United States: District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Reverses Summary Judgment Granted To Oil Companies In ‘Chainbridge' Litigation

On June 30, 2016, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) abused its discretion in applying offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against the District of Columbia Office of Tax and Revenue (OTR) and granting summary judgment to three oil company taxpayers.1 The Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the OAH for reconsideration of whether offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel applied to these taxpayers, potentially setting up another substantive review of the Chainbridge methodology that has been used in addressing transfer pricing issues arising under the District's corporation franchise tax.

The OTR issued tax deficiency notices to three oil company taxpayers for their 2007-2009 tax years, which alleged underpayment of corporation franchise taxes resulting from the effects of intercompany transfer pricing agreements. The oil companies protested these assessments, asserting that the underlying methodology used to calculate the deficiencies, known as the Chainbridge methodology, "was contrary to applicable law." The oil companies each filed separate motions for summary judgment arguing that the OAH's decision in Microsoft Corp. v. Office of Tax & Revenue2 collaterally estopped the OTR from "defending the legality of the Chainbridge methodology."3 The OAH agreed and granted the oil companies summary judgment. The OTR subsequently filed petitions for review, which were consolidated by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Proper Application of Offensive Non-Mutual Collateral Estoppel

The core determination before the Court of Appeals was whether the OAH properly applied offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against the OTR. Offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel is "a version of the doctrine [of collateral estoppel] that arises when a plaintiff seeks to estop a defendant from relitigating an issue which the defendant previously litigated and lost against another plaintiff."4

The Court of Appeals explained that the resolution of this issue turned on whether it was bound by the decision in District of Columbia v. Gould.5 Gould "addressed the applicability of offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against the District and its entities, such as OTR." The Court of Appeals ultimately concluded that it was "bound by Gould's discussion of the applicability of offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against the District."

The Court of Appeals explained that, typically, the determination of whether offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel has been properly applied is a two-step inquiry.6 First, the trial court must ascertain whether the "traditional requirements for invoking collateral estoppel" have been met by the case. According to District case law, these traditional requirements include the determination of an issue that is litigated and resolved by a valid, final judgment on the merits, along with a full and fair opportunity for both parties to litigate under circumstances where the determination was essential to the judgment.7 Next, there must be "a discretionary balancing of a long list of factors to 'determin[e] whether the offensive use of non-mutual collateral estoppel would be fair.'"8

However, Gould requires a third step when offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel has been asserted against the District or one of its entities. Gould sets forth the proposition that "'[e]stoppels against the public are little favored' and 'should not be invoked except in rare and unusual, or exceptional, circumstances . . . , especially where their application would have an adverse impact on the public fisc.'" Thus, under Gould's third step, courts should only apply the doctrine in special cases where there exists "'exceptional[] circumstances,' 'where the interests of justice . . . clearly require it.'"9

The Court of Appeals explained that a determination of whether "exceptional circumstances" exist must first be made by the OAH, subject to deferential review by the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals noted that none of the parties raised Gould in the proceedings, and the OAH did not address Gould prior to applying offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against the OTR.

The Court of Appeals concluded that the failure by the OAH to take into consideration Gould before applying offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against the OTR was an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals vacated the orders granting summary judgment to the oil companies and remanded the cases back to the OAH for further consideration.


The use of transfer pricing studies generated by third-party audit firms has been the subject of numerous challenges. The fact that third-party audit firms have been compensated on a contingent fee basis has proved particularly troubling. Although the decision by the Court of Appeals revolved around the applicability of the procedural issue of non-mutual offensive collateral estoppel, the Court clearly stated that it was not ruling on the validity of the underlying Chainbridge methodology for assessing tax deficiencies.10 Thus, while the quality of Chainbridge's methodology continues to be criticized, it remains to be seen whether it will withstand further scrutiny. The fact that the Court of Appeals stressed that the doctrine of non-mutual offensive collateral estoppel should only be applied against a governmental entity in rare circumstances, as instructed by Gould, is telling. One could surmise that the OAH will be compelled to consider the substantive issue of how Chainbridge's methodology was applied to the oil company taxpayers involved in this litigation.


1 District of Columbia Office of Tax and Appeals v. ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, et al., District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Nos. 14-AA-1401, 14-AA-1403 & 14-AA-1404, June 30, 2016.

2 No. 2010-OTR-12 (D.C. Office of Admin. Hearings May 1, 2012).

3 In Microsoft Corp. v. Office of Tax & Revenue, the OAH reversed a tax deficiency assessment issued by the OTR against Microsoft Corporation that was based on a transfer pricing analysis conducted by Chainbridge Software. The OAH determined that the transfer pricing study was "arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable" because it did not comport with appropriate transfer pricing methodology as allowed by the federal Treasury regulations interpreting Internal Revenue Code Section 482. The OTR subsequently voluntarily dismissed its petition for review in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

4 Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 505 F.3d 874 (9th Cir. 2007) (citing Appling v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 340 F.3d 769 (9th Cir. 2003) citing Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322 (1979)).

5 852 A.2d 50 (D.C. 2004).

6 Citing In re Wilde, 68 A.3d 749 (D.C. 2013).

7 Washington Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Holle, 573 A.2d 1269 (D.C. 1990).

8 Citing to K.H., Sr. v. R.H., 935 A.2d 328 (D.C. 2007).

9 Citing Gould, supra

10 Per the Court's opinion, "In so holding, we express no view as to how OAH should decide the oil companies' summary judgment motions on remand after conducting the exceptional circumstances inquiry. Furthermore, at this stage in the proceedings, considering neither OAH nor OTR addressed the merits of the underlying dispute in these cases (i.e., whether the Chainbridge methodology for assessing tax deficiencies is valid) in the proceedings below, we decline the oil companies' invitation to affirm OAH's orders on the alternate ground that the Chainbridge methodology is faulty as a matter of law."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.