United States: EEO-1 Reports: Time For Employers To Get In Formation

Last Updated: August 26 2016
Article by David J. Goldstein and Michael Childers

This is the time of year when employers with 100 or more employees and federal contractors with 50 or more employees must prepare and file their annual EEO-1 reports – documents that provide the government with details regarding employee counts and demographics for every company location. In this article, we will explain why all employers should be careful to correctly answer the EEO-1 questions relating to federal contractor status, discuss how all employers should prepare for required compensation reporting beginning in 2018, and advise federal contractors how to prepare their EEO-1 reports so as to avoid future audit headaches.

Sophisticated employers take the EEO-1 filing requirement seriously knowing that it is a violation of federal law to make a willfully false statement on the report. At the same time, however, employers also generally assume that the government is unlikely to make any use of the data that will directly impact an individual filer. In other words, employers generally see little or no risk associated with EEO-1 reporting.

Such an assumption may be reasonable for non-federal contractors but, as discussed below, there is considerably more risk associated with EEO-1 reporting for federal contractors, who are subject to U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs ("OFCCP") audits. In addition, if the EEOC implements its pending proposal for collecting compensation data through the EEO-1 filing, all employers subject to the filing requirement should take the process much more seriously.

1. Identification as a Federal Contractor

Employers completing an EEO-1 report are asked to answer the following questions:1

Section C-EMPLOYERS WHO ARE REQUIRED TO FILE

2. Is your company affiliated through common ownership and/or centralized management with other entities in an enterprise with a total employment of 100 or more?

3. Does the company or any of its establishments (a) have 50 or more employees AND (b) is not exempt as provided by 41 CFR 60-1.5, AND either (1) is a prime government contractor or first-tier subcontractor, and has a contract, subcontract, or purchase order amounting to $50,000 or more, or (2) serves as a depository of Government funds in any amount or is a financial institution which is an issuing and paying agent for U.S. Savings Bonds and Savings Notes?

A company that answers "yes" to question 2 is required to file its EEO-1 reports as part of its parent's filing no matter how independent the company may be from its parent. As an example of how this works in practice, consider a corporate family with a parent and three subsidiaries ("subs"). The parent will be required to file a headquarters report with employee counts for its principal place of business and a consolidated report indicating the total number of individuals employed by the parent and its 3 subs. In addition, the parent will also file separate reports for each of its own "establishments" in addition to its headquarters. Finally, the parent must file separate reports for every one of its three subsidiaries' establishments. The EEO-1 instructions define an "establishment" as an economic unit which produces goods or services, such as a factory, office, store, or mine. In most instances, the establishment is at a single physical location and is engaged in one, or predominantly one, type of economic activity.2

It is in this context that question 3 must be answered with regard to each establishment for which a report is being filed.

The answer to question 3 is very important because answering "yes" to question 3 identifies the company as a federal contractor, information that the OFCCP will use to create its own database of entities that must meet federal affirmative action requirements and subject to audit for compliance. In other words, answering "yes" to this question substantially increases the likelihood of a company being audited by OFCCP.

The first thing to note in answering question 3, is that a company should only answer "yes" if it is a prime or first-tier subcontractor.3 While entities with contracts necessary to the performance of a federal contract are subject to affirmative action requirements even if they are second-tier or lower subcontractors, such entities are not required to answer "yes" to this question on the EEO-1 form.

The second thing to note in answering this question is that its application to multi-establishment companies is complicated. The convoluted wording of the question combined with the system's default settings often lead companies to incorrectly identify themselves as federal contractors.

When one company in a corporate family is a federal contractor, affiliated companies often are subject to federal affirmative action requirements even though they have no contracts of their own. Whether non-contractor companies must comply will depend on their relationship with their contractor siblings, parents or subsidiaries, but that is beyond the scope of this article. Either way, however, question 3 is not asking employers to broadly disclose whether they are federal contractors. It is only asking employers to self-identify as prime contractors or first-tier federal subcontractors.

Therefore, the correct response to question 3 should be determined on an establishment by establishment basis as follows. For each establishment, determine if the company whose employees are being reported for the establishment is a prime or first tier covered government contractor. If so, answer "yes" to question 3; answer "no" otherwise.

Note, too, though, that if a company answers "yes" to question 3 for any establishment in the family, the EEO-1 system will default to a "yes" answer for every other establishment. This means that establishments that are not subject to the OFCCP's rules may be inadvertently identified as a covered federal contractor subject to audit.

In order to avoid erroneously indicating government contractor status, employers with a covered government contract must indicate "yes" on the report for every establishment that is subject to a federal contract but then go back through the reports and make sure that "no" is indicated for all establishments not subject to a covered federal contract. It is important to follow this process because answering "no" to question 3 for any one establishment will not automatically populate "no" responses for other establishments.

2. Aligning AAP and EEO-1 Establishments

Federal contractors are required to prepare and maintain annual affirmative action plans (AAPs). In general, every location (or "establishment") with 50 or more employees must have a plan and every employee in the contractor's workforce must be included in a plan.

Unfortunately, however, the definition of an establishment for AAP purposes is not quite the same as the definition of an establishment for EEO-1 purposes. Accordingly, an employer's EEO-1 establishments may not precisely map to a contractor's AAP establishments. This disconnect can result in the OFCCP selecting a location for an audit based on EEO-1 filings that should not be subject to a compliance review. Even more frequently, this disconnect can lead to disputes with the OFCCP over the proper scope of an audit. For example, if the OFCCP chooses a location for an audit based on an EEO-1 report that shows 500 individuals employed at that location but then finds that the AAP for the location only includes 150 employees, the contractor is likely to be closely questioned about the disconnect.

Accordingly, it is important for federal contractors to conduct a review of their EEO-1 and AAP establishment structures to ensure the greatest possible alignment. Again, because of the differences in the rules for identifying EEO-1 and AAP establishments, a perfect correlation is generally unlikely. However, a high degree of consistency is desirable and definitely possible.

Although such consistency has always been important, once the OFCCP begins using EEO-1 reporting as a tool for collecting compensation data, alignment will become essential.

3. New Compensation Collection Requirements

On February 1, 2016, the EEOC published a notice of its intention to begin collecting compensation information as part of annual EEO-1 reporting.4 The proposed rule, as later revised,5 will require every employer subject to EEO-1 filing obligations to submit both W-2 wages and hours worked in 12 pay bands within the 10 current EEO job categories.

The proposed final rule also changes the EEO-1 filing deadline from September 30 to March 31. Employers will not be required to file EEO-1 reports at all in 2017, but will then have to file the new report, including compensation data, by March 31, 2018.

This new obligation creates two major challenges for covered employers—aside from the problems that may arise from the EEOC or OFCCP's efforts to use the data for enforcement purposes.

First, employers will need to have a way of tracking the average hours each non-exempt employee is working during the year.6 Second, employers will want to have some means of integrating payroll and HR information systems in order to generate the reports necessary to file the new EEO-1 reports.

In order to prepare for this new filing system, we recommend that employers review and update their software, systems, and data as follows.

First, employers should verify that they will be able to track cumulative taxable wages (i.e., W-2 wages)7 and not just gross pay in their payroll or a related system.

Second, employers should also verify that will be able to track cumulative hours worked for non-exempt employees in their payroll system or a related system.

Third, employers should review their mapping of job titles to the ten EEO-1 job categories. In the past, misidentifying an employee's EEO-1 job category had minimal or no consequences. That will no longer be the case, however, if the EEOC and OFCCP carry through with their plans to use EEO-1 compensation data to identify employers for audit or investigation. Improperly combining employees into a group could then increase the appearance of disparities in pay between men and women or minorities and non-minorities attracting agency scrutiny.

Fourth, employers will likely find it convenient to incorporate the new EEO-1 pay bands into their HR information systems.

Finally, employers with separate payroll and HR information systems will want to determine how they are going to ink information between the two systems in order to pull the information that has to be reported.8

4. Required Consolidated Establishment Reporting

Prior to 2015, companies were able to easily identify multiple entities operating at a common site. Beginning with the 2015 EEO-1 reporting cycle, however, a parent company with multiple subsidiaries operating at a single site has been required to consolidate reporting of its multiple subsidiaries' employees at that site in a single EEO-1 establishment report for the site (unless the subs have different North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes). This consolidation is required even if the different business units are separate, genuinely independent legal entities.

Aside from the potential tax implications of listing independent businesses as a single entity on reports to the federal government, this raises a special concern for government contractors because of the relationship between EEO-1 reports and compliance reviews. If the OFCCP chooses an EEO-1 establishment for audit, it is going to have concerns if the employer then asserts that only a subset of the employees reported on the EEO-1 form for that site are subject to audit or if the employer responds that there are multiple different AAPs associated with the site.

In addition, once the EEOC and OFCCP begin to collect compensation data through the EEO-1, this consolidation of separate entities will make the data useless (or at least misleading) for purposes of assessing compensation practices of individual entities.

For these reasons, in preparing their EEO-1 reports, employers should seek to avoid having to combine data from different companies whenever possible. Your legal counsel may be able to offer assistance in identifying ways to properly do this. In situations where there is no way to avoid having to combine data from different companies, an employer may wish to file a "Type 5" petition requesting the use of a special filing procedure. This special filing procedure requires the company to explain in detail why the standard system is incompatible with its needs and to offer a detailed alternative for completing its EEO-1 filing obligations.

Unfortunately, the Joint Reporting Committee (JRC) – which is responsible for EEO-1 administration – has not offered any details as to the circumstances under which it will permit the use of a special filing procedure or the alternate arrangements that might be authorized. Also unknown is the time it would take for the JRC to process such a request or whether the filing of a petition tolls the reporting deadline. In our experience, it has taken up to nine months to get a decision and one cannot count on getting a decision prior to expiration of the filing deadline.

Conclusion

Because EEO-1 reports are always reviewed by the OFCCP in connection with compliance reviews and may be sought in discovery by private litigants, there has always been some risk of this data being used against an employer in support of discrimination claims, but that risk has been relatively limited. Once EEO-1 reports begin to include compensation data, however, that risk increases substantially. Due to that increased risk, employers will want to pay greater attention to their EEO-1 reporting.

Recognizing that there is at least a possibility that Congress could intervene and prevent the implementation of the new EEO-1 requirements, employers may wish to wait a little longer before beginning serious implementation efforts. At the same time, because there is no evidence at this time that the proposed changes will not be implemented, and compliance will be complicated, employers should not delay their preparations much longer.

If you have any questions regarding the new EEO-1 reporting system or require assistance in filing your EEO-1 reports, please do not hesitate to contact Littler.

Footnotes

1 A sample EEO-1 form is available at https://www.eeoc.gov/employers/eeo1survey/upload/eeo1-2-2.pdf

2 https://www.eeoc.gov/employers/eeo1survey/2007instructions.cfm

3 A "yes" answer is also required, of course, if the company serves as a depository of Government funds in any amount or is a financial institution which is an issuing and paying agent for U.S. Savings Bonds and Savings Notes. Because these bases for an affirmative response are of limited applicability, we will not reference them again in this article.

4 https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-02-01/pdf/2016-01544.pdf

5 https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2016-07-14/pdf/2016-16692.pdf

6 Both the proposed rule and the revision to the propose rule have stated that employers can use 40 hours per week as a proxy for the average hours worked by exempt employees.

7 Definition of W-2 wages. Section 199(b)(2) and § 1.199-2(e) of the regulations provides that, for purposes of § 199(b)(1), the term "W-2 wages" means, with respect to any person for any taxable year of such person, the sum of the amounts described in § 6051(a)(3) and (8) paid by such person with respect to employment of employees by such person during the calendar year ending during such taxable year. Thus, the regulations provide that the term W-2 wages includes: (i) the total amount of wages as defined in § 3401(a); (ii) the total amount of elective deferrals (within the meaning of § 402(g)(3)); (iii) the compensation deferred under § 457; and (iv) for tax years beginning after December 31, 2005, the amount of designated Roth contributions (as defined in § 402A).

8 This can be done either by building an internal bridge between the two processes or by preparing separate reports in Microsoft Access or Microsoft Excel and combining the reports in one of those programs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
David J. Goldstein
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions