United States: Could The NLRB Make It Easier For Unions To Access Employers' Financial Records?

Last Updated: September 16 2016
Article by Daniel Altchek

Many practitioners at one time or another have been frustrated by the lack of clear and consistent guidance from the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or the "Board") regarding union requests for employer financial information. Much of the confusion concerns whether and to what extent an employer must furnish financial information when it has not claimed an inability to pay at the bargaining table, but rather has asserted an unwillingness to pay, typically based on concerns about a labor cost-driven competitive business disadvantage.

This has left bargaining parties uncertain about the scope of their respective rights and obligations when it comes to financial information requests.

A recent decision by the Board suggests that change may be forthcoming – but not necessarily the kind of change employers would like. That is because, as discussed below, the Board has hinted that it may be inclined to significantly expand the scope of employers' obligations to share their financial information.


The general rule governing union requests for financial information was articulated by the Board in Nielsen Lithographing Co., 305 NLRB 697 (1991), aff'd sub nom, Graphic Communications Local 50B v. NLRB, 977 F.2d 1169 (7th Cir. 1992). In Nielsen, the Board held that a union is entitled to the employer's general financial information – e.g., a union audit of the employer's financial records – when the employer has made a claim of inability to pay at the bargaining table. A claim of "inability to pay" is a claim that the employer cannot afford the current or proposed level of wages and benefits during the term of the collective bargaining agreement under negotiation without putting its own survival at stake. General financial information must be provided upon request where the employer claims inability to pay because, according to the Board, that type of information is necessary to verify or substantiate the employer's claim. But, the Board went on, that obligation is not triggered when an employer asserts that maintaining wages and benefits would place the employer at a competitive disadvantage. The latter type of claim, the Board found, amounts to an unwillingness to pay which the employer is not obligated to substantiate. In determining whether there has been a claim of inability to pay, the Board evaluates an employer's statements and conduct in the context of the particular circumstances in that case; in other words, the Board has pointed out, there are no "magic words" which amount to a claim of inability to pay.

This rule was subsequently applied by the Board in a number of decisions that yielded confusing and occasionally contradictory results. This muddled state of the law was recognized by the Board's then-Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon in a 2011 Guideline Memorandum. As the Memorandum observed:

"Since Nielsen, however, there has been no clear delineation as to what exactly constitutes a statement of an inability to pay. Indeed, the Board appears to have often come to differing conclusions on facts that are difficult to distinguish."

The Memorandum reviewed these cases and came to the conclusion that claims of competitive disadvantage, while not triggering a duty to provide general financial information such as an audit, may still require the production of more limited financial information to verify the specific claims made by the employer at the bargaining table. A claim of competitive disadvantage, for example, could obligate an employer to provide data on its competitors, even if it would not require total access to the employer's books. The Memorandum also pointed out that in some cases a request for financial information should be analyzed under both frameworks – i.e., whether the request is warranted by a claim of inability to pay, and also whether other employer assertions and representations during bargaining make specific financial information relevant and therefore subject to disclosure to the union even if there has been no claim of financial hardship. Essentially, the Memorandum advocated sharpening the distinction between inability to pay claims and competitive disadvantage claims, and taking different analytical approaches to evaluating financial information requests depending on which type of claim has been made by the employer.

A Hint of Things To Come

Fast-forward to August 2016, when the Board issued its latest decision concerning financial information requests, Wayron, LLC, 364 NLRB No. 60 (Aug. 2, 2016), a case involving a convoluted fact pattern. The employer, which sought major reductions in wages and benefits, repeatedly asserted in negotiations that it was not claiming inability to pay, while at the same time complaining about competitive disadvantage and making ominous remarks about the company's chances for survival. The Board majority found that the employer's statements, viewed in context and in their totality, constituted a claim of inability to pay. The dissent interpreted the employer's statements differently and argued that the employer had merely claimed a competitive disadvantage and was therefore not obligated to grant the union's request for a financial audit.

Interestingly, nowhere in Wayron did the Board consider the notion that a claim of competitive disadvantage could trigger a duty to furnish specific financial information, as outlined by the 2011 Guideline Memorandum. To the contrary, the Board appears to have rejected the Memorandum's analytical framework in its entirety, leading off the legal analysis portion of its decision with the statement that "under the rationale of Nielsen Lithographing Co., bargaining claims of an inability to pay differ from bargaining claims of competitive disadvantage: the former require the party making the claim to provide substantiating financial information if requested, while the latter do not." This formulation of the law is at odds with the 2011 Guideline Memorandum— not to mention much of the Board's own precedent – which described how even claims of competitive disadvantage could require the employer to provide substantiating information even if that information is less than the "general" financial information warranted by an inability to pay claim. Instead, the Board in Wayron focused solely on whether or not the employer's statements rose to the level of an inability to pay claim, with no consideration given to whether the undisputed competitive disadvantage claim by itself obligated the employer to provide some if not all of the requested financial information.

A possible explanation for the Board's disregard of the 2011 Guideline Memorandum's analytical framework can be found in a footnote in Wayron. Specifically, the Board remarked that in this case it had not been asked to overrule its "inability to pay cases," but observed that parties' preoccupation in negotiations with "magic words" (i.e., whether the employer used words amounting to a claim of inability to pay) "distract[s] them from genuine dialogue and information sharing that can lead to productive bargaining." 364 NLRB No. 60 at n.27. Accordingly, the Board went on, "in an appropriate case, we would consider how the Board has distinguished between 'inability to pay' and 'competitive disadvantage' claims in post-Nielsen cases and whether these distinctions best serve the Act's goal of promoting good faith bargaining." Id. In other words, whereas the Memorandum sought to sharpen the distinction between inability to pay claims and competitive disadvantage claims, the Wayron footnote suggests the Board may be close to dispensing with that distinction altogether.

What's next?

Due to turnover among Board members and the coming change in presidential administrations, the Board has been issuing major decisions, including reversals of established precedent, at a rapid clip in recent weeks. The aforementioned footnote in Wayron suggests that we could soon see another significant change in this area of Board law as well. Although it is unwise to predict the content of any future cases, it stands to reason that the elimination of the distinction between inability to pay claims and competitive disadvantage claims would result in a much broader obligation upon employers to provide financial information upon request. Essentially, the Board appears inclined to lower the bar for when employers must provide general financial information. It remains to be seen whether the Board will receive the "appropriate case" for making such a significant change in the law. Until then, employers should give serious thought before making statements in bargaining concerning their financial condition and any requests for financial information should be given careful consideration.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions