United States: Court Clarifies Whether A Seller's Legal Privilege Passes To A Buyer Post-Acquisition

Last Updated: September 27 2016
Article by Aurora Cassirer and Matthew DeFrancesco

After a merger or acquisition, who is entitled to the seller's privileged documents post-closing? On September 20, 2016, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware provided an answer in the context of a of privilege dispute that arose after an acquisition. In In re Quicksilver Resources et al., 1:15-bk-10585 (Bankr. D. Del. 2016), the debtor Quicksilver Resources, Inc. ("Quicksilver") made a motion for an order authorizing the abandonment and disposal of certain legal documents in its possession to avoid turning those documents over to Bluestone Natural Resources II LP ("Bluestone"), the buyer. These documents included: (i) approximately 1700 documents from Quicksilver's legal department; and (ii) 22 boxes of expired oil and gas leases. See In re Quicksilver Resources et al., 1:15-bk-10585, Letter from Judge Silverstein to Counsel, Dkt. 1692, at 2. Bluestone argued that pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, it was entitled to all books and records related to certain oil and gas assets that were acquired. Id.

In deciding the issue, the Court looked to the terms of the contract. Specifically, with respect to the 1700 documents from Quicksilver's legal department, the Court held that the purchase agreement included a carve-out for "information entitled to legal privilege, including attorney work product and attorney-client communications." Id. Accordingly, the court held that Quicksilver was not required to turn the 1700 documents over. Id.1 However, the court ruled differently with respect to the expired oil and gas leases in Quicksilver's possession. In this regard, the court noted that, under the terms of the agreement, Bluestone was entitled to documents related to oil and gas assets and that there was no evidence showing that these leases were not related to any oil and gas assets. Id. at 3.

In the absence of a contractual provision, however, the answer to the question of who owns the seller's privileged documents post-closing, is not necessarily clear. In Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Weintraub, 471 U.S. 343 (1985), the Supreme Court ruled that, "[w]hen control of a corporation passes to new management, the authority to assert and waive the corporation's attorney-client privilege passes as well." Id. at 349. In recent years, courts have generally applied this bright-line rule, but have also: (i) made certain distinctions between merger-related documents and general corporate documents; and (ii) emphasized the importance of expressly contracting for procedures governing the treatment of privileged documents.

In New York, for example, the Court of Appeals in Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner & Landis, 89 N.Y.2d 123 (1996) considered two different categories of privileged communications during a post-closing privilege dispute: (i) communications regarding general corporate operations; and (ii) communications concerning merger negotiations. Id. at 127. With respect to the latter category of documents, the court held that privilege stayed with the seller post-closing, given that such communications were made at a time when the seller and buyer had adverse interests. Id. at 138. Conversely, the Court held that the privilege relating to communications about general corporate operations passed to the buyer after the closing. Id.

In a divergent example from 2013, the Delaware Chancery Court considered a situation where the acquiring corporation brought suit against the members of the target corporation for fraudulent inducement in Great Hill Equity Partners IV LP v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I LLP, 80 A.3d 155 (Del Ch. Nov. 15, 2013). According to the acquirer, certain communications between the target corporation and its attorneys concerning the merger revealed the alleged fraud. Id. at 156. In short, the Court held that the categorical approach of Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n continued to apply, but that parties may contract around that rule in merger negotiations. Id. at 161–62. In Great Hill, the parties did not contract to carve out any privileged documents from the transaction. Id. Thus, the court held that the privileged documents passed to the buyer. Id. The court also noted that the seller did nothing to protect its privilege, even leaving the documents in the possession of the acquiring company for a year prior to taking any action. Id. Finally, the Great Hill Court distinguished the Court of Appeals' decision in Tekni on the grounds that it focused on New York policy and did not expressly cite DGCL § 259.3

Quicksilver Resources emphasizes that parties engaged in merger or acquisition negotiations should be cognizant of potential privilege issues that can arise post-closing and should specifically negotiate the ownership of privileged or other sensitive documents. As Quicksilver Resources indicates, in most cases, courts will respect and give deference to contractual provisions concerning the treatment of these types of documents. Accordingly, such provisions are important considerations in the context of any acquisition or merger. Privilege disputes could be avoided, or at least mitigated, if parties to a merger or acquisition include specific contractual provisions governing the treatment of privileged documents.


1 But cf. Great Hill Equity Partners IV LP v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I LLP, 80 A.3d 155, 161-62 (Del Ch. Nov. 15, 2013) (holding that legal privilege passed from a buyer to a seller where the buyer and seller did not contract to carve out privileged documents from the transaction).

2 The court decided this dispute in the context of Delaware General Corporation Law Section § 259(a), which provides, in pertinent part, that "all property, rights, privileges, powers and franchises, and all and every other interest shall be thereafter as effectually the property of the surviving or resulting corporation...." DGCL § 259(a).

3 Notably, in Newspring Mezzanine Capital II, L.P. v. Hayes, No. 14-1706, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169900 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 9, 2014), the United States Court for the District of Pennsylvania rejected the Tekni approach and adopted the Great Hill approach.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Aurora Cassirer
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions