United States: Title Bout: Second Circuit Limits Parties' Control Over Construction Of Policies

Last Updated: November 19 2016
Article by Robert D. Helfand

Like other contracts, insurance policies are divided into parts, and most of the parts appear under headings or captions. A separate contract term (known as a "titles clause" or a "headings clause") sometimes specifies that the titles should not affect the interpretation of the policy. But a catchy title can be hard to resist. This week, in Infrassure, Ltd. v. First Mut. Transp. Assurance Co., No. 16-306 (2d Cir., Nov. 16, 2016), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that a titles clause did not prevent consideration of language in a heading, which the court took to be an "express indication as to the context in which a particular provision is operative." Because the ruling relied on judgments that are difficult to explain, it potentially opens a new frontier for disputes over contract interpretation.

London Calling

Infrassure was a reinsurance dispute that arose out of Superstorm Sandy. After the storm, New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authority (which operates the city's buses, subways and commuter rail lines) submitted a claim under a property insurance policy issued by its captive insurer, First Mutual Transportation Insurance Company. In connection with that policy, First Mutual had purchased more than $1 billion of reinsurance from a group of reinsurers. When First Mutual submitted its claim for the MTA's losses in Sandy, one of those companies—Infrassure, Ltd.—denied coverage.

Infrassure had agreed to provide coverage to First Mutual under a bilateral Certificate of Facultative Reinsurance. The certificate included an endorsement (Endorsement No. 2), calling for arbitration in London. That endorsement supplemented a clause in the body of the certificate, which provided for arbitration in New York, and which also required that the arbitrators be current or former officers of an insurer or reinsurer.

When First Mutual initiated the London arbitration, Infrassure responded with an action in federal court in New York, seeking a declaration that Endorsement No. 2 did not apply to this dispute—and so that any arbitration should proceed in New York, before a panel of insurance professionals. First Mutual counterclaimed, seeking (i) a declaration that the endorsement applied and (ii) an order compelling arbitration in the UK.

First Mutual and Infrassure are, respectively, American and Swiss corporations. Infrassure based its claim that Endorsement No. 2 was inapplicable on the following language, which appeared in boldface at the top of each page of the endorsement:


First Mutual, on the other hand, argued that this language was inoperative, because it appeared only in the title of the endorsement, and because the Certificate contained the following titles clause:

The several titles of the various paragraphs of this Certificate (and endorsements, if any, now or hereinafter attached hereto) are inserted solely for convenience of reference and will not be deemed in any way to limit or affect the provisions to which they relate.

The case turned, therefore, on whether the words "UK and Bermuda Insurers Only" were part of a "title," within the meaning of the titles clause (the Certificate did not define the word "title"), and, if so, whether that clause could nevertheless be construed in a way that permits consideration of that language. The district court, without delving into those questions, held that "Endorsement No. 2 is inapplicable because, by its explicit language, it only governs disputes between [First Mutual] and 'UK and Bermuda Insurers.'" The court awarded judgment on behalf of Infrassure, and First Mutual appealed.

Names Will Never Hurt Me

Infrassure responded to the appeal with a number of arguments, including the assertion that the phrase "UK and Bermuda Insurers Only" is "not a title":

While the Certificate does not define 'title,' [the titles clause] indicates that a 'title' is text that serves 'convenience of reference.' The parenthetical phrase 'UK and Bermuda Insurers Only' does not ... serve as a reference point ... . Rather, the phrase contains substantive instructions concerning the reinsurers to which the [endorsement] appl[ies]—an issue not addressed elsewhere in the provision."

This argument is hard to square with the language of the titles clause. That provision did not suggest that a "title" is defined or distinguished by the fact that it is used for "convenience of reference." Rather, it affirmatively stated that "titles"—however defined—should be understood as being used that way in this contract. Infrassure's contention that the disputed phrase "contains substantive instructions," therefore, is actually another way of saying that the titles clause should not be enforced, because the language of this particular title is too important to ignore.

Infrassure also made that argument directly. It asserted that the court could give force to the parenthetical language of the title without "limit[ing] or affect[ing]" Endorsement No. 2, in violation of the titles clause:

The district court's reading of the phrase 'UK and Bermuda Insurers Only' does not 'limit or affect' the [endorsement,] ... [because]the phrase does not concern the interpretation of any portion of the provision. Instead, the phrase clarifies an issue not addressed in the provision: to whom the [endorsement] appl[ies].

The Ruling

While the Court of Appeals affirmed the order of the district court, it is not clear which of Infrassure's arguments the court accepted. In its opinion, the court declared, without explanation, that the disputed language "is not part of the title itself, though it shares the same line and bolded format." The court's analysis, however, appeared to reach the conclusion that a titles clause simply does not apply to every title:

The purpose of the Titles Clause is not to strip away an express indication as to the context in which a particular provision is operative, but to ensure that the text of a provision is not discounted or altered by the words of its heading.

"Our reading ... is easily confirmed by consulting other provisions. In some instances, critical clauses would have no meaning at all if the Titles Clause were mechanically applied. For example, Paragraph 14 of the Certificate reads in its entirety:

14. Program Policy Limits
     Various as per the attached schedule.

"If we were to apply the Titles Clause to this paragraph in the same way that First Mutual asks us to apply it to Endorsement No. 2, we would be left with the cryptic provision, 'Various as per the attached schedule.' The heading 'Program Policy Limits' instructs the reader that the phrase 'Various as per the attached schedule' refers to program policy limits, as opposed to some other concern of the reinsurance agreement."

In short, some titles contain information that is just too valuable to pass up. The court's opinion shared this sentiment with one of the district court cases cited by Infrassure, Small Business Bodyguard Inc. v. House of Moxie, Inc., No. 14–cv–7170 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 20, 2015), which offered this thought:

[T]he parties did not choose to call Section 11 of their [contract] 'Zebras' or 'Xylophones,' although those words would have been just as effective in setting off Section 11 from the Section 10 that immediately preceded it; Instead, they gave Section 11 a generally descriptive title. Nothing in [the titles clause] ... requires this Court to pretend otherwise."

Context? Discount?

The Court of Appeals stated that it was issuing its opinion for the benefit of future litigants, because it was interpreting "wording that ... has not been construed before, and that is in a contract that may share features with other standard forms and endorsements." But while the decision makes it clear that titles clauses should not be enforced "mechanically," it provides little guidance about how to distinguish "mechanical" interpretations from valid ones.

The court stated, for example, that a titles clause serves to "ensure that the text of a provision is not discounted or altered by the words of its heading." In this case, the court found that consideration of the heading would not have that effect, because the title merely stated the "context" in which Endorsement No. 2 "is operative." But the endorsement is part of a bilateral contract between an American insurer and a Swiss reinsurer (albeit one of dozens of such contracts in First Mutual's facultative reinsurance program). Under the court's reading, therefore, the heading indicates that the endorsement can never be "operative." It is at least arguable that such an interpretation impermissibly "discounted" the endorsement. In Infrassure, however, the court did not identify the critical factor or consideration that led it to reject that argument.

Furthermore, the court provided no explanation for its underlying claim about the limited objectives of a titles clause. In this case, the clause stated expressly that the parties intended to use their titles "solely for convenience of reference," and that the titles should not "in any way ... limit or affect the provisions to which they relate." It is something of a stretch to conclude that prescribing the "context in which a particular provision is operative" does not "limit or affect" that provision "in any way."

Nor is it clear that following "an express indication as to ... context" will always be consistent with the parties' intent. As one commentator  has observed, a titles clause is a blunt instrument; parties who use it gamble that the body of their contract will, on the whole, reflect their agreement more accurately than the titles:

[A titles clause] is a simple, imperfect, solution to the problem of poorly-drafted agreements, with headings that conflict with clause language. It is ... best used in a pinch when parties don't have the time, or resources, to craft clear headings and clauses."

The Bottom Line On That Line At The Top

So what really happened in Infrassure? The key might lie in the court's unsupported assertion that the disputed parenthetical "is not part of the title itself." In the end, that is, the court might actually have accepted Infrassure's argument that language at the top of a page is not a title, if it does more than merely "serve as a reference point." After all, the phrase "UK and Bermuda Insurers Only" does not look like it was inserted "solely for convenience of reference," and it appears that the court simply found that fact impossible to ignore.

If that is correct, then the rule of Infrassure might be stated as, "To the extent a heading is intended to provide instructions to the reader, it is not a title." In effect, the court's view of what constitutes a proper "title" is the same as the view of Plato's Hermogenes on the subject of "names": "there is no name given to anything by nature; all is convention and habit of the users."

In future cases, though, it is likely that the question of whether a heading provides instructions to the reader will rarely be straightforward. Furthermore, as noted, it is by no means clear that parties will always have intended such instructions to be enforced.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions