United States: Harry Potter And The Cursed Legal Update

Last Updated: August 1 2016
Article by David A. Kluft

It has been about a year since we published Harry Potter Lawsuits and Where to Find Them, my attempt at a comprehensive review of Harry Potter-related litigation. Why update the article now? Two reasons. First: The long-awaited book version of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child hits the shelves on July 31, 2016. Since JK Rowling is supplementing her story, it seems like it's a good time for us to do the same.

Second: I needed an opportunity to talk some nerd smack. Earlier this year, Ms. Rowling announced the location of the "American Hogwarts," in other words, the fictional North American wizard school that will play some role in connection with the upcoming film, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. Before the announcement, there was speculation that some hip or trendy upstart might challenge Massachusetts for its preeminent place in witchcraft folklore, but in the end justice prevailed. Mount Greylock, the highest natural point in the Commonwealth and a mere 45 minute broom ride from Salem, was identified as the home the Ilvermorny School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. So in your face, Roanoke! Eat it, Area 51! As for you New York, you already have the entire Game of Thrones universe rooting for your football team, so you're just going to have to let this one go.

Ok, without further ado, here are the highlights and lowlights of how Harry Potter has touched the legal world in the last twelve months or so:

Is Merrick Garland the Chosen One? As we discussed last time, many thought Justice Scalia's reference to "jiggery-pokery" in King v. Burwell was the very first Supreme Court nod to Harry Potter, but it turned out to be a false alarm. However, the lack of SCOTUS notice of the 'boy who lived' seems likely to change if Obama-nominee Merrick Garland ever gets there. It turns out he is a fan. Speaking to a group of high school students in May, Judge Garland encouraged the kids to do good in the world even if they decided not to make the law a career, like "one of my favorite people: Hermione Granger." Then, quoting Professor Dumbledore, Judge Garland continued, "it is our choices that show what we truly are, more than our abilities. So make the choice to do some good in the world." In June, Judge Garland doubled down on the Harry Potter shout-outs and told a group of elementary schools kids: "There is an important step between dreaming and doing; you have to work for it. Dreams don't come to you by magic, even if you're Harry Potter." Of course, Judge Garland must also be wondering if a little magic couldn't hurt when it comes to Senate confirmation.

Harry Potter and the Extended Copyright Metaphor. Harry Potter continued to serve as an extended metaphor (and maybe not the most effective one) in the blockbuster Oracle v. Google copyright trial. In order to emphasize the creativity and originality of the JAVA code architecture, Oracle analogized the various levels of its computer language to the Harry Potter book titles, chapter names and topic sentences. In rebuttal, Google's attorney reportedly retorted:

What are we looking at Harry Potter for? They want to talk about Harry Potter rather than about what the labels do . . . java.net . . . java.io . . . java.security . . . This is what we're looking at . . . Not Harry Potter.

Google prevailed at trial on its fair use defense, and Oracle's post-trial motions are pending.

An A-MAZE-ing Idea. Author Tize Clark brought suit against Random House and others claiming that James Dashner's popular Maze Runner books were ripped off from her 2002 manuscript, The Maze. Among other things, Clark alleged the copying of her "ideas and concept" of a giant maze with moving walls and robotic creatures. The District of New Mexico offered a mini-lecture in comparative maze literature, from Theseus to Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, and informed the plaintiff that she did "not have a monopoly on the idea of . . . teenagers attempting to escape a giant maze [while being] consistently thwarted by formidable elements." The Court also found a lack of substantial similarity between the works, and dismissed the claims.

"Harry Potter" and the Ethnic Intimidation Charge. A minor named CW and his friends were adjudicated delinquent by a Pennsylvania juvenile court after they assaulted some "different" and "weak" kids in the high school cafeteria. The specific charges were harassment and ethnic intimidation. CW appealed on the grounds that he did not knowingly waive his Miranda rights (Mom apparently waived them for him), an argument which probably wasn't going to get him too far even if he won it, because he and his genius buddies also videotaped the whole thing and uploaded it to the internet. Among the evidence that the harassment was racially motivated were the juveniles' use of the terms "pink" and "Harry Potter looking motherfucker." The Superior Court affirmed.

From the Sublime to the R-r-iddikulus : Curtis Lee Washington was charged with "intentionally discharge[ing] a firearm proximately causing death." At trial, closing arguments got very "meta." Defense counsel tried to pull back the veil on the prosecution strategy by explaining that it was the prosecutor's job to pretend that doubt doesn't exist. The Fresno County prosecutor responded with a PowerPoint presentation entitled "Cross Exam as Smoke, Illusion and Slight [sic] of Hand," during which he explained to the jury:

So how do you—what is a juror to use? Evidence and facts . . . Now I'm reminded of the movie Harry Potter. In Harry Potter there's this creature called a Bogart. And it assumes whatever your worst fears are. And whatever your fears are, it becomes. So if I was afraid of a snake, and there was one here, a snake would pop out of my bag. Oh, oh, oh. And the way you get rid of this is you pull out your little magic wand and the spell is 'ridiculouso' also known as 'ridiculous.' And I would suggest that as you listen to some of those arguments Counsel [was] making that you use that wand and try it out for size, because I think if you do you're going to find that most of them are ridiculous.

