United States: Beyer Beware: An Examination Of A Family Limited Partnership Gone Wrong

Last Updated: October 19 2016
Article by Scott J. Bent

The opinion issued on Sept. 29, 2016, in the case of Estate of Edward G. Beyer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue was the culmination of an estate planning exercise that had an unfortunate ending for everyone involved (other than the IRS). The case involved a number of failed estate planning techniques.

Background

The situation began when Edward Beyer, a Chicago resident and longtime executive at Abbott Laboratories, and Mr. Beyer's nephew, Craig Plassmeyer, were introduced to attorneys at the firm of Madonia & Associates (Madonia) for the purpose of discussing and considering certain wealth transfer techniques. On the advice of Madonia, Mr. Beyer decided to form a limited partnership, the general partnership interest of which would be owned by revocable trust established by Mr. Beyer (GP revocable trust), with the limited partnership interest owned by a separate revocable trust also established by Mr. Beyer (LP revocable trust). The plan called for Mr. Beyer to form an irrevocable trust sometime after the formation of the limited partnership, which would purchase the limited partnership interest from the LP revocable trust.

Mr. Beyer named himself, Craig Plassmeyer and another of Beyer's nephews, Bruce Plassmeyer, as the co-trustees of the LP revocable trust. The provisions of the LP revocable trust instrument obligated the LP revocable trust to pay any transfer taxes imposed by reason of Mr. Beyer's death. Mr. Beyer also named his nephews Craig and Bruce Plassmeyer as the co-trustees of the GP revocable trust.

On Oct. 13, 2003, the trustees of the LP revocable trust and the GP revocable trust executed a limited partnership agreement in their respective capacities, thereby forming the Edward G. Beyer Limited Partnership under Illinois law. About six months after the formation of the limited partnership, a Madonia attorney advised Craig Plassmeyer that most of Mr. Beyer's securities, including 800,000 shares of Abbott Laboratories stock, should be transferred from Mr. Beyer's previously existing revocable trust (1999 revocable trust) to the limited partnership, while Mr. Beyer's cash could remain in his personal account. The attorney indicated that "we need to establish to the IRS that [Mr. Beyer] has enough assets outside of [the limited partnership] to live on, and, given [Mr. Beyer's] modest lifestyle, I think [$1.5 million] will do that." The proposed transfer to the limited partnership was completed on April 20, 2004, and it left Mr. Beyer with about $4 million in assets owned either personally or through the LP revocable trust.

In April 2005, about a year after the limited partnership was funded, Mr. Beyer and his nephews began implementing the next phase of the estate plan proposed by Madonia. First, the trustees of the GP revocable trust entered into an investment account agreement with the Capital Trust Company of Delaware (Capital Trust), pursuant to which the limited partnership was required to deposit about 75 percent of its assets into a restricted management account (RMA). The investment agreement ran for four years unless extended by the parties, and it authorized Capital Trust to manage and invest the assets held in the RMA. The investment account agreement also required the limited partnership to obtain Capital Trust's written consent prior to transferring any assets held in the RMA.

Next, Mr. Beyer formed an irrevocable trust (irrevocable trust) in April 2005, with Craig and Bruce Plassmeyer as co-trustees. On Dec. 30, 2005, the irrevocable trust purchased the LP revocable trust's entire 99 percent limited partnership interest in exchange for a promissory note in the face amount of $20,866,725 (promissory note). The principal amount of the promissory note was payable to the LP revocable trust on Dec. 30, 2005, and the promissory note bore interest at a rate of 4.45 percent, compounded annually. The promissory note was secured by a security interest granted by the irrevocable trust in all of its accounts, accounts receivable, equipment and other tangible personal property. When the irrevocable trust issued the promissory note to the LP revocable trust, the irrevocable trust had only $10 of assets. Immediately following the transfer, the LP revocable trust's assets consisted of the promissory note from the irrevocable trust and a bank account holding about $600,000.

On April 15, 2006, the trustees of the LP revocable trust drew a check in the amount of $659,660 payable to the IRS to cover the gift tax owed by Mr. Beyer for the 2005 taxable year. Then, on April 17, 2006, after the LP revocable trust had transferred its entire limited partnership interest to the irrevocable trust, $659,660 was transferred from the limited partnership's bank account to the LP revocable trust's bank account.

Mr. Beyer died on May 19, 2007, and several months later, during January and February 2008, the limited partnership sold a significant number of shares of stock. Then, on Feb. 12, 2008, the limited partnership transferred $250,000 to the LP revocable trust. On that same date, Craig Plassmeyer, as the Executor of Mr. Beyer's estate, signed two checks drawn on the limited partnership's checking account, each for $75,000. One check was payable to Craig Plassmeyer, the other to Bruce Plassmeyer, and the memorandum line of each check read "Administration Fee."

The estate tax return for Mr. Beyer's estate was filed by Craig Plassmeyer as Executor around Feb. 14, 2008, and the return showed net estate tax of $9,345,334. Four days later, on Feb. 18, Craig Plassmeyer signed a check drawn on the limited partnership's checking account in the amount of $9,345,334 payable to the IRS. The following day, $9,945,000 was transferred from the limited partnership's checking account to the LP revocable trust's account.

The IRS issued a notice of deficiency to Mr. Beyer's estate on Feb. 8, 2011. According to the IRS, the assets transferred by Mr. Beyer to the limited partnership were includable in Mr. Beyer's gross estate under Section 2036(a).

Bona Fide Sale Exception to Section 2036(a)

Mr. Beyer's estate argued that Section 2036(a) did not apply because the transfer to the limited partnership was a "bona fide sale for an adequate and full consideration...." The Tax Court disagreed, however, because the estate failed to establish that the transfer was "motivated by a legitimate and significant nontax purpose...."

According to the estate, the transfer was motivated by Mr. Beyer's desire to (a) keep his Abbott stock in a single block, (b) transition Craig Plassmeyer into managing Mr. Beyer's assets and (c) maintain continuity of management. The Tax Court rejected each purported motivation and noted that none of these objectives were identified in the limited partnership agreement's boilerplate list of 28 purposes for the partnership. According to the Tax Court, Mr. Beyer could have achieved each of these objectives by amending his 1999 revocable trust instead of forming a limited partnership. The Tax Court also noted that the limited partnership agreement did not require the partnership to maintain the Abbott stock in a single block, and the general partner had the authority to sell the Abbott stock if necessary. Moreover, before the limited partnership was ever formed, Craig Plassmeyer already had the opportunity to manage Mr. Beyer's assets as his attorney-in-fact.

According to the Tax Court, even if the estate did establish that the transfer to the limited partnership was motivated by a legitimate nontax purpose, the bona fide sale exception to 2036(a) still would not apply because Mr. Beyer did not receive adequate and full consideration in exchange for the assets transferred to the limited partnership. The estate claimed that adequate and full consideration was received because the capital accounts of both the LP revocable trust and the GP revocable trust were credited with the value of the assets transferred to the limited partnership, and, in the event of liquidation and dissolution, each revocable trust had the right to distributions in accordance with their respective capital accounts. The Tax Court rejected this claim and noted that the limited partnership never established separate capital accounts for its partners.

Possession or Enjoyment of the Transferred Property

Having concluded that the bona fide sale exception did not apply, the Tax Court next examined whether Mr. Beyer retained the possession or enjoyment of, or the right to the income from, the assets transferred to the limited partnership for purposes of Section 2036(a)(1). The Court found that there was an implied agreement or understanding that Mr. Beyer would retain the possession or enjoyment of the assets transferred to the limited partnership, and therefore the transferred assets were included in his gross estate.

According to the Tax Court, the April 17, 2006, transfer of $659,660 from the limited partnership to the LP revocable trust evidenced such an implied agreement or understanding. The transfer occurred after the LP revocable trust sold its limited partnership interest to the irrevocable trust, and the Tax Court observed that this payment was used by the LP revocable trust to pay Mr. Beyer's 2005 gift tax liability.

The Tax Court also concluded that Mr. Beyer knew at the time of the initial funding of the limited partnership that the LP revocable trust lacked sufficient funds to pay the transfer taxes that would be owed upon Mr. Beyer's death. The LP revocable trust was obligated to pay those transfer taxes under its governing instrument. Furthermore, the Court found that, when the LP revocable trust sold its limited partnership interest to the irrevocable trust, Mr. Beyer knew that the LP revocable trust would need to use a very substantial amount of the limited partnership's assets to satisfy its obligation to pay the transfer taxes upon Mr. Beyer's death.

The Tax Court also found the existence of an implied agreement or understanding supported by the fact that Mr. Beyer failed to retain sufficient assets outside of the limited partnership to pay his anticipated financial obligations. While Mr. Beyer retained about $4 million when the limited partnership was initially funded, those funds were significantly depleted by two gifts made by Mr. Beyer in 2005 to his nephews Craig and Bruce Plassmeyer, collectively totaling $2,500,000. Further, the Court noted that Mr. Beyer would not have used limited partnership assets to pay his 2005 gift tax liability of $659,660 if he had retained sufficient assets outside the limited partnership to satisfy his anticipated financial obligations.

Value of the Assets Included in Mr. Beyer's Gross Estate

The assets transferred by Mr. Beyer to the limited partnership were included in Mr. Beyer's gross estate. With that settled, the Tax Court set about determining whether the stipulated (and undisclosed) value of those assets could be discounted. The estate claimed that the value of the assets should be discounted based on the investment account agreement between Capital Trust and the limited partnership, pursuant to which Capital Trust held and managed 75 percent of the limited partnership's assets. Under the terms of the agreement, distribution of principal from the restricted account was prohibited and the limited partnership could not transfer the assets in the account without Capital Trust's written consent. Despite these restrictions, the Tax Court held that the estate could not discount the limited partnership assets held in the restricted account because the investment account agreement did not prohibit Capital Trust from selling the assets held in the account.

Conclusion

This case reminds us that the devil truly is in the details when it comes to family limited partnership planning. Establishing a legitimate nontax purpose, retaining sufficient personal assets, treating the partnership as a truly separate and distinct entity, establishing separate capital accounts – details such as these can and do mean the difference between a successful estate plan and an unexpected multimillion-dollar tax bill.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions