adopted by the EU, it will still not have any immediate effect because—like any EU directive—it will first need to be implemented into national law in each Member State.

With this timeline in mind, the full scope of future OTT regulations will only become clear after implementation into Member State law. Realistically, this will not happen before mid-2019.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions