United States: Lyondell Decision Opens Door To Actual Fraudulent Conveyance Claims By Lenders In LBOs

A recent decision from the Southern District of New York may reopen a door — which many had believed was all but closed — for disgruntled creditors seeking to challenge failed leveraged buyouts ("LBOs") as fraudulent conveyances. In In re Lyondell Chemical Co., 2016 WL 4030937 (S.D.N.Y. July 27, 2016), District Judge Denise Cote reinstated an intentional fraudulent conveyance claim seeking to claw back $6.3 billion in distributions made to Lyondell Chemical's shareholders through an LBO that failed quickly and dramatically. Absent judicial reversal (which seems unlikely), the District Court's decision will be valuable support for similarly situated plaintiffs.

Lyondell received an unsolicited merger offer in August 2006. After nearly a year of hard bargaining, a deal was struck at almost twice the initial offer, and the transaction closed in December 2007. Barely two months later the company was "fighting for its life"; a bankruptcy petition was filed in January 2009, with creditors — including lenders who financed the apparently overpriced acquisition — receiving pennies on the dollar, together with an interest in a trust formed to seek redress through litigation.

Failed LBOs are fertile ground for litigation. Creditors who have lost the lion's share of their debt investment after former shareholders have pocketed large profits understandably feel that the ordinary relationship of debt and equity has been turned upside down, and look for legal theories to reverse the outcome. Initially, the most attractive avenue appeared to be constructive fraudulent conveyance, a statutory cause of action under both section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and the laws of every state. This cause of action provides for the unwinding of any transaction made (1) when the transferor was insolvent (or rendered insolvent), and (2) for less than reasonably equivalent value. In the case of failed LBOs, which are financed by debt that is putatively greater than the value of the acquired business, these two elements amount to the same thing, and the litigation path appears straightforward.

The straightforward path is derailed, however, by Bankruptcy Code section 546(e), which generally provides a "safe harbor" for, among other things, any transfer made to redeem commercial paper. In Enron Creditors Recovery Cor. v. Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V., 651 F.3d 329, 334-35 (2d Cir. 2011), the Second Circuit held that this safe harbor applies to LBO payouts to shareholders. The other shoe for creditors dropped earlier this year, when the Second Circuit held further that the safe harbor bars state law constructive fraud claims as well. In re Tribune Co. Fraudulent Conveyance Litig., 818 F.3d 98, 109-12 (2d Cir. 2016).

After Enron and Tribune, creditors such as the Lyondell trustee were left with only the potential to assert claims for actual fraudulent transfer, a separate cause of action under the Bankruptcy Code (section 548(a)(1)(A)) that is not covered by the safe harbor. But this cause of action has an entirely different element, requiring the plaintiff to plead and prove that the defendant had "actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any entity to which the debtor was or became . . . indebted." This is a high and difficult hurdle to overcome.  How the task can be accomplished was the subject of the recent District Court opinion.

The first issue raised is familiar whenever the state of mind of a corporation is involved. What does it mean to say that an enterprise has an "intent"? As corporations can act only through individuals, the question becomes, when can the state of mind of an individual be imputed to the business? In the Lyondell complaint, plaintiff relied on some strong allegations suggesting that Dan Smith, the CEO and chairman of the Lyondell board of Directors, knowingly presented false financial information in negotiating the LBO and obtaining its board approval. The bankruptcy court found such allegations insufficient, reasoning that, because under Delaware law only the full board could approve a merger, the relevant state of mind had to be alleged as to the entire board — or at least a majority of its members. Alternatively, it might be sufficient to show that Smith so dominated and controlled the board that his will alone was relevant. Because the complaint lacked facts supporting either of these situations, the bankruptcy court dismissed the complaint.

The District Court reversed, holding that under Delaware law "the knowledge and actions of a corporation's officers and directors, acting within the scope of their authority, are imputed to the corporation itself." Stewart v. Wilmington Trust SP Servs, Inc., 112 A.3d 271, 302-03 (Del. Ch. 2015). The bankruptcy court, applying this principle, had concluded that while Smith had negotiated the merger within the scope of his authority — and hence the buyer may have had a cause of action for misrepresentation — Smith lacked the authority to approve the merger.  Judge Cote disagreed, holding that under Delaware law whenever a corporation acts, even through a board vote, it is charged with all knowledge gained by its officers acting within the scope of their agency. Thus, for purposes of assessing the actual fraud claim, Smith's knowledge and actions were the actions of Lyondell.

This leaves the important question of how one could establish that Lyondell had "actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud" creditors. Read literally, this would seem to require that the defendant wanted creditors to suffer a loss, which is almost never true even in the most extreme case. Surely Smith, even on the most egregious interpretation of the facts, wanted the post-LBO Lyondell to succeed. Applying relatively well-settled law, Judge Cote held that the standard actually means something less: It is sufficient to demonstrate that the defendant acted either with a desire to cause the harmful consequences (unlikely) or with substantial certainty that the consequences will result (much easier). Applying that standard, and a list of "badges of fraud" commonly applied in such cases (including, for example, the fact that Smith stood to and did make vast personal profits from the merger), Judge Cote found that the complaint had adequately alleged fraudulent intent — as to Smith and, by imputation, as to the defendant corporation.

The defendant shareholders are currently urging reconsideration of this decision, stressing the public policy implications of holding thousands of innocent shareholders responsible for the actions of an individual. Alternatively, they seek leave to take an interlocutory appeal directly to the Second Circuit; ordinarily no appeal can be taken until a final judgment on the merits is reached, which could be many more years down the road. Given the vast amount at issue and the substantial resources that would be spent to litigate this case to conclusion, absent interlocutory appeal or a defense win on summary judgment, it is likely that this case will settle, leaving the District Court opinion as an important precedent for future busted LBO plaintiffs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions