United States: The Privacy Shield: What U.S. Multinational Employers Need To Know To Enjoy The Benefits Of The Newest EU-U.S. Data Transfer Mechanism

Last Updated: July 15 2016
Article by Philip L. Gordon

Since the European Court of Justice declared invalid, on October 6, 2015,1 the Safe Harbor agreement between the U.S. Department of Commerce and the European Commission for the transfer of personal data, hundreds of U.S. multinationals have been struggling to find an alternative while waiting hopefully for the Safe Harbor's replacement. The Privacy Shield, effective as of July 12, 2016, may provide the alternative these organizations have been seeking. For U.S. multinationals that relied on the Safe Harbor to transfer human resources data from EU subsidiaries to their U.S. parent corporation, the Privacy Shield will seem familiar notwithstanding U.S. and EU officials' public pronouncements that this new data transfer mechanism substantially enhances the now much-maligned Safe Harbor. Nonetheless, U.S. multinationals should consider several caveats before strapping on the Privacy Shield.

BASIC STEPS TO ENJOY THE PRIVACY SHIELD'S BENEFITS

As with the Safe Harbor, the basic steps necessary to enjoy the Privacy Shield's benefits are straightforward. An eligible2 U.S. organization must self-certify on the Commerce Department's recently launched Privacy Shield website and publish a Privacy Shield Privacy Policy that embodies the Privacy Shield Privacy Principles. U.S. organizations will be able to self-certify beginning August 1, 2016.

Self-certifying for transfers of human resources data in the context of the employment relationship is substantially the same as self-certifying for transfers of other types of personal data. The organization will be required to provide basic information, including, for example, the organization's contact information, information about the data transfer, and information about the organization's privacy policy. A corporate officer must sign the self-certification form.

Self-certification for transfers of HR data entails one critical distinction from other types of data transfers. The organization is required to choose EU data protection authorities ("DPAs") from among the several available independent dispute resolution mechanisms. The implications of this mandatory selection are discussed below. In addition, organizations must pay a fee that will not exceed $500 USD, and will be less for smaller companies, to subsidize this dispute resolution mechanism.

The "human resources privacy policy" submitted with the self-certification must contain the same mandatory elements as other Privacy Shield privacy policies. The policy must address the organization's commitment to all seven of the "Privacy Shield Privacy Principles" (the "Principles"). These Principles include Notice, Choice, Accountability for Onward Transfers, Security, Data Integrity and Purpose Limitation, Access, and Recourse/Enforcement and Liability. To satisfy the Commerce Department that the HR privacy policy fully addresses the Principles, the policy submitted by the certifying organization must contain a long list of required elements including, among others, the following:

  1. An identification of all U.S. affiliates that will access transferred personal data and their commitment to adhere to the Principles;
  2. The categories of personal data collected;
  3. The purposes for the collection;
  4. The third parties to which data may be transferred;
  5. A description of data subjects' access rights; and
  6. A contact for requests to exercise individual rights and submit complaints.

There is one significant distinction between an HR privacy policy and privacy policies addressing other types of personal data under the Privacy Shield. The HR privacy policy does not have to be posted on a publicly available website. Instead, the policy must be posted where it will be available to all EU-based employees whose personal data will be transferred to the U.S. subject to the Privacy Shield. This typically means that the policy will be posted on the corporate intranet. Organizations that choose not to publicly post their HR privacy policy will be required to submit the policy with the self-certification form rather than just providing a link.

Once the certifying organization completes these basic steps, the Commerce Department will review the self-certification form, to confirm that required information has been provided, and the HR privacy policy, to confirm that it addresses all required elements. If so, the Commerce Department will list the U.S. parent corporation and any certifying affiliates on its Privacy Shield List. Immediately after the listing, the EU subsidiaries can begin transferring their employees' personal data to the U.S. Because the European Commission has determined that the Privacy Shield "ensures an adequate level of protection for personal data," the EU subsidiaries will not need to obtain additional approvals from local DPAs, albeit in some countries, such as France, the DPA must be notified of the data transfer.

The Privacy Shield can be used to transfer personal data of both current and former EU employees. The U.S. parent corporation must apply the Principles to all transferred data for as long as that information is retained, even if the parent corporation subsequently decides to withdraw from the Privacy Shield. An organization that withdraws from the Privacy Shield will be required to satisfy the annual verification and recertification requirements (discussed below) for as long as the organization retains personal data transferred pursuant to the Privacy Shield.

NOT SO SIMPLE: IMPLEMENTING A PRIVACY SHIELD COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FOR TRANSFERS OF HR DATA

Satisfying the formal requirements for self-certification generally will be straightforward, but achieving meaningful compliance that mitigates enforcement risk will be far more complicated, and enforcement risk, particularly for transfers of HR data, has increased materially. To begin with and as discussed in detail below, virtually all enforcement will take place in the EU, not the U.S. Second, EU DPAs, particularly in countries like France, Germany and Spain, appear to be primed to flex their enforcement muscle. Third, while EU employees may not grasp all the nuances of the debate over the Safe Harbor, they and their works council or trade union have become generally leery of large-scale transfers of HR data to the U.S. As a result, they are readier than ever to complain, especially if they sense that the U.S. parent corporation is not taking data protection seriously.

To demonstrate its commitment to compliance to its EU employees (and their representatives) and, if needed, to regulators, the U.S. parent corporation should consider taking the following steps:

1. Confirm That EU Subsidiaries Comply With Local Requirements For Cross-Border Data Transfers To The U.S.

The Privacy Shield framework document emphasizes that the "Privacy Shield Principles are relevant only when [HR data is] transferred or accessed" and that collection and processing of HR data "prior to transfer will have been subject to the national laws of the EU country where it was collected, and any conditions for or restrictions on its transfer according to those laws will have to be respected." Supplemental Principles §III.9.a.i. As a practical matter, this requirement to comply with local laws means that EU subsidiaries must take the following steps before transferring their employees' personal data to the U.S. pursuant to the Privacy Shield: (a) provide their employees with notice of data processing, including transfer to the U.S. pursuant to the Privacy Shield; (b) consider local law restrictions on cross-border data transfers, particularly on transfers of sensitive personal data, such as employees' health information; (c) confer with works councils or trade unions, if any and if legally required, concerning data transfers to the U.S.; and (d) depending on the country, register with or notify the local DPA of data processing, including cross-border data transfers.

In a world where technology permits a small or medium-sized U.S. business to be a multinational employer, many EU subsidiaries of organizations that will certify to the Privacy Shield are only small sales offices or factories with no locally assigned human resources professional or legal counsel. As a result, these subsidiaries likely will address compliance with local data protection laws for the first time when the U.S. parent corporation decides to transfer EU employees' personal data to the U.S.

2. Establish Policies And Procedures To Implement The Privacy Shield Privacy Principles

While the HR privacy policy submitted to the Commerce Department will contain the high-level principles that should guide the handling of EU employees' personal data transferred to the U.S., that policy typically will not instruct U.S.-based HR professionals, payroll personnel, managers and others on exactly what it is they need to be doing to achieve compliance. For example, the Privacy Shield framework document requires certifying organizations to satisfy the Security Principle by "tak[ing] reasonable and appropriate measures to protect [transferred personal data] from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction." Principles, §II.4.a. However, that document identifies no specific measures to be taken.

Because there is a similar lack of detail for most of the other Principles, certifying organizations will need to develop detailed policies and procedures to implement the Principles. Some of those policies and procedures are described below.

a. Notice And Choice Principles

U.S. multinational employers typically will transfer EU employees' personal data to the U.S. to store it in a centralized human resources information system ("HRIS") that facilitates global workforce management. Given this purpose, the HR privacy policy likely will inform the EU workforce only about the use and disclosure of their personal data for HR administration purposes.

If the U.S. parent subsequently were to use transferred personal data for other purposes, such as to market the company's products to the EU workforce or to support a global charitable campaign, it would be required to give EU employees the opportunity to opt out from the previously undisclosed use. According to the Privacy Shield framework document, such "choices must not be used to restrict employment opportunities or take any punitive action against such employee." Supplemental Principles §III.9.b.i. In other words, EU employees cannot be confronted with a choice between consenting to the new use or losing their job.

As a benefit to employers, the Privacy Shield specifically excludes from the Notice and Choice Principles processing EU employees' personal data for "promotions, appointments or other similar employment decisions." This exclusion applies only "[t]o the extent and for the period necessary to avoid prejudicing" the decision-making process. Supplemental Principles §III.9.b.iv. This exclusion should help to avoid a situation where notice disrupts the employment decision-making process.

To handle transferred data in compliance with the Notice and Choice Principles, the certifying organization should consider implementing several policies and practices. By way of illustration, it should specifically identify the categories of employees authorized to access EU employees' personal data; the categories of data that can be accessed; the permissible purposes for access, use and disclosure; and the steps to be taken before using such data for a purpose not previously disclosed in the HR privacy policy or otherwise.

b. Accountability For Onward Transfer Principle

Under the Accountability For Onward Transfer Principle, certifying organizations must require, by written agreement, that third parties who receive transferred personal data provide the same level of protection for that data as required by the Privacy Shield. The U.S. parent corporation must enter into these "onward transfer agreements" with both agents, such as HR service providers, and non-agents that will use transferred personal data for their own purposes. Organization that certify to the Privacy Shield within sixty days of its effective date (i.e., September 10, 2016) will have nine months from the date listed on the Privacy Shield List to bring contracts with third parties into conformance with this Principle.

The Privacy Shield establishes an important exception from the requirements described above for cross-border data transfers within a corporate group. The U.S. parent corporation can make such transfers without an "onward transfer agreement" provided that "other instruments, such as EU Binding Corporate Rules [BCRs] or other intra-group instruments (e.g., compliance and control programs), ensuring the continuity of protection of personal information under the Privacy Shield Principles" have been implemented. Supplemental Principles §III.10.b.i (emphasis supplied).The italicized phrase gives U.S. parent corporations greater flexibility because it allows them to forego not only onward transfer agreements but also the potentially onerous process of implementing BCRs when those organizations need to share EU employees' personal data with non-U.S. and non-EU affiliates, for example, when an HR director for Europe, the Middle East, and Africa ("EMEA") resides in the United Arab Emirates.

c. Security Principle

To satisfy this Principle, the U.S. organization will need to implement specific measures, such as access controls, restrictions on storage of EU personal data on portable storage media, safeguards for paper records containing EU personal data, and secure methods of document disposal. The organization may be able to leverage for this purpose policies and practices used to safeguard other types of sensitive employee data, such as Social Security numbers and protected health information subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA").

d. Access Principle

Under the Access Principle, individuals have the right to access their personal data, to correct personal data that is inaccurate, and to delete personal data that the U.S. organization processes in violation of the Principles. However, the detailed procedures established by the Privacy Shield framework for implementing these rights have limited applicability to HR data transferred in the context of the employment relationship.

The Privacy Shield dictates that "employers in the European Union must comply with local regulations and ensure that European Union employees have access to such information as is required by law in their home countries, regardless of the location of data processing and storage." Supplemental Principles §III.9.c.i (emphasis supplied). The Privacy Shield also mandates, in light of EU employees' rights under local law, that the U.S. parent corporation "cooperate in providing such access either directly or through the EU employer." Id. Consequently, certifying organizations will need to implement policies and procedures to facilitate a coordinated response to requests by EU employees to exercise their rights to access, amend and delete their personal data.

3. Establish An Annual Verification Process

The Privacy Shield requires that certifying organizations recertify annually, and that before recertification, they verify on-going compliance with the Principles. The verification can be conducted as a self-assessment or by an outside entity. In either case, the certifying organization must verify that the attestations in its self-certification and assertions in its HR privacy policy are true and that "privacy practices have been implemented as represented and in accordance with the Privacy Shield Principles." Supplemental Principles §III.7.a.

To meet those standards, organizations that choose to conduct a self-assessment must verify that:

  1. The HR privacy policy is "accurate, comprehensive, prominently displayed, completely implemented and accessible";
  2. The HR "privacy policy conforms to the Privacy Shield Principles";
  3. Individuals are informed how to submit complaints, both internally and to the relevant EU data protection authority;
  4. Employees with access to transferred personal data have received training and will be disciplined for policy violations; and
  5. The organization conducts periodic compliance reviews.

Supplemental Principles §III.7.c. The verification must be signed by an authorized corporate representative and must be produced upon request to employees, or in the context of an investigation or complaint proceeding.

4. Be Prepared To Resolve Complaints In The EU

As noted above, U.S. organizations that certify to the Privacy Shield to transfer HR data are required to agree to cooperate with investigations by, and abide by the advice of, EU data protection authorities. Notwithstanding this certification by the U.S. parent corporation, the Privacy Shield framework document emphasizes that even after HR data is transferred, "primary responsibility for that data vis-à-vis the employee remains with the organization in the EU." Supplemental Principles §III.9.d.i. Consequently, the framework document provides that EU employees who are not satisfied with the internal resolution of their data protection complaints "should be directed to the state or national data protection or labor authority in the jurisdiction where the employees work" even if the U.S. partent corporation is responsible for the alleged violation. Supplemental Principles §III.9.d.i.

To fulfill its representation in the self-certification form, the U.S. parent corporation would be required to participate in the complaint proceeding in the EU with its EU subsidiary. Significantly, this proceeding will be governed by the relevant EU Member State's law and not by the Principles or U.S. law. In addition, the U.S. parent corporation will be required to abide by the advice of the DPA, which could include an order to implement remedial measures and/or to compensate the employee.

SHOULD U.S. MULTINATIONAL EMPLOYERS CERTIFY TO THE PRIVACY SHIELD?

Since the Privacy Shield was initially announced in early February 2016,3 many U.S. multinational employers have confronted the question whether to rely on the Privacy Shield as a data transfer mechanism once it will have been finalized. While waiting for the finalization, some of these organizations implemented as a data transfer mechanism the Standard Contractual Clauses (the "Clauses"), which are form agreements approved by the European Commission as ensuring an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred outside the EU. Others have taken a wait-and-see approach. With the Privacy Shield now finalized, these organizations will need to decide whether to certify. In doing so, they should take three principal considerations into account.

First, the Privacy Shield's validity remains subject to substantial uncertainty. To begin with, Max Schrems, who filed the original challenge to the Safe Harbor, already has indicated his intent to initiate proceedings with the aim of forcing a review of the Privacy Shield by the European Court of Justice ("ECJ").4 The lengthy critiques of the official draft of the Privacy Shield by the Article 29 Working Party in April 2016 and the European Data Protection Supervisor in June 2016 provide a playbook for such a legal challenge and would give it immediate credibility, particularly because the European Commission did not revise the draft to address many of the criticisms.

Second, the Privacy Shield could soon be materially revised. The Privacy Shield is designed to ensure compliance with the EU's current data protection framework document, the Data Protection Directive (the "Directive"). In May 2018, the General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") will replace the Directive.5 It is unclear whether the European Commission is planning to address this change in the applicable legal regime by revising the Privacy Shield. In its critique, the Article 29 Working Party raised concerns that the Privacy Shield does not provide an adequate level of protection as required by the GDPR.

Finally, certifying to the Privacy Shield may materially increase enforcement risk for the U.S. parent corporation. Both EU employees and data protection authorities are more closely scrutinizing U.S. multinationals' data handling processes. Certifying to the Privacy Shield would facilitate the local DPA's extension of its enforcement authority to the U.S. parent corporation.

In sum, the Privacy Shield's finalization may make U.S. multinationals' handling of cross-border transfers of EU employees' personal data more, not less, complicated than ever. Consequently, these organizations should undertake a thorough (and privileged) review of their current data protection practices for EU employees' personal data, evaluate the available options for transfers of EU employee data to the U.S., and implement the data transfer mechanism that suits the corporate group best. As demonstrated by recent enforcement actions in Germany against U.S. multinationals for continued reliance on the invalidated Safe Harbor, the time for a wait-and-see approach to implement an alternative to the Safe Harbor has passed.

This article was first published in the International Association of Privacy Professionals' Privacy Tracker blog.

Footnotes

1. Philip Gordon and Tahl Tyson, What Does The European Court of Justice's Invalidation Of the U.S. – EU Safe Harbor Framework Mean for U.S.-Based Multinational Employers?, Littler Insight (Oct. 6, 2015).

2. The certifying entity must be subject to the jurisdiction in the U.S. of either the Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Transportation.

3. Philip Gordon, EU and US Beat The Clock With Their Announcement Of The "Privacy Shield" a/k/a Safe Harbor 2.0, Littler ASAP (Feb. 3, 2016).

4. Notably, Max Schrems recently submitted a complaint with the Irish Data Protection Commissioner alleging that the Standard Contractual Clauses do not ensure an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred to the U.S.

5. Philip Gordon, Ten Steps For U.S. Multinational Employers Towards Compliance With Europe's New Data Protection Framework – The General Data Protection Regulation, Littler Insight (Jan. 21, 2016).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Philip L. Gordon
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Reed Smith
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Foley Hoag LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Reed Smith
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Foley Hoag LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions