House Committee on Financial Services Chair Jeb Hensarling asserted that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") must comply with certain Executive Orders in light of the recent U.S. Court of Appeals opinion in PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In that case, the Court determined that the CFPB must operate as a "traditional executive agency."

Representative Hensarling argued that the following Executive Orders now apply to the CFPB:

Representative Hensarling asked the CFPB to provide, no later than October 26, 2016, "written assurance that the CFPB will comply in full with the requirements of relevant Executive Orders prior to issuing any future final rule, including rules governing arbitration agreements; payday, vehicle title, and installment loans; and debt collection."

Commentary / Steven Lofchie

The argument that these Executive Orders are applicable to the CFPB as an "executive agency," raises practical questions. Should the Orders apply retroactively to rules that were adopted by the CFPB already, since the CFPB should not have been operating as an independent agency? Should the CFPB perform a clean review of its prior rulemakings to conform them to the regulatory requirements to which the CFPB should have been subject?

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.