United States: Seyfarth's Analysis Of The Short-Term Impact Of The Election On Business And Employment-Based Immigration

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Trump Administration will have the power to make significant changes to the business immigration landscape. Here is what we can expect.

Immigration issues have become more important than ever for employers. Click here to join our exclusive mailing list to receive the latest immigration law and policy updates.

The unforeseen victory of Donald Trump and the continued GOP control of both houses have caught many by surprise. Since control of illegal immigration served as a foundation stone of the incoming president's campaign, many now wonder or worry about the future of U.S. employment-based immigration policy and procedure in a Trump Administration.

While no one has a crystal ball to address these concerns, the lawyers in Seyfarth Shaw's Business Immigration Group offer the following analysis based on their decades of practicing immigration law under several past presidents.

What Immigration Programs, Policies and Procedures Will Not Change Easily or Quickly

Here is what Seyfarth's immigration attorneys foresee:

No immediate change to the immigration laws. The Trump Administration and members of the Republican-controlled Congress who take office in January must operate within our constitutional system and the rule of law. For our purposes, this means new laws cannot be quickly enacted. Hence, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)- which established the alphabet soup of visas for immigrants and nonimmigrants, will remain in place for the time being. Unless and until Congress amends the INA and President Trump signs any amendment, nothing in this statute will change.

Moreover, Senate Democrats will likely filibuster proposed immigration changes that they believe are ill-considered, harmful or unhelpful in advancing our country's tradition as a nation of immigrants. There is even the remote possibility that Senate Democrats may collaborate with the party in power to reflect the will of more than 70% of the American public to enact comprehensive immigration reforms. Any meaningful reform would necessarily reflect our nation's interest in encouraging the passage of laws to spur innovation, job creation, and an enhanced ability of U.S. businesses to compete in the global economy.

No immediate change to the federal judiciary. Although the composition of the Supreme Court will likely reflect Republican views once a justice is chosen to replace the late Antonin Scalia, the federal judiciary -- comprised of district and circuit court judges with lifetime appointments by past Democratic and Republican presidents -- remains in place as a buffer against unlawful legislative or regulatory actions. Moreover, the Supreme Court in the past has surprised many observers by issuing immigration-related decisions that acted as a check on immigration-agency regulations and state laws, and confirmed basic due process rights of immigrants. In short, it will take time before adverse court rulings will drastically change existing judicial interpretations of the INA and the Administrative Procedure Act.

What Immigration Programs, Policies and Procedures Can Be Changed Quickly?

The Constitution and Congress provides President-elect Trump with the power to effectuate wholesale immigration changes quickly in certain contexts. Candidate Trump declared that he would immediately reverse all of President Obama's executive actions on immigration, For a recap, see, Seyfarth Client Alert, " The Top 10 Things U.S. Employers Need to Know about President Obama's Executive Actions on Immigration," November 21, 2014. It is possible that such reversals, although unlikely in the short-term, would include the regulatory changes made by President Obama's administration, including those relating to business immigration such as the USCIS final rule allowing certain F-1 students with STEM degrees to apply for a 24-month extension of their post-completion optional practical training and the H-4 EAD rule allowing certain H-4 dependent spouses to file for employment authorization. The elimination of F-1 STEM employment authorization program does not appear to be in immediate danger. The fact that this program requires employers to participate in E-Verify (an internet-based system that allows businesses to determine the eligibility of their employees to work in the U.S.) rather than leaving it optional should remove it from the target list, at least initially.

Here are the most likely actions that we believe President Trump could take:

Elimination of the DACA and DAPA programs. Candidate Trump has vowed that very soon upon arrival in the Oval Office he would end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, an Obama executive action taken in 2012 that allowed a class of foreign nationals who came to the U.S. as children to receive deferred action against enforcement, employment authorization and advance parole travel authorization. As of December 31, 2015, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued 638,897 initial DACA approvals and 148,171 renewals. Presumably, DACA beneficiaries have received a like number of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs). As a result, a significant segment of DACA beneficiaries have become lawfully employed in the United States, and their employers probably have an interest in avoiding the loss of valued employment.

It is unclear, however, whether President Trump's elimination of DACA will be effective only on a going-forward basis, or whether the program's termination will also include the immediate revocation of existing DACA-based EADs. There is precedent where the USCIS requested EAD cards to be returned to the government and rendered them invalid.

U.S. employers of DACA beneficiaries must therefore monitor developments and consult with immigration legal counsel to determine whether these employees may remain lawfully employed or be terminated on or before a publicly announced date. Practically speaking, in order to avoid additional burden on USCIS, a DACA-elimination executive order could provide that unexpired grants of employment authorization to DACA beneficiaries will only expire on the date noted on the EAD.

Thus, Employers should consider joining in the foreseeable efforts of immigration advocacy groups to urge the Trump Administration—as a matter of prioritizing immigration enforcement measures—to refrain from eliminating DACA (whose beneficiaries have already been screened for past criminal conduct) or doing so only prospectively.

Suspension or revocation of proposed or recently finalized immigration regulations. In addition to the roll back of executive actions and orders, President Trump could easily stop current immigration rulemaking activity. Regarding proposed immigration regulations, the president could merely instruct departments to cease or suspend all rulemaking activity. Thus, several recent proposed rules may be stopped. These proposed rules might include:

  • The USCIS proposed rule on International Entrepreneurs, offering parole entry and employment authorization for certain founders of start-up entities supported by venture capital funding;

  • The Department of Labor proposed regulation seeking to modernize the Labor Certification (PERM) system which has not yet been published but currently sits with the Office of Management and Budget for initial review. These regulations were reportedly intended to update antiquated PERM advertising requirements and provide a mechanism for correcting harmless errors on pending applications;
  • The USCIS proposed rule on "Retention of EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 Immigrant Workers and Program Improvements Affecting Highly-Skilled Nonimmigrant Workers," formalizing policies adopted as a result of the American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act of 1998 (ACWIA) and the American Competitiveness in the Twentyfirst Century Act of 2000 (AC21), as well as a variety of employment-based immigration changes discussed generally in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's formal comment to the proposed rule (i.e. H-1B portability, Adjustment portability, H-1B extensions beyond six years);
  • The U.S. Customs & Border Protection proposed rule authorizing the CBP to waive passport and visa requirements for nonimmigrant applicants for admission to the U.S. due to an unforeseen emergency, as well as a corresponding U.S. Department of State proposal;
  • The USCIS proposed rule, "Expansion of Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers of Inadmissibility," which allows stateside processing of unlawful-presence waivers to be granted to an expanded class of relatives of citizens and lawful permanent residents, thereby minimizing the risk that an individual pursuing an immigrant visa abroad would be barred from reentry under the three- or ten-year bars; and
  • The U.S. Department of Justice proposed regulation, "Standards and Procedures for the Enforcement of the Immigration and Nationality Act," relating to citizenship status and national origin discrimination under INA § 274B.

In addition, certain recently finalized immigration rules promulgated in the final months of the Obama Administration, known as "midnight regulations," could be rescinded by the GOP-controlled Congress—at the bidding of the Trump Administration. This has occurred before when President George W. Bush was able to nullify a workplace ergonomics regulation issued in the final months of the Bill Clinton Administration. Even if this route were not pursued, the Trump Administration could initiate steps to withdraw certain Obama Administration regulations. Here are some of the final rules that could be revoked (perhaps to eliminate them or to allow for their replacement with tougher or more costly or burdensome immigration regulations):

Increase in Worksite Enforcement, Mandatory E-Verify and Visa Compliance.

During the campaign President-elect Trump promised his supporters his administration would have zero tolerance for criminal aliens and the end of the catch and release of foreign individuals illegally present in the United States. He also stated he planned to request Congress to pass several laws targeting those entering the U.S. illegally and enhancing state and local cooperation with federal authorities. While these steps may not directly affect companies, there will likely be fall out in the form of increased investigations of employers, while pursuing targeted individuals. It is possible these visits could trigger tangential worksite initiatives by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Since 2012 employers have enjoyed a respite from "raids" and worksite enforcement actions. The programs that flourished under the Bush administration, however, could be resurrected with increased onsite inspections of Forms I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verifications). Candidate Trump's campaign statements promising to deport millions serves as a reminder about the importance of proactive compliance planning. Accordingly, employers should tighten their compliance efforts. In particular, employers who have not yet instituted Form I-9 and visa-related compliance initiatives should focus efforts on a comprehensive review of their records, policies and protocols under the guidance of immigration counsel.

President-elect Trump has mentioned his support of making E-Verify mandatory nationwide. Depending upon the particulars of such a sweeping mandate, including whether or not current workers would need to be screened through E-Verify, certain U.S. businesses could find themselves in precarious positions. Accordingly, to reduce the potentially adverse impact, employers should consider conducting voluntary immigration compliance audits now, assessing potential liabilities, engaging I-9 remediation efforts, and implementing a potential E-Verify roll -out plan of action.

Finally, President-elect Trump will likely spread around the focus on immigration enforcement and tie this into his quest to protect U.S. workers. Reforms of the H-1B and L-1 visa programs have been part of the bipartisan agenda in years past and may become a priority for the new administration. This, combined with Candidate Trump's discussion of "extreme vetting" of potential immigrants, may have a chilling effect on overall immigration. Here again, it will be critical for employers to consider joining in the policy conversation to ensure the U.S. retains access to the best and brightest in a world where everyone is competing for global talent.

The reinstatement of the "Culture of No" on Steroids.

On March 22, 2002, James W. Ziglar, the Commissioner procedure for the legacy agency Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) issued a policy known as "zero tolerance memorandum," announcing that any immigration official who fails to abide by policies and procedures adopted by the INS headquarters office "will be disciplined appropriately."

Although USCIS revoked the policy at an internal Town Hall on September 8, 2003, its adverse consequences have lingered. In the ensuing years, the zero tolerance policy memorandum has been replaced by a "culture of no." The culture's foundation appears to be the conclusion of immigration officials, particularly at USCIS's Regional Service Centers, that no officer will ever be disciplined or impeded in career progression by saying, "no," to any petition or application for immigration benefits, whereas a "yes" answer could well result in the officer's subpoenaed appearance at a congressional hearing, if the officer's approval of an immigration benefit request unwittingly allowed a terrorist to slip into the United States. The culture of no has resulted in the ever-increasing issuance by USCIS of burdensome and expensive requests for additional evidence and notices of intention to deny or to revoke approval of employment-based immigration petitions and applications, as well as the publication of policy memorandums and regulations that insist on ever-higher evidentiary burdens imposed on employers.

If the Trump Administration were to move forward with comprehensive Draconian changes in immigration policies, the culture of no could be given enhanced recognition and application upon the appointment of a new USCIS Director who, after Congressional confirmation, could easily instruct immigration officials (including adjudicators and officers of the USCIS Fraud and National Security Directorate who perform worksite visits) to apply, effective immediately, heightened skepticism and scrutiny in adjudication of benefits requests and in the conduct of post-approval site visits.

Since USCIS has historically issued far more policy memorandums than final regulations, nothing would prevent the incoming Director from rescinding a host of INS and USCIS employer-friendly agency policies and procedures, and promulgating new policy guidance mandating substantially greater strictness and the issuance of more frequent and burdensome demands for additional evidence. Examples of enlightened policies that could readily be revoked would include policy memorandums encouraging immigration officers to refrain from issuing multiple requests for evidence in the same case or reversing employment-based status grants by claiming in renewal petitions and applications that the prior adjudicator committed clear error.

In addition to quickly implementing DHS changes in immigration policies and procedures that the new Trump Administration could adopt, President Trump could bring about the easy withdrawal of existing precedent decisions issued by the USCIS Administrative Appeals Office and the Board of Immigration Appeals, and their replacement by rulings that emphasize immigration enforcement and ineligibility for benefits rather than leniency. Since the INA gives the Attorney General the sole power to make rulings on all immigration-related questions of law, a new AG appointed by President Trump could fundamentally alter the administration and enforcement of the immigration laws in ways that employers and their noncitizen workers would find wholly unwelcome and intolerable.

The election of Donald Trump to the presidency and the GOP's continued control of the Legislative Branch did not rescind the fundamental market need of U.S. employers to hire foreign workers or the desire of noncitizens to enter and work in the United States. None of the foregoing "parade of horribles" is necessarily inevitable. Only advocacy and constituent pressure on the new administration and the Congress can slow down or prevent the introduction of quickly implemented Draconian reforms of the current employment-based immigration system.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions