European Union: Copyright: Europe Explores Its Boundaries - 2016

Last Updated: October 17 2016
Article by Kristina Ehle and Susan McLean

Digital Single Market Update: The European Commission's Proposal to Modify and Harmonize EU Copyright Law

Copyright reform is a key part of the European Union's package of measures designed to create a Digital Single Market (DSM) in the EU. The European Commission's view is of nothing less than a modernisation of EU copyright law to reflect the digital age. Until now, specific details of the Commission's plans have been thin on the ground.

But, like buses arriving together after a long wait, the Commission has now published a series of proposals designed to achieve its aim of a more modern copyright law that takes account of the features and potential uses of digital technology and widens the degree of cross-border access to protected works online.

In this Alert, we give an overview on the Commission's main aims in the copyright field and examine the potential impact that its proposals may have on content rights owners, online services providers and end users.


The Commission has issued a draft Directive on copyright in the digital market and a separate Regulation on the exercise of copyright and related rights applicable to certain online transmissions of broadcasting organisations and re-transmissions of television and radio programmes. In addition, it has published a separate proposal for a Directive and a Regulation to implement the Marrakesh Treaty, facilitating the access of visually impaired people to protected content.

1. Proposal for a Directive on Copyright in the DSM

The Commission's proposal for a Directive on copyright in the DSM includes the following main features:

Related right for press publishers

The Commission follows the examples given by Germany and Spain and introduces a related right for press publishers in relation to the digital use of their press publications (also called "link tax"). This related right would be an original right of the press publisher, rewarding it for investing in and enabling the digital distribution of a press publication. This right – expiring 20 years after the initial digital publication – would exist alongside and not affect the author's copyright in the digitally published work.

The proposed directive awkwardly defines a "press publication" as a "fixation of a collection of literary works of a journalistic nature [...] within a periodical or regularly-updated publication under a single title [...] having the purpose of providing information related to news or other topics [...]". This will include daily newspapers, weekly or monthly magazines of general or special interest, news websites and certain blocks, but not periodical publications for scientific or academic purposes.

The creation of such a related right for press publishers stands in the tradition of similar related rights that already exist under the current copyright regimes of EU Member States (such as the rights of the producers of phonograms (music recordings), films and databases and of broadcasters) established to reward their financial, technical and organisational contributions in creating and selling the copyrightable works. This new "press publisher's right" aims to protect digitally published press content like news or other journalistic content from systematic licence-free exploitation by online platforms such as news aggregators, web search engines or social media platforms like Facebook or Twitter.

Based on such related right, third parties would have to obtain the original press publisher's consent to

  • reproduce the digitally published press publication (whether in whole or part), or
  • display and make available the digitally published press publication (whether in whole or part) to the public (e.g., display it on websites, mobile websites, apps, etc.).

The press publisher's right would be subject to the statutory copyright exceptions (which are comparable to the U.S. doctrine of fair use), including an exception of quotation for purposes such as criticism or review, private use, use by non-profit educational organisations, etc.

The central question that's likely to arise as a result of the new press publisher right is what type of use is going to be considered a "digital use" of a press publication?

  • In accordance with previous case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), the Commission emphasizes that hyperlinking of press publications would not be subject to this related right because hyperlinking is not considered to be a communication to the public. However, as we have written elsewhere, this principle may be changing as a result of recent cases before the CJEU.
  • While, for example, the current German Copyright Act (where a comparable related right of press publishers was introduced with effect of 1 August 2013, see Sec.87f German Copyright Act) permits the digital use of individual words or small text clips without the press publisher's consent, the new Copyright Directive proposal does not provide for any such exceptions to the right. Would, therefore, a common search engine result or a news teaser in a social media account using the articles headline "TV-Duell: Trump vs Clinton – winners everywhere?" be a digital use requiring the press publisher's consent? And could permitting the search engine to crawl over and index the website of the press publication be considered an implied consent of the press publisher to a display a part of its press publication in the search results?

In Germany, this press publishers' right has turned out to be a paper tiger insofar as it has done more to generate litigation costs than generate revenues. The online business model of many press publishers is to make press content available to users free of charge and to monetize that content through advertising on their websites and mobile platforms. This means that they highly rely on user traffic generated by search engines and the most prominent global social media platforms. Therefore, to avoid a "delisting" threatened by Google, the German press publishers granted Google a royalty-free licence to display small text clips in the search results.

Since the introduction of the related right three years ago, German press publishers have received in total only €714,540 in licence fees from other online news aggregators1. For the German market of about 52 million online users over the age of 14, this does not look like a significant income generator for press publishers.

In addition, the German Patent and Trademark Office – the DPMA, which is the competent supervising authority for rights management and collecting societies in Germany – decided that the practice of the rights management and collecting society VG Media (which manages the press publishers' right) to grant Google a royalty-free licence for digital use of press publications while other online services providers are required to pay a licence fee for such use is discriminatory and therefore prohibited. VG Media sued DPMA to challenge this decision2.

The outcome of this conflict of economic interests and applicable law may be that press publishers will have to grant royalty-free licences to all search engines and news aggregators in order not to lose significant traffic and revenues on their websites.

These experiences in Germany make it questionable whether a related right of press publishers for digital use of their press publications will indeed be an effective instrument to protect their financial, technical and organisational contribution in their digital distribution. As regards the protection of a full press article or major parts thereof against unauthorized display on other websites and apps, such a related right is not necessary because the publisher can prevent their digital use based on the exclusive exploitation rights that the authors of the articles usually grant to the press publishers.

Publisher's share in statutory compensation payable for uses under copyright exceptions

The Commission plans to give Member States the option to introduce a right for publishers to claim a share in the statutory compensation payable for the use of protected works (such as literary works) under copyright exceptions.

EU and national laws provide for a number of exceptions to copyright that allow the use of protected works without the rights-holders' consent (for example for non-profit educational, freedom of speech and art, private use and non-profit scientific purposes) but require the commercial beneficiaries to pay the authors and other rights owners a statutory fee as compensation for the uses under such exceptions.

This proposal seems to result from a decision of the CJEU. In the "HP vs. Reprobel" case (C-572/13, decided in November 2015) the Court ruled that publishers are not entitled to claim a share in the statutory compensation for use of literary works under a copyright exception. The CJEU argued that under the current law (InfoSoc Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC)), only the authors as the original rights owners were entitled under the exceptions but not the publishers to whom the authors had assigned or licensed their rights in the literary works.

However, in some countries like Belgium and Germany, the applicable rights management and collecting societies distributed the revenues collected for use under the copyright exceptions not only to authors, but also to publishers when the author had assigned or licensed his or her copyright to the publisher. Thus, pursuant to this decision, the publishers are deprived of any compensation for the use of works published by them under copyright exceptions. The proposal of the Commission would therefore legalize this practice, which, according to the CJEU, is currently non-compliant with applicable copyright law.

User-generated content platforms (Art.13):

The Commission proposes additional obligations for online service providers displaying large amounts of user-generated content, such as YouTube, Spotify, Soundcloud, Facebook or Instagram, with the aim of ensuring a better protection of third-party content against unauthorized use. The platform providers, in cooperation with the right holders, would have to take appropriate and proportionate measures to

  • "ensure the functioning of agreements concluded with rights-holders for the use of their works or other subject-matter" or
  • "prevent the availability on their services of works or other subject-matter identified by right holders through the cooperation with the service providers".

Such measures could include, for example, the use of effective content recognition technologies and would have to include adequate reporting tools and procedures once an unauthorized use of a work has been identified, including complaint mechanisms for users whose uploaded content is claimed to infringe third-party rights.

The Commission points out that the second obligation also applies to so-called host providers of third-party content who can claim safe harbour under Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EC) and are not obliged to monitor and search for copyright-infringing third-party content on their platform. Platforms like YouTube already provide for content recognition technologies and claims procedures allowing rights-holders to block or monetise the infringing content on YouTube3. However, there are content categories like remixes or heavily edited videos where the efficiency of such technology is (still) limited.

The proposal seems to include an obligation for the platform providers to take down the specific content using the protected work without the rights-holder's consent when identified. But there would also be an obligation to take appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure the stay down of such work, i.e., to take measures to prevent the identified work being repeatedly uploaded thereafter as part of the same or other user-generated content, for example by using adequate filter technologies (see the wording above "prevent the availability ... of works... identified"). However, this obligation should not be understood as imposing a general monitoring obligation on the platform providers because such an obligation would not be in compliance with Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive4.

In recital 38 of the proposed directive, the Commission confirms the CJEU decision5 regarding the application of Article 14 of the E-Commerce Directive, according to which the application of the safe harbour privilege requires verification of whether the service provider plays an "active role, including by optimizing the presentation of the uploaded works or promoting them". If the service provider plays such an active role, the safe harbour privilege of Article 14 does not apply.

Fair remuneration of authors and performers

The EU Commission also aims to strengthen the contractual rights of authors and performers whom it considers to be usually in a weaker contractual position.

  • It proposes a transparency obligation to provide authors with the right to obtain information on the exploitation of their works on a regular basis, including how the works have been exploited and what revenues were generated. Member States may exclude authors and performers whose contributions to the work are not significant (e.g., background singers, stunt performers, etc.).
  • Authors and performers will have the right to request from their contract partners payment of additional remuneration for the assignment or licence of rights to their works if the fees that the parties originally agreed upon are disproportionally low compared to the subsequent relevant revenues and benefits derived from the exploitation of the works. This means that authors and performers would have a right to request the adjustment of their contracts that would be enforceable in court.

The courts would have to define what "disproportionally low" means. As a result, we would expect several years of uncertainty during which it would be unclear when and what level of additional fees may be payable for the successful exploitation of a work until the first CJEU decisions will have been received. This may make business planning difficult.

Remember also that many content-exploitation business models (e.g., in the film or music industries) depend upon revenues generated by one or two really successful works to finance the production and marketing of another 8 to 10 flops that generate little to no revenue. From the proposed wording, it's unclear whether the fee adjustment right would be triggered by a slight disproportion of the originally agreed fees or only in case of a significant disproportion when the exploitation of the work was exceptionally successful and such success was not reflected in the originally agreed fees.

In Germany, where the Copyright Act already provides for a fee adjustment right of authors and performers in case of a significant disproportion, such right has been successfully enforced in court only in a few exceptional cases.

Member States are also required to provide for a voluntary dispute resolution mechanism for disputes about these fee adjustment rights.

Negotiation mechanism for parties making available audiovisual works on VoD platforms

The Commission aims to increase the number of available European movies (motion pictures and TV movies) on Video-on-Demand (VoD) platforms and proposes that the Member States set up a negotiation mechanism introducing a separate impartial body "with relevant experience".

If the VoD platform provider and the film content provider cannot reach an agreement on the licensing of the film content on the VoD platform, they should have the possibility to reach out to this body and obtain its assistance in the contract negotiations. The Commission assumes a decisive role of the VoD platforms in the dissemination of European works across the EU. It states in recital 29 that "such issues may, for instance, appear when the holder of the rights for a given territory is not interested in the online exploitation of the work or where there are issues linked to the windows of exploitation".

In reality, it's probably doubtful whether VoD platform providers and film content providers have a real need to involve a third-party in their contract negotiations, so the practical relevance of such a body seems very questionable.

New Copyright Exceptions

The Commission proposes three new mandatory copyright exceptions for the use of works without having to acquire the rights-holder's consent:

  • Scientific research organisations (such as research institutes or universities) will be granted the right to carry out text and data mining of works (only) for scientific research purposes either on a non-for-profit basis or that serve certain public interests (recognized by a Member State).
  • Educational organisations may use materials to illustrate teaching through digital tools and in online courses across borders, provided that the use serves non-commercial educational purposes and that the use is restricted to the premises or the closed-user electronic network of the organization (e.g., the Intranet of a school accessible by students and teachers only).
  • Cultural heritage institutions have the right to digitally preserve the works that are permanently in their collections. However, the exception is restricted to the purpose of preservation, meaning that, under this exception, the institution is not entitled to use the digital copy, for example, for advertising for its institution, display it on its website or show it as part of its exhibition.

2. Proposal for a Regulation regarding online transmissions and re-transmissions of TV and radio programmes

Services like podcasts or TV catch-up services are transmitted online in individual Member States alongside traditional broadcasting by satellite, cable or terrestrial, whereby broadcasters license programmes from others or produce them themselves. However, such broadcasted programmes are rarely available online in other Member States. The Commission's new proposed Regulation aims to make such broadcasted programmes also available online in the other Member States by extending the existing regulations on satellite transmissions and cable re-transmissions to online transmissions of broadcasting programmes.

Under the Satellite and Cable Directive (Directive 93/83/EEC), a satellite transmission is deemed to occur only in the EU or EEA Member State where the transmission is carried out (even if the signals can be received by users in other Member States). Thus, the broadcaster must only acquire a licence from content rights-holders for that single Member State. Furthermore, the Satellite and Cable Directive provides that the cable re-transmission right may be exercised only by a collective rights management and collection organisation but not by the individual rights-holders (except for rights of the broadcasters).

  • In accordance with the Satellite and Cable Directive, the Commission proposes that the copyright-relevant uses for the online transmission of an ancillary online service (e.g. necessary reproductions and the display to the public online) will be deemed to occur solely in the Member State where the broadcaster has its principal establishment, and
  • the right to the digital (simultaneous, unaltered and unabridged) re-transmission of TV and radio programmes over closed-circuit IP-based networks (IPTV) by a party other than the broadcaster are to be exercised solely by a collective rights management and collection organisation.

"Ancillary online service" is defined in the Regulation as the online transmission of radio or TV programmes simultaneously with or for a defined period of time after the broadcast (e.g., so called catch-up services). Recital 8 of the proposed Regulation states that these are services "which have a clear and subordinate relationship to the broadcast". Consequently, the online transmission of the programme has to be carried out shortly after the original broadcast. However, the exact time period is not regulated by the proposed Regulation.

The Regulation does not extend the scope of rights that the broadcaster has acquired for its programme in the country of origin, i.e., if the broadcaster does not have the right to transmit the programme online in its home country, the Regulation does not grant the broadcaster the right to transmit the programme online in other Member States.

The proposed Regulation does not apply to online video on demand services – in respect of these services, the cross-border use will be ensured by the proposed Regulation on Cross-border Portability of Online Content Services.

3. Proposals for easier access for disabled persons to protected works

Additionally, the Commission has proposed a Directive and a Regulation to implement the Marrakesh Treaty into EU law to facilitate access to published works for persons who are blind, visually impaired or otherwise print disabled.

The Directive proposes a mandatory exception in favour of the aforementioned disabled persons allowing them to access books and other content in formats accessible to them (e.g., braille books, large print, audio books, etc.), while the Regulation governs the cross-border exchange between the EU and other countries party to the Marrakesh Treaty.

As the group of entitled persons under the Directive is very narrowly defined – only the visually impaired person, the persons acting on their behalf and non-profit organisations for education or training – the impact on content rights-holders seem rather limited.


Exception for Freedom of Panorama

The Commission has chosen not to impose an EU-wide "freedom of panorama" copyright exception to guarantee people the right to take and share photographs of public spaces. Some Member States, including Germany, have introduced such an exception, while others (e.g., Italy) have not.

The exception of freedom of panorama allows not only taking photographs or videos, but also creating other works, such as paintings of buildings or other art works located in the public for a permanent time that are protected by copyright. Usually, the rights owner is authorized to permit the creation and distribution of derivative works. This is not applied to copyright-protected works that are part of public scenes or places when freedom of panorama is guaranteed.

The confused legal situation within the EU in this respect therefore remains unchanged.

Use of copyrightable content by linking and framing:

Though the Commission refers to the decisions of the CJEU on linking and framing6 in its Impact Assessment underlying the proposed Copyright Directive, the Commission does not see a need to redefine the public performance rights ("Communication to the Public" and "Making Available to the Public") and does not make any proposals specifying when the online use of a work such as linking or framing is considered a copyright-relevant act that requires the rights-holder's consent.

The CJEU decided in 2014 that hyperlinking and framing, generally speaking, do not constitute a copyright infringement as long as:

  • the content is not made available by technical means different from those used for the original communication to a public, and
  • no new audience (other than the one addressed by the original communication) is granted access to the content.

In a recent decision, the CJEU further decided7 that setting a hyperlink to copyright-protected content (e.g., videos, photos, texts, etc.) displayed on a website without the rights-holder's consent infringes the copyright in this content if the party responsible for the hyperlinking knew or should have known that the display of the work on the other website is illegal. If the hyperlink is posted for profit (i.e., for generating revenues through advertising), it will be presumed that such party had full knowledge of the copyright-protected nature of the content and possible lack of the rights-holder's consent unless this presumption is rebutted.

This judgement requires providers of websites that use hyperlinks to generate traffic (and thereby advertising revenues) on their website to carefully review whether the content they link to might be subject to copyright protection and whether there are any indications that the rights-holder has not agreed to the display of the linked content on such website.

This still leaves open the question of whether a provider may frame content on its website that is legally available on another website and use such framed third-party content for advertising purposes on its website or whether the commercial use of such framing has to be considered a copyright-relevant act requiring the rights-holder's consent.

The Commission could have closed down debate on the extent of third-party rights in this area, but it clearly chose not to do so and to leave further developments of EU law in this area to CJEU decisions.

Private Copying Levy

The Commission had also announced a plan to review EU Member States' implementation of the optional copyright exception to make copies of protected works for private, non-commercial use (the so-called "private copying exception").

Under current EU law, if a Member States decides to introduce a private copying exception, it must provide for a compensation of the copyright owners. The existing compensation schemes in the Member States are different from state to state, which is an administrative burden for the businesses subject to paying such levies (e.g., levies on mobile phones and tablets).

However, the Commission does not address this topic in the proposed directive on copyright.


The Commission's proposals will need to be approved by the European Parliament and the Council. The regulations will be directly applicable, whereas EU Member States have to implement the provisions deriving from the Directives into national laws within a year after they enter into force.





4 See CJEU judgement, 12 July 2011, C-324/09 – L'Oréal/eBay, recital 139

5 CJEU decisions, dated 23 March 2010, C 236-238/08 – Google France, and dated 12 July 2011, C-324/09 – L'Oréal/eBay

6 CJEU, 13 February 2014, C-466/12, Svensson 21 October 2014, C-348/13, BestWater International

7 CJEU, 8 September 2016, C-160/15, GS Media

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Kristina Ehle
Susan McLean
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.