United States: Good Hill v. Deutsche Bank: CDS Market Participants Free To Deal In Underlying Reference Obligation In Own Self-Interest

Parties to credit default swaps ("CDS") often own or otherwise have exposure to the debt instrument underlying the swap (the "reference obligation") or other securities of the borrower or issuer of the reference obligation (the "reference entity"). The CDS contract typically enables the buyer of credit protection to hedge the credit risk of the reference obligation (e.g., a failure to pay coupon or interest on the debt in accordance with its terms or an insolvency of the reference entity). On the other hand, a seller of credit protection may seek to increase its long position with respect to the reference obligation or reference entity. In any case, one or more of the parties to a CDS trade may have certain voting and other rights with respect to a reference obligation or could enter into transactions outside the CDS trade that could affect the value of the swap. Further, a party may have incentive to take certain of those actions with respect to the reference obligation in order to maximize its profits or minimize its losses across its portfolio. A recent case in the New York State Supreme Court, Good Hill Master Fund L.P. v. Deutsche Bank AG, Index No. 600858/2010, 2016 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2317 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Feb. 3, 2016), provides important guidance to market participants, particularly distressed-debt investors that transact in both CDS and the reference obligation or other securities of the reference entity. The case held that a party to a CDS trade was within its contractual rights, and did not act in bad faith, where it entered into arm's length transactions with respect to the reference obligation. This was so even though the transactions in the reference obligation had the direct effect of substantially decreasing the payout it was required to make as seller of credit protection under the CDS and was solely motivated by the party's own self-interest in that respect.

The Facts

In October 2007, two hedge funds managed by Good Hill Partners L.P. (collectively referred to as "Good Hill") purchased $54 million of synthetic residential mortgage-backed securities from Bank of America in an initial offering of $10.3 billion, of which Bank of America retained the remainder. Good Hill purchased several tranches of notes, but only the most senior tranche was investment grade.

The following year Good Hill entered into three CDS contracts with Deutsche Bank AG ("Deutsche Bank") referencing the investment grade tranche of notes and governed by market standard documentation, as published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ("ISDA"). Under the terms of the CDS confirmations, Good Hill, as seller of credit protection, was required to make a floating amount payment to Deutsche Bank upon the occurrence of certain credit events, including a write-down or forgiveness of the principal of the investment grade notes. The confirmations set forth a formula for the calculation of that floating amount payment, which was based on the amount of the write-down multiplied by the face amount of the notes and a number referred to as the "current factor," each of which would be provided in the servicer report prepared by the servicer of the notes under the securitization. Although Deutsche Bank, as calculation agent under the CDS, was responsible for making all determinations and calculations under the confirmations, any floating amount calculation was to be made based solely on information provided in the servicer report.

In April 2009, during the financial crisis, Bank of America and Good Hill negotiated a repurchase of the notes by Bank of America, which sought to surrender and cancel the notes. In August 2009, Good Hill and Bank of America entered into a transaction for the repurchase of the notes by Bank of America at a purchase price of approximately $15 million, an amount equal to 29% of the par value of the notes but representing a significant premium to the market value on the books of each party. The parties to the note repurchase agreed to allocate the purchase price across the tranches of notes sold by Good Hill, such that the investment grade notes would receive a favorable valuation of 83% of par and each of the other tranches of notes would receive a significantly lower valuation. At the same time, Bank of America entered into an agreement with the indenture trustee to unwind the securitization and in the process forgave 17% of the principal of the investment grade notes. The servicer of the notes subsequently issued a servicer report reflecting the terms of the unwind.

In the week following the repurchase, Deutsche Bank notified Good Hill that a credit event triggering payment under the CDS contracts had occurred as a result of the write-down. Given the 17% write-down, the calculation of the floating amount under each CDS contract payable by Good Hill amounted to roughly $5 million in the aggregate. Under the ISDA credit support documentation, Deutsche Bank had required Good Hill to post collateral based on the market value for securities, which as of the time shortly prior to the note repurchase was calculated by Deutsche Bank to equal approximately $27 million.

Good Hill maintained that, given the $5 million floating amount payment required under the confirmations, Deutsche Bank was obligated to return the remaining $22 million of collateral under the ISDA credit support documentation and that the failure to do so was a breach of contract by Deutsche Bank.

Deutsche Bank refused to return the collateral (or make the required calculation) and claimed that Good Hill had failed to act in good faith and a commercially reasonable manner by virtue of negotiating a valuation of the underlying investment grade notes that did not reflect the true market value (alleged by Deutsche Bank), which directly resulted in Deutsche Bank's CDS payout being reduced by approximately $20 million.

The Court's Analysis and Takeaways

With respect to the commercial reasonableness defense, the court looked to the swap documentation and (somewhat unsurprisingly) found that neither the ISDA master agreement nor the credit support annex imposed any explicit commercial reasonableness standard on Good Hill with respect to the note repurchase transaction. Moreover, the court pointed to the provision in the incorporated ISDA credit definitions whereby each party to a CDS contract agrees that each other party and its respective affiliates may deal in the reference obligation or other securities of the reference entity as each of them would if the CDS did not exist, regardless of whether any such action might have an adverse effect on the position of their counterparty to the CDS or whether any such action might constitute or give rise to a credit event with respect to the reference obligation. Accordingly, the court found that with respect to the note repurchase, the swap documentation did not require Good Hill to negotiate a purchase price or the allocation of that purchase price based on a market value standard or any other standard that might be viewed as commercially reasonable.

With respect to the good faith defense, the court cited numerous cases for the long-held proposition that the implied duty of good faith does not impose additional contractual obligations on a party or override a contract's terms. Instead, the implied obligation acts in aid and furtherance of other terms of the parties' agreement. The court noted that in fact no obligation can be implied which would be inconsistent with other terms of the parties' contractual relationship and, in order for a claim to be recognized for a breach of an implicit good faith obligation, a party must show that its counterparty exercised its contractual rights malevolently and in bad faith. In Good Hill, the court found that such a showing did not exist where the purchase price negotiation and allocation in the note repurchase were effected at arm's length between Good Hill and Bank of America, and that both parties to the note repurchase acted in their own self-interest and conducted their own internal analysis for the transaction.

In this respect, Good Hill provides important guidance to market participants insofar as the court showed that the parties to CDS could rely on the terms of their CDS contracts absent a showing that a party was acting malevolently and in bad faith. To that end, the court suggested that showing a party was seeking to maximize its return across its investments to the other party's detriment would not be a sufficient basis for proving bad faith absent some other showing, such as that the party was not dealing at arm's length. Ultimately, however, the extent to which market participants can rely on Good Hill remains unseen as Deutsche Bank has filed an appeal as of earlier this month.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions