United States: Insurance Recovery Law: History's Best Decisions: The Penford Case

Last Updated: September 13 2016
Article by Mark Miller

Our next case in our series "Insurance Recovery Law: History's Best Decisions" is the Penford case from 2011. See Penford Corp. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 662 F.3d 497 (8th Cir. 2011). Although this case had a tragic outcome, it illustrates what not to do in the corporate insurance arena.

In Penford, after years of litigation, the insurance broker lost the case. If case was a one-off situation, one could understand a mistake being made. We highlight this case, however, because the way Penford and its broker handled this claim, is similar to the way that many claims are handled today.

The problems in Penford are raised whenever an insurance broker attempts to act as a claims advocate. Watch the video to understand what happened, and to devise a plan that properly utilizes insurance broker expertise and contacts to settle a claim.

We have included a transcript of the video below:

To view the video clink here.

Insurance Recovery Law: History's Best Decisions: The Penford Case

Next stop in our top insurance decisions of all time is the Penford case. In the Penford case the insurance broker killed a claim. The insurance broker there was doing a number of things that they shouldn't have done, and it completely killed the claim after years of litigation. Now this case is one of these unfortunate cases, but we're highlighting it, because it's something that can be prevented.

Penford Corporation versus National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA. Citation 642 Fed 3rd 497, 8th circuit 2011. Recent case in the 8th circuit of the Federal Court System, and it's a situation where ... It's a property insurance case, but it highlights some of the problems in the insurance industry that can get a policyholder into a lot of trouble. Here's what happened. Penford is a manufacturing facility. They're a big company located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Had a flood. The flood was terrible. It caused a lot of damage, and they got into a dispute with their insurance company about which limits applied. There are several different limits in the policy as far as it will pay this much for that, this much for that, and this much for that.

We won't get into the details of how that worked, or what they claim, but what we would like to say is the policyholder was right. They had the right argument, and they had the correct interpretation under the policy, but they still lost. They lost in the worst possible way. That is they lost after years of litigation on appeal, the Appellate Court said, "You know what? Your broker said something. We are dismissing the claim, because of what the broker said." Let me explain what happened.

The problem in this situation was Marsh, which was a very sophisticated insurance broker. Marsh was representing Penford on something. They were doing what they call an insurance claim advocacy. What happens is if you have an insurance claim ... Marsh deals with these things, so they have Claims Advocates. People who will help resolve the claim. These Claims Advocates at Marsh were working on this claim, but Marsh also placed the policy. They did whatever work they needed to do to get the policy in place.

What happened here is the insurance company did what any insurance company would first do, and that's depose the broker. They asked the broker, "Hey, what ... Don't you think our interpretation of the policy is correct?" The broker, I guess after a lot of questioning said, "Okay, yeah. Okay, you're right." You know how these depositions go. Clients under oath, they're there for long periods of time, and the insurance company's only job is to break 'em down. They'll hit ya, and they'll hit ya, and they'll hit ya hour, after hour, after hour looking for that one snippet of information that helps them.

They got this one snippet here. I'm not saying that it wasn't easy for Marsh, but Marsh gave that snippet of information. That snippet of information was, "Yeah. We get what you're saying about the deductible. Yeah, it could be right." That was it. The court said, "Marsh is the agent of Penford. Marsh speaks ...When Marsh speaks, Penford speaks. Marsh spoke and said, "It's not covered," therefore Penford spoke, and said it's not covered. It's under the agency principle.

Not disputing agency law, but what we're disputing here is how Penford got into so much trouble. It can be avoided. Here's the problem. I think there's several problems that can be avoided here. Problem number one to avoid: Marsh drafted the policy. You're like, "Why did Marsh draft the policy?" Here's what happens. Marsh does so many of these things. They have a word processor like everybody else. They scan in everybody's policy. They cut and paste, put the different pieces together, and then they put it on Marsh letterhead, so to speak and they say, "This is the best, and the brightest policy out there." They put Marsh on the bottom of it, and they market it to their clients and they say, "Hey. Why don't you use the Marsh form, because we had our word processing folks put this together, and it's the best." Some clients say, "Okay, we'll use the Marsh form."

The problem with that, and it's a big problem, is the court looked at it and said, "You know what? We would've found in your favor here, because the policy could be interpreted that way. The language is good. It could be interpreted in favor of the policy holder, but we're not going to do it here." Why? Because Marsh drafted the policy. The insurance company didn't draft it. Policyholder said, "Wait a second. Contra Preferentum." What's Contra Preferentum? It means you construe a document against the party that drafted it. This has been around insurance law for hundreds of years. If an insurance company drafts the policy it's construed against them. If it's unclear the policyholder wins. That's a doctrine that's been around forever.

What happened here is Marsh took the doctrine away, because they wanted to do some word processing, and put it on their letterhead, and make it look good, and use it as a piece of marketing. It doesn't matter that the insurance company's drafted the language. The fact ... They did draft the language. What happened was Marsh put it on their paper, and it looked like a Marsh policy. That gave the court the opportunity to say, "No Contra Preferentum. Marsh drafted this. Marsh is your agent, i.e. you, the policy holder drafted this policy." That's the problem.

The court didn't apply Contra Preferentum. We get it. The lesson here is don't accept a policy from Marsh, or any other broker. Marsh is not the only company, broker that's doing this. Most of the big brokers like to put it on their letterhead, and then give it to the clients and say, "Hey. This is the best and the brightest." It may be a good policy. We're not saying that. What we're saying is that you can't take a policy off broker letterhead. You have to have the policy from the insurance company, so the Contra Preferentum applies.

Point number two, which is very important about this case. The case got messed up, because Marsh accepted insurance industry custom and practice. You can read the case, and you can see the quotes. I think there's a point in there where the insurance adjuster says, "This is insurance industry 101 practices," something to that effect. He says, "This is just what we do. This is how we do it. Everybody knows this is how we do it.", so that's custom and practice. It didn't mean the policy said it. It just meant this is how we do it. What did Marsh say under oath? Oh, Marsh said, "Yeah, that's pretty much how they do it." "Do you disagree with it?" "Not so much. Not really." That was what got 'em in trouble.

Marsh adopted the industry custom, and practice as the truth. They should not have done that, because it's not the truth. It's all in how it's looked at. Yes. It's true that that's what the insurance companies do, but it's not true that that's what the policy means. There's a big distinction between those two things.

Miller Friel, PLLC is a specialized insurance coverage law firm whose sole purpose is to help corporate clients maximize their insurance coverage. Our Focus of exclusively representing policyholders, combined with our extensive Experience in the area of insurance law, leads to greater efficiency, lower costs and better Results. Further discussion and analysis of insurance coverage issues impacting policyholders can be found in our Miller Friel Insurance Coverage Blog and our 7 Tips for Maximizing Coverage series.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions