United States: Social Media Investigations: Digging Deep, Or Just Scratching The Surface

Time and again, defendant corporations find themselves settling cases at inflated valuations simply to avoid the costs to preserve, review and produce substantial amounts of electronically stored information (ESI). In contrast, individual plaintiffs with very few documents to produce, if any, have been sitting back and relaxing throughout discovery.

This is changing as defendants increasingly use social media to turn the tables on plaintiffs. A well-known example involved the surviving husband in a wrongful death case in Virginia who shared a picture of himself on Facebook in which he was drinking a beer and wearing a t-shirt that read "I ♥ Hot Moms." His attorney instructed him to delete this picture, but not before it was spotted and retained by defense counsel, ultimately resulting in an adverse inference instruction to the jury and a fine of more than $700,000. Allied Concrete v. Lester, 285 Va. 295, 302 (2013).

Defendants can and should use photos, tweets, vines, snaps, emojis and whatever else can be pulled from a plaintiff's social media trail to potentially discredit the plaintiff and demonstrate that alleged damages are not based in reality. But are defense attorneys today properly digging through social media postings, or are they just scratching the surface?

New York's Social Media Authority

The creation of Facebook in 2004 kicked off the social media boom. But it was not until September 2010 that New York courts dipped a toe into the treacherous social media waters and addressed the issue of discoverability. In Romano v. Steelcase, 30 Misc.3d 426 (Sup. Ct. Suffolk County, 2010), the court granted access to the plaintiff's complete Facebook and MySpace accounts, including private and deleted content, following production by defendants of public postings from both accounts that depicted the plaintiff's "active lifestyle" in contradiction to her claims:

[W]hen plaintiff created her Facebook and MySpace accounts, she consented to the fact that her personal information would be shared with others, notwithstanding her privacy settings. Indeed, that is the very nature and purpose of these social networking sites, else they would cease to exist. Since plaintiff knew that her information may become publicly available, she cannot now claim that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy....

In some situations, unfettered access to the private portion of a social media account could be characterized as a "fishing expedition." Yet, in Romano, the court focused on the existence of contradictory materials and determined that the defendants' right to discovery, specifically their need for materials hidden behind privacy settings, far outweighed the plaintiff's relative privacy interest. Two months later, the Appellate Division in McCann v. Harleysville Ins. Co. of N.Y., 78 A.D.3d 1524 (N.Y. App. Div. 4th Dep't. 2010), articulated the standard that a party seeking social media content must establish "a factual predicate with respect to the relevancy of the evidence." Under this standard, access will likely be granted to a plaintiff's protected content where a defendant establishes a "factual predicate" by producing material found on "public" portions of social media platforms that sufficiently contradicts the nature and character of the plaintiff's claims or testimony.

Gaps in Social Media Authority and Guidance

The lasting impact from Romano and McCann is the commentary on plaintiff's diminished privacy interest and the application of the "factual predicate" standard to social media, respectively. This authority remains relevant and is still cited across courts in New York and around the country. See Forman v. Henkin, 134 A.D.3d 529, (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't. 2015); Breton v. City of New York, 2016 WL 2897848 (Sup. Ct. New York Cty 2016); Higgins v. Koch Dev., 2013 WL 3366278 (S.D. Ind. 2013); Keller v. Nat'l Farmers Union Prop. & Cas. Co., 2013 WL 27731 (D. Mont. 2013). However, the rapid pace of innovation in social media has caused these 2010 opinions and their progeny to become outdated.

Compared to 2010, the current social media landscape is almost unrecognizable, with many notable platforms, including Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter and Snapchat, gaining prominence over the past several years. In addition, the very definition of "social media" has been blurred as quasi-social and third-party mobile apps, such as Waze (a GPS app) and Venmo (a digital payment app), have developed followings. This begs the question of whether these platforms fall within the social-media-specific "factual predicate" standard.

A larger question looms: Should demonstration of a factual predicate through social media material on one platform permit access to private material on other platforms? To date, New York courts have largely treated individual accounts as discrete locations on which data can be stored. Is this a workable approach in light of "linking" functionality where users on one platform simultaneously post identical content across multiple platforms? The intermingling of accounts creates a scenario where courts will likely treat a plaintiff's social media content as consisting of a single portfolio of material rather than discrete and unrelated accounts.

Rapid innovation also has caused a lack of guidance regarding counsel's ethical obligations. Snapchat's process for viewing another user's postings provides a unique example. Traditional platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and Twitter offer publicly accessible landing pages for each user's profile while indicating whether certain content is accessible only to that user's "friends." This does not exist on Snapchat. Also, there is no traditional access ("friend") request where mutuality exists through an option to approve or deny the request. Instead, one's Snapchat postings can be viewed only by those that unilaterally "add" that user, a novel functionality not covered by the Social Media Ethics Guidelines of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the New York State Bar Association, June 9, 2015. Once this "adding" occurs, the owner of the added account automatically receives a notification that he or she has been "added" by a certain user.

Could "adding" another user on Snapchat be considered an unethical communication with a person represented by counsel? The answer to this question appears to be no. A 2010 opinion of the New York State Bar Association's Committee on Professional Ethics (Formal Opinion No. 843), explicitly allowed an attorney to view publicly accessible portions of an opposing party's account. In addition, the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility (Formal Opinion No. 466) explained in 2014 that LinkedIn's analogous page-view notification feature was not an impermissible communication, but only an innocuous communication between LinkedIn and the user. If this Snapchat "add" feature were deemed per se unethical, it would run contrary to these opinions. In fact, it would entirely prohibit viewing a user's publicly available content despite that user's lack of an expectation of privacy. This issue, among other social media-related ethical issues, has remained unanswered while Snapchat has grown into one of the most popular platforms. In any event, it is difficult to think that ethical guidance will be able to keep pace with social media's expansion.

Digging Deep

In contrast to the early days of Facebook, an individual's social media content is likely to be spread across multiple platforms. It is not enough to focus on Facebook and merely take screenshots from an easily identified account. This approach may overlook treasure troves of metadata, possibly pinpointing when and where a plaintiff visited a particular location, not to mention entire social media accounts that are not easily identified. In addition, the general population has increasingly implemented privacy settings and restricted access exclusively to approved "friends" or "followers." It also remains possible that some plaintiffs' attorneys may still follow the approach taken by counsel in Lester v. Allied Concrete, or at least recommend tweaks to their clients' privacy settings. Regardless, a proper social media investigation and forensic collection, which should be conducted early and often, will still frequently uncover useful material on anyone who maintains even a modest online presence.

In today's world, uncovering probative social media material requires much more than "Googling" a plaintiff's name and crossing your fingers. Attorneys must know the right questions to ask during discovery. This is not limited to straightforward questions about name-brand platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, but includes questioning designed to uncover the use of lesser-known platforms and third-party mobile apps or to confirm ownership of accounts using pseudonyms or misleading profile usernames.

A proper investigation does not stop with a plaintiff's accounts, but extends to friends and relatives whose profiles may not be hidden behind privacy settings. It is no longer enough to merely understand the law. Counsel today must develop a thorough understanding of a wide variety of social media platforms and third-party apps, or associate with one who does, especially when technology develops at a lightning pace and where fads come and (Pokémon) go in the blink of an eye.

Originally published by New York Law Journal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Ostrow Reisin Berk & Abrams
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Ostrow Reisin Berk & Abrams
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions