United States: Better Safe Than Sorry: CERCLA Contribution Actions And The Operative Statute Of Limitations

The Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)1 is a dynamic, constantly evolving area of law. Because of this, interpretations of the statute can vary drastically from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Thus, it is imperative that practitioners are aware of how certain areas of CERCLA are interpreted in different jurisdictions across the country. One important example of a divergence in CERCLA law is whether judicially approved settlements of environmental liabilities that do not specifically resolve CERCLA liability trigger the statute of limitations for CERCLA contribution claims. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals and Third Circuit Court of Appeals have reached starkly different conclusions on this issue, and are the only two circuits to have addressed this issue. In the Second Circuit, the statute of limitations for a contribution action under Section 113(f)(3)(B) of CERCLA does not begin to run if a settlement with a state does not mention CERCLA and only resolves liability for state law claims. The Second Circuit's decision conflicts with the Third Circuit, which has ruled that the statute of limitations for a contribution action under Section 113(f)(3)(B) of CERCLA begins to run when a party settles its state law environmental cleanup liability, even if the settlement does not expressly mention and resolve CERCLA liability.

Many circuits have not addressed when judicially approved settlements trigger the statute of limitations for CERCLA contribution actions, leaving a great deal of uncertainty. Plainly, attorneys must be cognizant of this issue or face statute of limitations problems.


When CERCLA originally was passed in 1980, it contained neither a contribution provision nor a statute of limitations. In 1986, Congress sought to address these omissions with the passage of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA).2 SARA provides that "[a] person who has resolved its liability to the United States or a State for some or all of a response action or for some or all of the costs of such action in an administrative or judicially approved settlement may seek contribution..."3 SARA further set forth a statute of limitations for CERCLA contribution claims. Under SARA, contribution claims must be filed no more than three years after the date of: 1) judgment for response costs; 2) an administrative order for de minimis settlement under Section 9622(g); 3) an administrative order for cost recovery settlement under Section 9622(h); or 4) a judicially approved settlement under Section 9622(h).4

The authors believe one of the problems with the way Congress drafted SARA is that it does not address whether the judicially approved settlement must resolve CERCLA liability in order to trigger the running of the statute of limitations. Likely as a result of this omission, a clear circuit split has arisen between the Second Circuit and Third Circuit regarding whether a judicially approved settlement requires resolution of CERCLA liability.

The Circuit Split

The Second Circuit has taken a restrictive view of the statute, finding that, absent a reference to CERCLA, a judicially approved settlement of environmental liabilities does not trigger the statute of limitations on a CERCLA contribution claim. In Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. UGI Utilities, Inc.,5 the Second Circuit interpreted CERCLA "to create a contribution right only when liability for CERCLA claims, rather than some broader category of legal claims, is resolved." In other words, a state settlement does not create a contribution right or trigger the corresponding statute of limitations. In Consolidated Edison, ConEd sued UGI Utilities to recover cleanup costs at several sites. ConEd alleged UGI was liable under CERCLA, as well as New York state law. The judicially approved settlement agreement at issue in the case was a voluntary cleanup agreement between ConEd and the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC) resolving ConEd's state law liability only. In the voluntary cleanup agreement, the NYDEC agreed that if ConEd cleaned up the properties specified in the agreement, the NYDEC would furnish ConEd with a release and covenant not to sue. The release and covenant not to sue stated that the NYDEC "releases, covenants not to sue, and shall forebear from bringing any action, proceeding, or suit pursuant to the [New York] Environmental Conservation Law, the Navigation Law or the State Finance Law, and from referring to the Attorney General any claim for recovery of costs incurred by the Department... for the further investigation and remediation of the Site, based upon the release or threatened release of Covered Contamination."6

The Second Circuit found the language made clear that the only liability resolved under the voluntary cleanup agreement was liability for state law, not CERCLA claims. The Second Circuit held that there was no CERCLA contribution claim and, therefore, no running of the statute of limitations, because the settling party did not resolve its liability for a "response action," which the court characterized as a "CERCLA-specific term describing an action to clean up a site or minimize the release of contaminants in the future." The court further found that the statute did not begin to run because SARA's legislative history provided that Section 113 "clarifies and confirms the right of a person held jointly and severally liable under CERCLA to seek contribution...."7

Several years later, in W.R. Grace & Co.–Conn. V. Zotos Int'l, Inc.,8 the Second Circuit confirmed this ruling. In 1988, W.R. Grace & Co. voluntarily entered into an administrative order on consent with the NYDEC. The order provided: "If the [NYDEC] acknowledges that the implementation is complete...such acknowledgment shall constitute a full and complete satisfaction and release of each and every claim, demand, remedy or action whatsoever against [Grace], its officers and directors, which the [NYDEC] has or may have...."9 The order further stated: "Nothing contained in this [o]rder shall be construed as barring, diminishing, adjudicating or in any way affecting...(3) the [NYDEC's] right to bring any action, at law or in equity against [Grace]...with respect to areas or resources that may have been damaged as a result of the release or migration of hazardous or industrial wastes from the Site."10

The Second Circuit found this text, which made no reference to CERCLA, established that "the [NY]DEC settled only its state law claims against Grace, leaving open the possibility that the [NY]DEC or the [United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA")] could, at some future point, assert CERCLA or other claims."11 The Second Circuit affirmed its ruling in Consolidated Edison, holding that "the operative question in deciding whether [Grace's] claims arise under 113(f)(3)(B)...is whether [Grace] resolved its CERCLA liability before bringing suit."12 Thus, in the Second Circuit, Section 113(f)(3)(B) does not give rise to a contribution claim unless the judicially approved settlement expressly resolves CERCLA liability. The Third Circuit rejected the Second Circuit's interpretation of Section 113(f)(3)(B) in Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.13 There, Trinity and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) entered into a consent order in 2006, whereby Trinity agreed to fund and conduct 'response actions' according to a schedule approved by the DEP. The consent order was entered into pursuant to Pennsylvania's Hazardous Sites Cleanup Act14 and Land Recycling and Environmental Remediation Standards Act.15

Trinity sought CERCLA contribution based on the order absolving it of liability under the two Pennsylvania statutes. The court held "[n]otwithstanding the rule adopted by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and by various district courts...113(f)(3)(B) does not require resolution of CERCLA liability in particular."16 The court pointed to the plain language of CERCLA, finding that it "requires only the existence of a settlement resolving liability to the United States or a State 'for some or all of a response action.'"17 Further, Section 113(f)(3)(B) "does not state that the 'response action' in question must have been initiated pursuant to CERCLA—a requirement that might easily have been written into the provision."18 The court was persuaded by what it described as a lack of any plain language in Section 113(f)(3)(B) requiring a party to have settled its liability under CERCLA in particular. Thus, in the Second Circuit, in the context of judicially approved settlements, a CERCLA contribution claim arises when the settlement expressly resolves CERCLA liability. Conversely, in the Third Circuit, a judicially approved settlement of state law claims (without express reference to CERCLA) can give rise to a CERCLA contribution action, and thereby trigger the three-year statute of limitations on that claim. Therefore, it is imperative that practitioners are aware of this distinction in order to avoid having a contribution claim found to be time barred.

Potential Trends and Practical Implications

While Consolidated Edison and W.R. Grace established that, within the Second Circuit, Section 113(f)(3)(B) does not give rise to a CERCLA contribution action or trigger the corresponding statute of limitations unless the judicially approved settlement specifically resolves CERCLA liability, a later case, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.,19 casts some doubt on the continued viability of the prior Second Circuit cases.

In Niagara Mohawk, the court acknowledged "the Consolidated Edison/ W.R. Grace problem."20 The court cited a portion of the amicus brief filed by the EPA, which it described as "understandably tak[ing] issue with our holding in Consolidated Edison[:]" "The United States was not a party to Consolidated Edison and believes it was not correctly decided...The settlement of federal and state law claims other than those provided by CERCLA fits within [Section] 113(f)(3)(B) as long as that qualifies as a 'response action...."21 Ultimately, the court did not resolve "the Consolidated Edison/W.R. Grace problem" because the consent order at issue explicitly encompassed CERCLA liability.

The Ninth Circuit will soon be the third federal appeals court to weigh in on this issue. In Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co.,22 Asarco is appealing a decision by the United States District Court of Montana that Asarco waited too long to bring its CERCLA contribution claim against Atlantic Richfield.23 On appeal, Asarco is arguing that its 1998 judicially approved consent decree with the EPA, under the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act and the Clean Water Act that made no reference to CERCLA, could not trigger the statute of limitations for Asarco's contribution claim.

Below, the district court followed the Third Circuit's approach to the triggering of the statute of limitations for contribution actions. According to the district court, "[i]f Congress intended to narrow the scope of § 113(f)(3)(B) to cover only settlements that expressly resolve CERCLA liability, it could have done so, as it did in § 113(f)(1)."24 The district court concisely stated "[t]his Court agrees with the Third Circuit and the Niagara Mohawk panel."25

Until this issue reaches the United States Supreme Court, lawyers practicing in any circuit need to pay careful attention to the scope of settlements that resolve environmental cleanup liability. As demonstrated by the divergence between the Second and Third circuits, there can be very different timing regarding when the statute of limitations begins to run. In deciding when to file a contribution claim, counsel should bear in mind that a wide range of cleanup activities taken pursuant to state remediation laws or other federal environmental laws (aside from CERCLA) may constitute 'response actions' under CERCLA. For example, the removal of certain types of fill from a wetland in connection with restoration activities could constitute 'response costs' under CERCLA and be subject to CERCLA's three-year statute of limitations for contribution actions if the subject of a judicially approved settlement. Ultimately, to eliminate any doubt, a prudent practitioner should consider filing their contribution action and letting the court rule on whether the claim is ripe. The expense incurred in bringing an unripe claim is far outweighed by the potential loss of an opportunity to file a contribution claim.


1. 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq.

2. See Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-499, 100 Stat. at 1647–48 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(3)(B)).

3. Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, 100 Stat. at 1648.

4. 42 U.S.C. § 9613(g)(3).

5. 423 F.3d 90 (2d Cir. 2005).

6. Consolidated Edison, 423 F.3d at 96.

7. Id. at 95-96.

8. 559 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2009).

9. Id. at 91.

10. Id.

11. Id.

12. Id. at 90-91.

13. 735 F.3d 131 (3d Cir. 2013).

14. 35 Pa. Stat. § 6020.101, et seq.

15. 35 Pa. Stat. § 6026.101, et seq.

16. Trinity, 735 F.3d at 136.

17. Id.

18. Id.

19. 596 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 2010).

20. Id. at 126 n.15.

21. Id..

22. No. 14-35723 (9th Cir. 2015).

23. Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 73 F. Supp. 3d 1285 (D. Mont. 2014).

24. Id. at 1292.

25. Id. at 1291.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.