On a habeas petition to the Eastern District of California, the Court held that this speech was a fair response to defense counsel's argument and not prosecutorial misconduct. The Court corrected the prosecutor's misspelling of "Sleight of Hand," but nobody bothered correcting several egregious misspellings of the "Riddikulus" charm.

Too Young for Hogwarts. In September 2015, the Children's Advertising Review Unit ("CARU") of the Better Business Bureau announced some concerns with Pottermore.com, an official Harry Potter fan site. The main area of CARU's focus was on the ability of clever kids under 13 to register without parental consent, thus running afoul of CARU privacy guidelines about the collection of personal information. The site operators agreed to make certain changes to ensure the verification of parental consent, and to add some other minor privacy enhancements.

Saint-Adeniran v. Twentieth Century Fox. Plaintiff, the alleged author of an unpublished story about a princess with the special ability of making flowers bloom, brought a copyright infringement action against Twentieth Century Fox, alleging that the studio copied her story to make the movie Epic. In a complaint punctuated with smiley and frowny-face emojis, Plaintiff explained that she had written a "Christian" response to Harry Potter, because "it is WRONG to glorify magic. It's very, very WRONG." So, in order not to glorify magic, she "decided to write about this Princess Sophia – myself, who naturally has this awesome gift SHE IS BORN WITH. No magic. Nothing." Plaintiff was at first outraged when she tried to sell her story, because:

I NEVER HEARD BACK FROM ANYONE!!!! At first I was unsure why I hadn't heard back even though I was sure my story . . . treatment was FANTASTIC! But thankfully, I then remembered J.K. Rowlings billionaire author of Harry Potter said she had sent out Harry Potter script to 400 different people, and NO ONE got back to her .:... J.K. Rowling. We all know that later Harry Potter became huge. I think they were planning to steal her script. That's what these people do. UNFORTUNATELY!

Plaintiff alleged that the makers of Epic "must have ... somehow" got a hold of one of the manuscripts she had distributed, either through the U.S. Mail or through an alien spying virus known as "preterinfection." The Central District of California dismissed the case at the first opportunity, finding Plaintiff's complaint "nonsensical."

Harry Potter and the Obvious Patent. Richard Correll attempted to register a patent for a "museum for horror, science fiction and fantasy movie artifacts," comprising an entrance hall, an interior exhibit hall, and "at least one movie artifact positioned in the interior exhibit hall to show how the artifact was used in a movie to frighten and entertain." The patent was rejected as being obvious in light of an earlier patent with a priority date of June 2001 for an "interactive dark ride," one embodiment of which included the "theme of a 'magic' training center for would-be wizards in accordance with the popular characters and storylines of" the Harry Potter book series. Aha, argued Correll! That's just for books – there were no Harry Potter movies back then (the first movie was released in November 2001). So perhaps Correll's claims were not so obvious after all, right? Wrong, said the PTAB, which took "official notice" of the Harry Potter film release dates and held that, by the time of Correll's priority date in 2008, there were plenty of Harry Potter movies. The rejection of the patent claims was affirmed.

US v. See. Harry Potter may have ended the political career of a frequent Republican candidate for the Pennsylvania General Assembly. According to a two count Information filed in the Western District of Pennsylvania, Michael K. See was selling pirated Harry Potter DVDs on eBay even while he was running for office. In June 2016, See pled guilty to criminal copyright infringement.

Harry Potter and the Shamelessly Parasitic Headline. Finally, we feel obliged to mention what appears to be the darling legal story of the UK tabloid press this summer: Just type "Harry Potter lawyer" into Google and you'll see tons of stories about Solicitor Alan Blacker. Blacker got himself into trouble by allegedly exaggerating his credentials and showing up in Court wearing eccentric outfits. After skipping his disciplinary hearing because it was being held on his birthday, Blacker has now reportedly been "struck off" the rolls and fined. What's the connection to Harry Potter? Well, a judge once told Blacker: "If you want to look like something out of Harry Potter you can forget coming to this court ever again." This was apparently related to Blacker's superficial resemblance to the actor Robbie Coltrane, who plays Hagrid in the movies. As a result of this one offhand remark, Mr. Blacker's plight has become a shameless excuse for every UK media outlet (including the BBC; sigh) to put the words "Harry Potter" in the headline of a bunch of stories that are decidedly not about Harry Potter. Some of you may be thinking that I'm not the best-positioned blogger in the world to be making this criticism. Fair point, M'lud, I'll take it under advisement.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
12 Oct 2018, Other, Boston, United States

The New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable has been meeting bimonthly since 1995 to discuss current topics related to important changes in the electric power industry in Massachusetts and throughout New England.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions