United States: NLRB Issues Raft Of Pro-Union Decisions As Time Expires

In the last days of Summer 2016, as the political make-up of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) was about to change, the Board suddenly issued 20 decisions in a single week. The reason for this unusual output was not some legal requirement or particular deadline but rather a long held tradition at the Board.

NLRB member Kent Hirozawa's term ended August 27, 2016. Hirozawa was a Democrat appointed by President Obama to the five-member Board. With the departure of member Harry Johnson last year and the recent departure of Hirozawa, the Board was reduced from its usual five members to three. Two of those members are Democrats, and one is a Republican. The Supreme Court has found that three members constitute a quorum, and, thus, the Board can continue to make binding decisions. However, it has long been the practice of the Board to not make major changes in the law without the support of at least three Board members. With the departure of member Hirozawa, the now three-member Board is ideologically split between two Democrats and one Republican. It seems unlikely that any major changes will be made to NLRB law with three votes supporting the change until new members are appointed by the next President. This tradition of requiring three members to change existing law must have been on the minds of the Board members as the summer, and Mr. Hirozawa's term, came to an end. As the number of remaining days of Mr. Hirozawa's term shortened, the Board engaged in a flurry of activity, issuing decisions making major changes in the law that many view as strongly pro‑union and which are likely to have real significance to employers.

In United States Postal Service, 364 NLRB No. 116 (August 27, 2016), on Hirozawa's last day on the job, the Board reversed years of precedent and substantially limited the authority of its administrative law judges. Previously, administrative law judges (ALJ) could approve settlements of unfair labor practice complaints, even if the General Counsel of the NLRB or the charging party objected. Provided that the settlement proposed by an employer "substantially remedied" the violations alleged in a complaint, and as long as the administrative law judge concluded that the settlement was reasonable given the nature of the violations alleged and the litigation risks, he or she had the authority to approve a settlement, even if the General Counsel or the charging party didn't think it was fair or appropriate.

There are times in litigation when the settlement of a case should make sense to all parties. However, sometimes the NLRB's general counsel or a charging party will refuse to settle on any terms other than their own. In those situations, an administrative law judge was able to take the proposed settlement over the objection of the general counsel or a charging party by applying the factors noted above. That authority is gone.

In U.S. Postal Service, the Board abandoned precedent and held that an ALJ cannot approve a settlement over the objection of the general counsel or a charging party unless the settlement provides "full relief".

The Board's decision in U.S. Postal Service will give the general counsel and a charging party much more leverage in settlement negotiations and may cause more cases to go to trial when a more appropriate result may have been achieved with a good faith settlement approved by an ALJ.

In Columbia University, 364 NLRB No. 90 (August 29, 2016), the Board tackled, again, the issue of whether student teaching assistants in private universities are employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act and are therefore able to unionize.

This is not the first time that the Board has grappled with this issue. In 2000, in the last year of the Clinton Administration, in a case involving New York University, the NLRB concluded that graduate assistants were in fact employees. Four years later, during the Bush Administration, in a case involving Brown University, the Board reversed its position and held that graduate teaching and research assistants were not employees because their relationship to the school was "primarily educational". In its late summer decision in Columbia University, the Board concluded that its previous decision in the Brown case was wrong and that its decision in that case to treat graduate assistants as nonemployees "deprived an entire category of workers of the protection of the Act, without a convincing justification in either the statutory language or the policies of the Act. Instead, in Columbia, the Board concluded that the language of the Act "supports the conclusion that student assistants who are common-law employees are covered by the Act, unless compelling and statutory policy considerations require an exception".

Phillip Miscimarra, the only dissenter in the case, and the Board's only Republican, expressed his concern that treating students as employees and allowing unions to represent them in collective bargaining would detract from student education. Miscimarra also worried about "the risks and uncertainties associated with collective bargaining— including the risk of breakdown and resort to economic weapons—governing the single most important financial decision that students and their families will ever make."

The United Auto Workers, the union representing the Columbia graduate assistants, has announced that it expects graduate assistants at other Ivy League schools such as Harvard and Yale to follow Columbia's lead.

Last year, the Board issued a decision that radically expanded the joint employer doctrine. Browning Ferris Industries, 362 NLRB No. 186 (2015). Under established law, a joint employer is generally one who does not hire, fire, supervise, or determine wages and benefits of another employer's employees but who still bears responsibilities to those employees under the National Labor Relations Act. Prior to Browning, the test of whether two employers, for example, a business using an independent staffing agency, were joint employers and could be combined in a single unit for collective bargaining purposes was if they "shared or codetermined matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment". In Browning, the Board expanded its joint employer doctrine to include not just employers who do exercise authority to control terms and conditions of employment of another employer's employees but also those who merely have the right to do so, even if unexercised.

Browning set the stage for the Board's decision in late August in Miller & Anderson, 364 NLRB No. 39 (July 11, 2016). Miller reversed years of precedent by holding that the Board would no longer require consent of both employers to include jointly employed employees in a single unit for a union election.

With the one-two punch of Browning and Miller, an employer using employees of another employer in its business, for example, cleaning or janitorial services, caterers, management companies which staff and operate its business, and staffing agencies providing additional help, runs the risk that it may be found to be a joint employer of these employees. If so, without their consent, the employer may find itself at a bargaining table negotiating with a union over the terms and conditions of its vendors' employees.

There are other cases in which the Board made last minute changes to existing law before Member Hirozawa ended his term. For example:

  • In King Soopers, Inc., 364 NLRB No. 93 (August 25, 2016), the Board changed its practice of compensating workers who have been unlawfully terminated. The Board's prior rule, since 1938, had been that the expenses incurred searching for a new job were treated as off sets to interim earnings, and then that amount was subtracted from lost wages to determine the amount of back pay. Under the Board's new approach, job search, moving, and training expenses are separate elements of damages, not merely deductions from interim earnings, and must be reimbursed by an employer who is determined to have unlawfully terminated a worker
  • In Total Security Management Illinois, 364 NLRB No.106 (August 26, 2016), the Board concluded that newly organized employers who have not yet negotiated a collective bargaining agreement must give the union notice of and an opportunity to bargain over serious discipline it intends to impose on an employee before it imposes the discipline. The risk in not negotiating such discipline is that the NLRB may find the discipline illegal.

Is there more to come before the presidential election? Tradition at the Board would require that the Board have at least three members who would sign off on a decision making a major change in the law. With two Democratic and one Republican member, it seems unlikely that the Board could put together a three-person decision that would unanimously change existing law. On the other hand, the current Board has been aggressively pro‑union and might just decide to break with tradition and make changes while it can with only two votes.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.