United States: The D.C. Circuit Reins In The Executive Powers Of The CFPB

Last Updated: October 19 2016
Article by Scott A. Cammarn

Most Read Contributor in United States, August 2018

On October 11, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued its long-awaited opinion in PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The appeal relates to an action brought by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB") against PHH for alleged violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA") relating to PHH's "captive reinsurance arrangements." RESPA is one of the many pre-existing "enumerated consumer laws" listed in the Dodd-Frank Act for which interpretation and enforcement authority was assigned to the newly created CFPB in 2011.

Under a typical captive reinsurance arrangement, a mortgage lender (such as PHH) owns a subsidiary mortgage insurance company that reinsures mortgage risk written by third party insurance companies. These third party insurance companies are referred business by the mortgage lender and write mortgage insurance with respect to such consumers; these mortgage insurers then reinsure (or "cede") such risk back to the lender's captive mortgage company for a fee paid to the captive. Section 8 of RESPA bars the payment of "referral fees" in connection with the rendering of real estate settlement services (such as mortgage insurance). Captive insurance arrangements were not considered to involve a prohibited referral fee – and, thus, are permissible under Section 8 – by the agency previously responsible for administering RESPA, the Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"), provided the amount paid to the mortgage reinsurance company for the ceding of risk did not exceed reasonable market value.

Nonetheless, the CFPB rejected HUD's prior position and held that the PHH captive reinsurance structure violated Section 8 of RESPA as a prohibited referral arrangement, regardless of whether the amount paid to the reinsurer was consistent with market value. The CFPB imposed a $109 million fine on PHH for these alleged violations of Section 8 of RESPA, including violations that occurred prior to the CFPB's re-interpretation of Section 8. In doing so, the CFPB held that the three-year statute of limitations in RESPA did not apply to administrative determinations made by the CFPB.

In its appeal from the CFPB's ruling, PHH argued that the CFPB's determination was unenforceable because the CFPB was unconstitutionally organized as an agency under the control of a single Director not subject to Presidential removal except for cause. The court agreed that the CFPB was unconstitutionally structured in violation of the President's Article II powers because excessive power was conferred on a single individual not subject to the control of the Executive Branch. The court noted that the CFPB's structure was distinguishable from "independent agencies" that historically have been headed by multiple individuals or commissioners. These independent agencies, the court reasoned, pass constitutional muster under prior rulings because the existence of multiple commissioners serves as an alternative check on excessive authority wielded by an individual other than the elected President. In contrast to such independent agencies, the power granted the Director of the CFPB was clearly unconstitutional. In this regard, the majority opinion emphasized that:

Indeed . . . the Director [of the CFPB] enjoys more unilateral authority than any other officer in any of the three branches of the U.S. Government, other than the President.

Rather than striking down all of the Dodd-Frank Act provisions creating the CFPB, the D.C. Circuit instead held that the constitutional deficiency could be cured by interpreting the Dodd-Frank Act to allow the President of the United States to fire the CFPB's Director without cause, thus effectively transforming the CFPB from an independent agency to an executive agency, and thus enabling it to continue to operate. The court declined to consider the legal ramifications of its ruling on past CFPB rulemaking and enforcement actions.

Turning to the merits of PHH's RESPA arguments, the D.C. Circuit agreed with PHH on all points:

  • With respect to Section 8 of RESPA, the court reaffirmed the original construction adopted by HUD, ruling that Section 8 of RESPA permits a mortgage lender such as PHH to maintain captive reinsurance arrangements so long as the amounts paid by the third party mortgage insurance companies to the captive mortgage reinsurance company do not exceed reasonable market value.
  • In addition, the court ruled that the CFPB violated PHH's due process rights by retroactively applying its new interpretation, which departed from consistent, prior interpretations issued by HUD that covered referral arrangements for mortgage-loan reinsurance. In this regard, the court stated that the CFPB "violated bedrock principles of due process." The CFPB's abrupt re-interpretation was described as "upend[ing] the entire system of unpaid referrals that has been part of the market for real estate settlement services . . . [and] flout[ing] . . . decades of carefully and repeatedly considered official government interpretations."
  • Finally, the D.C. Circuit ruled that the CFPB was bound by RESPA's three-year statute of limitations, and could not avoid the restriction by asserting that the statute of limitations was not incorporated by the Dodd-Frank Act when Congress moved responsibility from HUD to the CFPB, or by asserting that the statute of limitations applied solely to judicial rather than administrative proceedings.

The decision is a major political blow to the autonomy of the CFPB. Moreover, the D.C. Circuit's decision makes clear that the CFPB does not have unlimited ability to reinterpret statutory provisions previously interpreted by other agencies responsible for the statute, at least not without fair warning, and may be unable to apply such interpretations retroactively.

In a partially dissenting opinion, one judge ruled that, given that the court had vacated the CFPB's disciplinary action on statutory and due process grounds, it was neither necessary nor appropriate for the court to reach the constitutional question of the CFPB's structure.

The CFPB announced that it disagrees with the D.C. Circuit's opinion and is "considering options for seeking further review" – which, undoubtedly, include seeking en banc review or the filing for a writ of certiorari.

A more detailed description and commentary on the CFPB decision will appear shortly in a Clients and Friends Memorandum that will be included in the Cabinet news.

Commentary / Scott Cammarn

Section 8 of RESPA has been one of the most contested provisions of consumer credit law due to its sweeping language, the vague nature of its prohibition, and its draconian sanctions (which include criminal penalties). Throughout the 80s and early 90s, the industry contested the proper interpretation of Section 8 with regard to a variety of arrangements, including, but not limited to, captive reinsurance arrangements. Some of these disputes were resolved following the issuance of a HUD letter in 1997 allowing captive reinsurance arrangements, provided that the fair market value conditions are met. HUD reaffirmed its interpretation several times thereafter, and its position regarding fair market value was widely cited in treatises and court cases. The industry relied on this HUD letter for 18 years until the CFPB abruptly rejected HUD's conclusion in 2015. The CFPB apparently neglected to appreciate this very long history surrounding Section 8, or failed to appreciate that PHH likely would not be cowed. In seeking to apply its own re-interpretation of Section 8 retroactively, notwithstanding these prior HUD interpretations allowing such arrangements, the CFPB committed a gross overreach, leaving PHH with little choice but to appeal. In doing so, the CFPB invited the D.C. Circuit to re-examine the controversial structure of the CFPB. The CFPB's actions violate the most fundamental tenet of dispute resolution – pick your battles.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions