United States: Spotlight Remains On Marketplace Lenders Post-Madden

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in Madden v. Midland Funding LLC, the focus on online marketplace lenders spawned by the Second Circuit's decision has only intensified, significantly impacting lenders, investors and consumers. In the wake of Madden, online lenders such as LendingClub Corp. have become the subject of new lawsuits and could be subject to further claims. This potential legal exposure has caught the attention of at least one rating agency, which has warned of potential losses in securitizations backed by online marketplace loans. The prospect of further litigation and losses by consumers and investors, in turn, has caused regulators to step up their efforts to develop clearer regulations for the industry that would not unnecessarily limit access to credit. Marketplace lenders will need to adjust their business operations and expectations as the legal landscape evolves post-Madden.

How Madden v. Midland Drew Attention to Legal Issues in Online Marketplace Lending In Madden, a case that did not involve marketplace lending, the Second Circuit held that a nonbank assignee of a national bank's loan is not afforded the preemption benefits available to a national bank if the national bank does not hold a continuing interest in the loan. Consequently, lawful interest rates charged by a selling national bank may be rendered illegal upon a nonbank's purchase of an assigned debt. By denying Midland Funding's petition for certiorari, the U.S. Supreme Court left in place, at least for the time being, the Second Circuit's decision, which remains binding on courts located within New York, Connecticut and Vermont.

Although Madden involved a debt collector and credit card debt, the decision has had an immediate and significant impact on online marketplace lenders due to similarities between the preemption rules under a National Bank Act, which was at issue in Madden, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, which is relevant to marketplace lenders. Marketplace lenders use online platforms to make loans to small businesses and consumers by matching investors and borrowers. Many of these lenders utilize a partner bank origination model, whereby the loans are initially originated by a state-charted bank and then immediately purchased by the online lender (lenders utilizing this model are sometimes referred to as "platform lenders"). The purpose of this structure is to allow the lender to take advantage of the bank's ability under the FDIA to charge interest rates in excess of the rates permitted by the borrower's home state. Similar to the NBA, the FDIA preempts the application of state usury laws to federally insured state-charted banks. Therefore, the holding in Madden has the potential to severely disrupt the partner bank origination model.

New Legal Actions Will Keep Attention on Marketplace Lending Practices The holding in Madden has prompted shareholders and borrowers to commence class actions against one of the nation's most prominent platform lenders, LendingClub. In the shareholder suits, plaintiffs assert violations of federal securities laws in connection with LendingClub's initial public offering, alleging, among other things, that the offering materials failed to disclose that LendingClub utilizes an unsustainable business model that is predicated on making usurious loans. Such allegations have also given rise to a shareholder derivative suit against LendingClub's directors and officers. In the borrower suit, the plaintiff alleges that the interest rates charged by LendingClub violate state consumer usury laws and give rise to claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. To the extent plaintiffs are able to maintain their claims, similarly situated investors and borrowers will be emboldened to commence litigation against other platform lenders.

The LendingClub suits have cast a spotlight on so-called "true lender" challenges. The preemption benefits afforded a bank are available only if the bank, and not some nonbank assignee, is the true lender. As Madden continues to draw attention to the bank origination model, questions have arisen as to whether a platform lender, and not the partner originating bank, is the true lender. In fact, in a May 2016 report, Moody's Investors Service had advised that even if Madden was overturned, platform lenders could still face true lender challenges. Evidencing this risk, Moody's noted that the plaintiff in the borrower suit against LendingClub focuses on the partner bank's limited role in loan transactions. The plaintiff appears poised to argue that LendingClub, and not the partner bank, is the true lender and therefore should not be afforded any preemption benefits.

An additional issue that may become hotly contested in the LendingClub lawsuits and other actions where preemption and application of state usury laws are in question is the "valid-when-made" rule. Under the long-standing doctrine, a loan that is not usurious at inception cannot become usurious based upon subsequent transactions. The Second Circuit in Madden did not consider its application, and thus it remains to be seen how the rule may be applied in the context of online marketplace lending. More broadly, as the industry carefully watches the LendingClub suits, it is reasonable to expect the focus on marketplace lending will spark additional claims against lenders.

In fact, scrutiny of marketplace lenders' businesses practices has already begun to sprout concerns regarding consumer protection. The U.S. Treasury has warned that the use of "big data" and automated systems could have a disparate impact on protected classes and lead to fair lending violations. In addition, platforms' sharing of consumer information, credit decisions and the bases for those decisions may become subject to challenges under consumer privacy laws.

Securitization Losses Could Result in Further Litigation

The frequency and size of securitizations backed by loans originated through marketplace lenders has grown significantly in recent years. According to PeerIQ, a provider of marketplace lending data, the first half of 2016 saw the issuance of $3.2 billion in marketplace lending securitizations — a 77 percent increase from the prior year.

According to Moody's, the recent borrower lawsuit against LendingClub is a "credit negative" for securitizations backed by loans issued through marketplace lenders that utilize a bank origination model. Moody's reports that victories by borrowers in similar actions and legal challenges over whether loans are exempt from state usury limits could reduce cash flows to marketplace lending loans and securitizations. Moody's also advises that if an adverse ruling jeopardizes online lending platforms, lenders could be left unable to service loans or fulfill their obligation to repurchase loans that breach loan-level representations and warranties.

Losses to securitizations could in turn lead to claims by investors and trustees against marketplace lenders that issued the underlying loans and underwriters that marketed the related securities, similar to the recent wave of lawsuits commenced in connection with residential mortgage-backed securities. Any such claims could be based on representations in the underlying transaction documents and statements in the offering materials related to the enforceability of the underlying loans and compliance with applicable laws. As in RMBS lawsuits, the causes of action could include common law fraud and violations of federal and state securities laws, as well as breach of contract claims, which may give rise to repurchase obligations by the marketplace lender.

Additionally, in the event securitizations suffer losses and appropriate measures are not taken to enforce the trust's remedies (securitized loans are often held by a trust), investors may look to assert claims against the trustee and any other entity appointed to administer the trust. The trustee of a securitization trust often has a contractual or fiduciary duty to pursue claims on behalf of the trust and to maximize the value of trust assets. A trustee's failure to comply with these duties may give rise to breach of contract and/or fiduciary duty claims based on losses caused by the trustee's failure to act. The viability of such theories will depend on how the case law develops in connection with the numerous suits that have been commenced against trustees in the RMBS context for failing to notify investors of loan-level breaches of representations and warranties and to pursue repurchase claims on behalf of trusts.

Regulatory Agencies Will Have Their Say

The fast growth of marketplace lending and potential for additional litigation has recently caught the attention of regulatory agencies, which are at the beginning stages of proposing new rules to govern the industry. In May 2016, the U.S. Treasury released a white paper regarding the central complexities facing the industry and made certain policy recommendations, including enhanced protections for small-business borrowers, greater transparency and increased regulatory clarity. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has indicated it likely will propose new regulations before year-end. Marketplace lenders themselves are expected to take an active role in developing clearer rules, which would benefit lenders, borrowers and investors alike. In fact, in the past year, various industry associations have proposed blueprints for self-regulation to address the increased interest expressed by regulators.

The Industry Will Continue to Adjust Its Practices to Reflect the Legal Challenges

As potential issues crystallize through lawsuits and regulations, the opportunity exists for marketplace lenders to adjust their practices and steer away from unintended consequences. As an example, in response to the Second Circuit's preemption analysis in Madden, LendingClub has reportedly restructured its operations so that its partner bank, WebBank, maintains an economic interest in the loans it originates and sells. Under the modified structure, WebBank retains a contractual relationship with borrowers and is paid a monthly fee for each loan that LendingClub purchases. By tying the monthly fee to loan performance, WebBank is said to maintain an economic interest in the assigned loans. A similar structure could also potentially alleviate true lender issues going forward for other lenders.

There are other measures marketplace lenders can implement to create greater certainty that business expectations are met and litigation is avoided, although the effectiveness of such measures will depend on how case law develops:

Use of Choice-of-Law Provisions. Lenders could include a choice-of-law provision in their loan agreements that mandate the application of the originating bank's home state's laws, including usury laws. The effectiveness of such a provision may be case-specific, however, because a borrower may overcome it by demonstrating that application of the chosen law would undermine a fundamental policy of the borrower's home state. In Madden, this issue will likely be determined by the district court on remand from the Second Circuit.

Use of Forum-Selection Clauses. To avoid being hailed into a court within the Second Circuit or other unfavorable jurisdictions as the law develops, lenders may revise their loan documents to include forum-selection clauses designating where litigation must take place. Such clauses, although generally enforceable, could be subject to challenge based on public-interest considerations.

Avoiding Unfavorable Jurisdictions. Lenders could avoid making loans to borrowers within the Second Circuit and jurisdictions with unfavorable usury laws. This approach, however, narrows the borrower pool and may significantly curtail profits. Moreover, intentionally avoiding borrowers in specific areas could give rise to discrimination claims.

Excluding Borrower Information. To avoid being accused of fostering discrimination, lenders may begin concealing a borrower's place of residence. In fact, some marketplace lenders have already begun implementing such measures, including LendingClub, which only provides investors with the first three digits of an applicant's zip code (although in many instances this would not prevent an investor from ascertaining an applicant's state of residence). Any such measures, however, would need to be balanced against the need to attract investors and fund loans.

Conclusion The online marketplace lending industry has had the good fortune of emerging at a time of low interest rates and strong demand for fast credit; however, many foreseeable legal challenges may lie ahead, including new rules and regulations, and it remains to be seen whether marketplace lenders can sufficiently adjust their business expectations and operations accordingly. Should investors in marketplace lending securitizations suffer losses or marketplace lenders run afoul of consumer protection laws, litigation exposure for lenders may intensify.

Originally published in Law360, New York (July 13, 2016, 4:13 PM ET) --

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.