United States: DOJ And FTC Release Guidance Putting Firms On Notice That The Justice Department Will Proceed Criminally Against Naked Wage-Fixing And No-Poaching Agreements

On Thursday, October 20, 2016, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission issued joint guidance for human resource (HR) professionals to help educate and inform them about how the antitrust laws apply to employee hiring and compensation. Within this guidance, the Justice Department for the first time announced that it will hereafter proceed criminally against naked wage-fixing and no-poaching agreements.

In recent years, agreements between companies that inhibit employees' rights to work have drawn increasing attention from the Justice Department. With employment mobility at its peak, several companies have attempted to reach agreements with their direct industry competitors that could limit employee mobility. The Justice Department has investigated such agreements and, in several cases, has brought civil suits against the companies involved. For example, in 2010, the Justice Department filed a high-profile civil suit against several high-tech companies-including Apple, Adobe, Google, Intel, Intuit, and Pixar-which had entered into agreements not to solicit each other's employees. Similar suits followed against Lucasfilm and eBay, and there also were follow-on civil class actions filed on behalf of the affected employees.

The Justice Department determined that the companies reached "facially anticompetitive" or "naked" agreements that eliminated a significant form of competition to the detriment of employees who lost access to information and better job opportunities. It concluded that the non-solicit agreements between the companies were naked restraints of trade that were per se unlawful under federal antitrust laws. In the government's view, the primary impact of these agreements was to depress salaries artificially, as employees could not leverage offers from one company to move to another.

Notably, these agreements were not "ancillary to any legitimate collaboration," such as a joint venture or research project.

The civil suits culminated in settlements that broadly prohibited the companies from entering, maintaining, or enforcing any agreement that in any way prevented any person from soliciting, cold calling, recruiting, or otherwise competing for employees. The companies also were required to implement compliance measures to guard against these practices. Based on the Justice Department's recent guidance, however, no-poaching agreements will now be investigated as criminal antitrust violations with serious monetary penalties and the possibility of jail time.

While Justice Department scrutiny of this area is not new, its announcement of criminal enforcement is. It is significant that the Justice Department has decided to proceed criminally for the first time against wage-fixing and no-poaching agreements. Elizabeth Prewitt, a partner in Hughes Hubbard's antitrust practice and former longtime Justice Department litigator, was quoted today by Global Competition Review about the Justice Department's announcement, and explained that [t]he DOJ has historically limited criminal antitrust prosecutions to a small subset of violations which it considers to be severe and well-known by the public to be illegal. This decision evidences the Justice Department's view that no-poaching and wage-fixing agreements hamper competition in the same anticompetitive ways as agreements to fix the price of goods, rig bids, and allocate customers or market share-conduct that has traditionally been subject to criminal prosecution.

There also has been significant government action on the federal and state levels, over the past year, concerning non-compete agreements that employers enter into with their employees rather than with each other (as is the case with no-poaching and wage-fixing agreements). In March of this year, the U.S. Department of the Treasury released a report on the economic effects and policy implications of non-compete agreements and proposed directions for reform. The report noted that these non-compete agreements often cover low-wage workers unlikely to possess trade secrets that employers have a legitimate interest in protecting, as well as that workers are often poorly informed about the existence, details, and implications of their non-compete agreements. In May, the White House also released a report about non-compete agreements, suggesting that they limited job mobility, worker bargaining power, entrepreneurship, and wages. The White House instructed executive departments and agencies to propose new ways of promoting competition and providing consumers and workers with information they need to make informed decisions.

On the state level, in June, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced a high-profile settlement with legal news provider Law360, ending a multi-year investigation into the company's labor practices. In the settlement, Law360 agreed to end its use of mandatory non-compete agreements for its staff, which prohibited them from working for any competitor for a year after leaving the company. Several states also have recently enacted or proposed legislation intended to address the issues raised by non-compete agreements.

The recent attention to both no-poaching and non-compete agreements suggests that the entire arena of competition restraint via agreements relating to employment is becoming a focus of the government.

It is important to note that, notwithstanding the Justice Department's new policy of criminal liability, no-poaching agreements can still be entered into lawfully when they are not "naked restraints" on trade. A "naked restraint" is generally an agreement that is considered to be explicitly anticompetitive without any procompetitive justifications. Although the Justice Department has not provided comprehensive guidance about the types of conduct that would or would not fall into the "naked restraint" category in the employment context, the "naked restraint" label would not attach to ancillary restraints made in pursuit of a legitimate commercial interest and tailored to it in terms of geography, job function, product group, and duration. For example, the Justice Department will not criminally prosecute no-poaching agreements that are related or necessary to a larger legitimate business collaboration or the settlement of a theft of trade secrets dispute. Therefore, we would not expect a carefully drafted and narrow no-poaching agreement to be attacked criminally if it was entered into in the context of a joint venture or settlement that necessitates such an agreement. By contrast, a shared desire among competitors to hold down costs or preserve for each of them the benefits of their own employee training would not qualify as a legitimate reason for a no-poaching agreement. Even when there is no criminal exposure, agreements that restrain employees' freedom of movement and the ability to bargain may still be subject to civil lawsuits.

In the wake of this announcement, we recommend that all of our clients review and, if necessary, strengthen their existing antitrust compliance programs and their existing and future non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. It is particularly important that HR professionals are educated on these issues and ensure that their companies' hiring practices comply with the antitrust laws. The potential criminal sanctions are severe-both companies and individuals can be prosecuted for violations of U.S. antitrust law, punishable by a fine of up to $100 million for corporations and $1 million for individuals (or more, under certain circumstances), and the maximum jail sentence is ten years. Given the extraterritorial reach of U.S. antitrust law, this policy shift presents a risk to companies and individuals located outside of the U.S. as well.

An effective compliance program and careful drafting of agreements relating to employment competition are critical means for a company to deter or detect potential violations. The Antitrust Division of the Justice Department has a Leniency Program, which allows corporations and individuals to report their own violations and cooperate in the Division's investigation of the violations reported. As recent enforcement actions demonstrate, a corporation that is the first to report an antitrust violation, and meets other conditions of the Division's Leniency Program, can qualify for full immunity from fines, full immunity from prosecution for its cooperating employees and executives, as well as potential mitigation of civil damages.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions