United States: Lyondell Decision Opens Door To Actual Fraudulent Conveyance Claims By Lenders In LBOs

A recent decision from the Southern District of New York may reopen a door — which many had believed was all but closed — for disgruntled creditors seeking to challenge failed leveraged buyouts ("LBOs") as fraudulent conveyances. In In re Lyondell Chemical Co., 2016 WL 4030937 (S.D.N.Y. July 27, 2016), District Judge Denise Cote reinstated an intentional fraudulent conveyance claim seeking to claw back $6.3 billion in distributions made to Lyondell Chemical's shareholders through an LBO that failed quickly and dramatically. Absent judicial reversal (which seems unlikely), the District Court's decision will be valuable support for similarly situated plaintiffs.

Lyondell received an unsolicited merger offer in August 2006. After nearly a year of hard bargaining, a deal was struck at almost twice the initial offer, and the transaction closed in December 2007. Barely two months later the company was "fighting for its life"; a bankruptcy petition was filed in January 2009, with creditors — including lenders who financed the apparently overpriced acquisition — receiving pennies on the dollar, together with an interest in a trust formed to seek redress through litigation.

Failed LBOs are fertile ground for litigation. Creditors who have lost the lion's share of their debt investment after former shareholders have pocketed large profits understandably feel that the ordinary relationship of debt and equity has been turned upside down, and look for legal theories to reverse the outcome. Initially, the most attractive avenue appeared to be constructive fraudulent conveyance, a statutory cause of action under both section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and the laws of every state. This cause of action provides for the unwinding of any transaction made (1) when the transferor was insolvent (or rendered insolvent), and (2) for less than reasonably equivalent value. In the case of failed LBOs, which are financed by debt that is putatively greater than the value of the acquired business, these two elements amount to the same thing, and the litigation path appears straightforward.

The straightforward path is derailed, however, by Bankruptcy Code section 546(e), which generally provides a "safe harbor" for, among other things, any transfer made to redeem commercial paper. In Enron Creditors Recovery Cor. v. Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V., 651 F.3d 329, 334-35 (2d Cir. 2011), the Second Circuit held that this safe harbor applies to LBO payouts to shareholders. The other shoe for creditors dropped earlier this year, when the Second Circuit held further that the safe harbor bars state law constructive fraud claims as well. In re Tribune Co. Fraudulent Conveyance Litig., 818 F.3d 98, 109-12 (2d Cir. 2016).

After Enron and Tribune, creditors such as the Lyondell trustee were left with only the potential to assert claims for actual fraudulent transfer, a separate cause of action under the Bankruptcy Code (section 548(a)(1)(A)) that is not covered by the safe harbor. But this cause of action has an entirely different element, requiring the plaintiff to plead and prove that the defendant had "actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any entity to which the debtor was or became . . . indebted." This is a high and difficult hurdle to overcome.  How the task can be accomplished was the subject of the recent District Court opinion.

The first issue raised is familiar whenever the state of mind of a corporation is involved. What does it mean to say that an enterprise has an "intent"? As corporations can act only through individuals, the question becomes, when can the state of mind of an individual be imputed to the business? In the Lyondell complaint, plaintiff relied on some strong allegations suggesting that Dan Smith, the CEO and chairman of the Lyondell board of Directors, knowingly presented false financial information in negotiating the LBO and obtaining its board approval. The bankruptcy court found such allegations insufficient, reasoning that, because under Delaware law only the full board could approve a merger, the relevant state of mind had to be alleged as to the entire board — or at least a majority of its members. Alternatively, it might be sufficient to show that Smith so dominated and controlled the board that his will alone was relevant. Because the complaint lacked facts supporting either of these situations, the bankruptcy court dismissed the complaint.

The District Court reversed, holding that under Delaware law "the knowledge and actions of a corporation's officers and directors, acting within the scope of their authority, are imputed to the corporation itself." Stewart v. Wilmington Trust SP Servs, Inc., 112 A.3d 271, 302-03 (Del. Ch. 2015). The bankruptcy court, applying this principle, had concluded that while Smith had negotiated the merger within the scope of his authority — and hence the buyer may have had a cause of action for misrepresentation — Smith lacked the authority to approve the merger.  Judge Cote disagreed, holding that under Delaware law whenever a corporation acts, even through a board vote, it is charged with all knowledge gained by its officers acting within the scope of their agency. Thus, for purposes of assessing the actual fraud claim, Smith's knowledge and actions were the actions of Lyondell.

This leaves the important question of how one could establish that Lyondell had "actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud" creditors. Read literally, this would seem to require that the defendant wanted creditors to suffer a loss, which is almost never true even in the most extreme case. Surely Smith, even on the most egregious interpretation of the facts, wanted the post-LBO Lyondell to succeed. Applying relatively well-settled law, Judge Cote held that the standard actually means something less: It is sufficient to demonstrate that the defendant acted either with a desire to cause the harmful consequences (unlikely) or with substantial certainty that the consequences will result (much easier). Applying that standard, and a list of "badges of fraud" commonly applied in such cases (including, for example, the fact that Smith stood to and did make vast personal profits from the merger), Judge Cote found that the complaint had adequately alleged fraudulent intent — as to Smith and, by imputation, as to the defendant corporation.

The defendant shareholders are currently urging reconsideration of this decision, stressing the public policy implications of holding thousands of innocent shareholders responsible for the actions of an individual. Alternatively, they seek leave to take an interlocutory appeal directly to the Second Circuit; ordinarily no appeal can be taken until a final judgment on the merits is reached, which could be many more years down the road. Given the vast amount at issue and the substantial resources that would be spent to litigate this case to conclusion, absent interlocutory appeal or a defense win on summary judgment, it is likely that this case will settle, leaving the District Court opinion as an important precedent for future busted LBO plaintiffs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.