United States: Recent FLSA Changes: Pay Now Or Pay More Later – What You Can Do To Minimize Your Risk

Last Updated: October 14 2016
Article by Adam Brown and Lawrence L. Lee

The U.S Labor Department (USDOL) has finally released the anxiously awaited revised regulations affecting certain kinds of employees who may be treated as exempt from the federal Fair Labor Standards Act's (FLSA) overtime and minimum-wage requirements. After nearly a year of uncertainty, the final rules were published on May 23, 2016. These rules apply to government employers, and they have an effective date of December 1, 2016.

Public employers who currently consider any employees to be exempt "white collar" employees might have to make some sweeping changes.

Exemption Overview

To understand why the new regulations will have such a large effect, it is worthwhile to engage in a quick refresher of the exemptions that will be affected by the new regulations.

The FLSA is the federal statute that mandates that all employees receive at least minimum wage for all hours worked, and they are to receive overtime payments at a rate of time and a half of their regular rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 in any workweek. The FLSA starts from a presumption that every employee is entitled to overtime for all hours worked in excess of 40 in a given week. However, there are exemp­tions or exceptions to this requirement. As relevant here, employees are exempt from overtime if they meet two tests: The duties test and the salary test.

Duties test: Many employers errone­ously believe that any employee that is paid on a salary basis instead of an hourly basis is exempt from overtime. However, in order to be properly exempt from overtime under the FLSA under one of the "white collar" exemptions, the employee must work in an executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, or certain types of computer posi­tions. Each of these duties categories has specific and lengthy definitions and regulations that explain how a particular employee qualifies for the exemption.

Salary test: In addition to the du­ties test, exempt employees must also meet a salary test. Under the old FLSA regulations, which remain in effect until December 1, 2016, the employee must be paid at least $455 per week, which annualizes to a yearly salary of $23,660. If an employee meets one of the duties tests and is paid at least $455 per week, the employee can be properly exempted from the overtime requirements of the FLSA.

Specific and Wide-Ranging Changes For This Year and Beyond

Under the new final rule published on May 23, 2016, the following changes have been made in the USDOL's definitions of executive, administrative, professional, computer-employee, and highly com­pensated exemptions under the FLSA's Section 13(a)(1):

The minimum salary threshold is increasing to $913 per week, which an­nualizes to $47,476 (up from $455 per week, or $23,660 per year). USDOL says that this figure is set at the 40th percentile of data representing what it calls "earn­ings of full-time salaried workers" in the lowest-wage Census region (currently the South). This more than doubling of the minimum salary threshold is sure to affect large numbers of exempt public sector employees, who currently earn more than $23,660, but less than $47,476 per year.

This minimum salary amount will now be "updated" every three years (mean­ing that it will likely increase with each "update"), beginning on January 1, 2020. USDOL will announce these changes 150 days in advance. The practical impact of this change is that public sector employ­ers will now be forced to increase the compensation of exempt employees whose salaries are at the minimum level or below the new "updated" level every three years, regardless of employee performance, budgetary concerns, or other factors that affect the amount of money available for salary increases. The 150 day announce­ment period also presents issues for public sector employers, who often operate based on yearly budgets. These employers will need to be aware of any impending increases when new budgets are in the process of being drafted and approved. Unfortunately, employers may be forced to estimate the updated amount, if it is not released in detail before the new budget is finalized.

Employers will be able to satisfy up to 10% of this new salary threshold through nondiscretionary bonuses and other incentive payments, includ­ing commissions, provided that the payments are made at least quarterly. This crediting will not be permitted as to the salaries paid to employees treated as exempt "highly compensated" ones. This change is less likely to impact pub­lic sector employers, but it is important to keep in mind in the event that it can be utilized to offset some of the burden associated with the mandated salary increases.

The total-annual-compensation threshold for the "highly compensated employee" exemption will increase from $100,000 to $134,004 (which will also be "updated" every three years). USDOL says that this figure is set at the 90th percentile of data represent­ing what it calls "earnings of full-time salaried workers" nationally.

These rules will become effec­tive on December 1, 2016, which is considerably later than had been proposed. Unless this is effective date is somehow postponed, by December 1 employers must have done what is necessary to continue to rely upon one or more of these exemptions (or another exemption) as to each affected employee, or they must forgo exempt status and begin paying over­time to any employee who no longer satisfies all of the requirements.

Considerations for the Public Employer

Essentially, USDOL is doubling the current salary threshold. This is likely intended to both reduce the proportion of exempt workers sharply and increase the compensation of many who will remain exempt, rather than engag­ing in the fundamentally definitional process called for under the FLSA. This represents a stark departure from past USDOL interpretations of the agency's power, when even the agency itself said that manipulating exemption requirements to "give employees a raise" or to establish a minimum wage for exempt employees was not, and never has been, an authorized or legitimate pursuit for USDOL to under­take.

Additionally, as discussed above, for the first time in the more-than-75-year history of the white collar exemption regulations, USDOL will publish what amounts to an automatic "update" to the minimum salary threshold. This departs from the prior US­DOL practice of engaging in what should instead ultimately be a qualitative evalua­tion that also takes into account a variety of non-numerical considerations. This new imposition also creates a real hardship for public sector employers, which are often constrained by budgetary concerns.

Thankfully, USDOL did not change any of the exemptions' requirements as they relate to the kinds or amounts of work neces­sary to sustain exempt status. The USDOL had previously asked for comments directed to whether there should be a strict more-than-50% requirement for exempt work. The agency, however, apparently decided that this was not necessary in light of the fact that the number of workers for whom em­ployers must apply the duties test is reduced by virtue of the salary increase alone.

What These Changes Mean for Public Employers

Many public sector employers do not close­ly track the hours worked by their exempt employees. Under these new regulations, tracking hours has become even more important than it ever has been. First, there is a good probability that some employees who were formerly classified as exempt and who received a salary will be reclassi­fied as nonexempt because there simply is not money in the budget to increase their salaries to meet the new salary test.

Many public sector employees are not used to working strict 40 hour workweeks, and many of them in fact routinely work more than 40 hours per week. Public sector employers will need to begin closely tracking employees' work hours, to ensure employees are properly compensated for any hours worked in excess of 40 in a work­week, or employers risk increased liability in future lawsuits brought by nonexempt employees alleging unpaid or improperly paid overtime. Another reason to closely monitor hours worked is to avoid future risk from a disgruntled exempt employee who argues that he or she was improperly classified as exempt, and who claims to have worked a large amount of overtime hours. In the absence of a proper timekeeping system that generates contemporaneous records of hours worked, courts have held that an employee's recollection alone is sufficient to prove the amount of overtime hours worked. Proof of hours worked is the foundation for damages in FLSA cases. Thus, it is extremely impor­tant for employers to require all employees to record and track their time every week.

Unfortunately, there is likely no way to avoid feeling the impact of these changes in some fashion. Municipal employer fund­ing is usually defined by taxes, federal or state contributions, and creative budgeting. Public entities are unlikely to see a suffi­cient funding increase to help place all sala­ries at the necessary new levels, because tax increases are unpopular, and even if they are passed, they likely will not make up the gap between the old salary basis amount and the newly doubled amount. This very real possibility has the potential to harm both the local government themselves and the public in general. If public entities are forced to raise some salaries large amounts to meet the new minimum requirements in the regulations, they will be forced to cut other services or programs. The extent of these cuts depend on how many employees are affected in each entity.

By that same token, if public sector em­ployers choose not to raise salaries and to begin classifying affected formerly exempt employees as non-exempt employees, they will still have difficulty making up the necessary funds, because they will likely be paying overtime premiums to employ­ees whose job duties and work habits have evolved to necessitate more than 40 hours per week under the old regulations. Employers who elect to prohibit employees from working overtime will find it difficult to adjust to the decline in productivity as­sociated with key employees reducing their work hours each week.

While granting comp time in lieu of overtime is permissible under the FLSA for public sector employers, the budgetary and decreased productivity issues discussed above will not be improved if employers elect to give comp time in lieu of overtime. This practice usually results in municipal employers paying affected employees to not work, which could further exacerbate the existing issues. Under any scenario, government employers may likely see less work being done and/or more money being paid out. This conclusion is particularly difficult for public sector employers with limited funding, many of whom will be unable to hire ad­ditional employees to make up for any productivity gaps that arise. To make up for the monetary gap necessary to maintain exemptions, more funds will be shifted from programs and services that benefit the public over to increased employee salaries. The extent of these issues is unknown at this time, and will vary between different public employ­ers, but what is clear is that these new regulations will have a profound impact on public sector payroll practices, as well as programs and services offered to the communities as a whole.

These changes also carry the signifi­cant administrative burden of figuring out how to implement them, and decid­ing which of the multiple unpleasant options is the least unpleasant for each affected employee within a particular municipal employer. These tasks will likely include a full compensation review for any exempt employees, as well as an analysis of any needed changes for each employee. For any employee whose sala­ry is not increased to the new minimum $47,500, there will be significant work to decide whether to convert them to hourly or to pay overtime with a salary. The latter could be a problem if such employees are regularly working over­time, but might work well if employees generally work 40 hours or less and only occasionally have overtime spikes.

Finally, although most governmental employers do not have many employees who meet the "highly compensated employee" exemption, the change to that exemption may force some employers to reevaluate whether a few of their people who presently fall under that designation will be raised to meet the new amount or not. This is likely to be minimal for most public sector employers, but some government entities have employees who qualified for this exemption under the old salary test, who would not qualify under the new test.

How Can Public Sector Employers Comply with the New Rules?

The new rules have left many employers puzzled about how to ensure compliance. While the practical impact of the solutions proposed by this article may be somewhat harsh, fortunately the concepts and meth­ods necessary to ensure compliance are not complex.

First, the simplest, yet perhaps least plau­sible, way to ensure compliance is to make sure all employees who are exempt under one of the exemptions discussed in this article are paid a salary of at least $913 per week, and that their job duties qualify them for one of the relevant exemptions. However, this option may not be available to cash strapped municipal employers. Fortunately, there are other solutions available.

Public sector employers can also convert exempt employees who will no longer meet the salary basis test to nonexempt employees. These employees can lawfully receive their wages either as a salary, or as hourly pay, but they must be paid overtime at time and a half of their regular rate of pay for any hours worked in excess of 40 in a week. For this reason, employers should always track the hours worked by these employees, and should consider implementing strict "no overtime" policies that require prior managerial approval for any overtime hours. These policies will not completely protect against liability for future claims of unpaid overtime, but they will likely dissuade employees from working overtime.

If nonexempt employees do work over­time, the FLSA allows public sector employ­ers to grant employees compensatory time off, or comp time, in lieu of cash overtime. This comp time must be granted at a rate not less than one and one half hours of comp time for every overtime hour worked, and employees must be free to use comp time within a reasonable period of time after it is earned. Additionally, employers may not permit employees to accrue more than 240 hours of comp time (except for certain safety-related positions), and employers must compensate employees for all banked comp time hours upon separation from employ­ment for any reason.

Why is this Important?

Compliance with the FLSA is mandatory for all employers, and there are multiple avenues of risk associated with noncompliance. First, the employer may face a lawsuit from one or more employees alleging violations. Its applica­tion is very mechanical, and damages in these cases are ordinarily very easy for employees to prove by using simple math. Employers that violate the statute, even unintentionally, face harsh consequences. FLSA lawsuits are difficult for employers to win, and prevailing plaintiffs under the FLSA are presumptively entitled to their entire amount of unpaid wages, plus an additional equal amount as liquidated damages designed to compensate the employee for the period where they were forced to live without wages they were owed under the FLSA, plus full payment of their at­torneys' fees by the employer. This last point is important, because it is not uncommon for FLSA plaintiffs to have a relatively small amount of damages, and for their attorneys to spend far more litigating the case than the amount to which the plaintiff is entitled, since the attorneys know that the employer will ultimately be on the hook for their fees if they win. Additionally, the FLSA has a sepa­rate statutory provision that allows employees to join together in a "collective action" which is easier to maintain than a traditional class action. Obviously, the larger a collective action against an employer becomes, the more potential exposure there is to increased damages and attorneys' fees.

Employers also face potential risk if FLSA violations are discovered during a USDOL audit. USDOL has the power to audit any business at any time, but audits come about most frequently in response to employee complaints. If violations are found, the USDOL has the power to re­cover back wages and liquidated damages for employees either administratively, or through its own lawsuit. Additionally the USDOL may assess civil money penal­ties of up to $1,100 per violation against noncompliant employers. Finally, USDOL can recommend felony criminal charges under the FLSA against any person if violations are egregious enough.

Put simply, it is critical that all em­ployers ensure full compliance with the FLSA at all times.

What Should You Do Now?

Some members of Congress are still considering action aimed at stopping these changes, and it is possible that lawsuits will be filed with the same goal. The Obama Administration intends to make the new rules a key piece of its legacy, and thus the President is extremely likely to veto any such legislation that makes it to his desk. Additionally, only time will tell whether any lawsuits will be filed, and how successful they may be if ultimately filed. While one or more of these chal­lenges may be successful, municipal em­ployers should assume for the time being that the new requirements will take effect as scheduled. Employers would be wise to immediately begin analyzing and ad­dressing any issues presented by the new rules, in light of the bureaucratic process inherent in making such changes, and the lengthy timeline that often accompanies such changes.

Right now, public sector employers should be:

  • Analyzing whether the requirements for the "white collar" exemptions they have been relying upon will continue to be met under the new rules;
  • Evaluating what might be changed about one or more jobs so that the incumbents may be treated as exempt in the future;
  • Considering the possible application of alternative FLSA exemptions;
  • Developing FLSA-compliant pay plans for employees who have been treated as exempt but who will be reclassified as non-exempt after December 1, 2016; and
  • Contacting your internal personnel attorney or a reputable and knowledge­able private employment attorney that is well-versed in wage and hour law.

Originally published in Municipal Lawyer.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Adam Brown
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.