United States: Final Rule On The Fair Pay And Safe Workplaces Executive Order Revealed

Key Points

  • While making some welcomed changes to the proposed rule, the final rule leaves many of the significant burdens and costs associated with requiring contractors and subcontractors to disclose various labor violations to the government. The government's assessment of these violations can result in significant consequences, including denial of awards, termination of existing contracts, referral to enforcement agencies, or suspension and debarment proceedings.
  • The final rule also prohibits certain contractors from entering predispute arbitration agreements covering Title VII and tort claims for sexual harassment/assault, and it mandates new pay notice requirements.
  • Contractors and subcontractors should take action now to ensure compliance with the new regulations implementing the so-called "blacklisting" Executive Order and to avoid potential labor violations that must be reported to the government.
  • You may attend one of our upcoming training sessions to learn practical steps for compliance.

On August 25, 2016, the Department of Labor (DOL) and the Federal Acquisition Regulatory (FAR) Council issued the long-awaited final rule and guidance (the "Final Rule") implementing Executive Order No. 13673, the Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order (the "Order"). Initially signed by President Obama in July 2014, the Order requires contractors and subcontractors to disclose various labor law violations to the government to consider before awarding federal contracts. As we previously discussed, the proposed rule for the Order was issued on May 28, 2015. The contractor community, business groups and certain members of Congress immediately objected to the rule, citing the imposition of unnecessary burdens and costs and the numerous unresolved practical issues that left contractors wondering how the rule would be implemented. The Final Rule, while making changes to address some of those concerns, still leaves a number of problematic requirements unchanged.

The Final Rule becomes effective on October 25, 2016, but certain requirements will be gradually phased in over the next three years. Undoubtedly, the rule will face legal challenges from various contractor, business and political groups, but the outcome of those actions may not be seen for some time. In the meantime, contractors need to implement plans and processes for complying with these new requirements to avoid potentially losing future solicitations.

Overview of Final Rule

The Final Rule requires contractors and subcontractors bidding on contracts with an estimated value of $500,000 or more to disclose to the government violations under 14 federal labor statutes and state law equivalents. Labor law violations have been broadly defined to include any administrative determinations, arbitral awards and civil judgments that occurred within the three-year period immediately preceding the date of the disclosure. Contracting officers, with input from the newly created position at each agency called an "agency labor compliance advisor" (ALCA), must assess those violations (along with any mitigating evidence provided by the contractor) to determine whether the contractor is responsible and has a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics sufficient to receive a federal contract. When making these determinations, contracting officers have the discretion to deny contract awards; terminate performance of a covered contract; refer contractors to enforcement agencies, such as the DOL or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), for investigation; or refer them for suspension and debarment. After the contract is awarded, contractors must update their disclosures every six months during the contract with any new labor violations that occurred since the last disclosure. The contracting officer (with input from the ALCA) must assess these new violations to determine whether the contractor can continue to perform the contract.

Subcontractors bidding on covered contracts must submit labor violations to the DOL following a process similar to the prime contractor disclosures. The DOL will assess the subcontractor's violations and make a recommendation for the subcontractor to provide to the prime contractor. The prime contractor can use that recommendation to determine whether to award the subcontract.

The Final Rule also prohibits contractors with contracts in excess of $1 million from entering predispute arbitration agreements with employees for Title VII and tort claims for sexual harassment and assault. This requirement does not affect arbitration agreements that are signed before October 25, 2016, so long as those agreements do not permit the contractor to make changes to the terms of the contract and are not renegotiated or replaced after the effective date of the Final Rule. Finally, the Final Rule requires contractors to provide certain written notifications to employees and independent contractors, including notifying independent contractors of their status; informing employees who are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of their exempt status; and providing notifications each pay period to employees reflecting the hours worked, overtime, pay and deductions.

Gradual Implementation of Requirements

Some requirements under the Final Rule will be implemented on a phased-in schedule starting October 25, 2016. For the first six months, the requirements for prime contractors to disclose their labor law violations will apply only to solicitations of $50 million or more. Starting April 25, 2017, prime contractors bidding on solicitations of $500,000 or more must disclose their labor violations. The subcontractor disclosure requirements will be delayed until October 25, 2017.

The government will also gradually implement the three-year lookback period for labor violations to be reported. Until October 25, 2017, contractors will have to disclose only violations that occurred within the year preceding the date when they submit a bid for a covered solicitation. Starting October 25, 2017, the lookback period will increase to two years, and, starting October 25, 2018, the three-year period begins.

The Final Rule also delays implementation of the paycheck transparency requirements until January 1, 2017. However, the prohibition on predispute arbitration agreements will start on October 25, 2016.

Significant Changes to the Proposed Rule

The Final Rule addressed some problematic issues in the proposed rule, including:

  • DOL to Track and Provide Advice on Subcontractor Violations: Under the proposed rule, prime contractors were tasked with assessing their subcontractor's labor violations before awarding covered subcontracts and continuing to monitor those violations on a semiannuall basis. Many in the contractor community were concerned that prime contractors were ill-equipped to conduct these assessments and that tracking these violations would be overly burdensome and costly, particularly for contractors with hundreds of subcontractors. The Final Rule eases some of the concerns by requiring subcontractors to report their violations directly to the DOL (rather than the prime contractors) and requiring the DOL to provide a recommendation for subcontractors to provide to prime contractors on the subcontractors' labor law violations. Although prime contractors will still be responsible for determining whether the subcontractor is qualified to be awarded the subcontract, the Final Rule states that prime contractors "can rely" on the DOL's recommendations.
  • State Law Equivalents Not Reportable for Now: The proposed rule required contractors to disclose violations under 14 different federal labor laws, as well as their "state law equivalents." Because the proposed rule failed to identify which "state law equivalents" would be covered, many commenters requested greater clarity on the types of state violations to track and report. In the Final Rule, the government punts on this issue, stating that "[d]isclosure and consideration of decisions concerning other equivalent State law violations will not go into effect until the DOL and FAR Council seek public comment on additional Guidance and rulemaking." For now, the only state law violations that must be reported are violations of state plans approved by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
  • Preaward Assessment Available: The DOL will start offering a preaward assessment of contractor's labor violations and compliance as early as September 12, 2016. During these assessments, contractors can discuss their compliance and violations with the DOL before bidding on contracts to seek its advice on whether any of the violations are potentially problematic. These assessments are not binding on the contracting officers and ALCAs who are ultimately responsible for determining whether the contractor can be awarded the contract. Although they can rely on the DOL's assessment so long as there have not been any changes in the number or scope of the violations at the time the violations are submitted in response to a solicitation, it remains to be seen whether ALCAs or contracting officers will actually do so. Notably absent from the Final Rule is any assurance that the DOL will not use information provided to it by potential contractors as part of a preaward assessment for enforcement purposes.

Unresolved Issues

Despite some of the welcomed changes, the Final Rule still leaves a number of the problematic issues unresolved:

  • Must Disclose Administrative Merits Determinations: The proposed rule would have required contractors and subcontractors to disclose "administrative merits determinations," which were broadly defined to include notices or findings issued by an federal enforcement agency following an investigation, including Form WH-56 or letters from the DOL's Wage and Hour Division indicating violations of the FLSA or Family and Medical Leave Act, show-cause notices from the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs citations from OSHA, complaints filed by the regional director of the National Labor Relations Board and reasonable-cause determinations by the EEOC. Many contractors had concerns about reporting these decisions because they are mere allegations that have not been through a formal adjudication process where a contractor has been afforded due process. In the Final Rule, the government rejected these concerns, noting that the "proposed definition is consistent with the Order and delegated authority [and is] . . . limited . . . to a finite number of findings, notices, and documents." The government also dismissed the concern that contractors could be denied awards based on administrative determinations that are later overturned, finding that there is a "very low percentage of administrative merits determinations that are later overturned or vacated."
  • Not Enough Guidance or Time to Make Appropriate Responsibility Determinations: The proposed rule contemplated that contracting officers would consult with the ALCA on contractor labor law violations, and any mitigating evidence that contractors submit, to determine whether those violations were serious, repeated, willful, and/or pervasive. The ALCA would then have three days to review all the information and recommend to the contracting officer whether to award the contract. Many contractors feared that the tight time-frames and vague standards for assessing violations provided ALCAs and contracting officers with too much discretion for weighing those violations, which could result in inconsistent applications and arbitrary determinations. Although the government acknowledged that these case-by-case assessments "may result in different decisions," it claimed that the sufficient guidance in the Final Rule and that ability to collaborate with the DOL and other ALCAs would assist them with making proper assessments and avoiding inconsistent determinations. The government also stated that the timing for responsibility determinations was adequate, since the contracting officers could proceed if the ALCA did not provide input within the three business days or could request more time. It is unrealistic, however, to believe that ALCAs and contracting officers, many of whom have little or no labor law experience, can assess and provide thoughtful recommendations of various violations under 14 different labor laws in such a short time-frame.
  • Third-Party Reporting: Many commenters were concerned that the proposed rule allowed ALCAs and contracting officers to consider information obtained by "other sources" concerning contractors' labor violations. They noted that third parties may report violations that are being resolved, or lack merit altogether, to gain tactical advantages in their disputes with contractors (e.g., unions seeking to organize a contractor may have an incentive to report meritless labor violations to exert pressure on contractors). The Final Rule disregards these concerns and confirms that the government will consider information from employees, worker representatives, community groups and even competitors during the preaward and postaward assessment process.
  • Labor Compliance Agreements: The proposed rule contemplated that contracting officers in coordination with ALCAs would request contractors to sign Labor Compliance Agreements (LCAs) if they determined that the contractor was not responsible to obtain the contract. Many were concerned that the government would aim to have contractors (even with minor violations) enter LCAs before awarding contracts as a way to force the government's compliance agenda on contractors. A number of commenters also noted that the Final Rule failed to delineate the circumstances under which these would be sought and provide details on the scope of these agreements, including their length, content and remedial measures, or what would occur if the contractor breached the agreement. The Final Rule provides little guidance on the details of LCAs instead stating that these will be subject to negotiation with ALCAs, and it does not specify what consequences contractors would face if they breached the agreement.
  • Public Availability: The proposed rule contemplated that information initially submitted by contractors to the government would be publicly available through the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), which includes contractors' self-reported information on the laws violated, the case identification/docket numbers, dates of the decisions and the names of the bodies issuing the determinations or judgments, and whether the contractor has entered an LCA. Contractors were concerned that this type of information could be used against them (e.g., by plaintiffs' attorneys or competitors) and could have a negative effect on their businesses and reputations, especially if those violations were later overturned. However, the Final Rule continues to require information initially disclosed by contractors to be publicly available on FAPIIS. Moreover, although the Final Rule provides that actual details of an LCA will not be available on FAPIIS, it does not foreclose the possibility that those agreements could be disclosed publicly, stating that the "enforcement agencies that negotiate labor compliance agreements have the discretion to make the agreements . . . publicly available." Third parties may also be able to access some of this information through the Freedom of Information Act, which was recently changed to make it more difficult for the government to limit the release of information.

Legal Challenges

Contractors and business groups will undoubtedly bring various legal challenges against the Final Rule. Lawmakers may also try to limit the applicability of certain parts of the rule, as several members of Congress have done recently by issuing an amendment to the 2017 Defense Authorization Act seeking to exempt contracts with the Department of Defense from the Final Rule. Obviously, the outcome of the presidential and congressional elections this November could also affect whether the rule will survive. In any case, contractors will likely have to prepare and start complying well before any of the challenges or events take place.

Practical Implications

Contractors should create and implement plans now for compliance with the Final Rule. Contractors that have not already created a system for tracking and reporting labor violations should immediately begin that process. Many contractors, particularly larger companies, have several different departments that are responsible for labor compliance and disputes. It will take time to identify key stakeholders and amass the necessary information into a cohesive system that can be quickly compiled for timely submission of bids. Contractors should also consider appointing a position or team to handle these disclosures, respond to requests from the government concerning their labor violations, and negotiate and ensure compliance with an LCA should the government require one. It will be imperative to have a quick turnaround responding to inquiries from the contracting officer or ALCA that is not only accurate, but presents a consistent message about the contractor's labor compliance and disputes across the various agencies. Achieving this will require certain internal stakeholders to take ownership of that piece now. Contractors should also reassess their litigation strategies in light of the rule. In certain instances, it may make more sense to settle matters or appeal decisions based on the nature of the violations that must be disclosed, particularly if those disputes could affect the contractors' ability to win contracts.

Of course, the best way to minimize the impact of this rule is for contractors to assess their labor compliance and take proactive steps to decrease the number of potential violations that must be reported. As a practical matter, contractors should conduct privileged audits of their employment practices to uncover and fix potential vulnerabilities now. In addition, contractors should review their internal complaint reporting systems and provide effective training and policies to ensure that complaints can be adequately addressed and potentially resolved before they result in an agency investigation or legal dispute.

Training

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP will be hosting training sessions in the coming weeks to advise contractors and subcontractors on practical steps for compliance with the Final Rule. Details on those sessions will be available soon.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.