United States: Michigan Court Of Appeals Enforces Mandate Allowing IBM To Make Three-Factor Apportionment Election

The Michigan Court of Appeals has held that the Michigan Court of Claims erred when it failed to issue an order granting summary disposition in favor of International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) on remand as specifically instructed by the Michigan Supreme Court.1 The Michigan Supreme Court's decision had held that IBM could elect to use the Multistate Tax Compact's equally-weighted three-factor apportionment formula for the 2008 tax year. Contrary to the Michigan Supreme Court's instructions, the Court of Claims had entered an order granting summary disposition in favor of the Michigan Department of Treasury. The Court of Appeals' decision does not extend to other taxpayers currently litigating the validity of the Compact.


On July 14, 2014, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in International Business Machines Corp. v. Department of Treasury in favor of the taxpayer.2 The case centered on whether IBM could use the Compact's three-factor apportionment formula for purposes of the Michigan Business Tax (MBT) for the 2008 tax year or whether it was limited to using the statutory single sales factor formula. The Michigan Supreme Court determined that IBM could elect to use the Compact formula for MBT purposes for the 2008 tax year. According to the Michigan Supreme Court, the legislature had not repealed the Compact's apportionment election provision by implication when it enacted the MBT. The Michigan Supreme Court remanded the case to the Michigan Court of Claims "for entry of an order granting summary disposition in favor of IBM."

In response to the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in IBM, the state enacted legislation on September 11, 2014, which amended the MBT, retroactively rescinded Michigan's membership in the Compact, effective January 1, 2008, and precluded "foreign corporations such as IBM from using the three-factor apportionment formula that had been available under the Compact."3 The Department filed a motion for rehearing with the Michigan Supreme Court bringing this new development to its attention. The Michigan Supreme Court denied the Department's motion.

On remand, as instructed by the Michigan Supreme Court, the Court of Claims entered judgment in favor of IBM. However, the Court of Claims later granted the Department's motion for reconsideration. In its decision, the Court of Claims addressed and acknowledged the "law of the case" doctrine, which provides that "a ruling by an appellate court on a particular issue binds the appellate court and lower tribunals with respect to that issue."4 However, the Court of Claims granted the Department's motion for reconsideration because the 2014 legislation was "an intervening change of law" that created an exception to the application of the law of the case doctrine. IBM appealed this decision to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

Law of the Case Doctrine Did Not Apply

In reversing the Michigan Court of Claims, the Michigan Court of Appeals explained that its analysis turned on the applicability of the "law of the case" doctrine and the exception to the doctrine where there is an intervening change of law. Under the doctrine, generally, "an appellate court's determination of an issue in a case binds lower tribunals on remand and the appellate court in subsequent appeals."5 The Court of Appeals concluded that its analysis was not controlled by the "law of the case" doctrine. Instead, the Court of Appeals looked to the controlling principle that "a lower court cannot exceed the scope of a remand order," which can be distinguished from the "law of the case" doctrine. The Court of Appeals noted that a recent federal case referenced a "rule of mandate" that "is similar to, but broader than, the law of the case doctrine" and provides that "any district court that has received the mandate of an appellate court cannot vary or examine that mandate for any purpose other than executing it."6 While the district court is allowed to decide matters not foreclosed by the mandate, the district court cannot takes an action that contradicts the mandate.7 The Court of Appeals pointed out that, while the term "rule of mandate" does not appear in Michigan case law, it reflects the principle found in Michigan case law that "a lower court must strictly comply with, and may not exceed the scope of, a remand order."

The Court of Appeals indicated that the Michigan Supreme Court's mandate of a ministerial entry of judgment for IBM eliminated all other possibilities for the Court of Claims to do anything other than enter the judgment for IBM's 2008 tax year. By contradicting this mandate, the Court of Claims exceeded the remand's jurisdictional scope. According to the Court of Appeals, the IBM case for the 2008 tax year ended following the Supreme Court's decision without the possibility of further substantive activity and the Court of Claims was "simply to perform the nondiscretionary, ministerial task of entering judgment in favor of IBM." The Court of Claims' decision to apply the 2014 legislation to IBM's 2008 taxes amounted to an impermissible reversal of the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in IBM. The Court of Appeals noted that the Michigan Supreme Court was aware of the 2014 legislation when it denied the Department's motion for rehearing. The Michigan Supreme Court may revisit the issue if it so desires but a lower court cannot ignore the directive by the Supreme Court to dispose of the case.

In reaching its decision, the Court of Appeals also addressed the decision in Gillette Commercial Operations North America & Subsidiaries v Dep't. of Treasury, which upheld the constitutionality of the 2014 legislation.8 The Court of Appeals stated that the subsequent Gillette decision cannot "overrule or reverse" the Michigan Supreme Court's earlier decision in IBM concerning 2008 taxes. The Court of Appeals went on to explain that "other taxes not addressed in the [IBM] opinion but caught under the umbrella of [the 2014 legislation] . . . would be subject to [the 2014 legislation] as construed by the Gillette panel" as would all other pending tax disputes.


The ability of taxpayers to utilize the Compact's three-factor apportionment election has been the subject of much litigation in a variety of states. While the decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals marks a victory for IBM, it adds little to the overall Compact litigation that is under consideration. The decision by the Court of Appeals turned on a specific fact pattern that was unique to IBM: the failure of the Court of Claims to follow the remand order issued by the Michigan Supreme Court that directed the Court of Claims to issue summary judgment in favor of IBM.

While the decision does shed light on the nuances of the law of the case doctrine and introduces the rule of mandate into Michigan case law, it does not shed much light on the ongoing controversy in Gillette surrounding the constitutionality of the retroactive 2014 legislation that eliminated the ability to make the Compact election. On June 24, 2016, the Michigan Supreme Court denied the taxpayers' application for leave to appeal.9 However, two justices filed a dissent contending that the Court should grant leave to appeal because the issues raised in the case are "of considerable constitutional significance as to matters affecting the tax policy and procedures, the fiscal and business environments, and the jurisprudence of [Michigan]." At this point, it is likely that at least one of the many taxpayers in Gillette will appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.


1 International Business Machines Corp. v. Department of Treasury, Michigan Court of Appeals, No. 327359, July 21, 2016.

2 International Business Machines Corp. v. Department of Treasury, 852 N.W.2d 865 (Mich. 2014), reh'g denied, 855 N.W.2d 512 (Mich. 2014). See also GT SALT Alert: Michigan Supreme Court Allows Multistate Tax Compact Three-Factor Apportionment Election for 2008 MBT Return.

3 Act 282 (S.B. 156), Laws 2014. For a discussion of this legislation, see GT SALT Alert: Michigan Enacts Legislation Designed to Eliminate Multistate Tax Compact Apportionment Election Refunds Allowed by IBM Case.

4 International Business Machines Corp. v. Department of Treasury, Michigan Court of Claims, No. 11000033-MT, April 28, 2015, citing Ashker v. Ford Motor Co., 627 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). See also GT SALT Alert: Michigan Court of Claims Reconsiders and Rules Against IBM in Multistate Tax Compact Three-Factor Apportionment Case.

5 Citing In Grievance Administrator v. Lopatin, 612 N.W.2d 120 (Mich. 2000). In Grievance Administrator, the Michigan Supreme Court provided the following explanation of the law of the case doctrine: "Under the law of the case doctrine, if an appellate court has passed on a legal question and remanded the case for further proceedings, the legal questions thus determined by the appellate court will not be differently determined on a subsequent appeal in the same case where the facts remain materially the same. The appellate court's decision likewise binds lower tribunals because the tribunal may not take action on remand that is inconsistent with the judgment of the appellate court. Thus, as a general rule, an appellate court's determination of an issue in a case binds lower tribunals on remand and the appellate court in subsequent appeals."

6 Citing Stacy v. Colvin, U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, No. 13-36025, June 7, 2016.

7 Id.

8 878 N.W.2d 891 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).

9 Gillette Commercial Operations N.A. & Subsidiaries v. Dep't of Treasury, 880 N.W.2d 230 (Mich. 2016).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.