Worldwide: WTO Appellate Body Upholds Panel Ruling Rejecting Certain Cost Adjustment Methodologies By The EU In Anti-Dumping Investigations

On October 6, 2016, the World Trade Organization ("WTO") Appellate Body ("Appellate Body") issued its report in European Union – Anti-dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Argentina.1 The dispute concerned the EU's imposition of anti-dumping duties on biodiesel imported from Argentina, the complainant. Argentina claimed before the panel that the European Commission erred in its method of calculating dumping rates in this particular investigation. Moreover, Argentina claimed that a particular provision of the EU's anti-dumping legislation (the "Basic Regulation") was inconsistent "as such" with the EU's WTO obligations.

The European Union and Argentina brought separate challenges to the original panel report, which was circulated in March 2016. The Appellate Body report upheld all of the panel's findings and did not rule on Argentina's claim under Article 2.4 of the Anti-dumping Agreement ("Anti-dumping Agreement"). The Appellate Body recommended that the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body ("DSB") request that the European Union bring its anti-dumping measure on biodiesel from Argentina into conformity with the Anti-dumping Agreement and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 ("GATT 1994").

The Appellate Body's decision addresses a particular methodology used by the European Commission in its anti-dumping investigations on imports from countries in which market prices are distorted as a result of state intervention. The decision is of relevance in light of the upcoming reform of the EU's Trade Defence Instruments ("TDIs") and the new anti-dumping methodologies it might adopt in response to the expiry of Section 15(a)(ii) of China's Protocol of Accession.

The Appellate Body's Findings With Respect to the Anti-dumping Investigation on Biodiesel From Argentina

In the investigation on biodiesel from Argentina, the European Commission found that soybeans are "the main raw material purchased and used in the production of biodiesel." The European Commission found that there was a significant degree of state intervention in the Argentinean biodiesel market because of the existence of an export tax system. Consequently, it found that sales of biodiesel were not made in "the ordinary course of trade." Therefore the European Commission decided to construct the so-called "normal value" on the basis of the Argentinean producers' own production costs in their records. However, the European Commission considered that "the domestic prices of the main raw material used by biodiesel producers (soybeans) in Argentina were ... lower than the international prices due to the market distortion created by the export tax system." The costs of the main raw material were found not to be reasonably reflected in the records kept by the Argentinean producers.

The European Commission therefore decided to "disregard the actual costs of soybeans as recorded by the companies concerned in their accounts." Instead, such actual costs were replaced by "the reference price used by the Argentinean government for the calculation of the export tax on soybeans" (a particular "cost adjustment methodology"). This reference price reflected the level of the "international prices" of soybeans. The European Commission determined that this reference price "would have been the price paid by the Argentinean producers in the absence of the export tax system." On the basis of, inter alia, the revised constructed normal value, the EU authorities calculated dumping margins ranging from 41.9 percent to 49.2 percent for the Argentinean exporters/producers.

Before the panel, Argentina had successfully argued that the European Commission had failed to calculate the cost of production of the product under investigation on the basis of records kept by the Argentinean producers and by including costs not associated with the production and sale of biodiesel in the calculation of the cost of production. Thereby the European Union had, according to Argentina, acted inconsistently with Article 2.2.1.1 of the Anti-dumping Agreement.

On appeal, the European Union challenged these findings of the panel. The Appellate Body considered that the second condition laid down in Article 2.2.1.1 of the Anti-dumping Agreement (that such records should "reasonably reflect the costs associated with the production and sale of the product under consideration") relates to the issue of whether they "suitably and sufficiently correspond to, or reproduce, those costs incurred by the investigated exporter or producer that have a genuine relationship with the production and sale of the specific product under consideration." Importantly, the Appellate Body confirmed that the European Commission's determination that domestic prices of soybeans in Argentina were "artificially low" due to the Argentinean differential export tax system was not, in itself, a sufficient basis for concluding that the producers' records did not reasonably reflect the costs of soybeans associated with the production and sale of biodiesel. The Appellate Body therefore upheld the panel's findings under Article 2.2.1.1.

Before the panel, Argentina had also successfully argued that the European Union had acted inconsistently with Article 2.2 of the Antidumping Agreement by "failing to construct the normal value of the exports of biodiesel on the basis of the cost of production in the country of origin" (emphasis added).

The EU challenged the findings by the panel on this particular point. The Appellate Body's analysis began with the observation that Article 2.2 of the Anti-dumping Agreement requires that the normal value be constructed on the basis of, inter alia, the "cost of production [...] in the country of origin." Confirming the panel's findings on this point, the Appellate Body found that the phrase "cost of production [...] in the country of origin" does not limit the sources of information or evidence that may be used in establishing such cost to sources inside the country of origin. Importantly, the Appellate Body held that when out-of-country information is relied on, an investigating authority has to ensure that such information is used to arrive at the cost of production in the country of origin and that this may require the investigating authority to adapt that information. Thus, in the context of the investigation on biodiesel, the surrogate price for soybeans used by the European Commission to determine the cost of production of biodiesel in Argentina was not a cost "in the country of origin." The Appellate Body therefore confirmed the panel's finding that the European Union acted inconsistently with Article 2.2 of the Anti-dumping Agreement by not using the cost of production in Argentina when constructing the normal value of biodiesel.

The Appellate Body's Findings With Respect to the EU's Basic Regulation

Before the panel, Argentina had unsuccessfully argued that the second subparagraph of Article 2(5) of the EU's Basic Regulation was inconsistent "as such" with, inter alia, Article 2.2.1.1 and 2.2 of the Anti-dumping Agreement. Contrary to an "as applied" claim, such as that against the anti-dumping investigation on biodiesel, a claim of "as such" inconsistency refers to a measure that has "general and prospective application" and which will, in each instance it is applied, lead to a WTO-inconsistent application.

On appeal, the Appellate Body upheld the panel's finding that the second subparagraph of Article 2(5) of the Basic Regulation does not require the European Union to determine that a producer's records do not reasonably reflect the costs associated with the production and sale of the product under consideration when these records reflect prices considered to be "artificially or abnormally low" as a result of a distortion. The Appellate Body found no support in the text of the Basic Regulation for the view that the second subparagraph of Article 2(5) applies to such a determination by the EU authorities. As a consequence, the Appellate Body found that Argentina had not established that Article 2(5) of the Basic Regulation is "as such" inconsistent with Article 2.2.1.1 of the Anti-dumping Agreement and thereby upheld the panel's finding on this point.

Similarly, regarding Argentina's claim under Article 2.2 of the Anti-dumping Agreement, the Appellate Body upheld the panel's finding that the second subparagraph of Article 2(5) of the Basic Regulation does not require the EU authorities to establish the costs of production so as to reflect costs prevailing in other countries outside the country of origin. The Appellate Body held that the European Commission retains a degree of discretion and that, therefore, the second subparagraph of Article 2(5) of the Basic Regulation is not inconsistent "as such" with the Anti-dumping Agreement. Consequently, the Appellate Body also upheld the panel's findings on this issue.

Relevance of the Findings in the Appellate Body Report

The importance of the Appellate Body Report in EU – Biodiesel is twofold. First, the finding that Article 2(5) of the Basic Regulation is not "as such" inconsistent with the EU's WTO obligations under the Anti-dumping Agreement means that the European Union will not have to alter the Basic Regulation on which all of its anti-dumping investigations are based. Second, and more importantly, the decision presents a significant blow to the EU's plans to increase the use of cost adjustment methodologies to deal with dumped imports from countries in which there is a significant degree of state intervention in the economy. The European Union had proposed to make more use of this type of methodology as a means to alleviate concerns of domestic industries within the European Union about the upcoming expiration of Section 15(a)(ii) of China's Protocol of Accession. This proposal has now been dealt a significant blow, as the Appellate Body found that the costs reported by the producer have to suitably and sufficiently correspond to those costs incurred that have a genuine relationship with the production and sale of the specific product under consideration. A determination that domestic prices of raw materials are "artificially low" due to a particular state intervention is not, in itself, a sufficient basis for concluding that producers' records do not reasonably reflect the costs of that raw material associated with the production and sale of the end product. Consequently, investigating authorities such as the European Commission cannot simply disregard the costs of producers because these are artificially low as a result of government intervention.

Footnote

1. Appellate Body Report, European Union – Anti-dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Argentina, WT/DS473/AB/R, October 6, 2016. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/473abr_e.pdf

Originally published October 11, 2016

Learn more about our International Trade practice.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2016. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions